I thought Ivermectin didn't work and was dangerous

6,921 Views | 48 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by jimmo
Womackster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Is that wrong?
Foamcows
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
you mean that horse drug?
Slyfox07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Question:

If Ivermectin is intended to treat cases once they present, then why is a decline in cases attributed to Ivermectin?

I think this chart would be more impactful if it was showing a drastic decline in deaths. (unless they're using it as a preventative, but I don't think that's the case)
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Horse paste

Take the shots pleb!
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Paradise Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

The real question is how are their horses doing without their de-wormer?
The Dirty Sock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NOT brought to you by Pfizer
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not sure we should trust the data. We're better off waiting for Salute the Vaccine to tell us what he wants to believe.
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
slyfox07 said:

Question:

If Ivermectin is intended to treat cases once they present, then why is a decline in cases attributed to Ivermectin?

I think this would be more impactful if it was deaths. (unless they're using it as a preventative, but I don't think that's the case)
Could it be that in addition to treating the symptoms it somehow prevents the spread too? I'm no doctor, but it's certainly a conclusion to consider given the data.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This topic and the propaganda against ivermectin is why I will never take the jab. If this were ever about the science ivermectin would have been used long ago. It's always been about control and the jab is the tool they are using.
fooz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
slyfox07 said:

Question:

If Ivermectin is intended to treat cases once they present, then why is a decline in cases attributed to Ivermectin?

I think this chart would be more impactful if it was showing a drastic decline in deaths. (unless they're using it as a preventative, but I don't think that's the case)
I was prescribed as a preventive when my father had covid. I called teledoc and asked specifically for a prescription to help prevent me from catching it. My wife got the same from her teledoc.
Emotional Support Cobra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also reduction in prolonged disease could reduce the spread because the infection is being tackled more efficiently.
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
  • get over covid faster = less exposure to others = less cases
  • taken as a preventative = fewer or no symptoms = less cases
Womackster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
slyfox07 said:

Question:

If Ivermectin is intended to treat cases once they present, then why is a decline in cases attributed to Ivermectin?

I think this chart would be more impactful if it was showing a drastic decline in deaths. (unless they're using it as a preventative, but I don't think that's the case)

1. Deaths are also way down (just check out worldometer)
2. Prolonged infections lead to a longer exposure period and higher chance of more infections
3. Untreated infections can lead to hospitalization which can act as spreader events
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biggest scam of all time.

A crime against humanity.

Trampled human rights.

And we loved every minute of it!

We absolutely loved every second of covid.

Loved it!
92ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
slyfox07 said:

Question:

If Ivermectin is intended to treat cases once they present, then why is a decline in cases attributed to Ivermectin?

I think this chart would be more impactful if it was showing a drastic decline in deaths. (unless they're using it as a preventative, but I don't think that's the case)
Because it also works as a prophylaxes. There are at least 2-3 studies I know of, one in India, one in Peru, and I believe one in Brazil, where healthcare workers took it as pre-treatment/preventive medicine. Those that took it around 0% got COVID and of those that didn't it was like 60% got it.

Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crazy thing is, people were talking Ivermectin more than a year ago on here.

Would like to find out what poster was the first to raise the issue, but my search wont go that far back.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CSTXAg92 said:

I'm not sure we should trust the data. We're better off waiting for Salute the Vaccine to tell us what he wants to believe.


It's not a leaky vaccine. Doubt we will see him
Rexter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CSTXAg92 said:

I'm not sure we should trust the data. We're better off waiting for Salute the Vaccine to tell us what he wants to believe.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rexter said:




I see AOC got some new sunglasses
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When you can't find a good excuse to start another war, but the elite still demand we 'legally' funnel them taxpayer money so they can get richer......

The vaccine initiative is not hard to figure out.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Once Pfizermectin comes out then it will be okay for the brain dead in American to use Ivermectin again.
BurnetAggie99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dirty Sock said:

NOT brought to you by Pfizer
Merck owns Ivermectin but your right it's all about money and not what works for the fact Ivermectin is cheap and many generic's out there.
unmade bed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hmmm, in this same time period (August 13 to present) full vaccination rate in Japan climbed from 37% to 72.5%.
Layne Staley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shame on your misinformation about horse paste. We in the science community know that the only way we can do this is with experimental gene therapy with no long term side effect data.

The 1,673,645 adverse events, 17619 DEATHS, and 86,542 vaccine related hospitalizations (on the low side for all of those) are all worth it (so big pharma can keep making contributions to dems and rino's and the globalists can usher in the reset).
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old Buffalo said:

CSTXAg92 said:

I'm not sure we should trust the data. We're better off waiting for Salute the Vaccine to tell us what he wants to believe.

Thanks, but I can't take credit for that. SKY1 came up with it.
Ags4DaWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CSTXAg92 said:

slyfox07 said:

Question:

If Ivermectin is intended to treat cases once they present, then why is a decline in cases attributed to Ivermectin?

I think this would be more impactful if it was deaths. (unless they're using it as a preventative, but I don't think that's the case)
Could it be that in addition to treating the symptoms it somehow prevents the spread too? I'm no doctor, but it's certainly a conclusion to consider given the data.


If u were exposed and take prophylactic dosages, then even if you contract COVID your viral levels never get to a level where u are contagious and so the virus will not be as easily spread within the population.
Womackster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
unmade bed said:

Hmmm, in this same time period (August 13 to present) full vaccination rate in Japan climbed from 37% to 72.5%.

Hmmm, what about highly vaccinated Israel?
Hmmm, what about the UK too?
Hmmm, or U.S.A. for that matter? Increasing our vaxxed rate hasn't really done a lot to stop the spread.
Hmmm, maybe you're right and it would be best to make the vaccines and Ivermectin both widely available to be on the safe side.
Hmmm, looks like vaccines are already highly available and are being forced on people.
Hmmm, looks like Ivermectin continues to be lied about and suppressed by the establishment along with every promising early treatment and prophylactic.

Hmmm. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Biggest scam of all time.

A crime against humanity.

Trampled human rights.

And we loved every minute of it!

We absolutely loved every second of covid.

Loved it!

You got a mouse in your pocket? What's this "we" *****
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
> I thought Ivermectin didn't work and was dangerous

There you go, listening to libs again
Clown_World
How long do you want to ignore this user?
unmade bed said:

Hmmm, in this same time period (August 13 to present) full vaccination rate in Japan climbed from 37% to 72.5%.


How then would you explain this?


txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CoachO_08 said:

unmade bed said:

Hmmm, in this same time period (August 13 to present) full vaccination rate in Japan climbed from 37% to 72.5%.


How then would you explain this?



It is almost like the vaccine doesn't really stop you from getting or spreading the disease or something...
jimmo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many lives could have been saved...
snowdog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I posted a link to this thread in F84 in the Joe Rogan thread. I hope Ivermectin use is continued to be pushed by courageous doctors worldwide. So many could have been saved. I was made aware of Ivermectin around June of 2020. Sadly, the media and the political elite didn't care about saving lives, their priority was defeating Trump. Sadly, after millions dead, their plan worked.
Post removed:
by user
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.