Kyle Rittenhouse

11,296 Views | 122 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by aTm2004
jonb02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FrioAg 00 • 1:56p, 10/26/21
AG
FrioAg 00 said:
Hope it works out with the kid getting exonerated, as it should.

He operated within his rights (being there and being armed), and when corrupt whacko Leftists attacked him violently - he prevailed 3 times.

Not sure about "hero" but he was definitely on the right side of this
Unfortunately, our justice system is no longer blind and all they jury is going to see is the color of his skin. Facts do not matter to these people.

Truth.
“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” - John Adams

“It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they’ve been fooled” - Mark Twain
Reply Quote
5
HtownAg92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fat Black Swan • 3:00p, 10/26/21
AG
Que Te Gusta Mas said:
This dip**** prosecutor can't keep his narrative straight. He painted himself into a corner by bringing up Rosenbaum urging people to shoot Kyle, then corrected himself after saying Rosenbaum was "starting fights".

It looks as though we may have a common-sense judge who isn't falling for the "peaceful protest" BS and also not going to let violent felonies like arson be discounted as no big deal.
Reply Quote
20
Fightin TX Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Boo Weekley • 3:09p, 10/26/21
AG
Boo Weekley said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.

He had a more noble and virtuous reason for being there than a single leftist did that night. He helped protect an innocent person's business from being burned to the ground.
This isn't an either-or, Barack Obama.

Don't offer false choices. The rioters were not the good guys. I don't have to choose between Kyle and them.

Kid should not have been out there. He also should not have been prosecuted, and he damn sure should not be convicted.
Reply Quote
5
Boo Weekley
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fightin TX Aggie • 3:17p, 10/26/21
Fightin TX Aggie said:
Boo Weekley said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.

He had a more noble and virtuous reason for being there than a single leftist did that night. He helped protect an innocent person's business from being burned to the ground.
This isn't an either-or, Barack Obama.

Don't offer false choices. The rioters were not the good guys. I don't have to choose between Kyle and them.

Kid should not have been out there. He also should not have been prosecuted, and he damn sure should not be convicted.
People shouldn't protect each others businesses and communities from violent destructive terrorists burning the town to the ground? Esp when law enforcement won't do a single f-ing thing about it? Guess these guys put a bad taste in your mouth too?




If Kyle and his friends don't show up to that guy's business, it almost certainly goes up in flames. Or at the very least is completely ransacked and totally destroyed.

The only reason he shouldn't have been there, is because THEY shouldn't have been there, Kamala Harris.
Reply Quote
17
3 edits
FratboyLegend
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MarkTwain • 3:22p, 10/26/21
sicandtiredTXN said:
Boo Weekley said:
sicandtiredTXN said:
Salute The Marines said:
The kid is an American hero
No he's not.

He was a scared sh**less kid that was running for his life and accidentally killed someone in his terror and fleeing to get away.

Stop lowering the bar on the title of "HERO". Too many "Heroes" have died or are maimed for life, who actually did heroic acts to earn the title.

To call Rittenhouse a hero is a slap in the face to real heroes in the world.
Accidentally killed two people and wounded another? All three of which were trying to attack him...one with a firearm?

LOL

He stopped a riot in a matter of minutes and took out left winged anti-American garbage in the process. And It was actually amazing shooting. Maybe extremely lucky, but it worked.
Please point out ANY EVIDENCE to support your absurd claim that anyone he shot had a firearm!!!!

Someone in the mob fired a random shot in the air, all documented in the video presented in court during pretrial.

If you think this kid took some kind of tactical stance and took out unarmed attackers you might consider backing off the intake.

He stopped a riot? Seriously? They burned that entire neighborhood to the ground afterwards. He didn't stop anything.

I stand by my original point and post
are you kidding? there's video proof.
#CertifiedSIP
Reply Quote
8
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:34p, 10/26/21
AG
Reply Quote
14
MaroonStain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MarkTwain • 5:08p, 10/26/21
AG
sicandtiredTXN said:
Ukraine Gas Expert said:
Accidentally? One dude tried to shoot him, another tried to skull him with a skateboard, and the last drew on him and lost. Three attempts were made to murder him, and he won. What would you do?

Try harder
What did the last one draw on him? A glass drink bottle?


Here are the three shootings:
1) pedo-midget chasing Rittenhouse into corner
2) skater hitting him with his skateboard
3) Medic! drawing out his pistol to shoot him point blank

***The guy that tried to kick him when he slipped is fortunate that his kick to the head missed. Then, when shots were fired, he ran.

Keep
Up
Reply Quote
9
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:27p, 10/26/21
AG
Hope this kid gets a fairer trial than Chauvin did. Jury selection should be interesting. Haven't seen if the jury is going to be sequestered or not.

Anyone know?
Reply Quote
14
aquarian
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Marcus Brutus • 6:04p, 10/26/21
CCP Joe Veggie said:
Boo Weekley said:
AgDotCom said:
Rittenhouse performed a textbook "duty to retreat". But some people call it "running away".

I support gun ownership even for people who are unaware of the difference, but good luck in court if you have have to use your weapon.
Didn't he even call medics to help his first attacker?

Besides the point though. Zero doubt in my mind they would have killed him or at least rendered him a bloody pulp, likely a vegetable, or suffering from lasting injuries/brain damage.

All good shots.

The ONLY argument, is should he have been there. I bet the business owner that didn't have his place destroyed is glad some armed men showed up to protect his place.


Yes, he was on the phone to 911 when the mob began forming around him and he ran.
Incorrect.

He was on the phone to his friend Dominic Black after he shot the first individual, per the criminal complaint.

https://heavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Complaint-Criminal_1-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H-2020CF000983-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H._3753097_1.pdf
As a man is, so he sees. - William Blake
Reply Quote
1
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgBQ-00 • 6:56p, 10/26/21
AgBQ-00 said:
sicandtiredTXN said:
Ukraine Gas Expert said:
Accidentally? One dude tried to shoot him, another tried to skull him with a skateboard, and the last drew on him and lost. Three attempts were made to murder him, and he won. What would you do?

Try harder
What did the last one draw on him? A glass drink bottle?
First guy was the mini-me paedo fellow that was chasing him into a parking lot. The other guy fired shots in Kyle's direction and at that point Kyle turned, mini-me closed the distance and tried to grab the gun and got shot and died.

Second guy was the skateboard wielding domestic abuser that tried to crack open Kyle's skull. He got shot and did the Mike Tyson knock-out dance and fell down and died.

Third guy was a felon who pulled a handgun. Kyle shot him in the arm and felon went wee-wee-wee all the way to the hospital.

Kyle then finishes his retreat to safety. Keep in mind that after the first shooting Kyle tried to administer help while on the line with 9-1-1 trying to get help. They told him to make his way to the cops a couple of blocks away.
Now that's a beat down of an uniformed poster. Kyle is a hero and we are going to need more just like him in the future.
Reply Quote
14
1 edit
aTm2004
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Boo Weekley • 7:02p, 10/26/21
AG
Boo Weekley said:
BusterAg said:
Every time I read his name, I have a powerful urge to mix myself an old fashioned or a manhattan.
Same here. Can't wait to teach my children about him. How he managed to shut a violent fiery riot down in a matter of minutes on his own. Something no police battalion could do in all of the violent riot-filled summer of 2020. And he took out some truly bad dudes...enemies of America and menaces to society. He was an amazing shot too...esp under duress. Almost seemed like divine intervention.

A true American Hero.

Don't forget he cleared a jam in the middle of this.
Reply Quote
16
aTm2004
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fightin TX Aggie • 7:08p, 10/26/21
AG
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.
Reply Quote
6
MaroonStain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aTm2004 • 8:16p, 10/26/21
AG
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?
Reply Quote
aTm2004
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MaroonStain • 8:30p, 10/26/21
AG
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.
Reply Quote
MaroonStain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aTm2004 • 8:37p, 10/26/21
AG
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.


So...a man...making his own decisions...
Reply Quote
1
aTm2004
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MaroonStain • 8:46p, 10/26/21
AG
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.


So...a man...making his own decisions...

Just checked. He was 17. So a minor.
Reply Quote
1
oysterbayAG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:32p, 10/26/21
AG
Finally a real Judge that understands convoluted logic !
Reply Quote
3
LightningDammitt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MarkTwain • 10:51p, 10/26/21
AG
sicandtiredTXN said:
Salute The Marines said:
The kid is an American hero
No he's not.

He was a scared sh**less kid that was running for his life and accidentally killed someone in his terror and fleeing to get away.

Stop lowering the bar on the title of "HERO". Too many "Heroes" have died or are maimed for life, who actually did heroic acts to earn the title.

To call Rittenhouse a hero is a slap in the face to real heroes in the world.


Someone needs to burn down, loot or shoot this trolling post.

Staff?
Reply Quote
4
TRADUCTOR
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:51p, 10/26/21
Think the first guy Rittenhouse shot had thrown a molotov cocktail at him while starting to chase him in video.
Reply Quote
6
LightningDammitt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fightin TX Aggie • 10:58p, 10/26/21
AG
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.



His actions prove his maturity, and prove you wrong about said maturity.
Reply Quote
4
LightningDammitt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aTm2004 • 11:11p, 10/26/21
AG
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.


So...a man...making his own decisions...

Just checked. He was 17. So a minor.


Nope... He can be tried as an adult in some cases... and... he can defend himself as an adult.
Reply Quote
mc_shipman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:26p, 10/26/21
Given the stress of the situation, there are a lot of rioters who are very lucky he didn't snap, and start picking off everybody moving his way. After having the third guy draw a gun on him, it would have been easy to start perceiving everyone as a threat, and start neutralizing problems before they closed on him.
Reply Quote
2
CanyonAg77
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TRADUCTOR • 5:03a, 10/27/21
AG
TRADUCTOR said:
Think the first guy Rittenhouse shot had thrown a molotov cocktail at him while starting to chase him in video.

That is incorrect. He threw something in a plastic bag. In an overhead drone video, it fluttered and the light hitting it made it look like flames

But the ground level video made it clear that it was a bag, not something on fire.

I remember this because I thought it was a Molotov at first myself.
Reply Quote
6
Marcus Brutus
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aquarian • 5:36a, 10/27/21
aquarian said:
CCP Joe Veggie said:
Boo Weekley said:
AgDotCom said:
Rittenhouse performed a textbook "duty to retreat". But some people call it "running away".

I support gun ownership even for people who are unaware of the difference, but good luck in court if you have have to use your weapon.
Didn't he even call medics to help his first attacker?

Besides the point though. Zero doubt in my mind they would have killed him or at least rendered him a bloody pulp, likely a vegetable, or suffering from lasting injuries/brain damage.

All good shots.

The ONLY argument, is should he have been there. I bet the business owner that didn't have his place destroyed is glad some armed men showed up to protect his place.


Yes, he was on the phone to 911 when the mob began forming around him and he ran.
Incorrect.

He was on the phone to his friend Dominic Black after he shot the first individual, per the criminal complaint.

https://heavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Complaint-Criminal_1-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H-2020CF000983-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H._3753097_1.pdf

He called his friend after calling 911.
Reply Quote
5
aTm2004
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LightningDammitt • 7:56a, 10/27/21
AG
LightningDammitt said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.


So...a man...making his own decisions...

Just checked. He was 17. So a minor.


Nope... He can be tried as an adult in some cases... and... he can defend himself as an adult.

Ok, but what does that have to do with this statement?

Quote:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.
Reply Quote
aquarian
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Marcus Brutus • 8:54a, 10/27/21
CCP Joe Veggie said:
aquarian said:
CCP Joe Veggie said:
Boo Weekley said:
AgDotCom said:
Rittenhouse performed a textbook "duty to retreat". But some people call it "running away".

I support gun ownership even for people who are unaware of the difference, but good luck in court if you have have to use your weapon.
Didn't he even call medics to help his first attacker?

Besides the point though. Zero doubt in my mind they would have killed him or at least rendered him a bloody pulp, likely a vegetable, or suffering from lasting injuries/brain damage.

All good shots.

The ONLY argument, is should he have been there. I bet the business owner that didn't have his place destroyed is glad some armed men showed up to protect his place.


Yes, he was on the phone to 911 when the mob began forming around him and he ran.
Incorrect.

He was on the phone to his friend Dominic Black after he shot the first individual, per the criminal complaint.

https://heavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Complaint-Criminal_1-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H-2020CF000983-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H._3753097_1.pdf

He called his friend after calling 911.
This is highly unlikely, given the timeline. Do you have a citation to support your assertion?
As a man is, so he sees. - William Blake
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
GeorgiAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:08a, 10/27/21
AG
Rittenhouse did nothing wrong. (Maybe violated some minor gun laws.) He should be acquitted on everything.
Reply Quote
4
Fightin TX Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:33a, 10/27/21
AG
Reply Quote
8
Gator92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fightin TX Aggie • 11:45a, 10/27/21
AG


Reply Quote
7
1 edit
TxAgPreacher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teslag • 12:03p, 10/27/21
S
Salute The Marines said:
The kid is an American hero
On this we agree!
Reply Quote
1
LightningDammitt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aTm2004 • 12:18p, 10/27/21
AG
aTm2004 said:
LightningDammitt said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.


So...a man...making his own decisions...

Just checked. He was 17. So a minor.


Nope... He can be tried as an adult in some cases... and... he can defend himself as an adult.

Ok, but what does that have to do with this statement?

Quote:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.


Doh! If he is deemed fit to be tried as an adult, he is obviously considered by law to be "mature enough".

Obtusity is unbecoming.
Reply Quote
aTm2004
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LightningDammitt • 12:33p, 10/27/21
AG
LightningDammitt said:
aTm2004 said:
LightningDammitt said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.


So...a man...making his own decisions...

Just checked. He was 17. So a minor.


Nope... He can be tried as an adult in some cases... and... he can defend himself as an adult.

Ok, but what does that have to do with this statement?

Quote:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.


Doh! If he is deemed fit to be tried as an adult, he is obviously considered by law to be "mature enough".

Obtusity is unbecoming.

There have been 12 year olds tried as adults.
Reply Quote
LightningDammitt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aTm2004 • 12:36p, 10/27/21
AG
aTm2004 said:
LightningDammitt said:
aTm2004 said:
LightningDammitt said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
MaroonStain said:
aTm2004 said:
Fightin TX Aggie said:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.

Once he was attacked, however, his self-defense was justified.


This is a reasonable take on it and one I agree with.


How old was he when the event occurred?

17 or 18, IIRC.


So...a man...making his own decisions...

Just checked. He was 17. So a minor.


Nope... He can be tried as an adult in some cases... and... he can defend himself as an adult.

Ok, but what does that have to do with this statement?

Quote:
The kid should not have been out there. He wasn't mature enough for that scene.


Doh! If he is deemed fit to be tried as an adult, he is obviously considered by law to be "mature enough".

Obtusity is unbecoming.

There have been 12 year olds tried as adults.


Back toyour original discussion...

If the law decides he is mature enough to be tried as an adult, do you presume he was (or was not) mature enough to be in that scene?
Reply Quote
P.H. Dexippus
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fightin TX Aggie • 12:38p, 10/27/21
AG
Fightin TX Aggie said:

Why, are these words Rittenhouse spoke, wrote, or endorsed?
The story isn't that [DeSantis] "couldn't win" the primary. The story is that an overwhelming majority of our population is heinously stupid. 50% of them vote for communists. 75% of the remaining 50% vote for Trump, who cant win. When the majority of the opposition party insists on voting for an opposition candidate who can't win, you get exactly the government you deserve. - Well Endowed Ag
Reply Quote
1
CanyonAg77
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to P.H. Dexippus • 12:39p, 10/27/21
AG
Quote:
Why, are these words Rittenhouse spoke, wrote, or endorsed?
I assumed the Tweet was a joke
Reply Quote
8
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.