Federal Reserve Predicts 4%+ Inflation Annually through 2024

9,074 Views | 103 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by SA68AG
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


In May, Janet Yellen said the inflation was temporary.

Oops.
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
which is what really... 8%?

wow!
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Libs don't care. All in the name of safety. Just keep spending, keep testing, wasting money trying to play god and prevent a non-preventable virus, etc.
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and it IS temporary, though the year 2024!
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But a certain resident told us inflation was 100% certain transitory
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But no mean tweets!
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks CMs
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beerad12man said:

Libs don't care. All in the name of safety. Just keep spending, keep testing, wasting money trying to play god and prevent a non-preventable virus, etc.

They'll increase welfare again. They upped food stamps by 25% with the stroke of a pen. SS is protected since its tied to inflation. This hurts the middle class, which they loathe.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cassius said:

and it IS temporary, though the year 2024!
Didn't he also claim that deflation should be our concern too?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting. Goldman Sachs is predicting a return to 2% by March 2022. Let's hope they are smarter than the Fed.
aggieland09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they are raising estimates to 4% then its probably more like 12%
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Doniphon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welcome to Democrat run America.... enjoy the supply chain issues and more expensive everything!
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What's compounding the issue is immense cost increase of transportation. Fuel cost is astronomical.

In 15 months it's gone from $1.62/gallon to $3.19.

So there is an artificially created short supply of materials, which has increased cost of goods. There is an artificially created labor shortage, which has increased cost of goods. And we've artificially double the price of fuel/transportation, which is raising cost of goods.

And none of that takes into account the reckless spending and resulting printing press in Washington.

I dont want to debate tariffs, but all those people who were staunchly against trumps' tariffs have to be wondering why, at this point. The effects pale in comparison to what's happening now, and we've opened the doors back up to our #1 competition.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I cannot explain what Im seeing economically. The harm has to be on purpose. There is no other explanation at this point. And half the country seems to be blissfully unaware as they scroll through tiktok
Athanasius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Alternative headline:

"Your salary is getting reduced 4% each year for the next few years."
Wyoming Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgGrad99 said:

What's compounding the issue is immense cost increase of transportation. Fuel cost is astronomical.

In 15 months it's gone from $1.62/gallon to $3.19.

So there is an artificially created short supply of materials, which has increased cost of goods. There is an artificially created labor shortage, which has increased cost of goods. And we've artificially double the price of fuel/transportation, which is raising cost of goods.

And none of that takes into account the reckless spending and resulting printing press in Washington.

I dont want to debate tariffs, but all those people who were staunchly against trumps' tariffs have to be wondering why at this point. The effects pale in comparison to what's happening now, and we've opened the doors back up to our #1 competition.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I cannot explain what Im seeing economically. It has to be on purpose. There is no other explanation at this point. And half the country seems to be blissfully unaware as they scroll through tiktok

EVERYTHING is on purpose.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unexpectedly.
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Athanasius said:

Alternative headline:

"Your salary is getting reduced 4% each year for the next few years."

That's the thing. If folks were told they were getting a 4% pay cut each year over the next 3 years by their company, they would be extremely ticked off and looking for a different job.

Yet that is exactly what this is.

Liberalism is a mental illness.
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waiting for the econ major to jump in and retranslate this story. Certainly he knows as well as all other academics that inflation cannot last.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Concerned Moderates - You allowed this.

Absolute trash.

Effectively, over a two year period, we have double digit inflation with wage increases that don't come close to matching.
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're right. What I mean is that it's intentional harm, rather than bad policy.

Maybe that's been obvious, but at this point, I cant even figure out how someone would explain it away. Very different than the past in that way.
PCC_80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they say 4% you should expect at least 8% and more likely 10%-15%. But, no mean tweets. Fing Idiots.

Sadly almost half the country supports this happening.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How to destroy an economy:

Fearmonger----->pay people not to work/run them out of the workforce----->create a labor shortage ----->create material supply/inventory shortage----->create inflation

The Democrat-Marxist schemes are working according to plan.

HarryJ33tamu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm an econ major. This is very very bad. Too bad half of our population is too dumb to realize what is going on.

At least there are no more mean tweets though, and that's what really matters.
Wyoming Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgGrad99 said:

You're right. What I mean is that it's intentional harm, rather than bad policy.

Maybe that's been obvious, but at this point, I cant even figure out how someone would explain it away. Very different than the past in that way.

Well, I am a conspiracy theorist in that I believe almost everything that happens is on purpose whether it be for good or bad. There is always a motive behind everything.
waitwhat?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many more teas do we need to buy to counteract this?
" 'People that read with pictures think that it's simply about a mask' - Dana Loesch" - Ban Cow Gas

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - Dr. Ron Paul

Big Tech IS the empire of lies

TEXIT
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We can handle 4% as long as we know about it in advance.
It's the "series high with 'large expected price rises' in food, rent, and medical costs" that should scare teh hell out of people.

Fed is basically putting a floor on stocks, commodities (esp the metals), and cryptos...
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Problem is the policy making set -- political and press- - are never effected or disturbed by inflation.
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gotcha.

I tend to think there are a lot of people, especially career politicians who simply have bad policy. They've never faced actual messy real-world situations, and make 'pie in the sky' policy decisions.

I also think there are politicians who are open to the highest bidder, or vote based on self preservation (reelection above country).

But it's also pretty clear, that there are those who want this country to fail, based on what we're seeing.
Wyoming Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgGrad99 said:

Gotcha.

I tend to think there are a lot of people, especially career politicians who simply have bad policy. They've never faced actual messy real-world situations, and make 'pie in the sky' policy decisions.

I also think there are politicians who are open to the highest bidder, or vote based on self preservation (reelection above country).

But it's also pretty clear, that there are those who want this country to fail, based on what we're seeing.

Agree on all those counts. And I think almost all politicians are open to the highest bidder. I think very few are actually in it for what's best for America and their constituents.
whytho987654
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All to cause the "need" for socialism, m4a, no taxes for the poor, etc
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Leftists and concerned moderates voted for biden who's administration implement policies that resulted in this.

Is that also ban worthy, staff? Or worth sending me a warning email?
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HarryJ33tamu said:

I'm an econ major. This is very very bad. Too bad half of our population is too dumb to realize what is going on.

At least there are no more mean tweets though, and that's what really matters.
They'll figure it out when their cash doesn't go as far to buy everything the government won't.
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If it's not already apparent, these guys in charge don't know jack *****
Who is John Galt?

2026
Central Committee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The administration and the Fed have done their best to hide it (lies), and an all too willing leftist media is helping them. But inflation cannot be hidden for long, as the higher prices hurts the middle class and upper lower class the most.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.