AZ Senate President @FannKfann announces a public election audit hearing for tomorrow at 10:00am MST.
— Audit War Room (@AuditWarRoom) July 15, 2021
AZ Senate President @FannKfann announces a public election audit hearing for tomorrow at 10:00am MST.
— Audit War Room (@AuditWarRoom) July 15, 2021
titan? She specified MST, which is not the actual time in AZ since they do not do Daylight Savings Time.titan said:
I would give it at 8:00 am and spread the word by word of mouth to just be "tuned in from dawn forward" just in case.
Oh, and to clarify, do not mean anything wrong with 10am. What I mean is the real time would be two hours earlier than announced. So not interfered with. Also recorded and immediately dispersed.
I didn't know for sure it wasn't MST. Good catch. But like said, all I mean is the real time (not matter which zone) would release the news would be two hours earlier than everyone thought. IF its a bombshell, of course. If its a dud announcement there is no need to take such precautions.aggiehawg said:titan? She specified MST, which is not the actual time in AZ since they do not do Daylight Savings Time.titan said:
I would give it at 8:00 am and spread the word by word of mouth to just be "tuned in from dawn forward" just in case.
Oh, and to clarify, do not mean anything wrong with 10am. What I mean is the real time would be two hours earlier than announced. So not interfered with. Also recorded and immediately dispersed.
Hell, I get so confused what the time is in Arizona even when I was visiting. Broad daylight and sunshine at 5 AM. But diner didn't open until 7 AM. Bummer.
aggiehawg said:titan? She specified MST, which is not the actual time in AZ since they do not do Daylight Savings Time.titan said:
I would give it at 8:00 am and spread the word by word of mouth to just be "tuned in from dawn forward" just in case.
Oh, and to clarify, do not mean anything wrong with 10am. What I mean is the real time would be two hours earlier than announced. So not interfered with. Also recorded and immediately dispersed.
Hell, I get so confused what the time is in Arizona even when I was visiting. Broad daylight and sunshine at 5 AM. But diner didn't open until 7 AM. Bummer.
Oak Tree said:
If there's factual evidence of voter fraud who here expects Republicans to do anything about it?
Seriously77 said:
He has connections on Texags, his trolling is third rate yet never gets time off.
Trump lost but deserved to win as he handled all issues while in charge, comical at times, but no wars.
Biden is doing a good job and I have no issues with him,will vote Democrat as I can relate to them more so than the stiffs on the other side, the dimwits.
Oak Tree said:
If there's factual evidence of voter fraud who here expects Republicans to do anything about it?
titan said:
Unfortunately you are right. Not much is liable to come of it. But it might strengthen the hand of states trying to impose election integrity reforms.
And proof could help grow the activist new right that is needed.
GeorgiAg said:Oak Tree said:
If there's factual evidence of voter fraud who here expects Republicans to do anything about it?
Hire a lawyer. Present said evidence in a court of law. Step 4. Profit. It's not that hard.
GeorgiAg said:Oak Tree said:
If there's factual evidence of voter fraud who here expects Republicans to do anything about it?
Hire a lawyer. Present said evidence in a court of law. Step 4. Profit. It's not that hard.
Proving your TDS? Is he on your mind 24/7? Again, why not defend the regime you voted for? Why be as vapid as they are? Take a stance and w/o your Trump addiction present and defend this admin.GeorgiAg said:
Enjoy:
The next major nation experiment's Grand Court needs to do away with the concept of standing. Instead, its jurisdiction and the kind of cases it addresses should simply be defined by relevance to the overall main national body. Not how they got there.taxpreparer said:GeorgiAg said:Oak Tree said:
If there's factual evidence of voter fraud who here expects Republicans to do anything about it?
Hire a lawyer. Present said evidence in a court of law. Step 4. Profit. It's not that hard.
Will not work. The SC does not recognize anyone's standing; not the citizens of the state, not the opposing candidate or party, and not other states whose EV was diminished.
Absolutely would not be surprised. Use to work in consumer products (soda and chocolate) and purposeful contamination happens all the time.thirdcoast said:
Looks like Maricopa might have provided ballots that weren't part of the official count to undermine the audit. Cyber Ninjas might have counted an unlabeled batch of ballots Maricopa recorded as (duplicate, test, etc.). This allows them to completely undermine the audit outcome based on a small forced error. Wouldnt be suprised.....they have been setting smoke screens and undermining the audit for months.