Gain of function moratorium lifted days before Trump inauguration

2,745 Views | 19 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by EKUAg
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obama administration did it.

Quote:

Today, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is releasing "Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO)." Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen's virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).

Issuance of this policy guidance concludes the deliberative process launched in October 2014 by OSTP and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). At that time, OSTP and HHS asked the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), as informed by feedback from the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, to provide recommendations to help shape the development and adoption of a new United States Government policy governing the funding and conduct of this category of research. While NSABB deliberated, such projects were placed on pause.

In May 2016, after thorough deliberation and extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the NSABB issued its recommendations. NSABB's central finding was that studies that are expected to enhance PPP have potential benefits to public health but also entail significant risks. NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny prior to being funded. NSABB further recommended a Department-level, multi-disciplinary review and ongoing Federal and institutional oversight for this category of research. The recommended policy guidance that OSTP is issuing today will implement this approach.
Jan 9 2017

Commentary:

Quote:

An even larger backstory. Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama's administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses. However, essentially this re-authorization was only kickstarting funding within the U.S. because the funding of weaponization of SARS-CoV-2 never actually stopped in 2014. The media reporting on this is misleading, if not downright false.

In the original pdf guidance for the 2014 research pause of into weaponization of SARS viruses there was a footnote that everyone seems to have missed


Quote:

This exception essentially permitted the Pentagon to continue funding the creation of SARS as a biological weapon in Wuhan, China, under the auspices of national security. Which is exactly what the defense department did: "Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020"
Quote:

October 17, 2014 U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon was paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic. However, the pause allowed agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined "the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security."
2014 through 2020 the Pentagon continued funding research in Wuhan, China. Fear of discovery would explain why many top officials in the U.S. Defense Department were against the Trump administration [with increased severity after the COVID pandemic began].
May 2016 [An Election Year] "after thorough deliberation and extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the NSABB [National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] issued its recommendations. NSABB's central finding was that studies that are expected to enhance PPP have potential benefits to public health but also entail significant risks. NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny prior to being funded." Anthony Fauci is on the NSABB.
January 9, 2017 [Four Days after the Susan Rice oval office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, et al] The Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons. "Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen's virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP)."
Link

So in net effect, there was no true moratorium as DOD continued to fund it.
aggiejayrod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, I've been reassured by several concerned moderates that it happened in 2017 and therefore Trump is entirely to blame
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is my shocked look... ;- <

Makes one wonder "WHOM" our government serves and benefits?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I'm not mistaken, Lt. Col. Fatass dictates US policy on all things. That's what I learned in a faux impeachment.
SoulSlaveAG2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
THAts why the hubbub of making it appear natural. The simple answer as to why we can't simply hold China accountable. We (our govt) is just as guilty for this virus as we were funding the research in cooperation.

The government giving the noble lie to "protect" the little people... in other word covering their butts as well.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoulSlaveAG2005 said:

THAts why the hubbub of making it appear natural. The simple answer as to why we can't simply hold China accountable. We (our govt) is just as guilty for this virus as we were funding the research in cooperation.

The government giving the noble lie to "protect" the little people... in other word covering their butts as well.
Well then...it's Butt Covers all around.

I'm lost, who's global worldview is it that we're following??????????????????????? I don't remember getting an opportunity to vote on this one.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

This is my shocked look... ;- <

Makes one wonder "WHOM" our government serves and benefits?


Exactly

CM wants you to know Lord Obama is completely blameless in all of this
Year of the Germaphobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll wait and see how this plays out...
SoulSlaveAG2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

SoulSlaveAG2005 said:

THAts why the hubbub of making it appear natural. The simple answer as to why we can't simply hold China accountable. We (our govt) is just as guilty for this virus as we were funding the research in cooperation.

The government giving the noble lie to "protect" the little people... in other word covering their butts as well.
Well then...it's Butt Covers all around.

I'm lost, who's global worldview is it that we're following??????????????????????? I don't remember getting an opportunity to vote on this one.


You got me. I didn't vote for this stuff either. Part of the leviathan that is big government. My $.02... i bet most elected officials have no clue about most things our govt does. The leg has relegated its authority to the bureaucracy and it's oversight to covering steroid use in baseball, and other trivial matters. Meanwhile scientist and bureaucrats go ape town on spending.
Albatross Necklace
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There were some "conspiracy theorists" saying this last May
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Albatross Necklace said:

There were some "conspiracy theorists" saying this last May
Speaking of May 2020.

Quote:

Peter Daszak is a scientist whose work is helping in the search for a COVID-19 cure. So why did the president just cancel Daszak's funding? It's the kind of politics which might seem ill-advised in a health crisis. President Trump is blaming China's government for the pandemic. The outbreak was first detected in the city of Wuhan. The administration has said, at times, the virus is man-made or that, if it's natural, it must have leaked out of a Chinese government lab. Both the White House and the Chinese Communist Party have been less than honest. And so, in China, and the U.S., the work of scientists like Peter Daszak is being undercut by pandemic politics.
Quote:

Peter Daszak is a British-born American Ph.D. who's spent a career discovering dangerous viruses in wildlife, especially bats.

In 2003, in Malaysia, he warned 60 Minutes a pandemic was coming.

Peter Daszak in 2003 interview: What worries me the most is that we are going to miss the next emerging disease, that we're suddenly going to find a SARS virus that moves from one part of the planet to another, wiping out people as it moves along.
Quote:

In the 17 years since that prophecy, Peter Daszak became president of the New York-based EcoHealth Alliance.

Peter Daszak: We're a nonprofit research organization that focuses on understanding where the pandemics come from, what's the risk of future pandemics and can we get in between this pandemic and the next one and disrupt it and stop it.

In China, EcoHealth has worked for 15 years with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Together they've catalogued hundreds of bat viruses, research that is critical right now.

Peter Daszak: The breakthrough drug, Remdesivir, that seems to have some impact on COVID-19 was actually tested against the viruses we discovered under our NIH research funding.

Scott Pelley: And so that testing would not have been possible--

Peter Daszak: No, it would not.

Scott Pelley: --if it hadn't been for the work that you did with the NIH grant?

Peter Daszak: Correct.

But his funding from the NIH, the U.S. National Institutes of Health, was killed, two weeks ago, by a political disinformation campaign targeting China's Wuhan Institute.

On April 14, Florida Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz claimed China's Wuhan Institute had, quote, "birthed a monster." Gaetz is a vigorous defender of the president. He's been under investigation by the House Ethics Committee for allegedly threatening a witness against Mr. Trump and he led a protest to delay impeachment testimony.
CBS News
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Lord. What a wretched hive of scum and villainy. This was, it appears, all about the the bureaucracy protecting itself at any cost. Absolutely unreal.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
outofstateaggie said:

Good Lord. What a wretched hive of scum and villainy. This was, it appears, all about the the bureaucracy protecting itself at any cost. Absolutely unreal.
Yeah. We were lied to, Trump included.

Notice Dr. "Scarves" Birx has dropped off of the face of the earth.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sorry Trump still shares in blame

unless his crew wasn't aware

which would make them incompetent
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Obama administration did it.
..
So in net effect, there was no true moratorium as DOD continued to fund it.

The malfeasance within the Obama administration was hidden for quite some time, however slowly the curtains are being pulled back exposing the incredible corruption.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cone said:

sorry Trump still shares in blame

unless his crew wasn't aware

which would make them incompetent


...and the Oblamea cabal complicit in releasing a bioweapon on the people of the US.
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is war!
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cone said:

sorry Trump still shares in blame

unless his crew wasn't aware

which would make them incompetent


Says the man who voted for Biden
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
An L of an Ag said:

This is war!


Agreed. What will it take to wake people up? Or govt is responsible for killing millions, ruining our kids education, destroying family's livelihoods....all for the sake of power and to usher in communism.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
didn't vote for JRB
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

This is my shocked look... ;- <

Makes one wonder "WHOM" our government serves and benefits?


Easy answer. Not the people.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.