Most of these "educators" couldn't handle the real world. It's amazing how many of them talk about how tough they have it but they have never really had a real job.
Quote:
Nonregdrummer09, I'm trying to make A&M a better place.
And as I recall, violated ethics rules about students participating in experiments.FriscoKid said:
The example you give of having students walk through the MSC, with their hats on, as part of a social experiment is a great example that I had forgotten about. How this passed as "education" is still beyond me. That serves no purpose on our campus.
FIFYPease said:
Ross was a segregationist. Yet many want to present him as arollrole model to be emulated... that is a mistake
Pease said:Nonregdrummer09, I'm trying to make A&M a better place. I suppose I could move to someplace that aligns more closely with my values, but I would be preaching to the choir. I can do the most good here.Nonregdrummer09 said:American Hardwood said:That quotation gives no explanation for the term or it's origin. For all we know, the writer made it up, tainted with his own bias. Unless you can point to another completely independent source with some explanation as to the origin, the most plausible explanation is that the is the personal characterization of the author, probably based on the pure coincidence that Sully's task in war engagement happened to pit him against black Union soldiers. This is proof of nothing.Pease said:https://www.newspapers.com/clip/53599300/sul-ross-negro-killer/chickencoupe16 said:
Gonna need sources for your "Gallant Negro Killer" claim. The only source I've ever seen was one article in one UNION newspaper.
Memphis Daily Appeal
Memphis, Tennessee
20 Apr 1864
We can pretty easily derive based on letters/accounts from said battle and the timing of this article you are correct.
"Pease" will disagree of course, because it doesn't fit his narrative of trying to destroy everything A&M is.
I honestly don't understand why he works here.
Pease, what is it that draws you to work for TAMU? Honest question.
Ellis Wyatt said:FIFYPease said:
Ross was a segregationist. Yet many want to present him as arollrole model to be emulated... that is a mistake
Joe Biden was also a segregationist.
Why did you vote for him in 2020, and what does that make you?
This is a great take.Ellis Wyatt said:FIFYPease said:
Ross was a segregationist. Yet many want to present him as arollrole model to be emulated... that is a mistake
Joe Biden was also a segregationist.
Why did you vote for him in 2020, and what does that make you?
It's irritating to see how much lip-service is paid to being "first-gen" today ... as if there have never been first-generation students before.UTExan said:
" First-generation college students lamented crippling lack of access to needed resources and lack of empathy from faculty and staff."
EclipseAg said:It's irritating to see how much lip-service is paid to being "first-gen" today ... as if there have never been first-generation students before.UTExan said:
" First-generation college students lamented crippling lack of access to needed resources and lack of empathy from faculty and staff."
A&M, especially, has long been a place where "first in their families" came to study.
Back in the day, I was in the MSC Bookstore behind a fish who had never written a check before. The cashier just sighed and told him what to write and where. He finished up sheepishly and moved on. I'm sure he was embarrassed, but that's part of growing up.
Today he would go on Twitter and complain that the school didn't offer him "needed resources" and exhibited a "lack of empathy."
Pease said:
Nonregdrummer09, I'm trying to make A&M a better place. I suppose I could move to someplace that aligns more closely with my values, but I would be preaching to the choir. I can do the most good here.
A certain someone is going back to eating chalk.TChaney said:
I give up.
Now I will tell you why Pease will not answer my questions.
Because they are admittedly loaded questions.
Since he is finally engaging some, he will have the opportunity to refute my summation and speculation.
The first set.
How do you feel about politicians of the period that had the raiding native tribes killed and pushed out of Texas?
Should we still be able to honor them for their other deeds or only judge them for select issues?
There is currently an initiative that has been approved as far as I know to erect a statue of politician Matthew Gaines on the Texas A&M campus. While I am not opposed to it, we have to be honest and admit it is simple pandering. Gaines was a black politician, he voted for the Morrill act that created land grant colleges in Texas. This is his only tie to Texas A&M and it's history. With so small of a tie to the University why erect a statue? He was black. That is the only reason. It's solely identity politics.
The crux of the situation is, for a couple of years Gaines was on the Committee of Indian Affairs during the time legislation was drafted to remove and displace the Comanche and other tribes from the State of Texas. He was key in writing the legislation that was approving genocide as some people claim.
In this respect if you have such a narrow view of history as some appear to, you cannot in good faith support both honoring Gaines while denouncing Ross.
Second loaded question
What's your take on missionaries stepping in and changing the culture of a tribe or group?
Remove your personal views of Christianity for a second and look at it from a history/anthropology perspective. Christian missionaries were destructive in these aspects. Once the outside influence arrived, many of the traditions and the culture itself were destroyed. Now try to go back and figure out and understand where and how the society was built prior to outside influence. The same could be said for conquering civilizations but missionaries were sent so far and wide there is no denying their impact.
Texas A&M is a unique culture steeped in tradition. There are probably hundreds of traditions and cultural examples that would be foreign from an outside view. If an anthropologist was self aware, honest and a true academic they would have a treasure trove of honest research available at their fingertips. Instead of observing the culture, lesser professors feel a desire through their own misguided political affiliations to subvert and change that culture to fit their own personal world view.
This makes them no better than a missionary in a tribal village when it comes to tradition, history and culture.
I will leave it with one prime example to prove my point.
The MSC, a memorial in place out of respect to the dead.
Instead of silently observing, some professor decided to actively thumb their nose at the tradition. Going out of their way to attempt to offend anyone that might hold those beliefs sacred. Thinking nothing of actually studying the phenomenon and only seeking to destroy it.
I wonder if studying a fishing village and they danced around a fire to honor the dead, if this same professor would stand up, walk through the dance and piss on the fire?
I'll leave you with some old quotes I found
"Training needs to start as children. TexAgs are like those old dogs. Respect is a value, but it is only directed at like-kind. Texas high schools trained 'em in nationalism..."
"It's not an environment conducive to informed discussion. It is interesting to see what triggers them the most. "
I contend the person that wrote these is not a teacher, professor or educator.
Their self identity is an agitator and activist first and the rest be dammed.
I tried honest discourse and I thank you for showing me that is not now and never will be possible.
Quote:
There is currently an initiative that has been approved as far as I know to erect a statue of politician Matthew Gaines on the Texas A&M campus. While I am not opposed to it, we have to be honest and admit it is simple pandering. Gaines was a black politician, he voted for the Morrill act that created land grant colleges in Texas. This is his only tie to Texas A&M and it's history. With so small of a tie to the University why erect a statue? He was black. That is the only reason. It's solely identity politics.
Game, set, match. Outstanding post on a couple of levels.Ellis Wyatt said:FIFYPease said:
Ross was a segregationist. Yet many want to present him as arollrole model to be emulated... that is a mistake
Joe Biden was also a segregationist.
Why did you vote for him in 2020, and what does that make you?
It's embarrassing, actually.Prognightmare said:
I bet Pease is sitting on a donut and reenacting the scene from "The Crying Game" after the complete ass kicking F16 gave him today. "Professor" my ass, he's weak and nowhere near as intelligent as he thinks he is.
FriscoKid said:
Gaines was a much bigger figure in Texas politics in general. I know we had this debate last year, but his ties to the University really are pretty weak. I don't like the idea of pandering at all either.
I know this is a s the kind of comment that makes it to Twitter and it's taken out of context, but all of the other statues on campus are deeply Aggie. His statue would be much more fitting for something that is focused on Texas politics and not TAMU in general.
I wasn't familiar with the association, then I looked at the board members. Those are some good Ags. I will donateJambesPoilu said:
If you are not a member, you should be. I don't know who brought critical race theory to A&M, but I know who will stop it. It will take thousands of good Aggies, but it will be done.
I am a member of The Rudder Association. Why aren't you?
Prognightmare said:
Has anyone requested a wellness check on Pease this morning? He probably spent the night at a battered women's shelter.

dermdoc said:
So these profs, who seem to be hiding their intelligence, admit in public forums that they carry their political bias and being "progressive" into their classroom, and actively try to "make things better" by changing their students to think let them. Pretty chilling stuff imho.
And then call anyone who calls them out Neanderthals or whatever. And say we do not listen to differing opinions than ours.
And no, we listened and rejected.
Much more tolerant than the cancel culture of the left.
And please quit trying to indoctrinate our kids. We are paying your salaries you know.
God bless.
RiverAg 80 said:
BusterAg,
Why does everything have to do with race? What about "make hard work valuable to society again"
I hope you don't mind but I am going to steal this and use it very often with people. A great 2 sentences!!
Pease said:Nonregdrummer09, I'm trying to make A&M a better place. I suppose I could move to someplace that aligns more closely with my values, but I would be preaching to the choir. I can do the most good here.Nonregdrummer09 said:American Hardwood said:That quotation gives no explanation for the term or it's origin. For all we know, the writer made it up, tainted with his own bias. Unless you can point to another completely independent source with some explanation as to the origin, the most plausible explanation is that the is the personal characterization of the author, probably based on the pure coincidence that Sully's task in war engagement happened to pit him against black Union soldiers. This is proof of nothing.Pease said:https://www.newspapers.com/clip/53599300/sul-ross-negro-killer/chickencoupe16 said:
Gonna need sources for your "Gallant Negro Killer" claim. The only source I've ever seen was one article in one UNION newspaper.
Memphis Daily Appeal
Memphis, Tennessee
20 Apr 1864
We can pretty easily derive based on letters/accounts from said battle and the timing of this article you are correct.
"Pease" will disagree of course, because it doesn't fit his narrative of trying to destroy everything A&M is.
I honestly don't understand why he works here.
Pease, what is it that draws you to work for TAMU? Honest question.