Just heard on WBAP that he's taking over Rush's time slot at 11 in May.
Old_Ag_91 said:
Dan doesn't pull punches. Definitely good listen.

You punkAgOutsideAustin said:
He's a SOB!!
- Geraldo
I remember thinking the same thing when Rush started.itsyourboypookie said:
Who?
itsyourboypookie said:
Who?
Yes. Do some of that, and it may work out somewhat. IMO the closest that could actually have captured his style and wit and just make it entertaining is Mark Steyn. And an even earlier example still applies, Dennis Miller. Humor about otherwise tedious and maddening things was one of Rush's gifts. And he very smartly presented things -- there was no cable news off the-cuff inaccuracy in most cases. You could look it up.nortex97 said:
He is great and I think this is a good selection for one of the biggest group of stations (by market/listeners) that distributed Rush. This is part of Cumulus' Westwood One group of stations.
I am a Dan fan, but one thing I hope he learns/refines is an ability to pivot away from a single issue focus that a lot of the 'newer' hosts have to a given show. Rush put a ton of prep into his shows and it's unfair to compare them but it was much more performance art for him after really studying a broad array of news daily, which is why he didn't need guests/callers most days. He could just opine with great insight for 3 hours (well, 2 really with all the ads) and pull it off.
aTmAg said:
The current Rush show is unlistenable. They are still playing playing Rush clips with a "this is what the Maha Rushie said about a similar situation...." and it's starting to come off like L Ron Hubbard. They even play old clips of Rush advertising stuff like cell phone plans like, "Rush found a great cell phone plan, and this is what he said about that...." I don't know who thought this format would work for more than a week.