Ruh Roh Raggie!


Edit for: my best Scoobie Doo impression.

Me too

Waffledynamics said:

---

TomFoolery said:

---

The snippet here states that Cuomo was stripped of his power by a party line vote in both chambers that are dominated by democrats. Is it implying that all republicans voted for him to keep his emergency powers?

---

I was wondering the same thing.

---

#metoo

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

TxAg82 said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

---

I think it was likely ****ty writing that isn't accurate. They likely meant only Dems voted for him to retain them, but don't understand what "along party lines" really means

AgResearch said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Kill a bunch of elderly...model governor.
Make unwanted advances on staffers...tar and feather.

Don't get me wrong, I want this jackass to hang, but prioritize, people!

---

Democrats are jumping on this story to hopefully bury the nursing home scandal and knock Cuomo down some.

---

Wag the dog. Burying the story of his culpability in the deaths of thousands with a tantalizing SEX scandal.

Fore Left! said:

---

TxAg82 said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

---

I think it was likely ****ty writing that isn't accurate. They likely meant only Dems voted for him to retain them, but don't understand what "along party lines" really means

---

I think you'd lose that vote. In New York there are 63 senators - 43 democrats and 20 republicans. Matches exactly the vote total they're reporting.

A Democrat Governor can overcome a sex scandal, much like a Blackface scandal (see Ralph Northam here). Kill thousands of elderly folks, and it is insurmountable.

The Dems will surely ramp this "nothing burger" of a sex scandal up, only to forgive him when it is the right time as He is a Cuomo, and to cover his murderous decisions with the nursing homes and Covid.

If any news agency that wants to really get at him (hear me OAN/Newsmax), they will run the sex stuff as a secondary byline to the murderous decisions this Fredo F/c made.

AgResearch said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Kill a bunch of elderly...model governor.
Make unwanted advances on staffers...tar and feather.

Don't get me wrong, I want this jackass to hang, but prioritize, people!

---

Democrats are jumping on this story to hopefully bury the nursing home scandal and knock Cuomo down some.

---

That doesn't make a lot of sense. Every story that will be written about this will mention the scandal, and you really can't bury a bad deed by punishing (whether real or perceived) the person who committed the deed.

91AggieLawyer said:

---

AgResearch said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Kill a bunch of elderly...model governor.
Make unwanted advances on staffers...tar and feather.

Don't get me wrong, I want this jackass to hang, but prioritize, people!

---

Democrats are jumping on this story to hopefully bury the nursing home scandal and knock Cuomo down some.

---

That doesn't make a lot of sense. Every story that will be written about this will mention the scandal, and you really can't bury a bad deed by punishing (whether real or perceived) the person who committed the deed.

---

Sure it makes sense. Cuomo wasn't the only one with that policy, and he's also disliked. They want to get rid of him while running cover for the other Dem governors, Fauci, and the media. The latter two praised Cuomo.

Average Guy said:

---

Now we need to do something in Austin

---

Most conservatives think Abbott is doing a great job...the Democrats and media get the blame. Texas GOP will make sure that no honest and true conservative will be on the Primary ballot for governor. This has worked since W Bush.

Okay, Texas, let's put some limits on the fascist in Austin!

Quote:

---

If any news agency that wants to really get at him (hear me OAN/Newsmax), they will run the sex stuff as a secondary byline to the murderous decisions this Fredo F/c made.

---

If his actions killed Americans shouldn't Republicans be demanding his arrest? The media doesn't uphold the law or bring justice to those individuals.

Fore Left! said:

---

TxAg82 said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

---

I think it was likely ****ty writing that isn't accurate. They likely meant only Dems voted for him to retain them, but don't understand what "along party lines" really means

---

Every one of you guys need to read the whole article. It says that the R's didn't think they went far enough to reign him in. So they voted against.

It's 2021 during a media-created public hysteria storm, and you couldn't get past paragraph 5 to figure it out.

Pathetic.

The POS career is over. Cuomo is a disgrace and needs to resign, and likely go to jail

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

The POS career is over. Cuomo is a disgrace and needs to resign, and likely go to jail

---

Democrats, like Cuomo, did what he was told by the progressive leaders. He wont go to jail unless he has purposely disobeyed them...the American justice system is compromised by progressives.

FratboyLegend said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

TxAg82 said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

---

I think it was likely ****ty writing that isn't accurate. They likely meant only Dems voted for him to retain them, but don't understand what "along party lines" really means

---

Every one of you guys need to read the whole article. It says that the R's didn't think they went far enough to reign him in. So they voted against.

It's 2021 during a media-created public hysteria storm, and you couldn't get past paragraph 5 to figure it out.

Pathetic.

---

We don't give liberal rags clicks.

We read quotes on Texags as god intended

FratboyLegend said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

TxAg82 said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

---

I think it was likely ****ty writing that isn't accurate. They likely meant only Dems voted for him to retain them, but don't understand what "along party lines" really means

---

Every one of you guys need to read the whole article. It says that the R's didn't think they went far enough to reign him in. So they voted against.

It's 2021 during a media-created public hysteria storm, and you couldn't get past paragraph 5 to figure it out.

Pathetic.

---

I read the whole article soon after it was posted and that part was not in there. If you look at the article byline, it says updated. You couldn't even read that before the first paragraph?

Pathetic

I'm curious who the establishment has pegged as next governor

Can't be deblasio.... might be aoc.... Jesus what a clown state...

Pretty sad it too a sex scandal (not killing thousands of old folks) for their legislature to act.

Not saying Texas is doing any better of removing Lord Emperor Abbott's rights to suppress and subdue.

Waffledynamics said:

---

TomFoolery said:

---

The snippet here states that Cuomo was stripped of his power by a party line vote in both chambers that are dominated by democrats. Is it implying that all republicans voted for him to keep his emergency powers?

---

I was wondering the same thing.

---

Not very far down in the article it say she republicans opposed the bill because it didn't strip enough of the emergency powers as moves he's taken will remain in place. My take: They knew it would pass but won't get blamed when Cuomo keeps poorly using his powers.

How the hell are those two things related? Strip him of emergency powers because he is evil and incompetent, not because he made an unwelcome advance.

Waffledynamics said:

---

91AggieLawyer said:

---

AgResearch said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Kill a bunch of elderly...model governor.
Make unwanted advances on staffers...tar and feather.

Don't get me wrong, I want this jackass to hang, but prioritize, people!

---

Democrats are jumping on this story to hopefully bury the nursing home scandal and knock Cuomo down some.

---

That doesn't make a lot of sense. Every story that will be written about this will mention the scandal, and you really can't bury a bad deed by punishing (whether real or perceived) the person who committed the deed.

---

Sure it makes sense. Cuomo wasn't the only one with that policy, and he's also disliked. They want to get rid of him while running cover for the other Dem governors, Fauci, and the media. The latter two praised Cuomo.

---

Explain how you get rid of Cuomo without ANY mention of the nursing home scandal? They can ignore what other govs. do, of course, but virtually every article is going to mention this. Especially since persons with d by their name ALWAYS survive sex scandals.

itsyourboypookie said:

---

FratboyLegend said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

TxAg82 said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

---

I think it was likely ****ty writing that isn't accurate. They likely meant only Dems voted for him to retain them, but don't understand what "along party lines" really means

---

Every one of you guys need to read the whole article. It says that the R's didn't think they went far enough to reign him in. So they voted against.

It's 2021 during a media-created public hysteria storm, and you couldn't get past paragraph 5 to figure it out.

Pathetic.

---

We don't give liberal rags clicks.

We read quotes on Texags as god intended

---

Well then, I'm glad this Longhorn is here to do your reading and thinking for you. I'm pretty sure that's the way we both like it.

FratboyLegend said:

---

itsyourboypookie said:

---

FratboyLegend said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

TxAg82 said:

---

Fore Left! said:

---

The 63 that voted that he keep them should be strung up with him

---

Apparently the 63 are all or mostly Republicans? I don't understand politics sometimes.

---

I think it was likely ****ty writing that isn't accurate. They likely meant only Dems voted for him to retain them, but don't understand what "along party lines" really means

---

Every one of you guys need to read the whole article. It says that the R's didn't think they went far enough to reign him in. So they voted against.

It's 2021 during a media-created public hysteria storm, and you couldn't get past paragraph 5 to figure it out.

Pathetic.

---

We don't give liberal rags clicks.

We read quotes on Texags as god intended

---

Well then, I'm glad this Longhorn is here to do your reading and thinking for you. I'm pretty sure that's the way we both like it.

---

Apparently you didn't think enough to not give clicks (and revenue) to sites that don't deserve it.

This is also a good reason to use a site like archive.today to save an archived version, thereby not giving those undeserving sites clicks.

But I'm sure you knew that.