I will look for link and post.
Anchor for newsmax walks off.
Anchor for newsmax walks off.
He's not wrong. Courts whiffed on even truly investigating.padreislandagfan said:
Anchor stated something to the effect " The courts have found the election to be legitimate with no cheating and newsmax defends that stance."
Guess election controversy is a no no at newsmax now.
wow
If you believe Patrick Byrne, so did Rudy. He never intended to present any evidence of election fraud.annie88 said:He's not wrong. Courts whiffed on even truly investigating.padreislandagfan said:
Anchor stated something to the effect " The courts have found the election to be legitimate with no cheating and newsmax defends that stance."
Guess election controversy is a no no at newsmax now.
wow
You don't have a case if you don't try.
Fair enough, but a true investigation was not allowed. At any avenue. Within hours and days, they'd quashed everything brought up, over and over.aggiehawg said:If you believe Patrick Byrne, so did Rudy. He never intended to present any evidence of election fraud.annie88 said:He's not wrong. Courts whiffed on even truly investigating.padreislandagfan said:
Anchor stated something to the effect " The courts have found the election to be legitimate with no cheating and newsmax defends that stance."
Guess election controversy is a no no at newsmax now.
wow
You don't have a case if you don't try.
With the exception of Antrim County when one judge was convinced enough to order a forensic examination of the machines. But that was not in a case having anything to do with Rudy or Sidney. It was an existing case challenging a referendum on a marijuana store. Although Patrick's team were instrumental in getting the evidence that was presented to the court that made said decision.annie88 said:Fair enough, but a true investigation was not allowed. At any avenue. Within hours and days, they'd quashed everything brought up, over and over.aggiehawg said:If you believe Patrick Byrne, so did Rudy. He never intended to present any evidence of election fraud.annie88 said:He's not wrong. Courts whiffed on even truly investigating.padreislandagfan said:
Anchor stated something to the effect " The courts have found the election to be legitimate with no cheating and newsmax defends that stance."
Guess election controversy is a no no at newsmax now.
wow
You don't have a case if you don't try.
Yes, Yes, Hell YesTrumpGaveMeABabyBump said:JR Ewing said:
I watched also, but the anchor was spewing the company line. Is NewsMax compromised now? Seems like a super censorship job...Lindell says evidence of voter fraud coming on Friday.
Good god I guess OAN is all we got left ... Oh well Chanel Rion, Emily Finn, Chloe Salsameda, and Jenn Pellegrino are all smoke shows!! If they keep them girls on 24/7 they would have already passed newsmax
May be a hotter lineup than fox ever had
Rapier108 said:
The courts found no such thing. They dismissed every case on something like "no standing" or "no harm" and never heard bit of evidence.
Bourbon Meyer said:
This kind of crap is destroying any semblance of a right of center party.
Can someone explain to me who does have standing?Rapier108 said:
The courts found no such thing. They dismissed every case on something like "no standing" or "no harm" and never heard bit of evidence.
The various states if the AG's had done their jobs.stetson said:Can someone explain to me who does have standing?Rapier108 said:
The courts found no such thing. They dismissed every case on something like "no standing" or "no harm" and never heard bit of evidence.
TexasAggie_97 said:Yes, Yes, Hell YesTrumpGaveMeABabyBump said:JR Ewing said:
I watched also, but the anchor was spewing the company line. Is NewsMax compromised now? Seems like a super censorship job...Lindell says evidence of voter fraud coming on Friday.
Good god I guess OAN is all we got left ... Oh well Chanel Rion, Emily Finn, Chloe Salsameda, and Jenn Pellegrino are all smoke shows!! If they keep them girls on 24/7 they would have already passed newsmax
May be a hotter lineup than fox ever had
padreislandagfan said:
Anchor stated something to the effect " The courts have found the election to be legitimate with no cheating and newsmax defends that stance."
Guess election controversy is a no no at newsmax now.
wow
TxTarpon said:
He just needs to challenge those against him to a pillow fight.
Didn't watch it, but how is supporting the court's decision making election fraud a no no? IMO, Newsmax is doing what they should...the courts don't agree, and until hard evidence is shown, they'll support the court's decision.padreislandagfan said:
Anchor stated something to the effect " The courts have found the election to be legitimate with no cheating and newsmax defends that stance."
Guess election controversy is a no no at newsmax now.
wow
It's not the job of courts to "investigate" anything. And private citizens like Rudy don't have subpoena power to drag hostile witnesses into court and make them testify. All private citizens have is "irregularities" that pole watchers claim they didn't understand what was happening. Not knowing what was in a box under the table, what was in it or how it got there is not positive proof that what came out of there was fraud, or just part of their procedures. However, there is enough concern that those in authority (not just all Democrats either), should conduct hearings with subpoena power. The fact that more of that is not happening, is suspicious and infuriating to those in the losing camp.aggiehawg said:If you believe Patrick Byrne, so did Rudy. He never intended to present any evidence of election fraud.annie88 said:He's not wrong. Courts whiffed on even truly investigating.padreislandagfan said:
Anchor stated something to the effect " The courts have found the election to be legitimate with no cheating and newsmax defends that stance."
Guess election controversy is a no no at newsmax now.
wow
You don't have a case if you don't try.