It would be very hard to blame an American President for virus that was created in a lab and released through negligence/malice

But now that we got all the mileage of blame we could out of COVID, we can now be honest about it's origin

pirmag said:

---

They don't mention that gain of function studies were banned in the US because of the danger of loss of containment, and were moved to China with the collaboration of the NIH to get around the ban.
Fauci said in January that the US did not have to worry about the china virus.
Fauci said going on cruises was not a problem.
China and the WHO said no person to person infection.

Why do we have a CDC and a national institute for infectious diseases (Fauci's gig)?

---

Not sure this is true. They were defunded and then refunded. Certainly not banned.

No way. Last spring, when I suggested that an accidental release from the lab made more sense than a multiple animal process at the wet market, one of our TexAgs experts said that a release from the lab would be nearly impossible and animal to animal to human mutations origins would be much more likely.

Based upon all the misinformation, deflected blame, political games to sway the election, I wouldn't be surprised if it were released intentionally. If this is the case, we are currently at war without knowing it. With the latest surge in cases, I also wouldn't be surprised if it has been released multiple times in order to continue to promote a political agenda.

At this point it also wouldn't surprise me if certain parts of our government were involved in its creation and release. If this were the case, we would truly be talking about real treason.

I hope that it was a just negligent accidental release by poor laboratory practices.
Otherwise, we are experiencing pure evil.

How are we a year in and people don't know this thing was man made? The evidence is there

P.U.T.U said:

---

How are we a year in and people don't know this thing was man made? The evidence is there

---

Because the virus is so politicized that the truth is buried in a sea of misinformation from many sides. It obviously is being used to create fear and panic on one side for political gain by some and the other side dismisses its severity too much. The way it has little to no symptoms for many but Israel deadly to others helps create this divide.

If it were just a pandemic, it would have been handled much differently and lives and livelihoods would have not been destroyed for political purposes.

Whether or not it was released intentionally, the irrational response by so many and the short term (economic shut downs) and long term (upcoming hyper inflation) economic destruction has made it a very effective Chinese weapon.

What were they developing in a lab that had this kind of effect. This was some sort of a planned chemical attack that at the very least, went bad............

P.U.T.U said:

---

How are we a year in and people don't know this thing was man made? The evidence is there

---

it was known.

and covered up by the media and deep state carrying water for the ccp.

Just a reminder that even a few months ago if you questioned the official story that COVID came from a Wet Market, you were a "conspiracy theorist".

You would also be correct.

It's not like this is the first time for China and virus-spreading.

Let's be honest...

The Dems were going to be toast going into the 2020 elections. They tried everything to stall, impeach, obstruct, and vilify President Trump and his economy for three years. The CCP pays Dems a lot of money to do their will but, they finally lost faith in the Dems to get Donald Trump out of office. So, they released the virus and the media, also bought and paid for by the CPP, did the rest.

EDIT: And they still had to rig the elections to win...pathetic

China is surely relieved that someone who loves the taste of commie dong will be back in the WH shortly. A report like this will never see the light of day in the near future

The accidental lab release isn't considered a controversial theory.

The Bioweapons study is a new twist on this...and isn't shocking either.

K2-HMFIC said:

---

The accidental lab release isn't considered a controversial theory.

The Bioweapons study is a new twist on this...and isn't shocking either.

---

It absolutely was considered controversial. Ridiculous that it was, but it was. Perhaps you were in a covid induced coma

K2-HMFIC said:

---

The accidental lab release isn't considered a controversial theory.

The Bioweapons study is a new twist on this...and isn't shocking either.

---

Revisionist history.

Move them goalpost!

That release doesn't say anything conclusive and is just throwing out all the possible theories. And frankly, is written like someone with an agenda. Not sure what y'all are high fiving about.

cmag said:

---

That release doesn't say anything conclusive and is just throwing out all the possible theories. And frankly, is written like someone with an agenda. Not sure what y'all are high fiving about.

---

Nobody is high fiving. As you point out the misinformation about the virus is continuing.
The report just adds to the pile by throwing out possibilities without giving any evidence. The report just confirms every's suspicions that the original reports were lies.

Ha to those who think it was accidental....a virus released that speed bumped Trumps lock to re-election and came from the country he was nailing. Coincidental, yeah right.

cmag said:

---

That release doesn't say anything conclusive and is just throwing out all the possible theories. And frankly, is written like someone with an agenda. Not sure what y'all are high fiving about.

---

The problem is that aso of this date, neither theory is conclusive. It appears there is growing evidence that it was released from the lab. The problem is the main stream media ccollectively all came out with news stating definitively factually it was the wet market, without any sort of investigation themselves. Some one feed them the wet market line....

Who feed them that line?


Which do you believe is more likely true, this U.S. State Department release or the Chinese Government release?