Read something interesting today. A study suggests that COVID-19 is a hybrid of...

5,812 Views | 38 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by nortex97
bkag9824
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed, but sequencing beforehand can shorten prophylactic/therapeutic responses.

It's the least invasive mechanism to have an idea of what is potential, not necessarily probable. Leaving humans up to make the decision as to what is probable via GoF is what is putting us in these positions.


Al Bula
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeangeloVickers said:

Just like South park told us it started
yeah

ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cone said:

lol

it's total gain of function lab ****
The coronaBro Chinese Bot has spoken. Biggest fear monger on txags
cupcakesprinkles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marcus Aurelius said:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457603/

Covid-19 has a furin cleavage insert which renders it more infective into mammals. These odds of this 4 nucleotide sequence addition occurring by chance are zero. This isn't a naturally occurring virus. It was created by the Wuhan lab IMO. Shi Zenghli.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Though there is undoubtedly a significant cover up, some intrepid reporting is going to continue to dig into this (pun intended):

Quote:

One research team recently managed to take some samples at the mine, but reportedly had them confiscated.

The reason for such secrecy goes back to the end of April 2012 when a 42-year-old man clearing bat droppings in these underground caverns turned up at a nearby hospital with a bad cough, high fever and struggling to breathe.

Within a week, five colleagues had similar symptoms. Three later died, one after doctors spent more than 100 days fighting to save his life yet the two youngest spent less than a week in the hospital and survived. Sound familiar?

We have since learned from a detailed masters thesis, which included medical reports and radiological scans, that these miners suffered a viral pneumonia, attributed to Sars-like coronaviruses originating from horseshoe bats.

One leading US health body pointed out last year that they had 'an illness remarkably similar to Covid-19'.

Little wonder a prominent vaccine scientist told me: 'This is about as close to a smoking gun as exists.'
Intriguingly, a second thesis three years later also highlighted these cases.

It was written by a student of Oxford-trained virologist Professor George Gao Fu, who is now head of China's Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, which is leading their response to the pandemic.
So the Chinese authorities must have known about the dead miners.

Yet they quickly tried to blame the wildlife market in Wuhan as Covid's source, until challenged by respected studies revealed in this newspaper.

Following the miners' deaths, Shi Zhengli, a Wuhan-based virologist known as Batwoman for her expeditions to gather samples in such caves and a member of the team that traced the origin of Sars to bats, went to investigate.

'The mine shaft stank like hell,' she told Scientific American magazine, explaining how her colleagues spent a year discovering new coronaviruses in samples taken from the blood and faeces of bats.
The miners, she claimed, died from a fungal infection.

Another expert noted how the miners who died were treated with anti-fungal medications, while those surviving were given other drugs.

'So in addition to the fact that the cases were more Sars-like than fungal-like, this treatment story argues against a fungal [cause],' he said.

'It is very odd that Shi Zhengli would assert these cases were fungal.'

Prof Shi examined samples in her Wuhan lab, a few miles from the infamous market. Studies later found the virus in sewage, but it was not detected in animals.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is the first laboratory with the highest global bio-safety level in China.
It specialises in the study of bat-borne viruses and is spearheading China's drive to assert itself in bio-technology.

Leaked diplomatic cables reveal that US officials who visited the lab two years ago warned about safety weaknesses and the risks of a new Sars-like epidemic emerging from the site.

The lab's own safety chief also publicly admitted concerns over flawed security systems.

The institute has carried out experiments on bat coronaviruses since 2015 including research that can increase their virulence by combining snippets from different strains.

Some viruses were injected into special 'humanised' mice that had been created for use in labs with human genes, cells or tissues in their bodies.

These controversial experiments artificially force the evolution of viruses so as to boost our understanding of diseases and their transmissibility.

They help researchers develop new drugs and vaccines.

The Wuhan scientists were working with prominent Western experts and supported financially by the National Institutes of Health, the most important US funding body although this relationship was ended on safety grounds after being revealed by The Mail on Sunday.

Some scientists argue this type of pathogen research is too risky since it could trigger a pandemic from a new disease.

As a result, there was a moratorium on such work by the US for four years under the Obama administration.

Other critics have warned that the Wuhan Institute was constructing 'chimeric' coronaviruses new hybrid micro-organisms that show no sign of human manipulation.

Now the big question is whether they took samples from the coronavirus that killed the Yunnan miners and, back in their laboratory more than 1,000 miles away, created a new virus that somehow leaked out into their own city.
Everyone who has lost a friend, loved one, co-worker, acquaintance or family member should know what this place looks like, and want to know what the heck happened here;

Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.