Ervin Burrell said:

---

No sirens on his tweet...not buying it.

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

John Roberts refuses to do his job. Don't need a whistleblower to tell us that.

---

did ACB refuse to do her job?

---

YES

Quote:

---

Or does she possibly know about this than you do?

---

NO

---

How did she refuse to do her job and why are you not a federal judge yet?

---

Oh, Tanya. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito (IIRC) wanted to hear the case. They can't help it if other justices are cowards.

---

AtlantaGaAggie said:

---

I don't know how anyone buys into what Lin Wood says.

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

even if you are a pro-Trumper, if you still believe any of the **** that Lin Wood is pedaling, you are a ****ing idiot.

---

Was Lin Wood considered a loon before November 2020?

---

Quote:

---

An attorney representing Nick Sandmann has demonstrated "erratic" behavior and has said he is being directed by "God Almighty," three former law partners allege in a lawsuit.

L. Lin Wood, who is based in Atlanta, is being sued in Georgia state court by the three attorneys who say they are his firm's former partners: Nicole Wade, Jonathan Grunberg and Taylor Wilson.

Among Wood's high-profile clients is Sandmann, the Northern Kentucky teen who has pursued lawsuits stemming from news coverage of him at a 2019 incident in Washington D.C. Wood also is representing Kyle Rittenhouse, the teen charged in the fatal shooting of two people last month during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

The attorneys allege that they left the firm in February because of Wood's "erratic, abusive and unprofessional behavior." That alleged behavior included "incoherent" phone calls and emails from Wood, the lawsuit says.


In a statement, Wood called the lawsuit "a shakedown" filled with false claims. He said it was an attempt to "extort money."

"These young lawyers have chosen to willingly engage in a disgraceful and unprofessional effort to publicly attack me by including irrelevant, out-of-context private messages I sent to them in the midst of a difficult time in my personal life arising primarily from my family's reaction to my faith in Jesus Christ," Wood said. "Now, in a shakedown effort to coerce me to do what I believe the ethical rules of my profession prohibit, they manipulate and ignore truth to try to force me, without my client's consent, to pay their separate law firms an unreasonable portion of my earned fee, while repeatedly refusing to provide to the client any proof of the work they claim to have performed on the case."

It's not clear if this will impact Wood's role in Sandmann's cases that are still pending.

The Washington Post settled with Sandmann earlier this summer and CNN settled in January. There are outstanding lawsuits against NBC, ABC News, CBS News, The New York Times, Rolling Stone and Gannett. The Enquirer is owned by Gannett.

The Northern Kentucky attorney representing Sandmann, Todd McMurtry, did not return a message Friday.

The lawsuit involving Wood's firm surrounds a settlement agreement Wood and the attorneys entered into in March. The settlement allegedly said the firm would pay them fees collected in several cases. The three had performed "substantial work if not the majority of the work" on the cases, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit alleges Wood's behavior became concerning last year.

In the fall of 2019, the lawsuit alleges that Wood committed an "assault and battery" on one of the attorneys who went to Wood's home to check on him.


Beginning in late 2019 and into February of this year, "incoherent" phone calls, text messages and emails in the middle of the night from Wood "were the norm," the lawsuit says. It alleges that Wood once summoned them to his home at about 1 a.m.

Most of the communications, according to the lawsuit, professed that "God or the Almighty was commanding his actions" and nearly all were abusive.

At 1:03 a.m. on Feb. 11, the day after Wood summoned the attorneys to his home, Wood sent an email in which he fired them, the suit says. By the afternoon of the same day, Wood "had completely changed his mind," the lawsuit says, and left voicemail messages for each attorney "rescinding his withdrawal from their partnership," according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit alleges that two days later, Wood hosted a three-hour teleconference with the attorneys, during which "he spoke almost nonstop," "referred to himself as 'Almighty,'" offered to fight the attorneys "to the death," and demanded their complete loyalty.

Days later, the lawsuit says Wood repeatedly called the attorneys, "berating them and also threatening them with alleged civil claims." On Feb. 14, the attorneys and two employees walked out of the firm before a meeting with Wood, "out of fear for their physical safety," the lawsuit says.

A series of "irrational and incomprehensible email, text and voicemail threats" followed, the lawsuit says. Wood sent an email at 1:42 a.m. on Feb. 15, the lawsuit says, to 14 people saying he had been victimized "by some unspecified action" and that he would use punishment "at the discretion of Almighty God."

Two hours later, according to the lawsuit, Wood emailed the attorneys and nine others, saying "God was somehow commanding or directing him to accuse (them)" and that "God has given me permission to be profane in this email."

According to the lawsuit, the email said, in part: "You damn dumb mother------s You are going to be ruined financiallyHere are the findings of your final judgment day on earth for today, the day after my Valentine's Day massacre."


In the email, Wood threatened to meet with the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia. "God Almighty told me to get you back to where you belong. Broke and essentially homeless," the email said, in part, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also says he referred to one of the attorneys as a "Chilean Jewish (expletive) crook."

Three days later, on Feb. 18, Wood sent an email to the attorneys and 18 others, recanting "every one of his accusations," the lawsuit says. Wood said in the email he had made "accusatory statements with incomplete information and out of anger, coupled with a tried brain and body."

---

C@LAg said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

even if you are a pro-Trumper, if you still believe any of the **** that Lin Wood is pedaling, you are a ****ing idiot.

---

Was Lin Wood considered a loon before November 2020?

---

irrelevant. actions since November reflect current status quo.

shyster. pure and simple.

---