Doug Ducey and Brian Kemp

4,526 Views | 40 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by MASAXET
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2 men I have respected since becoming Governors have now F'ed the elections in their states. These 2 guys have completely thrown a blind eye to the corruption their states have caused.




Diyala Nick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone is on the conspiracy!
NotAnurrDime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Diyala Nick said:

Everyone is on the conspiracy!


Unreal at this point. The inability to accept such a simple reality that Trump lost is somewhat concerning.
Geminiv
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump didnt lose he was cheated it's terribly obvious.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Diyala Nick said:

Everyone is on the conspiracy!


I don't know what you think about the results of this election, but it is unquestionable that the states broke multiple laws designed to prevent and catch fraud. That's not even in question.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NotAnurrDime said:

Diyala Nick said:

Everyone is on the conspiracy!


Unreal at this point. The inability to accept such a simple reality that Trump lost is somewhat concerning.
Unreal at this point. The inability to accept such a simple reality that Biden cheated is somewhat concerning.

See how that works.

Take off the blinders and open your eyes.
Albatross Necklace
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This shouldn't be a surprise. Pompeo warned us that China owned some Republican governors.

BoerneAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this an attempt to name drop that you text a host from OAN and she doesnt reply to you?
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump said before the election that if he lost it's because the Dems cheated. Then the day after the election, with zero evidence, he claimed he was cheated. Now he's been fishing for almost a month for any evidence to prove his original assertion. So far he's striking out Bigly, but he's getting plenty of donations.
Danimal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No idea what that text is supposed to imply or who is actually texting who.
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well she has replied to me we are friends
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JB99 said:

Trump said before the election that if he lost it's because the Dems cheated. Then the day after the election, with zero evidence, he claimed he was cheated. Now he's been fishing for almost a month for any evidence to prove his original assertion. So far he's striking out Bigly, but he's getting plenty of donations.
Zero evidence??
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danimal said:

No idea what that text is supposed to imply or who is actually texting who.


What is it you don't understand? It's a text conversation b/w me and Christina
BoerneAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LegalDrugPusher said:

Danimal said:

No idea what that text is supposed to imply or who is actually texting who.


What is it you don't understand? It's a text conversation b/w me and Christina


Conversation in the loosest form of the word
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JB99 said:

Trump said before the election that if he lost it's because the Dems cheated. Then the day after the election, with zero evidence, he claimed he was cheated. Now he's been fishing for almost a month for any evidence to prove his original assertion. So far he's striking out Bigly, but he's getting plenty of donations.


He has uncovered a massive amount of election day malfeasance that is inexcusable, and brings into question the legitimacy of the election, whether or not a smoking gun is found. Regardless if the election was stolen, the unacceptable negligence of poll workers should not be overlooked or excused. That will just bring out more fraud.
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BoerneAg11 said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

Danimal said:

No idea what that text is supposed to imply or who is actually texting who.


What is it you don't understand? It's a text conversation b/w me and Christina


Conversation in the loosest form of the word


Well I'm not going to show you our entire text conversations. I'm only showing related convo pertaining to Kemp and Ducey
Daveintx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Always hilarious to see the party that wasted 4 years of tax payers money trying to kick Trump out with made-up reasons wants to ask where evidence is
MROD92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They haven't thrown a blind eye. They're a part of it
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see the thumbs ups now.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Albatross Necklace said:

This shouldn't be a surprise. Pompeo warned us that China owned some Republican governors.


Yes, that was eye-opening at the time, but with the water under the bridge sense, it is even more arresting.

Notice the date -- Feb 8, 2020 --- just before the Chinese inflicted virus will hit in earnest the next month.

What he is describing is a social network you would need a McCarthy style investigation to start rooting out from the municipal and state level up.

But of course with an admin that is literally on the payroll of Beijing in the past, that will never happen. But Pompeo's speech could well explain the excessive promotion of Maoism in colleges and education today, couldn't it. Breitbart seems right again on this -- -and this is came from Pompeo.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Oak Tree
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:

Albatross Necklace said:

This shouldn't be a surprise. Pompeo warned us that China owned some Republican governors.


Yes, that was eye-opening at the time, but with the water under the bridge sense, it is even more arresting.

Notice the date -- Feb 8, 2020 --- just before the Chinese inflicted virus will hit in earnest the next month.

What he is describing is a social network you would need a McCarthy style investigation to start rooting out from the municipal and state level up.

But of course with an admin that is literally on the payroll of Beijing in the past, that will never happen. But Pompeo's speech could well explain the excessive promotion of Maoism in colleges and education today, couldn't it. Breitbart seems right again on this -- -and this is came from Pompeo.




Republican politicians have been working with Democrats/enemies for years...governors, Congressman, and especially GOP presidential candidates. The federal justice system is compromised and no legitimate investigation will ever happen.

The only way to root out corrupt Republicans is for conservatives to join together and fight the GOP. It has to be gutted and rebuilt from scratch.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't care what the law says duce!!!





Jmiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

NotAnurrDime said:

Diyala Nick said:

Everyone is on the conspiracy!


Unreal at this point. The inability to accept such a simple reality that Trump lost is somewhat concerning.
Unreal at this point. The inability to accept such a simple reality that Biden cheated is somewhat concerning.

See how that works.

Take off the blinders and open your eyes.


A simple Little reality that involves thousands of people and officials complicit in a conspiracy. Perfect for the Q thread.
AggDogg61
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JB99 said:

Trump said before the election that if he lost it's because the Dems cheated. Then the day after the election, with zero evidence, he claimed he was cheated. Now he's been fishing for almost a month for any evidence to prove his original assertion. So far he's striking out Bigly, but he's getting plenty of donations.


Didn't the Dems do this during the impeachment hearings?
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JB99 said:

Trump said before the election that if he lost it's because the Dems cheated. Then the day after the election, with zero evidence, he claimed he was cheated. Now he's been fishing for almost a month for any evidence to prove his original assertion. So far he's striking out Bigly, but he's getting plenty of donations.


He said the same about the 2016 elections before he won.
TheFirebird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Don't care what the law says duce!!!






Yeah, but did the crafters of those laws envision a scenario where the Sino-Venzuelans teamed up with the DNC, Hillary Clinton, Biden, and multiple double-agent Republicans to install a secret CIA vote harvesting program and steal the election?

I think not, ergo, the law doesn't apply, QED.
Counterpoint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

JB99 said:

Trump said before the election that if he lost it's because the Dems cheated. Then the day after the election, with zero evidence, he claimed he was cheated. Now he's been fishing for almost a month for any evidence to prove his original assertion. So far he's striking out Bigly, but he's getting plenty of donations.


He said the same about the 2016 elections before he won.
Yep, and in the primaries as well. He accused Ted Cruz of fraud when he lost to him in Iowa. Apparently it's his MO.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump losing because of his personality doesn't mean we didn't have corrupted elections also. Other Democratic nations are shocked at how corruptible and insecure our election processes are. We don't have voter ID. We don't mostly require in person voting excepting a few specific hardships, etc. Our election security is a joke. We don't have uniformly open confirmation of ballot counts by representatives of all parties in every jurisdiction, and we utilize needlessly complex convoluted ballot counting processes.

The rest of the actual Democratically governed world generally has corrected these problems over time, and we seem to be getting worse at the behest of one particular political party.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you think Kemp and Ducey are corrupt?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. I think they think the cheating might not have been the margin of difference in their states and want to move on, understanding that roughly half of the politically active population will be unhappy with whatever they do. They also probably don't enjoy catching heat for decisions made weeks and months ago that made this election cycle a potentially corruptible mess, even if actual problems didn't constitute the difference in any provable fashion. They want it behind them.
unmag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eh. Aren't they doing their jobs? Not sure what all this is about. They certified the vote.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't believe there is any big conspiracy. I simply believe that all the mail in voting allowed for by changes due to COVID fears was exploited to the maximum by corrupt individuals and elements of activist organizations, mostly in vote harvesting, and that harvesting sailed through our crappy lax detection and prevention processes.

Usually with these states having limited or no mail in ballots, this localized or individual harvesting is '1000 cuts' that don't affect outcomes. This time around it was greatly amplified in some areas by the availability and ease of corruption of the mail in ballot being expanded and making harvesting much easier to do at higher volume where it is unlawful. It might have made the difference in some close races, and once those ballots were admitted into the process due to poor controls and vetting and a general legal bias towards admitting questionable votes versus disallowing them, they could not be audited out.

I'm convinced there was an unusually large volume of small scale cheating via vote harvesting, but I don't believe there were vast state level conspiracies.

At best, in some Democrat Urban areas, the typical political machines do what they always have done to bend things in their favor, only the scale was amped up a bit as the opportunity was greater, but it is still the efforts of individuals or small groups following an ideology going to extremes they have rationalized versus some complex multifaceted conspiracy.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP makes an allegation, and in support of the allegation, quotes ........ himself?

Lol

Anyway, yes, I believe these 2 governors have no interest in pushing this if they think they can't win in court

They have re-elections coming up, and the last thing they want is this dragging out with Trump around their necks

I think they, and a lot of other Republicans, just want Trump gone. They are perfectly content to be in the rock throwing minority, and not have to actually do anything
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JB99 said:

Trump said before the election that if he lost it's because the Dems cheated. Then the day after the election, with zero evidence, he claimed he was cheated. Now he's been fishing for almost a month for any evidence to prove his original assertion. So far he's striking out Bigly, but he's getting plenty of donations.

With a ton of evidence of legal violations! Hard for liberal morons to understand!
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
Agvet12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captain Pablo said:

OP makes an allegation, and in support of the allegation, quotes ........ himself?

Lol

Anyway, yes, I believe these 2 governors have no interest in pushing this if they think they can't win in court

They have re-elections coming up, and the last thing they want is this dragging out with Trump around their necks

I think they, and a lot of other Republicans, just want Trump gone. They are perfectly content to be in the rock throwing minority, and not have to actually do anything


Funny enough they're both going to be replaced by Dems in the same manner that Trump lost IF they don't look into these issues being brought up.

I'll eat crow later, but it will happen.

The other funny thing is if Biden is sworn in (basically 99.9% at this point) and the Reps keep the senate they're likely to lose in the mid terms, but I fear Dems will "win" in the runoff.

Will be hilarious to watch it all happen, after Trump tells them exactly what is and will happen in a few short months
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.