aggiehawg said:

---

clarkebkr07 said:

---

I have been very intrigued by this, and thank you for bringing attention to it. Did the courts ever hear the cases?

---

Trying to track that down. Don't know.

---

I found this.

https://www.law.com/legalnewswire/news.php?id=2751728

Quote:

---

Plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit have filed a motion seeking a restraining order to block the use of private funds from billionaire Mark Zuckerberg for use in local election management, a statutory responsibility of state officials including the Pennsylvania Legislature.

The motion, filed on October 19 in U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania, highlights how a grant for $10 million from the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) explicitly requires the City of Philadelphia to open no fewer than 800 new polling places and failing to do so may require the City to forfeit the grant money. The funding from Mark Zuckerberg also pays for judges to oversee ballot counts and the outcome of disputes that arise regarding the eligibility of ballots in the election.

---

Filed 2 weeks before the election.

Thanks.

I think what is so frustrating to me is that different people were filing suit after suit before the elections on the flaws in the Dominion system, on the illegal actions of election officials changing state election law, on the Zuckerberg interference, etc. Shouting from the roof tops about the coming disaster and the courts remained silent.

And using laches as a defense now after the election, is just galling to me.

What about his Center for Kids who can't read good?

This cannot be the case. Although the plan fits every suspect thing we witnessed for the election, which our liberal friends can always justify, I am sure nothing nefarious occurred [edit to add:] that would change the outcome of the election.
Our liberal friends continue to assure us that there was no evidence that can be proven in court of coordinated cheating and that the effort to cheat on such a scale would not be possible. However hundreds of millions of dollars spent for a coordinated election cheating organization? I am sure that they will have receipts showing that all the money was spent on coffee and donuts for the pole workers.

BuddysBud said:

---

This cannot be the case. Although the plan fits every suspect thing we witnessed for the election, which our liberal friends can always justify, I am sure nothing nefarious occurred.
Our liberal friends continue to assure us that there was no evidence that can be proven in court of coordinated cheating and that the effort to cheat on such a scale would not be possible. However hundreds of millions of dollars spent for a coordinated election cheating organization? I am sure that they will have receipts showing that all the money was spent on coffee and donuts for the pole workers.

---

Seems like those "grants" were actual bribes to state and local election officials to violate state election laws, to me. All of the strings attached were specific requirements to do things not allowed by the election codes.

aggiehawg said:

---

BuddysBud said:

---

This cannot be the case. Although the plan fits every suspect thing we witnessed for the election, which our liberal friends can always justify, I am sure nothing nefarious occurred.
Our liberal friends continue to assure us that there was no evidence that can be proven in court of coordinated cheating and that the effort to cheat on such a scale would not be possible. However hundreds of millions of dollars spent for a coordinated election cheating organization? I am sure that they will have receipts showing that all the money was spent on coffee and donuts for the pole workers.

---

Seems like those "grants" were actual bribes to state and local election officials to violate state election laws, to me. All of the strings attached were specific requirements to do things not allowed by the election codes.

---

They weren't for refreshments for the poll workers? Another example where socialism makes the rich richer and gives everyone else not enough.

BuddysBud said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

BuddysBud said:

---

This cannot be the case. Although the plan fits every suspect thing we witnessed for the election, which our liberal friends can always justify, I am sure nothing nefarious occurred.
Our liberal friends continue to assure us that there was no evidence that can be proven in court of coordinated cheating and that the effort to cheat on such a scale would not be possible. However hundreds of millions of dollars spent for a coordinated election cheating organization? I am sure that they will have receipts showing that all the money was spent on coffee and donuts for the pole workers.

---

Seems like those "grants" were actual bribes to state and local election officials to violate state election laws, to me. All of the strings attached were specific requirements to do things not allowed by the election codes.

---

They weren't for refreshments for the poll workers? Another example where socialism makes the rich richer and gives everyone else not enough.

---

I don't know how much testimony you have watched but the Dem election workers were provided food, often at their work stations. Republican poll watchers/challengers had to leave the area to get anything to eat and were often locked out when they tried to come back in.

Open and blatant disregard for a fair and unbiased election.

Congratulations to the Democratic Party leadership, MSM and leftist progressives for performing massive election fraud in plain sight and the minions acceptance of their personal roles.

thirdcoast said:

---

I trust Zuckerberg more than Soros.

Zuckerberg testified to AOC that he thought it was bad to censor and good to expose lying. Soros would NEVER say that.

Also, in terms of staffing...how could it get any worse with DPS level gov workers screwing things up now.

---

Even if you are right, there is a slight flaw in that logic. To a congenital liar, why wouldn't Soros lie under oath and say whatever would work best?

Its like whatever promises Schumer may make. The Democratic leaders are the same ones that led the four year sedition. Calls for unity are by default lies.

This story infuriates me more than the election.

Troutslime said:

---

This story infuriates me more than the election.

---

It is amazing, isn't it? So much private money allowed to be dumped directly into how the election was conducted, right down to the counting of the votes.

And people were trying to stop it, trying hard and were turned away by the courts. You should be infuriated. Every law abiding American should be.

aggiehawg said:

---

Troutslime said:

---

This story infuriates me more than the election.

---

It is amazing, isn't it? So much private money allowed to be dumped directly into how the election was conducted, right down to the counting of the votes.

And people were trying to stop it, trying hard and were turned away by the courts. You should be infuriated. Every law abiding American should be.

---

I know better than to even ask this question, but what if any national media coverage is this receiving?

If we don't start fighting fire with fire, we'll never win another election

captkirk said:

---

If we don't start fighting fire with fire, we'll never win another election

---

That's why the 24 plaintiffs needs to see if they can stick together and use their "half the U.S.A." leverage to make D.C. (and MSM even) reform. Do it the same way the Left does, invent precedent by sheer demand and demonstration. Think of how CHAZ was formed.

Just start doing things. 24 states absolutely can.

The Amistad Project's Report. Basis for a lawsuit against Zuckerberg. LINK

A few pages but read the whole thing.

More:





IOW, there was federal money available for these purposes but local election officials could get "more" from Zuck's bribes.

aggiehawg said:

---

More:





IOW, there was federal money available for these purposes but local election officials could get "more" from Zuck's bribes.

---

Is anyone going to jail for this?

Maybe. Here's a video that describes the report.

aggiehawg said:

---

Maybe. Here's a video that describes the report.

---

Thanks