gonemaroon said:
what's the scale on that? what is 100?
bmks270 said:gonemaroon said:
what's the scale on that? what is 100?
It's normalized to the search volume.
Quote:
Each data point is divided by the total searches of the geography and time range it represents to compare relative popularity. Otherwise, places with the most search volume would always be ranked highest.
The resulting numbers are then scaled on a range of 0 to 100 based on a topic's proportion to all searches on all topics. Google Trends FAQs
Old_Ag_91 said:
Are these people just idiots? It's been clear from day one what Biden/Harris wanted to do with oil&gas. How naive can people be and still vote for them?
Some are, but a lot of them just don't consume anything outside of CNN, MSNBC, Daily Show, SNL, and they select highly filtered Twitter and Facebook feeds. Last night was probably the first time many of them had even heard about Hunter Biden's laptop. So they might be idiots, or they really might just not be aware of the Truman Show style reality they have locked themselves in.Old_Ag_91 said:
Are these people just idiots? It's been clear from day one what Biden/Harris wanted to do with oil&gas. How naive can people be and still vote for them?
Dem-CCP has been encouraging early voting. Don't ever vote for a communist/crook and it's not a big deal. Most states let folks vote in person and (supposedly) throw out the early vote if they mailed one in.nutmegger_aggie said:
not really encouraging to see a lot of people search for "change vote" based on a negative remark by Biden. That would indicate the vote has been cast already. Hopefully those people become advocates and change other votes prior to be cast.
this is why you dont encourage early vote
....and why I am a broken record about voting in person, on election day. (1) it has been good enough for a majority since our founding, (2) while not perfect, it is as close to 'fraud free' as we have. and (3) you get to see how the candidates handle facing each other in debates and having to answer questions rather than drop unchallenged campaign talking points.nutmegger_aggie said:
not really encouraging to see a lot of people search for "change vote" based on a negative remark by Biden. That would indicate the vote has been cast already. Hopefully those people become advocates and change other votes prior to be cast.
this is why you dont encourage early vote
Que Te Gusta Mas said:
What happened at 9:40 CST last night?
Also, looks like people slept on that "transition from the oil industry" comment and are realizing they really like being employed.
Quote:
According to voting laws in Connecticut, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, if you change your mind on who you wish to vote for, you can have a do-over.
That's incredibly good news. Some of those states are the exact ones Trump needs.richardag said:
Not sure if accurate but THIS LINK indicates in some states you can change your vote.Quote:
According to voting laws in Connecticut, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, if you change your mind on who you wish to vote for, you can have a do-over.
They need to be. This brand of media and entertainment culture has even been all but openly running interference for Marxism (look at Warner Brothers empowering the leader), the sworn enemy of free enterprise and capitalism. And they are all but directly sanctioning socialism, the train stop to communism.Reservoir Dog said:
What a beautiful post!
These people have buyers remorse before the purchase has even been completed!
I wonder how many of these voters are angry at the media for selling them a false bill of goods!
Que Te Gusta Mas said:
Joe getting out the vote.
OldArmyBrent said:
Can you imagine if somehow NY flipped? It would have to be a confluence of a bunch of ridiculously unlikely scenarios, but my god, the libs would lose it.
