bmks270 said:
Whose payroll are these people on?
Cassius said:
Right in time for Biden to use that line in the debate to dismiss the entire thing.
The damn laptop belongs to Hunter, that's a fact. The emails and texts are his. But yeah, Russia.
bmks270 said:
Whose payroll are these people on?
I hear you. Selective investigations. Our intelligence has no integrity.gig em 02 said:
"Former" intelligence, meanwhile current intelligence says it's not. They know Biden supporters aren't very smart and will repeat what they are told.
The laptop has been out for what, a week? They couldn't figure out Obama's Russian collusion hoax was fabricated in 3 years but they determined a laptop and files they have no access to was fake in 3 days?
That says it all.Quote:
former
Quote:
Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said in an interview on Monday said that Hunter Biden's laptop "is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign," amid claims from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff suggesting otherwise.
Current DNI Director TestifiesQuote:
He added: "Let me be clear: the intelligence community doesn't believe that because there is no intelligence that supports that. And we have shared no intelligence with Adam Schiff, or any member of Congress."
91AggieLawyer said:
In order for this to be true:
1. The computer shop guy has to be a Russian asset (VERY unlikely)
2. The computer itself has to be either bogus or a plant (already verified with Hunter's signature on drop off receipt)
3. The emails have to be fabricated (verified by those who sent/received them)
4. The pics can't be of Hunter (obviously they are) or are doctored (they aren't)
5. All of Joe, the campaign, and Hunter would have denied all of this (they haven't)
6. Rational, alternative explanations would abound -- e.g. alibis (none forthcoming; just silence)7. Media wouldn't be running interference but would get actual evidence
Yeah, that last one is a stretch. But you get the idea.
Hey guys you remember my thread from over the weekend?Jmiller said:91AggieLawyer said:
In order for this to be true:
1. The computer shop guy has to be a Russian asset (VERY unlikely)
2. The computer itself has to be either bogus or a plant (already verified with Hunter's signature on drop off receipt)
3. The emails have to be fabricated (verified by those who sent/received them)
4. The pics can't be of Hunter (obviously they are) or are doctored (they aren't)
5. All of Joe, the campaign, and Hunter would have denied all of this (they haven't)
6. Rational, alternative explanations would abound -- e.g. alibis (none forthcoming; just silence)7. Media wouldn't be running interference but would get actual evidence
Yeah, that last one is a stretch. But you get the idea.
Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, decides to fly 3000 miles across country, to drop off 3 MacBook Pros at a repair shop run by a blind guy who can't identify hunter by his appearance and charges the insanely low price of $85.
He gets off the plane and drives his cracked up self to the repair shop (because there aren't repair shops in LA). He drops them off, signs a contract for repair and then disappears. The repair shop owner recovers and reads Hunter's private emails, a few of which mention a possible meeting with his dad and is so alarmed, he contacts the FBI.
The FBI arranges to pick up the hard drives, but the computer repair shop owner takes a totally normal step of copying them. Once he realizes the FBI isn't doing anything with them, he calls up the most credible ex-Mayor on Earth that has had meetings with Russian intelligence agents and hands them the contents of these drives.
That totally credible ex-Mayor sits on them for months, then chooses to release them 3 weeks before the election. The mainstream media asks to independently verify their validity but said ex-Mayor does what all people trying to prove facts do and ignores these requests. A tabloid ends up being the only one willing to publish but the writer wouldn't sign his own work.
Do I have it right? Got him?
Jmiller said:91AggieLawyer said:
In order for this to be true:
1. The computer shop guy has to be a Russian asset (VERY unlikely)
2. The computer itself has to be either bogus or a plant (already verified with Hunter's signature on drop off receipt)
3. The emails have to be fabricated (verified by those who sent/received them)
4. The pics can't be of Hunter (obviously they are) or are doctored (they aren't)
5. All of Joe, the campaign, and Hunter would have denied all of this (they haven't)
6. Rational, alternative explanations would abound -- e.g. alibis (none forthcoming; just silence)7. Media wouldn't be running interference but would get actual evidence
Yeah, that last one is a stretch. But you get the idea.
Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, decides to fly 3000 miles across country, to drop off 3 MacBook Pros at a repair shop run by a blind guy who can't identify hunter by his appearance and charges the insanely low price of $85.
He gets off the plane and drives his cracked up self to the repair shop (because there aren't repair shops in LA). He drops them off, signs a contract for repair and then disappears. The repair shop owner recovers and reads Hunter's private emails, a few of which mention a possible meeting with his dad and is so alarmed, he contacts the FBI.
The FBI arranges to pick up the hard drives, but the computer repair shop owner takes a totally normal step of copying them. Once he realizes the FBI isn't doing anything with them, he calls up the most credible ex-Mayor on Earth that has had meetings with Russian intelligence agents and hands them the contents of these drives.
That totally credible ex-Mayor sits on them for months, then chooses to release them 3 weeks before the election. The mainstream media asks to independently verify their validity but said ex-Mayor does what all people trying to prove facts do and ignores these requests. A tabloid ends up being the only one willing to publish but the writer wouldn't sign his own work.
Do I have it right? Got him?