Things Are Heating Up: Jason Whitlock vs. Kayce Smith

60,846 Views | 384 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Coach_Fran
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jason Whitlock has been making headlines lately over his outspokenness against Big Tech and racism in America. Now that he has taken his job at Outkick his platform has been amplified and he's starting to speak his mind for than when he was at FS1 and before.



Kayce Smith initially called out Whitlock for his opinions on Maria Taylor and Katie Nolan.







It looks like Whitlock will eventually be coming on Smith's show on Barstool.

I know Kayce is an Aggie but it seems like she has gotten more liberal the longer she's been at Barstool and it's hard to agree with her on a lot.

I don't 100% agree with Whitlock but he seems like a voice of reason lately especially against liberal media narratives being pushed on us.

Also, here's KS for your time:

bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Isn't she on Barstool Sports? That site is trash.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be accepted at face value.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's Whitlock speaking this week at the House Judiciary Committee on Big Tech:

Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whitlock has been on a T E A R lately.

Lol at these *******!
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm in the conservative corner - regardless if they are an Aggie or not. So I guess I'll be in Whitlock's side here.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only names I recognized were Kayce's and Whitlock's (and portnoy). Sounds like media types who benefit from a public debate over a bunch of stuff in terms of clicks/views etc. I'd expect Whitlock to thoroughly win, as it's been pretty obvious Barstool has been hiring women/doing stuff basically to be their version of the Murdoch anchorette profile, but meh, don't care.
Daddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
of course he's right. But so is why Fox News Has hot Gals

Ainsley Earhardt gives her opinion. Is it to the level of a Tucker Carlson or Bill or Greta or whoever

but people like attractive people on TV. Absolutely.

Men just assume see an attractive woman on TV talking to Nick Saban as me, because Nick's not going to say anything on the sidelines.

You know Nick, I'm noticing your defense is giving up the big play vs the pass. What adjustments are you going to make.

you know Nick, your safeties in Cover 2 are getting exploited vs the slots because they are 6'3 225 pounds and they can't run vs the 4.4 slots. To you wish you recruited smaller safeties that are more built like corners so you don't give up big play vs big play?

Which one is going to work?
Aggies1322
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately, she's far outmatched by Whitlock - intellectually speaking. Im afraid she probably shouldn't be asking to have a conversation with someone who can run circles around her.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its cute that Kayce is arguing whether someone got hired for their looks.
good nuggets
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kayce might just want to sit this one out.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jason is clearly the more intelligent person and on the right side of the argument but I worry that Kayce will just talk over him and whine before he can articulate his points.
JR Ewingford
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ya she should probably shut up on this one. Good luck.
RikkiTikkaTagem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kayce, Katie and most female journalist in video media only get a chance to get their start because of their looks. It doesn't mean they only got their jobs because of only their looks. They have talent too, but if they were ugly they wouldn't have the job. They fact they argue this shows how ****ed up their train of thought is. Can't stand when these people who deny it.
Bag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meh, she is a below average talent with average looks.

I can remember a day when sports were fun, now they are just another vehicle to divide people.

c-jags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jason went after Benjamin Watson this week, which I don't love. No need for Watson to defend Maria Taylor here. While, i don't agree with Watson entirely on the basis of BLM and Race issues, that dude loves Jesus and has been the most outspoken pro-life athlete I've ever seen. Watson tweet at Whitlock was pretty immature from his normal stances.

I'd love for them to get on and do a podcast together because they're both Christians and both believe in the power of family to heal a lot of racial divide.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whitlock going to destroy Trevor Lawrence.
HartWorm93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I find Kayce annoying.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shots fired.

JohnnyStatueNow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Olin's Illegitimate Son That He Doesn't Know About
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I met Kayce at A&M a few times when she was a student. This is sort of hilarious seeing this exchange.

Whoever said she should sit this one out is probably right. Whitlock is a machine.
aggie appraiser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cromagnum said:

Its cute that Kayce is arguing whether someone got hired for their looks.
Hilarious.

Kayce needs to put on 20 pounds and see what happens to her job prospects.

Corn Pop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hmm, must be why there are so many ugos as sideline reporters asking riveting questions.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Found this relevant.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kayce should definitely sit this one out. She's not bright enough to get the facts straight.

Whitlock is 100% accurate on Katie Nolan. She's a terrible commentator and if she weren't cute she would never have the success she's had handed to her. Everybody out there gets the deal though, good looking people get gigs on TV that a smarter, funnier, more insightful person who is not attractive will get. Particularly women. We all accept that. The issue is that Nolan isn't self-aware enough to understand she's had the success she's had because she's relatively hot.

Frankly, Kayce is in the same vein as Nolan. If she weren't pretty hot she wouldn't have the success she's had. Have some self-awareness.

Maria Taylor is a little different. In addition to being hot she's really good at her job (usually). However, Whitlock is dead-on accurate in his criticism. It's not remotely sexist to hold her to the same standards as her male counterparts which is all Whitlock has done. In fact, it's sexist to not hold her to the same standards.

The idea it's sexist to call out these facts and hold these commentators accountable or criticize them is patently absurd.
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Poster said:

Jason is clearly the more intelligent person and on the right side of the argument but I worry that Kayce will just talk over him and whine before he can articulate his points.


She can because her listeners are half drunk frat boys that spent the night before butt chugging 5 gallons of boxed wine, being intellectual isn't a job requirement for her.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be accepted at face value.
The Shank Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kayce is homegrown. Aggie, TexAgs employee turned sideline reporter turned show host, and a cancer survivor. For that I am glad she is in her position as she regularly is talking up the school and is a good representative.

In this matter, she is barking up the wrong tree for no reason. Leave it alone Kayce.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anybody else find it funny that Kayce "apologized for having boobs" when she clearly paid good money for them?
Verne Lundquist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think last year she talked down on recruiting websites. I don't remember if it was on the rundown or stool scenes

All I remember is thinking, woah she started her career on Texags and now is going after dudes whose job it is to contact teenagers? Wtf is up with that?
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cromagnum said:

Shots fired.




Savage truth
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kayce will get destroyed if this debate happens, but lucky for her, Whitlock is hated in the media so she will be praised for "fighting back"

Whitlock will be called sexist and it is very possible that Kayce is forced to use that attack when Whitlock is berating her with facts.

She is very good at hosting shows and fits in at Barstool because she isn't overly sensitive. Debate is not one of her strengths and this could get very ugly.

Idk whether she started out as a conservative and became more liberal after moving to ESPN/Boston/NYC, but she, at a minimum, feels the need to act as liberal as she can to fit in and keep from being a target of the Twitter machine.
aggie appraiser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GCP12 said:


Idk whether she started out as a conservative and became more liberal after moving to ESPN/Boston/NYC, but she, at a minimum, feels the need to act as liberal as she can to fit in and keep from being a target of the Twitter machine.

It's difficult for one without intellectual firepower to overcome the emotional arguments put forth by the left....

especially when they can get you fired in a nanosecond.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jason Whitlock rn.

Matt Hooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dear Kayce - never apologize for being young and attractive. There is nothing wrong with that, in fact it is a blessing. Enjoy it and make the most of the opportunities it may bring. Unfortunately youth and beauty are not enduring; simple fact of life if your are lucky enough to enjoy a long and healthy life.

Second - that you, and some other ladies in your profession have careers accelerated others less attractive or possibly male do not have is provably true. Again - nothing to apologize for, embrace it. Don't run from it or diminish it. Instead say, Yes, and appreciate the blessing and opportunity you have at this point in your life and work every day to make the most of this time to develop your skillset to be the best you can be at in your profession today, and better tomorrow.

Third - it's human and natural to be drawn to youth and beauty. That is normal. It's the perverse group think at this moment in time that is not normal, that people should apologize for something good they have that others may not possess. You are not a fabrication being forced on the market, you are in demand by the market.

Imagine Usain Bold having to apologize for being fast. What would his life be life if he were the same in all regards except speed? Does he have speed privilege? Answer - Absolutely he does. Good for him and good of him for maximizing his talent. Is he always going to have world class speed. No.

Be you without apology or guilt.




Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably the most sensible thing posted on Texags. Maybe ever.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.