Rehashing a news article from October.
So what? Why isn't there a call by dims for Parnas to testify?Chance Chase McMasters said:
October 2: Trump arranged a legal umbrella to keep Fruman and Parnas from complying with subpoenas. Then 8 days later said "I don't know him". Yesterday, Trump repeats "I don't know who this man is".
Trump's attorney Jay Sekulow:
John Dowd's subpoena response to congress:linkQuote:
Be advised that Messrs. Parnas and Fruman assisted Mr. Giuliani in connection with his representation of President Trump. Mr. Parnas and Mr. Fruman have also been represented by Mr. Giuliani in connection with their personal and business affairs. They also assisted Joseph DiGenova and Victoria Toensing in their law practice. Thus, certain information you seek in your September 30, 2019, letter is protected by the attorney-client, attorney work product and other privileges.
Trump is responsible for the actions of Giuliani, Fruman, and Parnas in Ukraine. They were there representing his personal interests, with his knowledge, at his direction.
Giuliani requests a meeting with President Zelensky. He notes he represents Trump's personal interests:
I cant wait to bump every single post you have made in the last three years. You, of course, wont be around, but Ill still enjoy it.MetoliusAg said:
The only way it could get even funnier is if Trump asks Pam Bondi, Mark Levin, and Alexander Acosta to join his Impeachment trial defense team.
One thing being missed is that nice little tidbit in the signature line about the handling of the email and/or contents/documents...aginlakeway said:
Unsure how that proves anything that will lead to Trump being removed.
What am I missing?
MetoliusAg said:
The only way it could get even funnier is if Trump asks Pam Bondi, Mark Levin, and Alexander Acosta to join his Impeachment trial defense team.
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.MetoliusAg said:
The only way it could get even funnier is if Trump asks Pam Bondi, Mark Levin, and Alexander Acosta to join his Impeachment trial defense team.
Chance Chase McMasters said:
October 2: Trump arranged a legal umbrella to keep Fruman and Parnas from complying with subpoenas. Then 8 days later said "I don't know him". Yesterday, Trump repeats "I don't know who this man is".
#AnyDayNowAggiebrewer said:
Got him?
More solid than anything you or your alter-egos have posted.Chance Chase McMasters said:
Solid legal analysis. Would read again.
Quote:
So what? Why isn't there a call by dims for Parnas to testify?
So why didn't they take it to the SC to compel him to testify?Chance Chase McMasters said:Quote:
So what? Why isn't there a call by dims for Parnas to testify?
They subpoenaed him 3 months ago. Trump blocked it. If Republicans allow witnesses we'll hear from him.
Quote:
So why didn't they take it to the SC to compel him to testify?
Quote:
Of course you would follow that group on Twitter.
They suffer from TDS as bad as you do.
Chance Chase McMasters said:
Why are you on this thread if you don't want to discuss the topic?
But, he said that he had tapes of him and Trump talking!.Quote:
In the interview with The Times, Mr. Parnas said that although he did not speak with Mr. Trump directly about the efforts, he met with the president on several occasions and was told by Mr. Giuliani that Mr. Trump was kept in the loop.
Chance Chase McMasters said:
Why are you on this thread if you don't want to discuss the topic?
No, screw that. You can't come on here and spew lies and not be expected to have the truth thrown back in your face.Rockdoc said:
Be easy. Gary's having a rough day.
FriscoKid said:No, screw that. You can't come on here and spew lies and not be expected to have the truth thrown back in your face.Rockdoc said:
Be easy. Gary's having a rough day.