Now we know why Raskind is there and not Nadler. Raskind wasn't in the loop on how Schiff obtained the phone call records of Nunes, et. al. So he can't answer the questions about how those were obtained and why they were produced in the way that they were.
***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****
947,528 Views |
9220 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
Well as October showed, it would be pretty small compared to the pro-Trump element.FriscoKid said:
I really want to wear my new santa MAGA hat to an impeachment rally tomorrow night. Wonder if Dallas is having one.
aggiehawg said:
Now we know why Raskind is there and not Nadler. Raskind wasn't in the loop on how Schiff obtained the phone call records of Nunes, et. al. So he can't answer the questions about how those were obtained and why they were produced in the way that they were.
It's complete bull**** that Schiff avoided testifying in front of the Judiciary Committee, and now Nadler is avoiding today. It's so easy to see through. They're avoiding certain questions by using these witnesses that don't have knowledge of all the facts.
Neither Schiff nor Nadler can go before the rules committee because they have both broken rules to get to this point?aggiehawg said:
Now we know why Raskind is there and not Nadler. Raskind wasn't in the loop on how Schiff obtained the phone call records of Nunes, et. al. So he can't answer the questions about how those were obtained and why they were produced in the way that they were.
Can't hide from a Federal Subpoena when it goes to trial
"Continuous taunting of China" ----- interesting. What has always stood out is the Democrats only talk about Russia. Now in the one case here it, is in a defensive mode.Quote:
If whoever wrote that tripe doesn't have tenure somewhere, I'll be shocked.
Yes, many democrats know they are screwed in 2020 unless they can remove Trump before the election.
Too bad they have no actual crimes to impeach him. So they get to impeach on made up nonsense!
Too bad they have no actual crimes to impeach him. So they get to impeach on made up nonsense!
aggiehawg said:
Now we know why Raskind is there and not Nadler. Raskind wasn't in the loop on how Schiff obtained the phone call records of Nunes, et. al. So he can't answer the questions about how those were obtained and why they were produced in the way that they were.
They were discovered on the call records of Parnas, under indictment, and Giuliani, under investigation. They didn't tap Nunes' phone.
The transcript was so bad, Schiff had to completely fabricate everything it contained when describing it
"Parody."
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
Shorter: Pelosi, Soros, and Steyer are making sure I get paiiiiiiiiiidMetoliusAg said:
Quote:
Ryan Fournier
@RyanAFournier
10m
BREAKING: Mitch McConnell just said that the Senate will dismiss impeachment after opening arguments.
Take that, Dems.
So, is Nancy really going to go through with the farce tomorrow?
Libs have been running with Forest Gump for a long time. MCConnell just told them he was tired and going to go home. I imagine them standing in the road with a WTF took on their game.
Yes have you read the articles of impeachment? How many federal laws are cited?
MetoliusAg said:
Thanks for the free house seat pickup. Between that and the record fundraising I hope you guys try this again before next November.
Yes impeaching to remove a president for not breaking a law, a year before a new election is truly patriotic.
Just so we're clear: feelings trump logic now?
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
And the republicans are saving the country from a completely partisan impeachment.
Seems to be bipartisan support for voting against impeachment. Why if this is a slam dunk case isn't their bipartisan support for impeachment?
Seems to be bipartisan support for voting against impeachment. Why if this is a slam dunk case isn't their bipartisan support for impeachment?
Riding the progressive virtue signaling rocket all the way to the crash site. You have to be impressed with that magnitude of "self delusions of grandeur".
You said you'd keep the House in 2018, too.Quote:
We hope more in her position do the same. We will retake the house with ease at this rate.
MetoliusAg said:You said you'd keep the House in 2018, too.Quote:
We hope more in her position do the same. We will retake the house with ease at this rate.
It was won on the backs of fake moderates playing the "I won't be a Pelosi pawn" card in trump districts.
That doesn't seem to have been true.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/16/ukrainian-oligarch-paid-700000-to-the-husband-of-a-house-judiciary-committee-democrat/
Anybody know about this Florida district? Could this be enough to cost Debbie Mucarsel-Powell her seat?
Anybody know about this Florida district? Could this be enough to cost Debbie Mucarsel-Powell her seat?
Bo Darville said:MetoliusAg said:You said you'd keep the House in 2018, too.Quote:
We hope more in her position do the same. We will retake the house with ease at this rate.
It was won on the backs of fake moderates playing the "I won't be a Pelosi pawn" card in trump districts.
That doesn't seem to have been true.
It was also won with ballot harvesting in Cali. Hopefully the Rs are up for the task this time. Ballot harvest the hell out of the state and we turn the House over easily.
All impeachment is going to get you is a democrat switching parties, lots of "moderates" in a huge hole in trump districts during a presidential election year, and a massive funding gap. I truly hope it was worth it.
Congrats. I truly mean that.
Congrats. I truly mean that.
TCag2007
Another Interesting Thing From Elko That Went Under The Radar Monday
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
97
Ag pride
Another Interesting Thing From Elko That Went Under The Radar Monday
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
57