Jimmy Valentine said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

For someone that has a "job," you spend an inordinate amount of time on TexAgs. Maybe you're a lawyer, like me? Or, maybe, it's a slow day at McDonalds?

---

I'm a CPA

---

(pats head)

Jimmy/Gary working hard on the talking point downloads. Should've been a witness!

Pinche Abogado said:

---

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

For someone that has a "job," you spend an inordinate amount of time on TexAgs. Maybe you're a lawyer, like me? Or, maybe, it's a slow day at McDonalds?

---

I'm a CPA

---

(pats head)

---

(pats head back for being a lawyer)

Rockdoc said:

---

Jimmy/Gary working hard on the talking point downloads. Should've been a witness!

---

Who's Gary?

A CPA busy trolling TexAgs instead of working with his clients on year-end planning and advisory. In the word's of our Dear Leader, I would call you and let you know "You're Fired".

Jimmy Valentine is quickly turning into more of an irritant than the other trolls. Remained convinced this is someone with the site host trying to annoy enough people that you buy stars to use the ignore function.

Valentine brings nothing new to this. It really needs to move along and get back to work.

flown-the-coop said:

---

A CPA busy trolling TexAgs instead of working with his clients on year-end planning and advisory. In the word's of our Dear Leader, I would call you and let you know "You're Fired".

Jimmy Valentine is quickly turning into more of an irritant than the other trolls. Remained convinced this is someone with the site host trying to annoy enough people that you buy stars to use the ignore function.

Valentine brings nothing new to this. It really needs to move along and get back to work.

---

Why is it that my posts with sources to back them are considered Trolling? Are you upset simply because I bring a different view point to this board?

I don't do taxes, I work in industry.

Out of context, and you cite to fake news.

Pinche Abogado said:

---

Out of context, and you cite to fake news.

---

Which source do you have an issue with? I can try to find another one more suitable for you.

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

A CPA busy trolling TexAgs instead of working with his clients on year-end planning and advisory. In the word's of our Dear Leader, I would call you and let you know "You're Fired".

Jimmy Valentine is quickly turning into more of an irritant than the other trolls. Remained convinced this is someone with the site host trying to annoy enough people that you buy stars to use the ignore function.

Valentine brings nothing new to this. It really needs to move along and get back to work.

---

Why is it that my posts with sources to back them are considered Trolling? Are you upset simply because I bring a different view point to this board?

I don't do taxes, I work in industry.

---

So you are an accountant? If you are a MD but do not practice medicine, you don't watch someone sneeze and say "well, I am a doctor". If you are a lawyer who doesn't practice law, I dont' want your legal counsel. And when you try and counteract some calling you out for time spend posting, you do not try and throw a credential down to try and legitimize yourself. Its why you got called out and should continue to be called out.

And your boss should make you get back to work and not misappropriating company resources (or time) to spew political nonsense.

You don't bring a different view, you just regurgitate the same nonsense talking points of MSM that the other trolls do. And yes, when you post the utter keyboard defecation that has tied up this topic for the better part of the day, then you need to move along.

Again, move along.

Billy Ray Valentine is more credible.

Lol!

Great Movie!

Quite frankly, anything directly reported from sources with first hand knowledge (not opinion).

Trump's biggest lie is that I'd get tired of winning - He was wrong

captkirk said:

---

Trump's biggest lie is that I'd get tired of winning - He was wrong

---

I am nowhere near satisfied.

The Constitution dictates that impeachment shall NOT be PARTISAN. Yet, AOC, & Rep. Green have BOTH OPENLY stated that the President MUST be impeached before the next election because they're afraid he'll be reelected.
Are there no measures in place to stop this brazen, illegal coup?

pdc093 said:

---

The Constitution dictates that impeachment shall NOT be PARTISAN. Yet, AOC, & Rep. Green have BOTH OPENLY stated that the President MUST be impeached before the next election because they're afraid he'll be reelected.
Are there no measures in place to stop this brazen, illegal coup?

---

Don't worry, Pelosi said it's not a partisan impeachment because the republicans are not being true to their constitutional duty.

pdc093 said:

---

The Constitution dictates that impeachment shall NOT be PARTISAN. Yet, AOC, & Rep. Green have BOTH OPENLY stated that the President MUST be impeached before the next election because they're afraid he'll be reelected.
Are there no measures in place to stop this brazen, illegal coup?

---

Here is what the constitution says about Impeachment:

Article 1, Section 2 of the United States Constitution:

The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article 1, Section 3 of the United States Constitution:

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

I don't see anything about it not being Partisan.

txaggie_08 said:

---

pdc093 said:

---

The Constitution dictates that impeachment shall NOT be PARTISAN. Yet, AOC, & Rep. Green have BOTH OPENLY stated that the President MUST be impeached before the next election because they're afraid he'll be reelected.
Are there no measures in place to stop this brazen, illegal coup?

---

Don't worry, Pelosi said it's not a partisan impeachment because the republicans are not being true to their constitutional duty.

---

More than 500 law professors sign letter saying Trump committed impeachable conduct.

https://medium.com/@legalscholarsonimpeachment/letter-to-congress-from-legal-scholars-6c18b5b6d116

Includes 4 Texas A&M Law School Professors:
Huyen Pham - Professor
Srividhya Ragavan - Professor of Law
Lynne Rambo - Professor of Law
Malinda Seymore - Professor of Law

Looks like we have our share of idiots.

Congratulations on polling lib lawyers

Are you talking about Texas Wesleyan
?

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

More than 500 law professors sign letter saying Trump committed impeachable conduct.

https://medium.com/@legalscholarsonimpeachment/letter-to-congress-from-legal-scholars-6c18b5b6d116

Includes 4 Texas A&M Law School Professors:
Huyen Pham - Professor
Srividhya Ragavan - Professor of Law
Lynne Rambo - Professor of Law
Malinda Seymore - Professor of Law

---

Thanks for posting these idiots names.

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

More than 500 law professors sign letter saying Trump committed impeachable conduct.

https://medium.com/@legalscholarsonimpeachment/letter-to-congress-from-legal-scholars-6c18b5b6d116

Includes 4 Texas A&M Law School Professors:
Huyen Pham - Professor
Srividhya Ragavan - Professor of Law
Lynne Rambo - Professor of Law
Malinda Seymore - Professor of Law

---

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

More than 500 law professors sign letter saying Trump committed impeachable conduct.

https://medium.com/@legalscholarsonimpeachment/letter-to-congress-from-legal-scholars-6c18b5b6d116

Includes 4 Texas A&M Law School Professors:
Huyen Pham - Professor
Srividhya Ragavan - Professor of Law
Lynne Rambo - Professor of Law
Malinda Seymore - Professor of Law

---

And not a single one of them heard from a witness that had first hand knowledge of a bribe or saw any document proving guilt. Strange. They are willing to convict on hearsay and assumption.

Do you have a point with all this lib news?

Cow Hop Ag said:

---

Looks like we have our share of idiots.

---

Tommy Curry

Wildcat said:

---

Are you talking about Texas Wesleyan
?

---

Yes, a 5th rate law school.

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

More than 500 law professors sign letter saying Trump committed impeachable conduct.

https://medium.com/@legalscholarsonimpeachment/letter-to-congress-from-legal-scholars-6c18b5b6d116

Includes 4 Texas A&M Law School Professors:
Huyen Pham - Professor
Srividhya Ragavan - Professor of Law
Lynne Rambo - Professor of Law
Malinda Seymore - Professor of Law

---

How are those professors registered to vote?

Quote:

---

And not a single one of them heard from a witness that had first hand knowledge of a bribe or saw any document proving guilt. Strange. They are willing to convict on hearsay and assumption.

---

Assuming facts not in evidence. There is a lot of projection in their screed both as to events that have not occurred and motives that are unknown. Orange Man Bad so eventually he will do something bad so we need to stop that from happening, blah, blah, blah.

Laughing at "Lock him up"? She seems like an objective legal voice.

redline248 said:

---

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

More than 500 law professors sign letter saying Trump committed impeachable conduct.

https://medium.com/@legalscholarsonimpeachment/letter-to-congress-from-legal-scholars-6c18b5b6d116

Includes 4 Texas A&M Law School Professors:
Huyen Pham - Professor
Srividhya Ragavan - Professor of Law
Lynne Rambo - Professor of Law
Malinda Seymore - Professor of Law

---

How are those professors registered to vote?

---

Are they all Con Law professors?

What again was the point of the latest hearing, to show that our elected Congressmen need to be educated on the Constitution?