Is Donald J. Trump STILL the POTUS? AFAF

Those numbers confuse me.

The impeachment is an obvious party hack by the left. How could anyone who is 'independent' really be for it if they weren't of the same frame of mind. I know there is information out there which says a few republicans are for it, but I just assume that they are confused altogether.

oops.

Polls, schmolls

Everyone has a poll!

Nunes and Castor continued to step on rakes today The lawyer on The Simpsons, Lionel Hutz, was better than these two at cross examination.

MetoliusAg said:

---

Nunes and Castor continued to step on rakes today The lawyer on The Simpsons, Lionel Hutz, was better than these two at cross examination.

---

More assumptions. Not facts. Making assumptions makes an ass out of me and you.

Wow

1872walker said:

---

Wow

---

She sounds like she's had a few strokes.

Spotted Ag said:

---

I REALLY thought they had him but alas...


It's 8:38 AM on November 21, 2019 and Donald J. Trump is STILL the POTUS...




and Jeffrey Epstein STILL didn't kill himself.

---

Nunes asks first year lawyer questions. Everything is a "getcha" question

hbtheduce said:

---

She just admitted to the dem playbook of the past 30 years

If dems want it - its bipartisan
If Reps want it - its partisan

Thanks for the transparency nancy.

---

Yep. I'm still waiting for the last bill that was actually "bipartisan" that wasn't conservatives just cowtowing to liberals. Please show me one bill, ever, that was liberals proposing something and then working with conservatives to establish a compromise.

Nancy is a got damn Patriot.

Something about if your friend jumps off a bridge.......

And now we have come full circle back to quid pro quo Must have gone back to another focus group.

Silent For Too Long said:

---

Poor Met.

A whole day's worth of testimony and that's all the drive by talking points he was delivered.

Pretty good sign things didn't work out for the Dems today.

---

That and all the broadcast networks dropped live coverage shortly after they returned from the vote.

Shameful commentary aimed at American patriots who came forward as witnesses in the impeachment proceedings from two well known tv show hosts / news correspondents of rightwing cable tv news channel One America News Network.

Jack Posobiec is a Republican Party operative, an OANN host, and a Lincoln Fellow at the rightwing Claremont Institute, and Emerald Robinson is OANN's chief WH correspondent:

MetoliusAg said:

---

Shameful commentary aimed at American patriots who came forward as witnesses in the impeachment proceedings from two well known tv show hosts / news correspondents of rightwing cable tv news channel One America News Network.

Jack Posobiec is a Republican Party operative, an OANN host, and a Lincoln Fellow at the rightwing Claremont Institute, and Emerald Robinson is OANN's chief WH correspondent:

---

Sounds like someone might be pro-foreign interference in impeachment...

aggiehawg said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

Poor Met.

A whole day's worth of testimony and that's all the drive by talking points he was delivered.

Pretty good sign things didn't work out for the Dems today.

---

That and all the broadcast networks dropped live coverage shortly after they returned from the vote.

---

All the "No" as the answer to very pointed questions about this whole farce didn't help at all.

There's just nothing here, at the most, some moments of poor judgement.

4stringAg said:

---

Interesting how this word "patriot" made its way into the Dem lexicon in this matter. It's clearly been distributed as a talking point because we have the media, Pelosi, Schiff and other Dems and Metolius in his troll posts.

These people are not patriots but butthurt bureaucratic lifers who think they run the show.

---

Excellent topic for an RNC ad in the coming months. At least I'd like to see it!

EX-DOJ prosecutor Joyce Vance is looking at the bribery and extortion case, and asking aloud the same "elephant in the room" question most Americans have:

"Why are Trump's chief subordinates -- all who have now been implicated by Sondland and Hill -- refusing to be questioned by Congress and give sworn testimony if they and Trump are innocent?"

MetoliusAg said:

---

EX-DOJ prosecutor Joyce Vance is looking at the bribery and extortion case, and asking aloud the same "elephant in the room" question most Americans have:

"Why are Trump's chief subordinates -- all who have now been implicated by Sondland and Hill -- refusing to be questioned by Congress and give sworn testimony if they and Trump are innocent?"

---

Meanwhile the Senate was reported today to be making preparations for a quick 2 week trial.

Enjoy it all now I guess.

4stringAg said:

---

Interesting how this word "patriot" made its way into the Dem lexicon in this matter. It's clearly been distributed as a talking point because we have the media, Pelosi, Schiff and other Dems and Metolius in his troll posts.

These people are not patriots but butthurt bureaucratic lifers who think they run the show.

---

Reminds me of the old story when a new husband asks his wife why she cuts off the end of the Easter Ham before cooking. Her response, "Because my Mom always did."

Undeterred the new husband then asks his MIL why she cut off the end of the Easter Ham. Her response, "Because my Mom always did."

So he goes to Grand Ma with the same question. Her response, "So it would fit in the roasting pan I had."

There are often dumb reasons for bureaucratic protocol that outlast their necessity but no one knows how they got started. "But that's the way we have always done it!" "Why?" "I don't know!"