Bigoted racists, right?MetoliusAg said:I understand people like you and Bo perfectly.Quote:
And even though you have been reminded of it constantly, you still don't understand that we will continue to vote for the guy most likely to destroy everything you and your party stand for
Since when does "clear and overwhelming evidence" matter to Dems????? Sure as hell doesn't matter to Schiff and his merry band of idiots.MetoliusAg said:
... the prosecution's evidence was clear and overwhelming, and the defense had nothing substantive nor material to counter it with. Count #3 iirc was the only charge that a some MSM courtroom observers and lawyers thought might go in Stone's favor.
Another longtime close associate of President Trump convicted of multiple felonies.
MetoliusAg said:
Even though we have been reminded of it constantly for the past 3 years by Trump and his sycophants, it is still amazing to observe how far the Republican Party has voluntarily and quite deliberately chosen to lower itself. Here's Don Jr showing it again:
Thank, that's a good reminder. I sometimes forget that many rightwingers don't seek or consume news outside of a few RWM news outlets.BMX Bandit said:as a general rule, when you say "Even _________ says ...."Quote:
Even Chuck Rosenberg is disgusted by Trump's repugnant smears of Ambassador Yovanovitch and SecState Pompeo's cowardice and base servility.
the person in the blank should be someone people have heard of
I don't hate Rosenberg. I don't know who he is or care what he thinks. I'm indifferent to RosenbergMetoliusAg said:
Most prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys over the age of 30 know who Chuck Rosenberg is. Well-known longtime DOJ attny. Trump supporters apparently hate Rosenberg for the same litmus test reasons they excoriate Yovanovitch, Kent, Taylor, Vindman, and anyone else in government who places country and patriotism above subservience to Trump.
MetoliusAg said:
Most prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys over the age of 30 know who Chuck Rosenberg is. Well-known longtime DOJ attny. Trump supporters apparently hate Rosenberg for the same litmus test reasons they excoriate Yovanovitch, Kent, Taylor, Vindman, and anyone else in government who places country and patriotism above subservience to Trump.
You have the USA confused with some other country. There was a revolution here against the British king; it formally began in 1776. We subsequently won that war. We haven't been subjects to a monarch or king for 243 years. Hth.Cassius said:MetoliusAg said:
Even though we have been reminded of it constantly for the past 3 years by Trump and his sycophants, it is still amazing to observe how far the Republican Party has voluntarily and quite deliberately chosen to lower itself. Here's Don Jr showing it again:
They should be subjected to more than firing, if there were any justice. Traitors and subversives.
MetoliusAg said:
Another bad day in the impeachment hearings for Trump. Quite a few own goals netted by Trump, Trump Jr, and the pro-Trump questioners.
Biggest questions raised in today's testimony, imo:
-- Why did Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani + Trump associates Parnas and Fruman + four others (DiGenova, Toensing, Pete Sessions, and the indicted oligarch Firtash) engage in a despicable and completely false smear campaign against the extremely effective, competent, uber-patriotic anti-corruption USA ambassador to Ukraine?
-- Why did those 6 Americans -- all 6 are connected to Trump -- work so hard to meddle, discredit and undermine the USA's anti-corruption foreign policies in Ukraine?
Hopefully the SDNY's criminal investigation into Parnas, Fruman, and Giuliani will provide some answers.
backintexas2013 said:
He doesn't respond. Then he says he can't respond because the moderators told him not to.
Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.hbtheduce said:
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter. Firing an ambassador is well within the purview of the president.
MetoliusAg said:Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.hbtheduce said:
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter. Firing an ambassador is well within the purview of the president.
MetoliusAg said:Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.hbtheduce said:
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter. Firing an ambassador is well within the purview of the president.
Rapier108 said:MetoliusAg said:Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.hbtheduce said:
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter. Firing an ambassador is well within the purview of the president.
I'm sure you've already done it, but now you've "jumped the shark" or whatever term means that you've gone so far you can never come back. You've lost, again.Quote:
MetoliusAg said:
Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.
This is why no one on this board takes you seriously.MetoliusAg said:
Another bad day in the impeachment hearings for Trump. Quite a few own goals netted by Trump, Trump Jr, and the pro-Trump questioners.
Biggest questions raised in today's testimony, imo:
-- Why did Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani + Trump associates Parnas and Fruman + four others (DiGenova, Toensing, Pete Sessions, and the indicted oligarch Firtash) engage in a despicable and completely false smear campaign against the extremely effective, competent, uber-patriotic anti-corruption USA ambassador to Ukraine?
-- Why did those 6 Americans -- all 6 are connected to Trump -- work so hard to meddle, discredit and undermine the USA's anti-corruption foreign policies in Ukraine?
Hopefully the SDNY's criminal investigation into Parnas, Fruman, and Giuliani will provide some answers.
MetoliusAg said:Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.hbtheduce said:
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter. Firing an ambassador is well within the purview of the president.
backintexas2013 said:
That chick that almost cried is well respected. Same with CPL and Ford.
Wildcat said:backintexas2013 said:
That chick that almost cried is well respected. Same with CPL and Ford.
Why are the leftists glomming on to these people? After embarrassing themselves repeatedly, why not just stop and save a little dignity?
Funny reminder. Yes, probably too many anti-Islamist ambassadors in Bush's group.Rapier108 said:MetoliusAg said:Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.hbtheduce said:
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter. Firing an ambassador is well within the purview of the president.
MetoliusAg said:Actually it does matter. Presidents have an oath of office and Constitutional responsibilities they must uphold and conform to. Presidents have great leeway on foreign policy, choosing ambassadors, etc, but choosing and firing ambassadors isn't an unlimited Presidential power.hbtheduce said:
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter. Firing an ambassador is well within the purview of the president.
They've spent the last 2 decades convincing a decent portion of the population that identity politics is all that matters.Wildcat said:backintexas2013 said:
That chick that almost cried is well respected. Same with CPL and Ford.
Why are the leftists glomming on to these people? After embarrassing themselves repeatedly, why not just stop and save a little dignity?
