You are old. You should never use the term "lit".

aggiehawg said:

---

30wedge said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Another telling sign of how bad things went for Trump & Giuliani at the impeachment hearing today is evident from looking Trump's twitter feed. He has nothing -- nada -- to counter the facts and witnesses.

---

Don't worry, the fat lady is just clearing her throat.

---

Guess no one paid attention to the fact that Trump was with Erdogan all day.

---

Unlike Congressional Democrats, the President actually works.

Beaux12 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

30wedge said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Another telling sign of how bad things went for Trump & Giuliani at the impeachment hearing today is evident from looking Trump's twitter feed. He has nothing -- nada -- to counter the facts and witnesses.

---

Don't worry, the fat lady is just clearing her throat.

---

Guess no one paid attention to the fact that Trump was with Erdogan all day.

---

Unlike Congressional Democrats, the President actually works.

---

They noticed. Once Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine blows up in their face, it will be on to Turkey, Turkey, Turkey.

You can tell because etcetera has already posting those talking points today.

Gary Johnson said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

Quote:

---

As soon as Trump stops blocking witnesses and documents we won't have to rely on the word of Trump appointed ambassadors.

---

I wonder why Schiff won't subpoena them?

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mulvaney-backs-out-of-legal-battle

Quote:

---

"Mr. Bolton would take us to court if we subpoenaed him," a House Intelligence Committee official said in a statement.

"We would welcome John Bolton's deposition and he did not appear as he was requested today,"

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/469636-lawyer-for-bolton-kupperman-is-dismayed-about-lack-of-subpoenas

---

So you're saying they won't subpoena Bolton because he would take them to court? So what? Would not being affirmed by the court bolster the legitimacy of their subpoena, as well as their accusations?

Or, is it that they know they would get their teeth kicked in by the court for the idiocy that this whole process is?

MetoliusAg said:

---

txagbear said:

---

Trump lies and Trumpsters don't care.

---

I wish that was the furthest extent of it, but for many of his supporters, their support of Trump goes considerably beyond "not caring" about his lies.

---

Yet you 2 idi....vote for the party that is up to their ears in corruption, but never mind that!! Hypocrites!!

Rapier108 said:

---

Beaux12 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

30wedge said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Another telling sign of how bad things went for Trump & Giuliani at the impeachment hearing today is evident from looking Trump's twitter feed. He has nothing -- nada -- to counter the facts and witnesses.

---

Don't worry, the fat lady is just clearing her throat.

---

Guess no one paid attention to the fact that Trump was with Erdogan all day.

---

Unlike Congressional Democrats, the President actually works.

---

They noticed. Once Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine blows up in their face, it will be on to Turkey, Turkey, Turkey.

You can tell because etcetera has already posting those talking points today.

---

Oh good grief. I was very reluctant to get on the Trump Train because his business involvements brought a quite complicating factor on his ability to govern. Although even I never expected that any country where a Trump licensed hotel is located would be a rolling barrage of impeachment non-inquiry-inquiries.

Rapier108 said:

---

Beaux12 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

30wedge said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Another telling sign of how bad things went for Trump & Giuliani at the impeachment hearing today is evident from looking Trump's twitter feed. He has nothing -- nada -- to counter the facts and witnesses.

---

Don't worry, the fat lady is just clearing her throat.

---

Guess no one paid attention to the fact that Trump was with Erdogan all day.

---

Unlike Congressional Democrats, the President actually works.

---

They noticed. Once Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine blows up in their face, it will be on to Turkey, Turkey, Turkey.

You can tell because etcetera has already posting those talking points today.

---

They will have to be careful about bashing Turkey though, lest look anti-Muslim.

Quote:

---

So you're saying they won't subpoena Bolton because he would take them to court? So what? Would not being affirmed by the court bolster the legitimacy of their subpoena, as well as their accusations?

---

They're afraid it'll be tied up in courts for months.

rcb said:

---

Gary Johnson said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

Quote:

---

As soon as Trump stops blocking witnesses and documents we won't have to rely on the word of Trump appointed ambassadors.

---

I wonder why Schiff won't subpoena them?

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mulvaney-backs-out-of-legal-battle

Quote:

---

"Mr. Bolton would take us to court if we subpoenaed him," a House Intelligence Committee official said in a statement.

"We would welcome John Bolton's deposition and he did not appear as he was requested today,"

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/469636-lawyer-for-bolton-kupperman-is-dismayed-about-lack-of-subpoenas

---

So you're saying they won't subpoena Bolton because he would take them to court? So what? Would not being affirmed by the court bolster the legitimacy of their subpoena, as well as their accusations?

Or, is it that they know they would get their teeth kicked in by the court for the idiocy that this whole process is?

---

I thought that they didn't subpoena Bolton because they have the subpoena against Kupperman that is further along on going to court, and they expect Bolton to abide with the decision involving Kupperman. They expect that to be faster than dealing with two separate lawsuits involving the two subpoenas.

I might be completely wrong, though.

Gary Johnson said:

---

Quote:

---

So you're saying they won't subpoena Bolton because he would take them to court? So what? Would not being affirmed by the court bolster the legitimacy of their subpoena, as well as their accusations?

---

They're afraid it'll be tied up in courts for months.

---

What's the hurry again?

Interesting:

When Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, GOP Committee Counsel Steve Castor, and the other House R's on the impeachment investigation committee submitted a requested witness list for these hearings, they did not ask to hear testimony from any of the following fact witnesses who have direct knowledge of what Trump and Giuliani did:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer
Lev Parnas
Igor Fruman
John Eisenberg, NSC Counsel
Charles Kupperman, ex-Deputy NatSec Advisor
Rick Perry, EnergySec
John Bolton, ex-NatSec Advisor
Mick Mulvaney, OMB Director & WH Chief of Staff
Mike Pompeo, SecState

Why aren't the House R's demanding to hear from the Executive Branch witnesses who can exonerate Trump (if Trump did nothing illegal) ?

Why isn't Trump demanding that these witnesses be deposed?

Hmmm.

https://twitter.com/bnonews/status/1194768264662003712?s=21]

MetoliusAg said:

---

Interesting:

When Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, GOP Committee Counsel Steve Castor, and the other House R's on the impeachment investigation committee submitted a requested witness list for these hearings, they did not ask to hear testimony from any of the following fact witnesses who have direct knowledge of what Trump and Giuliani did:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer
Lev Parnas
Igor Fruman
John Eisenberg, NSC Counsel
Charles Kupperman, ex-Deputy NatSec Advisor
Rick Perry, EnergySec
John Bolton, ex-NatSec Advisor
Mick Mulvaney, OMB Director & WH Chief of Staff
Mike Pompeo, SecState

Why aren't the House R's demanding to hear from the Executive Branch witnesses who can exonerate Trump (if Trump did nothing illegal) ?

Why isn't Trump demanding that these witnesses be deposed?

Hmmm.

---

You serious Clark?

Gary Johnson said:

---

Quote:

---

So you're saying they won't subpoena Bolton because he would take them to court? So what? Would not being affirmed by the court bolster the legitimacy of their subpoena, as well as their accusations?

---

They're afraid it'll be tied up in courts for months.

---

lol

MetoliusAg said:

---

Interesting:

When Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, GOP Committee Counsel Steve Castor, and the other House R's on the impeachment investigation committee submitted a requested witness list for these hearings, they did not ask to hear testimony from any of the following fact witnesses who have direct knowledge of what Trump and Giuliani did:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer
Lev Parnas
Igor Fruman
John Eisenberg, NSC Counsel
Charles Kupperman, ex-Deputy NatSec Advisor
Rick Perry, EnergySec
John Bolton, ex-NatSec Advisor
Mick Mulvaney, OMB Director & WH Chief of Staff
Mike Pompeo, SecState

Why aren't the House R's demanding to hear from the Executive Branch witnesses who can exonerate Trump (if Trump did nothing illegal) ?

Why isn't Trump demanding that these witnesses be deposed?

Hmmm.

---

I'd like to hear from the whistleblower who started all this. Why hasn't Schiff called him to testify?

Hmmmm

Is there a fair and balanced synopsis somewhere?

MetoliusAg said:

---

Interesting:

When Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, GOP Committee Counsel Steve Castor, and the other House R's on the impeachment investigation committee submitted a requested witness list for these hearings, they did not ask to hear testimony from any of the following fact witnesses who have direct knowledge of what Trump and Giuliani did:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer
Lev Parnas
Igor Fruman
John Eisenberg, NSC Counsel
Charles Kupperman, ex-Deputy NatSec Advisor
Rick Perry, EnergySec
John Bolton, ex-NatSec Advisor
Mick Mulvaney, OMB Director & WH Chief of Staff
Mike Pompeo, SecState

Why aren't the House R's demanding to hear from the Executive Branch witnesses who can exonerate Trump (if Trump did nothing illegal) ?

Why isn't Trump demanding that these witnesses be deposed?

Hmmm.

---

Why do that when there's already a 100% chance he's exonerated in the senate?

The body language and facial expressions.

Bo Darville said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Interesting:

When Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, GOP Committee Counsel Steve Castor, and the other House R's on the impeachment investigation committee submitted a requested witness list for these hearings, they did not ask to hear testimony from any of the following fact witnesses who have direct knowledge of what Trump and Giuliani did:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer
Lev Parnas
Igor Fruman
John Eisenberg, NSC Counsel
Charles Kupperman, ex-Deputy NatSec Advisor
Rick Perry, EnergySec
John Bolton, ex-NatSec Advisor
Mick Mulvaney, OMB Director & WH Chief of Staff
Mike Pompeo, SecState

Why aren't the House R's demanding to hear from the Executive Branch witnesses who can exonerate Trump (if Trump did nothing illegal) ?

Why isn't Trump demanding that these witnesses be deposed?

Hmmm.

---

Why do that when there's already a 100% chance he's exonerated in the senate?

---

Hmmm,

I think you're right.

Hmmm

MetoliusAg said:

---

The body language and facial expressions.

---

Got 'eeeeem

You know it's a rough day for impeachment truthers when they are doing this. It's sad. They had him this time. They just knew it.

I haven't seen them this upset since Kav took a growler on Ford.

So this is what a bad day for Trump looks like?

MetoliusAg said:

---

The body language and facial expressions.

---

Speaks to me...and I'm sure many others on here. Let's see - Erdogan's obvious bl and fe scream:

"I'm phooked. This man cut off my cajones and now, he's handing them back on live TV."

MetoliusAg said:

---

Another telling sign of how bad things went for Trump & Giuliani at the impeachment hearing today is evident from looking Trump's twitter feed. He has nothing -- nada -- to counter the facts and witnesses.

---

Funny you should say this - Bill O'Reilly said the opposite. It was such a good day for Trump it was best for him to leave it alone.

will25u said:

---

---

House of cards is collapsing

MetoliusAg said:

---

Interesting:

When Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, GOP Committee Counsel Steve Castor, and the other House R's on the impeachment investigation committee submitted a requested witness list for these hearings, they did not ask to hear testimony from any of the following fact witnesses who have direct knowledge of what Trump and Giuliani did:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer
Lev Parnas
Igor Fruman
John Eisenberg, NSC Counsel
Charles Kupperman, ex-Deputy NatSec Advisor
Rick Perry, EnergySec
John Bolton, ex-NatSec Advisor
Mick Mulvaney, OMB Director & WH Chief of Staff
Mike Pompeo, SecState

Why aren't the House R's demanding to hear from the Executive Branch witnesses who can exonerate Trump (if Trump did nothing illegal) ?

Why isn't Trump demanding that these witnesses be deposed?

Hmmm.

---

Why isn't Schiff? He has all of the power in the world, until he goes to court. And gets his ass handed to him.

Even you know that. Schiff is too scared to go to court. And he should be. He has the losing argument.

But But Aggiehawg, if they have to wait for the courts, Trump might get reelected... That completely defeats the purpose.

DSAg44 said:

---

Is there a fair and balanced synopsis somewhere?

---

The witnesses gave the following testimony:

~ Orange man bad
~ We disapprove of orange man's policies
~ We don't like Orange man's style
~ Giuliani sucks
~ Orange man very bad

That about covers it.

captkirk said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Interesting:

When Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, GOP Committee Counsel Steve Castor, and the other House R's on the impeachment investigation committee submitted a requested witness list for these hearings, they did not ask to hear testimony from any of the following fact witnesses who have direct knowledge of what Trump and Giuliani did:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer
Lev Parnas
Igor Fruman
John Eisenberg, NSC Counsel
Charles Kupperman, ex-Deputy NatSec Advisor
Rick Perry, EnergySec
John Bolton, ex-NatSec Advisor
Mick Mulvaney, OMB Director & WH Chief of Staff
Mike Pompeo, SecState

Why aren't the House R's demanding to hear from the Executive Branch witnesses who can exonerate Trump (if Trump did nothing illegal) ?

Why isn't Trump demanding that these witnesses be deposed?

Hmmm.

---

I'd like to hear from the whistleblower who started all this. Why hasn't Schiff called him to testify?

Hmmmm

---

Someone connected to Brennan as he is is not that credible anyway.

Soooo you're saying you agree but only if I provide all the documents/etc to prove I'm innocent? That doesn't make sense. You can't go around and say someone did something then expect them to have to prove their innocence. He's innocent until you can PROVE he's guilty. He's doesn't have to do anything and doesn't have to allow anyone to speak. It's on you and the left to prove he did what you said.

OAN is spreading their wings big time.