captkirk said:

---

Gary Johnson said:

---

Trump is a corruption superhero defense.

He's conveniently only interested in debunked conspiracy theory corruption that helps him personally.

---

I'm starting to think you don't know what the term "debunked" means

---

I'm assuming GJ is talking about that completely asinine conspiracy theory about Obama not being a citizen, born in Kenya. That stupid Clinton-pushed narrative has been absolutely and thoroughly debunked by reality, kind of like liberal fiscal policies. Funnily, Clinton running in 2008 was supported by DJT like always.

titan said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

captkirk said:

---

In the running for the dumbest assertion ever made

---

From the guy who wanted to use nuclear weapons against American citizens who refuse to give up their guns.

---

And incidentally that's another case of where the Left Democrats are just inventing stuff that can and should be ignored. Bluntly ignored. Remember the phrase "serve at the pleasure of the President"? The POTUS can fire any one of his area for any reason or none at all that he wishes. Especially an ambassador can be removed or replaced with almost no comment at all because sometimes you don't want the world or nation involved knowing anything about the internal decision making.

---

Ambassadors not only serve at the pleasure of the President they also serve at the pleasure of the host country. If the host country doesn't trust the ambassador it is a huge breach of protocol to keep them in that post despite the host country's desires.

Whether she was guilty of the allegations or not is not the point. She was no longer tenable nor effective in that post. Hence the recall.

Noted anti-corruption superhero

None of that pertains to the legal actions taken by president Trump since his election.

I'm sure most of those issues were already settled with fines and such.

But keep arguing about stuff that doesn't matter. Maybe we can discuss how Trumps corrupt tax-cut bill illegally benefits his re-election.

Quote:

---

I'm sure most of those issues were already settled with fines and such.

---

They were not. Most are past criminal SOL now but civil liability remains.

Who better to root out corruption than the expert?!

Gary Johnson said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm sure most of those issues were already settled with fines and such.

---

They were not. Most are past SOL now but civil liability remains.

Who better to root out corruption than the expert?!

---

Civil liability sounds like a high crime. Maybe y'all should throw and article of impeachment on that too.

You're missing the satire Broheim.

tRuMp Is A cRiMe FiGhTiNg sUpErHeRo!

will25u said:

---

---

Schiff continues to show that he has no credibility.

mmmmm...K

Schiff Witness Vindman Testified that He "Thought" President's "Policy" Was Wrong So He Advised Ukrainians to Ignore the President

Adam Schiff's star witness Alexander Vindman testified to the House Intel Committee that he "thought" the President was wrong in his policy with the Ukraine. So he later told Ukrainians to ignore the President.

ElKabong said:

---

mmmmm...K

Schiff Witness Vindman Testified that He "Thought" President's "Policy" Was Wrong So He Advised Ukrainians to Ignore the President

Adam Schiff's star witness Alexander Vindman testified to the House Intel Committee that he "thought" the President was wrong in his policy with the Ukraine. So he later told Ukrainians to ignore the President.

---

So you are saying that Schiff and his witnesses continue to show that they have no credibility? Or are you saying that Schiff and his witnesses not only are not credible but also have committed treason by attempting to supersede the authority of the president as per the Constitution?

will25u said:

---

---

Schiff and etcetera will claim that removing him is obstruction/retaliation.

Rapier108 said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Schiff and etcetera will claim that removing him is obstruction/retaliation.

---

Yeah...because having known leaker of classified information is needed to keep the Republic safe...

Can't help but notice how quiet it's gotten from the Concerned Moderates now that once again The Narrative is falling apart and the Liberal Lies this investigation is based on are becoming painfully obvious

Finally, people are starting to realize the 'quid pro quo' argument is a bad hill on which to die when there is nothing wrong with a quid pro quo.

Rudy and his henchman are bumbling idiots.

Rand Paul totally destroyed Dodd,

I would hate to live in a world where it is a crime to disagree with the IRS on the IRS's OPINION of the value of something.

Saying an illiquid asset has a value of X is like saying that LeBron James is the best basketball player of all time. Yes, you can have a severely wrong opinion. No one would agree with me if I said that Otis Thorpe was the best NBA basketball player of all time. But, unless there is a competing, arms length offer on the table, value is speculation about future events, and very much an individual opinion.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/469846-broadcast-cable-news-networks-to-preempt-regular-programming-for-trump

Quote:

---

ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS on Wednesday will preempt their regularly scheduled programming for live coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's open impeachment hearings of President Trump.
Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, William Taylor, on Wednesday is slated as the first to publicly testify regarding possible efforts by Trump administration officials to link U.S. military aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigating top 2020 Democratic contender Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, for business dealings in the country.
Taylor's testimony will be followed by deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent.

---

(insert 'so it begins' meme)

So what begins? And what will be the end result?

chimmy said:

---

Finally, people are starting to realize the 'quid pro quo' argument is a bad hill on which to die when there is nothing wrong with a quid pro quo.

---

Little Chucky Todd is angry

chimmy said:

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/469846-broadcast-cable-news-networks-to-preempt-regular-programming-for-trump

Quote:

---

ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS on Wednesday will preempt their regularly scheduled programming for live coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's open impeachment hearings of President Trump.
Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, William Taylor, on Wednesday is slated as the first to publicly testify regarding possible efforts by Trump administration officials to link U.S. military aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigating top 2020 Democratic contender Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, for business dealings in the country.
Taylor's testimony will be followed by deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent.

---

(insert 'so it begins' meme)

---

First it was the Cohen hearing, then the Mueller hearing, then the Lewindowski hearing. How many times are you guys going to get excited only to have your heads bashed in?

captkirk said:

---

chimmy said:

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/469846-broadcast-cable-news-networks-to-preempt-regular-programming-for-trump

Quote:

---

ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS on Wednesday will preempt their regularly scheduled programming for live coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's open impeachment hearings of President Trump.
Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, William Taylor, on Wednesday is slated as the first to publicly testify regarding possible efforts by Trump administration officials to link U.S. military aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigating top 2020 Democratic contender Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, for business dealings in the country.
Taylor's testimony will be followed by deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent.

---

(insert 'so it begins' meme)

---

First it was the Cohen hearing, then the Mueller hearing, then the Lewindowski hearing. How many times are you guys going to get excited only to have your heads bashed in?

---

It's all a play toward drumming up enough public sentiment to oust Trump in 2020 at the ballot box...

It's the only way they can try to win...

It will fail...

Chuck did not like Biden or Hillary being called out. paraphrasing but "That's all in the past, let's talk about Trump." Never mind that Biden is running and Hillary might, and that the democrats will support them no matter what for doing things worse than what they would impeach Trump for.

FireAg said:

---

captkirk said:

---

chimmy said:

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/469846-broadcast-cable-news-networks-to-preempt-regular-programming-for-trump

Quote:

---

ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS on Wednesday will preempt their regularly scheduled programming for live coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's open impeachment hearings of President Trump.
Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, William Taylor, on Wednesday is slated as the first to publicly testify regarding possible efforts by Trump administration officials to link U.S. military aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigating top 2020 Democratic contender Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, for business dealings in the country.
Taylor's testimony will be followed by deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent.

---

(insert 'so it begins' meme)

---

First it was the Cohen hearing, then the Mueller hearing, then the Lewindowski hearing. How many times are you guys going to get excited only to have your heads bashed in?

---

It's all a play toward drumming up enough public sentiment to oust Trump in 2020 at the ballot box...

It's the only way they can try to win...

It will fail...

---

Hopefully so, and quite possibly will fail. Because Trump, unlike most former GOP leaders -- WILL keep reminding the public what the Democrats are offering instead: Rwanda-Venezuela.

It just doesn't matter what the hearings come up with until that choice itself changes.

titan said:

---

FireAg said:

---

captkirk said:

---

chimmy said:

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/469846-broadcast-cable-news-networks-to-preempt-regular-programming-for-trump

Quote:

---

ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS on Wednesday will preempt their regularly scheduled programming for live coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's open impeachment hearings of President Trump.
Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, William Taylor, on Wednesday is slated as the first to publicly testify regarding possible efforts by Trump administration officials to link U.S. military aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigating top 2020 Democratic contender Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, for business dealings in the country.
Taylor's testimony will be followed by deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent.

---

(insert 'so it begins' meme)

---

First it was the Cohen hearing, then the Mueller hearing, then the Lewindowski hearing. How many times are you guys going to get excited only to have your heads bashed in?

---

It's all a play toward drumming up enough public sentiment to oust Trump in 2020 at the ballot box...

It's the only way they can try to win...

It will fail...

---

Hopefully so, and quite possibly will fail. Because Trump, unlike most former GOP leaders -- WILL keep reminding the public what the Democrats are offering instead: Rwanda-Venezuela.

It just doesn't matter what the hearings come up with until that choice itself changes.

---

So it really doesn't matter what Trump did, or does, because the alternative is pure evil. I like it.

I wish the liberal posters who play the reverse logic posting games would just come out and say what they feel. They would be more respected (after all everybody is on one side or the other).

chimmy said:

---

titan said:

---

FireAg said:

---

captkirk said:

---

chimmy said:

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/469846-broadcast-cable-news-networks-to-preempt-regular-programming-for-trump

Quote:

---

ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS on Wednesday will preempt their regularly scheduled programming for live coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's open impeachment hearings of President Trump.
Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, William Taylor, on Wednesday is slated as the first to publicly testify regarding possible efforts by Trump administration officials to link U.S. military aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigating top 2020 Democratic contender Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, for business dealings in the country.
Taylor's testimony will be followed by deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent.

---

(insert 'so it begins' meme)

---

First it was the Cohen hearing, then the Mueller hearing, then the Lewindowski hearing. How many times are you guys going to get excited only to have your heads bashed in?

---

It's all a play toward drumming up enough public sentiment to oust Trump in 2020 at the ballot box...

It's the only way they can try to win...

It will fail...

---

Hopefully so, and quite possibly will fail. Because Trump, unlike most former GOP leaders -- WILL keep reminding the public what the Democrats are offering instead: Rwanda-Venezuela.

It just doesn't matter what the hearings come up with until that choice itself changes.

---

So it really doesn't matter what Trump did, or does, because the alternative is pure evil. I like it.

---

Yes. Right now, that's what they are pushing. Its very much like if last decade "you have to hate Bush and choose Bin Laden and sharia".

Doesn't work.

Its the most amazing election cycle in history. And the only reason the Media talking heads can get away with it is they are all rich and not affected by any social ruin. That's why need to be put in a five-figure living level cap like some kind of clergy. Then they would know about costs and the impact of stupid regulations and over-sized government.

Rockdoc said:

---

I wish the liberal posters who play the reverse logic posting games would just come out and say what they feel. They would be more respected (after all everybody is on one side or the other).

---

Very true. Take Chuck Todd's interview of Rand Paul. Todd kept trying to make it some kind of "so two wrongs make a right" when Rand's point was -- blatant one-sided "justice" that is consistently biased and unjust will produce a reaction where the other side doesn't care that you are suddenly acting concerned because you are not walking the talk.

He could have even added, sometimes the evil is great enough where it doesn't even matter. People don't realize it was the Allies that ordered going to un-restricted submarine warfare first and broke the convention limits on that. Because by the time of WW II they knew what they were up against.