Good grief. Talk about a blatant thread derail attempt. Start your own thread please.aginlakeway said:BeardedBear said:Neither party can claim fiscal responsibility.Silent For Too Long said:Wait a minute. You are worried about the dept but you are undecided about voting for a socialist who wants to add a 0 to said dept?BeardedBear said:To be honest I'm undecided. I'm a small business owner so I would prefer not to have my payroll taxes go up, but I also have customers getting hammered by tariffs and the GOP is doing nothing but increasing the debt exponentially.Bo Darville said:BeardedBear said:If thinking Trump is guilty makes me a liberal then I guess you got me! busted...Rapier108 said:
Oh joy, another liberal who rarely if ever posts here decides to slink over from another part of the board to post the same crap we've already heard from our usual seminar posters.
If warren is the nominee do you vote for her or trump?
Trump has proven nothing to me but incompetence over the last 3 years. His driving motivation just seems to be to stick it to the left. All of his policy "wins" could have been achieved by any of the other GOP candidates.
I'd honestly prefer a fiscally conservative candidate that doesn't get bogged down in silly moral debates. IMO we should spend more time talking about the debt and budget than where people take a piss.
Ooookaaaaay.......
The debt has ballooned under this administration, including an insane farm bill that is straight up socialism.
I guess honest answers don't really fly here? Just prefer to boil nuanced discussion down to left or right?
How about honestly answering a few questions then.
Are you for late term or partial birth abortion?
Do you think illegals should get free health care?
Do you want an open border?
Should there be a net worth tax?
So you believe in the 2nd amendment?
Thanks in advance for your honest answers.
***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****
989,378 Views |
9220 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
WOW! Well, thank you since we now know where you stand.Quote:
Abortion - pro choice. Not for late term abortions unless medically necessary.
Illegals & Healthcare - as a blanket statement? No. Do I think that it might offset the drain on our system when they're treated for care on the tax payer dime? I'd need to see concrete plans that spelled that out for me to see it as a good idea.
Tax - Our current situation is non tenable. Something has to change. We've had higher taxes on the ultra wealthy in the past.
2A - all for responsible gun owners, would be in favor of licensing programs like some other countries.
You will be disappointed on election night in November 2020, in my view.
MetoliusAg said:I must have missed Kevin McCarthy's ascension to the House Speaker post.aggiehawg said:
Just heard (on FNC) that Jordan, Meadows and Zeldin will be temporarily placed on Schiff's intel committee for the open hearings next week. Bringing the A team.
Just put popcorn on the grocery list.
The minority party assigns its members to committees
MetoliusAg said:Good grief. Talk about a blatant thread derail attempt. Start your own thread please.aginlakeway said:BeardedBear said:Neither party can claim fiscal responsibility.Silent For Too Long said:Wait a minute. You are worried about the dept but you are undecided about voting for a socialist who wants to add a 0 to said dept?BeardedBear said:To be honest I'm undecided. I'm a small business owner so I would prefer not to have my payroll taxes go up, but I also have customers getting hammered by tariffs and the GOP is doing nothing but increasing the debt exponentially.Bo Darville said:BeardedBear said:If thinking Trump is guilty makes me a liberal then I guess you got me! busted...Rapier108 said:
Oh joy, another liberal who rarely if ever posts here decides to slink over from another part of the board to post the same crap we've already heard from our usual seminar posters.
If warren is the nominee do you vote for her or trump?
Trump has proven nothing to me but incompetence over the last 3 years. His driving motivation just seems to be to stick it to the left. All of his policy "wins" could have been achieved by any of the other GOP candidates.
I'd honestly prefer a fiscally conservative candidate that doesn't get bogged down in silly moral debates. IMO we should spend more time talking about the debt and budget than where people take a piss.
Ooookaaaaay.......
The debt has ballooned under this administration, including an insane farm bill that is straight up socialism.
I guess honest answers don't really fly here? Just prefer to boil nuanced discussion down to left or right?
How about honestly answering a few questions then.
Are you for late term or partial birth abortion?
Do you think illegals should get free health care?
Do you want an open border?
Should there be a net worth tax?
So you believe in the 2nd amendment?
Thanks in advance for your honest answers.
I'm sorry are we taking away from you posting 20 biased liberal opinions a day that you wish were facts but aren't?
MetoliusAg said:Good grief. Talk about a blatant thread derail attempt. Start your own thread please.aginlakeway said:BeardedBear said:Neither party can claim fiscal responsibility.Silent For Too Long said:Wait a minute. You are worried about the dept but you are undecided about voting for a socialist who wants to add a 0 to said dept?BeardedBear said:To be honest I'm undecided. I'm a small business owner so I would prefer not to have my payroll taxes go up, but I also have customers getting hammered by tariffs and the GOP is doing nothing but increasing the debt exponentially.Bo Darville said:BeardedBear said:If thinking Trump is guilty makes me a liberal then I guess you got me! busted...Rapier108 said:
Oh joy, another liberal who rarely if ever posts here decides to slink over from another part of the board to post the same crap we've already heard from our usual seminar posters.
If warren is the nominee do you vote for her or trump?
Trump has proven nothing to me but incompetence over the last 3 years. His driving motivation just seems to be to stick it to the left. All of his policy "wins" could have been achieved by any of the other GOP candidates.
I'd honestly prefer a fiscally conservative candidate that doesn't get bogged down in silly moral debates. IMO we should spend more time talking about the debt and budget than where people take a piss.
Ooookaaaaay.......
The debt has ballooned under this administration, including an insane farm bill that is straight up socialism.
I guess honest answers don't really fly here? Just prefer to boil nuanced discussion down to left or right?
How about honestly answering a few questions then.
Are you for late term or partial birth abortion?
Do you think illegals should get free health care?
Do you want an open border?
Should there be a net worth tax?
So you believe in the 2nd amendment?
Thanks in advance for your honest answers.
Holy lack of self awareness Batman
I guess I'm more of a libertarian by traditional measurements other than thinking we should have some sort of licensing program when buying certain weapons.
I'm for whatever plan costs the country less, keeps the government away from morality issues, and provides a stable educated and healthy population
I'm for whatever plan costs the country less, keeps the government away from morality issues, and provides a stable educated and healthy population
BeardedBear said:
I guess I'm more of a libertarian by traditional measurements other than thinking we should have some sort of licensing program when buying certain weapons.
I'm for whatever plan costs the country less, keeps the government away from morality issues, and provides a stable educated and healthy population
There's nothing remotely libertarian about what Warren wants on anything. She makes Trump seem like Ayn Rand.
Do you think AR15's should be banned?
I'm plenty prepared to be disappointed for the rest of my life with our government.
I might be mistaken about this, but iirc, Bo, the Speaker has the power to block assignments to the House's Select Committees. Seems like I read that not too long ago.Bo Darville said:The minority party assigns its members to committeesMetoliusAg said:I must have missed Kevin McCarthy's ascension to the House Speaker post.aggiehawg said:
Just heard (on FNC) that Jordan, Meadows and Zeldin will be temporarily placed on Schiff's intel committee for the open hearings next week. Bringing the A team.
Just put popcorn on the grocery list.
Banned? No. I'm not a Beto sock account.
Do I think a program like the tax stamp program or the LTC program could be expanded? Absolutely. There are uses for AR15s, but someone with no practical use for one shouldn't be able to buy one off a stranger.
Do I think a program like the tax stamp program or the LTC program could be expanded? Absolutely. There are uses for AR15s, but someone with no practical use for one shouldn't be able to buy one off a stranger.
Wasn't trying to derail, just answer honestly. I know not replying to someone is serious business on the internet.
BeardedBear said:
Banned? No. I'm not a Beto sock account.
Do I think a program like the tax stamp program or the LTC program could be expanded? Absolutely. There are uses for AR15s, but someone with no practical use for one shouldn't be able to buy one off a stranger.
What's a "practical use" and who decides that?
MetoliusAg said:I might be mistaken about this, but iirc, Bo, the Speaker has the power to block assignments to the House's Select Committees. Seems like I read that not too long ago.Bo Darville said:The minority party assigns its members to committeesMetoliusAg said:I must have missed Kevin McCarthy's ascension to the House Speaker post.aggiehawg said:
Just heard (on FNC) that Jordan, Meadows and Zeldin will be temporarily placed on Schiff's intel committee for the open hearings next week. Bringing the A team.
Just put popcorn on the grocery list.
They are generally rubber stamped.
Wow I hadn't noticed how much he (second from left) looks like him!Quote:
Macaulay Culkin always cracks me up
Great question. I don't have a concrete answer. I'd say immediate practical uses would be hunting / work.
If you just want one to shoot for fun, go for it, but I'd like to see some licensing and or training before purchase. Similar to the CHL model we used to have.
If you just want one to shoot for fun, go for it, but I'd like to see some licensing and or training before purchase. Similar to the CHL model we used to have.
I mean we got Planet of the Apes or Yoda upfront too...annie88 said:Wow I hadn't noticed how much he (second from left) looks like him!Quote:
Macaulay Culkin always cracks me up
Lol.Bo Darville said:They are generally rubber stamped.MetoliusAg said:I might be mistaken about this, but iirc, Bo, the Speaker has the power to block assignments to the House's Select Committees. Seems like I read that not too long ago.Bo Darville said:The minority party assigns its members to committeesMetoliusAg said:I must have missed Kevin McCarthy's ascension to the House Speaker post.aggiehawg said:
Just heard (on FNC) that Jordan, Meadows and Zeldin will be temporarily placed on Schiff's intel committee for the open hearings next week. Bringing the A team.
Just put popcorn on the grocery list.
So now you agree the Speaker of the House does hold that power?
If it's true the SotH does hold that power, then I wouldn't get your hopes up. Not after your minority leader McCarthy and his 2nd in command Scalise told so many lies and falsehoods about a Constitutional process and a 100% warranted impeachment investigation.
IDK. Maybe technically the rules allow Pelosi to block a minority committee reassignment, but she would be quite foolish to even attempt that. (Unless she is sabotaging Schiff, which I think is a real possibility.)Quote:
I might be mistaken about this, but iirc, Bo, the Speaker has the power to block assignments to the House's Select Committees. Seems like I read that not too long ago.
So now Pelosi is sabotaging Schiff? You see conspiracies everywhere, hawg.aggiehawg said:IDK. Maybe technically the rules allow Pelosi to block a minority committee reassignment, but (Unless she is sabotaging Schiff, which I think is a real possibility.)Quote:
I might be mistaken about this, but iirc, Bo, the Speaker has the power to block assignments to the House's Select Committees. Seems like I read that not too long ago.
Also, there's no "she would be quite foolish to even attempt that" to it. If the SotH holds that power, she can simply choose to do it, or choose not to do it. There's no "attempt" to it.
Soon we'll prove that Biden is the innocent angel that Not Partisan Dems claim and Trump and Pence will be removed from office and Hillary will be rightfully restored to the throne!
All ahead for Season 4 of "We Got 'Em: No Really This Time!"
All ahead for Season 4 of "We Got 'Em: No Really This Time!"
First, you are underestimating Pelosi. Second, you completely ignore that the New York Times published the story about Schiff's office being directly involved with Ciaramella formerly known as the fake whistleblower right out of the gate. The Times would not have run with that without Pelosi's approval or shall we her, "No comment."Quote:
So now Pelosi is sabotaging Schiff? You see conspiracies everywhere, hawg.
Also, there's no "she would be quite foolish to even attempt that" to it. If the SotH holds that power, she can simply do it.
When that Times story came out, I asked, completely on my own (I don't do email talking points every hour everyday because I check my email account about once every few months, if at that) if Nancy had just knee-capped Schiff.
Unlike you, I do my own research. Don't use Facebook, twitter, even email that often because I want to read documents, official government websites including court pleadings and the results from FOIA requests. (I'll type this v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y so you understand that FOIA requests often result in actual government documents.
But by all means, continue saying stuff that you get from emails, chain letters and dumb FaceBook posts which are part of ShareBlue. I support your employment as their TexAgs rep. I expect it was a rigorous job interview, so congrats!
BeardedBear said:
Great question. I don't have a concrete answer. I'd say immediate practical uses would be hunting / work.
If you just want one to shoot for fun, go for it, but I'd like to see some licensing and or training before purchase. Similar to the CHL model we used to have.
Restricting civil liberties based on feels? Very libertarian of you...
MetoliusAg said:So now Pelosi is sabotaging Schiff? You see conspiracies everywhere, hawg.aggiehawg said:IDK. Maybe technically the rules allow Pelosi to block a minority committee reassignment, but (Unless she is sabotaging Schiff, which I think is a real possibility.)Quote:
I might be mistaken about this, but iirc, Bo, the Speaker has the power to block assignments to the House's Select Committees. Seems like I read that not too long ago.
Also, there's no "she would be quite foolish to even attempt that" to it. If the SotH holds that power, she can simply choose to do it, or choose not to do it. There's no "attempt" to it.
There's zero chance she does it, that's why your comment was stupid. The minority's choices for committee assignments and reassignment are historically rubber stamped.
You act like they have to clear it with the speaker first. That never ****ing happens.
mug? Since I normally go to bed early as most all posters know is my habit, do what you can when the resulting attack occurs against me later tonight.
TIA.
TIA.
Known troll being concerned about a thread derail. I have seen it all.
Did anyone ever address the "mistake" Bob's hand picked team made?
When you go to the literal meaning of words in one of my posts yet can never comprehend the literal meaning of a statute, ever, ever, you show your obsession.MetoliusAg said:So now Pelosi is sabotaging Schiff? You see conspiracies everywhere, hawg.aggiehawg said:IDK. Maybe technically the rules allow Pelosi to block a minority committee reassignment, but (Unless she is sabotaging Schiff, which I think is a real possibility.)Quote:
I might be mistaken about this, but iirc, Bo, the Speaker has the power to block assignments to the House's Select Committees. Seems like I read that not too long ago.
Also, there's no "she would be quite foolish to even attempt that" to it. If the SotH holds that power, she can simply choose to do it, or choose not to do it. There's no "attempt" to it.
Is it just with me? Or Trump?
Taylor ended up being a big nothing and there are two easy ways to tell.
Nothing on Twitter besides the usual liberal BOTs and background noise. Anytime those losers think they've got Trump, it will trend all day and all night.
The other is that etcetera is more interested in dropping random crap and trying to spar with Hawg, while forgetting all about Taylor post haste.
Nothing on Twitter besides the usual liberal BOTs and background noise. Anytime those losers think they've got Trump, it will trend all day and all night.
The other is that etcetera is more interested in dropping random crap and trying to spar with Hawg, while forgetting all about Taylor post haste.
Obsession noted.
Featured Stories
See All
Around CFB: Army, Notre Dame meet under a blue-gray November sky
by Olin Buchanan
35:17
1h ago
679
Offense in Review feat. Stephen McGee: Texas A&M 38, NMSU 3
by Billy Liucci
Defection from A&M's 2025 recruiting class disturbs smooth waters
by Ryan Brauninger
Presenting Texas Aggies United’s Battle For Atlanta Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
GeorgiAg
How do we manage the offense when Amari takes a breather
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
93