aggiehawg said:

---

That's quite the damning article from Politico. Published January 11, 2017 goes in to detail with quotes attributed to Alexandra Chalupa on her involvement on behalf of the DNC and Hillary campaign to dig up dirt on Manafort and Trump with the assistance of Ukrainian officials. Which lead Poroshenko to panic when Trump won instead of Hillary.

Need to get this to Jim Risch, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee to subpoena Chalupa as soon as legally possible.

---

From the article

Quote:

---

And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said "I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case."

---

Really is amazing how many pieces you and several others put together starting 12 months after this article.

Reading this article, written so soon after the election and given scant attention until today on Rushs program and posted here. Is pretty eye opening given what we know now and all the dots connected in 2018 and 2019 on Mueller thread.

Now why would they do that?!?!

Check this out...

The whistleblower claims in his statement (top pg 3) that Trump "praised the new prosecutor Lutsenko" who dropped charges against Burisma. The whistleblower claims Trump said Zelensky "might want to keep him in office". This is the same "solid" prosecutor that the entire media is leveraging to clear the Bidens, yet Trump is praising him and telling him to stay?!

Whistleblower complaint
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6430352/20190812-Whistleblower-Complaint-Unclass.pdf

So the media conveniently ignores that inconvenient claim. AND if you read Trump's actual call transcript (bot pg 3) you see he doesn't name that prosecutor and was almost certainly referring to Shokin (NOT Lutsenko).

Transcript:
https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

Heads up! Another hearsay "whistle blower" is in the pipeline.

Quote:

---

An Internal Revenue Service official has filed a whistleblower complaint reporting that he was told at least one Treasury Department political appointee attempted to improperly interfere with the annual audit of the president or vice president's tax returns, according to multiple people familiar with the document.

---

Was told, eh?

Quote:

---

Trump administration officials dismissed the whistleblower's complaint as flimsy because it is based on conversations with other government officials. But congressional Democrats were alarmed by the complaint, now circulating on Capitol Hill, and flagged it to a federal judge. They are also discussing whether to make it public.

---

Quote:

---

The complaint has come amid the escalating legal battle between the Treasury Department and House Democrats over the release of President Trump's tax returns. Part of that inquiry from Democrats is over how the IRS conducts its annual audit of the president and vice president's tax returns. That process is supposed to be walled off from political appointees and interference.

---

WaPo Via Hot Air

They're not going to stop.

Be proud, Democrats, your party is based in skullduggery.

will25u said:

---

---

So, CNN knows who the WB is. Only a matter of time now.

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Quote:

---

An Internal Revenue Service official has filed a whistleblower complaint reporting that he was told at least one Treasury Department political appointee attempted to improperly interfere with the annual audit of the president or vice president's tax returns, according to multiple people familiar with the document.

---

Translation: A Democrat Swamp Creature in the IRS bureaucracy tried to illegally leak the tax returns and were caught and stopped.

---

If the left raises any hell about the IRS they can go pound sand.

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

So, CNN knows who the WB is. Only a matter of time now.

---

I'm actually a little surprised. I figured it would be a former/current communist party member. Democrats wouldn't tolerate those guys. Oh, wait...

Quote:

---

I'm actually a little surprised. I figured it would be a former/current communist party member. Democrats wouldn't tolerate those guys. Oh, wait...

---

Considering the so-called WB is a current employee of the CIA, he's ruled out.

Which brings me to my second point here. You don't rise high enough in the CIA either as a field agent or an analyst to get the White House gig unless you have been there for a loooonngg time. He well knew the process for whistle blowing under ICWPA and didn't need guidance from the House Intelligence Committee on what to do. That's complete BS.

Quote:

---

Mark Zaid, the whistle-blower's attorney, said on Twitter that his clients 'bias' was 'nothing more than ... registered Democrat.'

'Give me a break! Bias? Seriously? Most ppl are,' he added, while declining to confirm the information.

In 31 U.S. states, plus the District of Columbia, Americans identify themselves as members of specific political parties when they register to vote. The other 19 states dont require it.

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/464281-volker-warned-giulianis-information-on-ukraine-wasnt-credible-report

Quote:

---

Former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker told House investigators Thursday he warned President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani that his Ukrainian sources alleging wrongdoing by former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter were not credible,

---

Jimmy Valentine said:

---

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/464281-volker-warned-giulianis-information-on-ukraine-wasnt-credible-report

Quote:

---

Former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker told House investigators Thursday he warned President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani that his Ukrainian sources alleging wrongdoing by former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter were not credible,

---

---

You keep posting this but no one believes you or McCainesque Volker

It's 9:10 AM on October 4, 2019 and Donald J. Trump is STILL the POTUS.

Trump is laying out why he wants the floor vote. Because right now, he has no rights unless he goes to court. The process in the House is currently rigged against him. And he's right.

captkirk said:

---

---

That really hurts the Democrats message. Ha.

will25u said:

---

captkirk said:

---

---

That really hurts the Democrats message. Ha.

---

Agree. It's strange though. When I read the news, all I see is that previous statement about withholding the funding for a political campaign.

will25u said:

---

---

Good luck with that.

will25u said:

---

---

A letter is not a subpoena. But when Pence doesn't comply, they will scream OBSTRUCTION anyway. Look for articles of impeachment against Pence too.

32 days. Does anyone remember what happens on the 5th of November?

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

A letter is not a subpoena. But when Pence doesn't comply, they will scream OBSTRUCTION anyway. Look for articles of impeachment against Pence too.

---

Yep, they already made it clear their goal is to remove both so Pelosi becomes President.

Even if the Senate got rid of Trump, they are never going to get rid of Pence.

Quote:

---

Agree. It's strange though. When I read the news, all I see is that previous statement about withholding the funding for a political campaign.

---

This is the first time I've read the reply.

I've seen the initial comment countless times in the media though.

It's amazing how quickly you can frame a situation when you only tell 1/3 of the story.

Quote:

---

Yep, they already made it clear their goal is to remove both so Pelosi becomes President.

Even if the Senate got rid of Trump, they are never going to get rid of Pence.

---

They want to negate his vote in the Senate.

Don't forget the hearsay "whistle blower" at the IRS has supposedly implicated Pence too.

Quote:

---

An Internal Revenue Service official has filed a whistleblower complaint reporting that he was told at least one Treasury Department political appointee attempted to improperly interfere with the annual audit of the president or vice president's tax returns, according to multiple people familiar with the document.

Trump administration officials dismissed the whistleblower's complaint as flimsy because it is based on conversations with other government officials. But congressional Democrats were alarmed by the complaint, now circulating on Capitol Hill, and flagged it to a federal judge. They are also discussing whether to make it public.

---

WaPo Via Hot Air

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Yep, they already made it clear their goal is to remove both so Pelosi becomes President.

Even if the Senate got rid of Trump, they are never going to get rid of Pence.

---

They want to negate his vote in the Senate.

---

Shouldn't we be able to negate Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy's votes?

will25u said:

---

---

If they want to exercise their constitutional powers, they need to follow the rules laid out in the constitution.

They're committed to this farce, I'll give them that