If Schiff gets the GJ material and leaks it he should be removed from office and go to jail.

And it will get leaked. Some innocent person who got called in to be questioned will have their life ruined. You can bet on it.

This will go nowhere of course.

Nunes and Patel have done a lot of damage the past 3 years.

Etcetera do you read any of the crap you post on here or do you just receive it and dump it here?

I wonder what kind of odds I could on Matt Gaetz being the 2024 Republican nominee. That guy is everywhere.

He doesn't respond he just posts. His new hope is naked picture chasing Schiff. Let that sink in.

New Ad

Been saying this for awhile, and it becomes more accurate with every passing day of new testimony:

-- Despite the mountain of evidence proving that Trump and Giuliani pushed an illegal quid pro quo, almost all of Trump's sycophants are still claiming Trump did nothing wrong.

-- Eventually the same Trump supporters will be saying: "Yes, Trump did it. And yes, it was wrong of him and Giuliani. But even though it was an abuse of Presidential power, it falls just short of the level warranting removal from office by the Senate."

A handful of the more astute Trump apologists see the handwriting on the wall & are already there.

Now that's funny etcetera. You must have come up with that yourself.

MetoliusAg said:

---

Been saying this for awhile, and it becomes more accurate with every passing day of new testimony:

-- Despite the mountain of evidence proving that Trump and Giuliani pushed an illegal quid pro quo, almost all of Trump's sycophants are still claiming Trump did nothing wrong.

-- Eventually the same Trump supporters will be saying: "Yes, Trump did it. And yes, it was wrong of him and Giuliani. But even though it was an abuse of Presidential power, it falls just short of the level warranting removal from office by the Senate."

A handful of the more astute Trump apologists see the handwriting on the wall & are already there.

---

What was an illegal quid pro quo? What crime was allegedly violated?

MetoliusAg said:

---

Been saying this for awhile, and it becomes more accurate with every passing day of new testimony:

-- Despite the mountain of evidence proving that Trump and Giuliani pushed an illegal quid pro quo, almost all of Trump's sycophants are still claiming Trump did nothing wrong.

-- Eventually the same Trump supporters will be saying: "Yes, Trump did it. And yes, it was wrong of him and Giuliani. But even though it was an abuse of Presidential power, it falls just short of the level warranting removal from office by the Senate."

A handful of the more astute Trump apologists see the handwriting on the wall & are already there.

---

Ukrainian bot

Quote:

---

What is an an illegal quid pro quo? What crime was allegedly violated?

---

Just saying the name "Biden" meets the threshold for impeachment, apparently.

MetoliusAg said:

---

Been saying this for awhile, and it becomes more accurate with every passing day of new testimony:

-- Despite the mountain of evidence proving that Trump and Giuliani pushed an illegal quid pro quo, almost all of Trump's sycophants are still claiming Trump did nothing wrong.

-- Eventually the same Trump supporters will be saying: "Yes, Trump did it. And yes, it was wrong of him and Giuliani. But even though it was an abuse of Presidential power, it falls just short of the level warranting removal from office by the Senate."

A handful of the more astute Trump apologists see the handwriting on the wall & are already there.

---

We aren't going to remove a duly elected president and vote for a socialist no matter how many times you beg us to.

Quote:

---

Ukrainian bot

---

Share Blue poster.

Doesn't respond to anything, just posts some blatantly pre-written dribble, or something from Twitter which was likely included in the latest e-mail blast, and when challenged, either disappears for a few hours, activates a sock, or just posts more stuff from Share Blue.

MetoliusAg said:

---

Been saying this for awhile, and it becomes more accurate with every passing day of new testimony:

-- Despite the mountain of evidence proving that Trump and Giuliani pushed an illegal quid pro quo, almost all of Trump's sycophants are still claiming Trump did nothing wrong.

-- Eventually the same Trump supporters will be saying: "Yes, Trump did it. And yes, it was wrong of him and Giuliani. But even though it was an abuse of Presidential power, it falls just short of the level warranting removal from office by the Senate."

A handful of the more astute Trump apologists see the handwriting on the wall & are already there.

---

Nope. "Quid pro quo" only sounds illegal like dems pathetic attempts to impach trump for "violating his oath or office" or "collusion".

He was right to push for investigations into possible corruption, and he definitely should find out why our intelligence agencies were duped into thinking he was a Russian asset.

Foreign policy isn't a campaign contribution. HTH.

aggiehawg said:

---

This will go nowhere of course.

---

This is actually a pretty big deal.

Day after day, more witnesses are deposed, and more shoes keep dropping.

Trump should go national tv in the Oval Office, admit he did it, admit it was wrong, and then apologize. Otherwise he's going to continue to lose public support as his lies get exposed while the evidence against him piles up.

Pelosi controls the ethics committee. Again, this goes nowwhere.

MetoliusAg said:

---

Day after day, more witnesses are deposed, and more shoes keep dropping.

Trump should go national tv in the Oval Office, admit he did it, admit it was wrong, and then apologize. Otherwise he's going to continue to lose public support as his lies get exposed while the evidence against him piles up.

---

Why would he do that when there's 0.0% chance he's removed by the senate?

Quote:

---

-- Despite the mountain of evidence proving that Trump and Giuliani pushed an illegal quid pro quo, almost all of Trump's sycophants are still claiming Trump did nothing wrong.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Day after day, more witnesses are deposed, and more shoes keep dropping.

Trump should go national tv in the Oval Office, admit he did it, admit it was wrong, and then apologize. Otherwise he's going to continue to lose public support as his lies get exposed while the evidence against him piles up.

---

No, he did nothing wrong. Joe Biden shouldn't have allowed his son to make millions of dollars in country he was in charge of foreign policy. You know, a thing of actual monetary value.

Everyone should just leave this thread to the troll and quit responding to him.

He is not here to discuss or debate. He is here to get in his talking points, pickup a ShareBlue check, and troll.

Rapier108 said:

---

Everyone should just leave this thread to the troll and quit responding to him.

He is not here to discuss or debate. He is here to get in his talking points, pickup a ShareBlue check, and troll.

---

Its good to see posts from the other side, so when people close to us start spouting off on this nonsense, we already know how to shut it down.

He'll just infest other threads. Only staff can do anything about trolling.

Rockdoc said:

---

He'll just infest other threads. Only staff can do anything about trolling.

---

They won't. He is posting with at least two accounts at the same time and nothing happens.

1) I want Trump to schedule a prime time oval office address to the nation.
2) Let it leak out that he is going to resign.
3) Then start the speech real somber like he's really going to resign and then drop some giant turd on the dems. Maybe announce the indictment of some deep state actor or something like that.
4) Sit back and watch all the screaming from people like our friend etcetcra.

aggiehawg said:

---

Pelosi controls the ethics committee. Again, this goes nowwhere.

---

Not without a vote changing the rules of the Ethics Committee, she doesn't. The Ethics Committee is bipartisan with both the Chairman and Ranking Member controlling equal power. That's the real reason you don't see a ton of Ethics investigations. It's too easy for the minority to start an Ethics war if the Majority steps out of line.

A member filing an actual ethics complaint on another member requires an actual investigation by the Committee. When you hear a member say "I'm filing an ethics complaint!" or "The ethics committee should investigate!" that member is usually talking about Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent organization with lot of investigation powers and no penalty powers. Those guys can throw political complaints right in the garbage.

That's not what Gaetz did. He went straight to big Ethics, which will actually require an investigation. It's really uncommon because of the potential to escalate things.

Congress only works because members allow it work. Members have a lot of power to drag it to a crawl. An all out Ethics war would do that.

Anyway, here's a link the members of House Ethics: https://ethics.house.gov/about/committee-members

Metolius---a river in Oregon, or a company which designs climbing gear.

MetoliusAg said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

Ukrainian bot

---

Share Blue poster.

Doesn't respond to anything, just posts some blatantly pre-written dribble, or something from Twitter which was likely included in the latest e-mail blast, and when challenged, either disappears for a few hours, activates a sock, or just posts more stuff from Share Blue.

---

Please stop your false accusations and trolling. I've responded to numerous posters and engaged in multiple discussions in this thread on the thread topic and topics directly related to it. I am not paid & I am not affiliated with any oeganization. I've posted content (with links) and participated in political discussions in this forum for 21 years.

Your persistent trolling and attempted thread derails, as well as the constant trolling from several other posters, is what I seldom respond to. A texags Mod told me to ignore you trollers and let the Mods handle it. So I'm doing what the Mod requested me to do.

---

Boom

Since you seem to be an expert on quid pro quo, can you explain why Ukrainians donated more money to the Clinton Foundation than any nationality?

Where did that money actually come from?

What did the Ukrainians believe they were getting in return from those "donations"?

FriscoKid said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

Ukrainian bot

---

Share Blue poster.

Doesn't respond to anything, just posts some blatantly pre-written dribble, or something from Twitter which was likely included in the latest e-mail blast, and when challenged, either disappears for a few hours, activates a sock, or just posts more stuff from Share Blue.

---

Please stop your false accusations and trolling. I've responded to numerous posters and engaged in multiple discussions in this thread on the thread topic and topics directly related to it. I am not paid & I am not affiliated with any oeganization. I've posted content (with links) and participated in political discussions in this forum for 21 years.

Your persistent trolling and attempted thread derails, as well as the constant trolling from several other posters, is what I seldom respond to. A texags Mod told me to ignore you trollers and let the Mods handle it. So I'm doing what the Mod requested me to do.

---

Boom

---

Haha. Another words Rapier
Nanny nanny boo boo. Lol