***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

1,023,004 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by 197361936
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lie in private but tell the truth in public view
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

I didn't realize that the POTUS was not in charge of implementing foreign policy for the US.


Don't be obtuse, the president doesn't have sole power over foreign policy. And even if that were the case it doesn't give immunity to criminal activity.

What crime was committed? Please provide evidence that would stand up in a court of law...


We're just talking just legal theory here. Kids contended that whatever happens is legal because the king commands it. Not true.

Plenty of potential crimes, bribery, misappropriation of taxpayer dollars, soliciting foreign election interference.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

FireAg said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

I didn't realize that the POTUS was not in charge of implementing foreign policy for the US.


Don't be obtuse, the president doesn't have sole power over foreign policy. And even if that were the case it doesn't give immunity to criminal activity.

What crime was committed? Please provide evidence that would stand up in a court of law...


We're just talking just legal theory here. Kids contended that whatever happens is legal because the king commands it. Not true.

Plenty of potential crimes, bribery, misappropriation of taxpayer dollars, soliciting foreign election interference.
Do you think a POTUS should be impeached for "potential crimes"?
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's what investigations and trials are for.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

FireAg said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

I didn't realize that the POTUS was not in charge of implementing foreign policy for the US.


Don't be obtuse, the president doesn't have sole power over foreign policy. And even if that were the case it doesn't give immunity to criminal activity.

What crime was committed? Please provide evidence that would stand up in a court of law...


We're just talking just legal theory here. Kids contended that whatever happens is legal because the king commands it. Not true.

Plenty of potential crimes, bribery, misappropriation of taxpayer dollars, soliciting foreign election interference.
When do we get proof of these?
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.


Usually there is evidence of "potential" crimes before beginning an investigation. Investigating to find unknown potential crimes for which there is no evidence is tyranny.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

I didn't realize that the POTUS was not in charge of implementing foreign policy for the US.


Don't be obtuse, the president doesn't have sole power over foreign policy. And even if that were the case it doesn't give immunity to criminal activity.

What crime was committed? Please provide evidence that would stand up in a court of law...
He'll have more flexibility to provide evidence after Trump is re-elected.
nomadic_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think sitting presidents should be able bribe foreign governments with taxpayer money in order to sway upcoming elections in their favor. Just saying... it happens all the time. Not sure why this is a big deal.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
chimmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chimmy said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
There is a big difference in people on the Internet discussing something, and members of Congress.

Of course Manny, you know that.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chimmy said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
So members of Congress said they were going to impeach Obama within days of his inauguration?
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"They" is nebulous. The right and the left both have nutso wings that want to impeach everything.

This is different. If the allegations are true, this was brazen and corrupt.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hunter Biden working for Burisma is an American "Domestic matter" according to Williams?
nomadic_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

chimmy said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
There is a big difference in people on the Internet discussing something, and members of Congress.

Of course Manny, you know that.
You don't remember congressmen being birthers or you don't know about it? There's a big difference.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nomadic_ag said:

Rapier108 said:

chimmy said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
There is a big difference in people on the Internet discussing something, and members of Congress.

Of course Manny, you know that.
You don't remember congressmen being birthers or you don't know about it? There's a big difference.
And how many of them and did any of them file articles of impeachment over it?

Democrats were calling for impeachment before Trump took office, and began filling for impeachment not long after.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LTC Vindman is going to get absolutely wrecked by JJ and the gang. He can barely read off a script.
ShotOver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Isn't that the guy from Remember the Titans sitting behind Nunez?
chimmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

chimmy said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
There is a big difference in people on the Internet discussing something, and members of Congress.

Of course Manny, you know that.
Lot, Our president discussed that. I know you know that.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why do we need to know their histories?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LTC Vindman is shaking badly.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

"They" is nebulous. The right and the left both have nutso wings that want to impeach everything.

This is different. If the allegations are true, this was brazen and corrupt.
So did I miss it or which Republican congressmen called for the impeachment of Obama or which Republican candidates ran on a platform of impeaching Obama?

You're such a partisan leftist hack. Don't tell me you're Libertarian or moderate because that's factually untruthful.
78_Pacecar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's 9:00 AM CST on November 19, 2019 and Donald J. Trump is STILL the POTUS...



Jeffrey Espstein STILL didn't kill himself

and

Epstein's guards didn't kill themselves.
chimmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

nomadic_ag said:

Rapier108 said:

chimmy said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
There is a big difference in people on the Internet discussing something, and members of Congress.

Of course Manny, you know that.
You don't remember congressmen being birthers or you don't know about it? There's a big difference.
And how many of them and did any of them file articles of impeachment over it?

Democrats were calling for impeachment before Trump took office, and began filling for impeachment not long after.
When all the sheep thought Hilldawg was going to win: Some Republicans are discussing their plans for President Clinton starting with impeachment
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

LTC Vindman is shaking badly.
People telling lies tend to do that.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chimmy said:

Rapier108 said:

chimmy said:

aginlakeway said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.
OK.

But didn't they start discussing impeachment the day he was elected? Sounds like they were looking for a crime ...
TBF, we did that with Obama, because he was born in Kenya and was constitutionally ineligible to be president.
There is a big difference in people on the Internet discussing something, and members of Congress.

Of course Manny, you know that.
Lot, Our president discussed that. I know you know that.
You seriously think I am Lot Y? You need help.

And Trump did it as a private citizen, not President.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did we get him yet?
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RGLAG85 said:

Gary Johnson said:

"They" is nebulous. The right and the left both have nutso wings that want to impeach everything.

This is different. If the allegations are true, this was brazen and corrupt.
So did I miss it or which Republican congressmen called for the impeachment of Obama or which Republican candidates ran on a platform of impeaching Obama?



Are we limited to just US congressmen? You can ascribe all the bad motives you want but at the end of the day Trump either committed crimes and abused his office or he didn't.
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He didn't
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.

Isn't a three year investigation long enough to find the crime?
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

Gary Johnson said:

That's what investigations and trials are for.

Isn't a three year investigation long enough to find the crime?
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

FireAg said:

Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

I didn't realize that the POTUS was not in charge of implementing foreign policy for the US.


Don't be obtuse, the president doesn't have sole power over foreign policy. And even if that were the case it doesn't give immunity to criminal activity.

What crime was committed? Please provide evidence that would stand up in a court of law...


We're just talking just legal theory here. Kids contended that whatever happens is legal because the king commands it. Not true.

Plenty of potential crimes, bribery, misappropriation of taxpayer dollars, soliciting foreign election interference.

Nope. What happened was legal because it doesn't the actions don't match the statutory definition of bribery or extortion, misappropriation of taxpayer dollars, and well your last one isn't even a crime (not surprising)

And even if they did, you have to contend that bribery and extortion is legal when negotiating with foreign powers when in the interest of the united states. And the misappropriation of taxpayer dollars never occurred because there was still several weeks to legally release the funds.

So 100% wrong.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nomadic_ag said:

I think sitting presidents should be able bribe foreign governments with taxpayer money in order to sway upcoming elections in their favor. Just saying... it happens all the time. Not sure why this is a big deal.

What about killing people to sway an upcoming election? It happens all the time.
First Page Last Page
Page 108 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.