Gary Johnson said:

---

Sorry yo boys clown show conspiracy investigation lost.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

I felt sorry for Castor on Wednesday and again today. He's a smart, competent attorney, but the facts are 99% against the side he's on. Can't make bread when you have no flour, yeast, or water.

---

Actually agree with you that Castor was a huge failure. He sucks as an effective cross examiner.

---

Bo Darville said:

---

Why do you defer so much respect for these government scum? Government service at the federal level, save for the military, should never be seen as noble.

---

Quote:

---

And chances of senate removal rise to 0.0% up from 0.0%.

---

Red Rover said:

---

Gary Johnson said:

---

Sorry yo boys clown show conspiracy investigation lost.

---

The "libertarian" continues to root for more power for the socialist party. That makes a lot of sense ideologically.

---

Bo Darville said:

---

Why do you defer so much respect for these government scum? Government service at the federal level, save for the military, should never be seen as noble.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Bo Darville said:

---

Why do you defer so much respect for these government scum? Government service at the federal level, save for the military, should never be seen as noble.

---

Wow.

You've got some serious issues, Bo, if you truly view American patriots like Taylor, Yovanovitch, and Kent that way.

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Red Rover said:

---

Gary Johnson said:

---

Sorry yo boys clown show conspiracy investigation lost.

---

The "libertarian" continues to root for more power for the socialist party. That makes a lot of sense ideologically.

---

titan said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Yes. Watch Barr's speech. You will learn more in the hour about how the Democrats are abusing the government process and Congress than four weeks of MSM broadcasting.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Yes. Watch Barr's speech. You will learn more in the hour about how the Democrats are abusing the government process and Congress than four weeks of MSM broadcasting.

---

Which speech is that, titan?

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Quote:

---

And chances of senate removal rise to 0.0% up from 0.0%.

---

That depends on what new information today's two closed session witnesses produced.

Do you really think a GOP Senate majority can afford the political risk of condoning bribery? The Constitution specifically spells out bribery as a cause for impeachment and removal from office.

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Yes. Watch Barr's speech. You will learn more in the hour about how the Democrats are abusing the government process and Congress than four weeks of MSM broadcasting.

---

Which speech is that, titan?

---

This one.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3076099/replies/55397663

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Yes. Watch Barr's speech. You will learn more in the hour about how the Democrats are abusing the government process and Congress than four weeks of MSM broadcasting.

---

Which speech is that, titan?

---

This one.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3076099/replies/55397663

---

Thks, I'll watch it tomorrow. You know about his past history with the IranContra pardons and his obfuscations and misrepresentations with the Mueller Report, I hope.

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Quote:

---

And chances of senate removal rise to 0.0% up from 0.0%.

---

That depends on what new information today's two closed session witnesses produced.

Do you really think a GOP Senate majority can afford the political risk of condoning bribery? The Constitution specifically spells out bribery as a cause for impeachment and removal from office.

---

Not much of a risk when their opponents are morally and ethically bankrupt on top of having devastatingly horrible policy positions. Nobody with a conscience is going to suddenly change their vote for those bottom feeding scum bags in the Democrat party. Try voting for someone worth a bucket of piss and then maybe your side will finally offer a good alternative.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Quote:

---

And chances of senate removal rise to 0.0% up from 0.0%.

---

That depends on what new information today's two closed session witnesses produced.

Do you really think a GOP Senate majority can afford the political risk of condoning bribery? The Constitution specifically spells out bribery as a cause for impeachment and removal from office.

---

Not much of a risk when their opponents are morally and ethically bankrupt on top of having devastatingly horrible policy positions. Nobody with a conscience is going to suddenly change their vote for those bottom feeding scum bags in the Democrat party. Try voting for someone worth a bucket of piss and then maybe your side will finally offer a good alternative.

---

This impeachment investigation isn't a POTUS election; it's about the rule of law.


And frankly the R's have a better shot at winning 2020 Potus election with Nikki Haley.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Quote:

---

And chances of senate removal rise to 0.0% up from 0.0%.

---

That depends on what new information today's two closed session witnesses produced.

Do you really think a GOP Senate majority can afford the political risk of condoning bribery? The Constitution specifically spells out bribery as a cause for impeachment and removal from office.

---

Not much of a risk when their opponents are morally and ethically bankrupt on top of having devastatingly horrible policy positions. Nobody with a conscience is going to suddenly change their vote for those bottom feeding scum bags in the Democrat party. Try voting for someone worth a bucket of piss and then maybe your side will finally offer a good alternative.

---

This impeachment investigation isn't a POTUS election; it's about the rule of law.

And frankly the R's have a better shot at winning 2020 Potus election with Nikki Haley.

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Yes. Watch Barr's speech. You will learn more in the hour about how the Democrats are abusing the government process and Congress than four weeks of MSM broadcasting.

---

Which speech is that, titan?

---

This one.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3076099/replies/55397663

---

Thks, I'll watch it tomorrow. You know about his past history with the IranContra pardons and his obfuscations and misrepresentations with the Mueller Report, I hope.

---

The history he is speaking of speaks for itself.

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Quote:

---

And chances of senate removal rise to 0.0% up from 0.0%.

---

That depends on what new information today's two closed session witnesses produced.

Do you really think a GOP Senate majority can afford the political risk of condoning bribery? The Constitution specifically spells out bribery as a cause for impeachment and removal from office.

---

Not much of a risk when their opponents are morally and ethically bankrupt on top of having devastatingly horrible policy positions. Nobody with a conscience is going to suddenly change their vote for those bottom feeding scum bags in the Democrat party. Try voting for someone worth a bucket of piss and then maybe your side will finally offer a good alternative.

---

This impeachment investigation isn't a POTUS election; it's about the rule of law.

And frankly the R's have a better shot at winning 2020 Potus election with Nikki Haley.

---

Not even remotely about that. That has never meant anything to them prior. But Nikki Haley definitely has great promise, and may need to be the one trying in 2024.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Yes. Watch Barr's speech. You will learn more in the hour about how the Democrats are abusing the government process and Congress than four weeks of MSM broadcasting.

---

Which speech is that, titan?

---

This one.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3076099/replies/55397663

---

Thks, I'll watch it tomorrow. You know about his past history with the IranContra pardons and his obfuscations and misrepresentations with the Mueller Report, I hope.

---

The history he is speaking of speaks for itself.

---

I'll watch it and let you know what I think. But I gotta be honest, Barr hasn't shown much trustworthiness or credibility yet as AG.

Always a pleasure, my friend. Enjoy the rest of your evening. I'm done for tonight.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

Quote:

---

And chances of senate removal rise to 0.0% up from 0.0%.

---

That depends on what new information today's two closed session witnesses produced.

Do you really think a GOP Senate majority can afford the political risk of condoning bribery? The Constitution specifically spells out bribery as a cause for impeachment and removal from office.

---

Not much of a risk when their opponents are morally and ethically bankrupt on top of having devastatingly horrible policy positions. Nobody with a conscience is going to suddenly change their vote for those bottom feeding scum bags in the Democrat party. Try voting for someone worth a bucket of piss and then maybe your side will finally offer a good alternative.

---

This impeachment investigation isn't a POTUS election; it's about the rule of law.

And frankly the R's have a better shot at winning 2020 Potus election with Nikki Haley.

---

Not even remotely about that. That has never meant anything to them prior. But Nikki Haley definitely has great promise, and may need to be the one trying in 2024.

---

Smh. How little you know about us.

---

aggie2812-2 said:

---

Still your president and will be for 5 more years.

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

This impeachment investigation isn't a POTUS election; it's about the rule of law.

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Coup attempt continues. Such a sad time for our republic. It will never be the same.

---

Yes. Watch Barr's speech. You will learn more in the hour about how the Democrats are abusing the government process and Congress than four weeks of MSM broadcasting.

---

Which speech is that, titan?

---

This one.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3076099/replies/55397663

---

Thks, I'll watch it tomorrow. You know about his past history with the IranContra pardons and his obfuscations and misrepresentations with the Mueller Report, I hope.

---

The history he is speaking of speaks for itself.

---

I'll watch it and let you know what I think. But I gotta be honest, Barr hasn't shown much trustworthiness or credibility yet as AG.

Always a pleasure, my friend. Enjoy the rest of your evening. I'm done for tonight.

---

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

titan said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

Arent most ambassadorships closely related to campaign donations?

---

Most of the big ones are such as the UK, Canada, Australia, and the like.

The rest are usually filled with existing state department employees. The troublemakers get sent to places like the Congo.

---

Yes. It is the politicization of the appointments rather than accenting suitability that is why State tends to get us into wars or crisis that might have been averted. Its a very important position to just make it a political sop ,but pretty much all the administrations do it. Many foreign governments too.

---

Depends on the country. We don't send a naive zero-experience clueless sop like Sondland to a place like Russia. Not if there's a competent administration in the WH, that is.

---

Actually the politics trumps the correctness of choice more often than not. It truly surprises how much of an admin's cabinet and embassy staff will be political appointments or rewards, etc. And its not just America doing it. Many wars are a product of incompetent obtuseness on the part of the embassy in conveying what is really desired,or what is unacceptable. Both extremes -- too obtuse to the country, or too friendly to the country, occur in history.

---

Historically since WW2 about 30% of US ambassadors usually are political appointees in each administration. The other 70% are chosen from career professional State Dept. employees, people like Taylor and Yovanovitch.

---

Red Rover said:

---

MetoliusAg said:

---

This impeachment investigation isn't a POTUS election; it's about the rule of law.

---

Does the fact they have been calling for impeachment before [sworn in - in Jan 2017!] these phone calls were made make you at least consider for a moment that this may be entirely political? Does Russian accusations and a multi-year investigation that turned up nothing criminal do that? What about Kavanaugh and the political circus they pulled there?

I don't understand how after the endless sham accusations anyone can believe Washington Democrats when they accuse anyone of anything.

---