FriscoKid said:
You lost.
Jeebus! What was that thing eating the octopus?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Breaking: AG Barr
27,878 Views |
205 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by titan
Jeebus! What was that thing eating the octopus?
A war with Iran ... looks like to me.rausr said:
I wonder what the deep staters will come up with next to try to distract everyone from this.
Nm
The world needs mean tweets
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
agent-maroon said:FriscoKid said:
You lost.
Jeebus! What was that thing eating the octopus?
It happens.
Looks like the Dems midterm victories were not enough to protect wrong doers. Im pleasantly surprised.
I hope all deep staters, rinos included, go down hard.
Numbray - an electric ray.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
agent-maroon said:dermdoc said:
Love Barr but he looks like Elton John.
Is it Elton John that sings that song that goes "Hold me closer Tony Danza"?
Barr looks to me like what Ralphie from A Christmas Story would look like as a grown up.
Still putting the neighborhood dirtbags in their place.
Trump and Barr vs. Democrats feels like the interaction between Schwartz and Flick.Doorbell said:agent-maroon said:dermdoc said:
Love Barr but he looks like Elton John.
Is it Elton John that sings that song that goes "Hold me closer Tony Danza"?
Barr looks to me like what Ralphie from A Christmas Story would look like as a grown up.
Still putting the neighborhood dirtbags in their place.
The triple dog dare is for the Dems to go for impeachment of Trump and Barr. The Dems may just be stupid enough to do it too. I just hope they get left with their tongues stuck to the pole.
Clinton is sooo much involved in this it cant be overlooked. Shes going down.
I can't tell who is winning, the octopus or whatever that fish is?
But, one thing is clear: there can be little debate that, among other things, the President's pressure exerted on Vice President Pence to violate his oath, and the false hope it sent to emotionally charged supporters, was wrong, troubling, and impeachable.
Liz should be commended, not condemned, for standing up in defense of the Constitution and standing true to herself
Chip Roy
Liz should be commended, not condemned, for standing up in defense of the Constitution and standing true to herself
Chip Roy
Johnny2Fan said:
Clinton is sooo much involved in this it cant be overlooked. Shes going down.
This time for sure!!
Duggins90 said:
I can't tell who is winning, the octopus or whatever that fish is?
Slightly longer video that shows more of the attack. Gets a bit messy so I couldn't tell for sure, but the octopus appears to be missing at the end.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
When it's all said and done, I think we are all gonna be shocked as to who was behind this. And I'm not just talking about liberals.
Agree. Going into the election I believed Trump was as much an insider as Hillary. It wasn't until I saw how poorly the Reps responded to their unexpected win that I realized that he generally is an outsider and that the establishment is in fact more important than anything to these people. We just may find out that Obama, Hillary and McCain orchestrated this thing. For his part Obama will say he read about it in the news when the rest of us did and Hillary will say it's old news and makes no difference now. The media will buy it to protect their heroes which will leave us blaming the dead guy.Charpie said:
When it's all said and done, I think we are all gonna be shocked as to who was behind this. And I'm not just talking about liberals.
Still clinging to the debunked myth that the RINO's were behind this??Charpie said:
When it's all said and done, I think we are all gonna be shocked as to who was behind this. And I'm not just talking about liberals.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
An Obama/McCain joint op.Charpie said:
When it's all said and done, I think we are all gonna be shocked as to who was behind this. And I'm not just talking about liberals.
The Bushs being involved wouldn't surprise at all.
30wedge said:loletcetera said:I will. Have known about this for awhile. Perfect guy to look at it. Longtime DOJ attny.Rockdoc said:
Just keep laughing funny man.
When people pretend to have inside info you know they have jumped the shark.
In an exceedingly rare type of post, I will actually sort of vindicate etcetera here. As much as he disdains the Mueller thread, he obviously reads it because Durham's name popped up months ago, right after Barr's confirmation. Although, other than Durham's extensive experience in prosecuting public officials for corruption was noted, it was still unclear exactly what Barr was tapping him for at the time.backintexas2013 said:30wedge said:loletcetera said:I will. Have known about this for awhile. Perfect guy to look at it. Longtime DOJ attny.Rockdoc said:
Just keep laughing funny man.
When people pretend to have inside info you know they have jumped the shark.
Now we know he has Durham set up with a taint team to do a parallel construction to avoid a Garrity* problem caused by IG Horowitz's report.
*Garrity is a case that protects federal employee who are compelled to cooperate with IG's or lose their jobs cannot have that evidence used against them in a criminal proceeding.
P.S. You're welcome, etcetera.
War with Iran seems to be the first attempt at distraction.rausr said:
I wonder what the deep staters will come up with next to try to distract everyone from this.
DGAF if they are D or R or I - there needs to be massive beat down with a wrecking ball in all levels of the government - from the basement to the top - to root out anybody that had anything to do with the massive corruption, attempted coup and subsequent cover up - to leave no doubt that the rule of law is supreme and nobody is above it - clerk, investigator, senior official, Secretary of State or President/ex-President.Layne Staley said:
We are watching a movie, or so Q Anon told me. I think I like the ending to this as MANY politicians are going down and rightfully so.
To this date the only major politician I'm aware of ever going down was Dennis Hastert who the globalist probably set up for success and failure in the first place being able to manipulate him with his pedophilia. Bunch more peds going to be outed when this is all over.
As General Maximus stated just before the battle with the Germanic tribes in "Gladiator" - "On my order, unleash hell.". I sincerely hope Trump and Barr have given such and order, because this is truly an issue that has the ability to make or break the future of the country IMO. This is far beyond the pettiness of politics - this is literally the determination as to whether we have a legitimate government or a caste system IMO.
Agreed.
I think a lot of RINO's believe that they are better than Trump. What Trump's election should teach us is that THE PEOPLE really do have a say into who they want to lead them, come hell or high water.
At any rate, it's gonna be fun to watch.
I think a lot of RINO's believe that they are better than Trump. What Trump's election should teach us is that THE PEOPLE really do have a say into who they want to lead them, come hell or high water.
At any rate, it's gonna be fun to watch.
It's a new day in America.
But in this role? I don't think anyone knew this. Even the NYT seemed caught off guard and had to circle the wagons. The Dems didn't even have the talking points ready. They all thought it was Huber doing this and basically doing nothing.
With the ***** slapping of Steele in the memo and then this it's taken a huge turn in the last week. That memo is not a good look for DOJ. (not even going to try and spell that name. )
With the ***** slapping of Steele in the memo and then this it's taken a huge turn in the last week. That memo is not a good look for DOJ. (not even going to try and spell that name. )
Agreed, he's still human.Mtn_Guide said:
Some of you need to tap the breaks on the Barr love affair. He isn't all roses.
As per the Sara Carter article that Hawg posted, Barr may have already dirtied the laundry a little. The good thing is he has tons of experience in this particular job, having already served 25 years ago. Plus, it's likely he follows the law as it's been adjudicated, meaning he doesn't likely make legal decisions for his political party first, and then fit that decision into the adjudicated law like a growing list of Dem judges and attorneys.
Those types of decisions I may not care for.
Also, Durham's first mention was buried on page 37 of Baker's 150 page transcript from his testimony to the joint committee of congress on October 3rd, 2018 ... so Durham was already heavily involved before Barr arrived. Makes me wonder how much of the NYT article is retreaded news vs new news.aggiehawg said:
In an exceedingly rare type of post, I will actually sort of vindicate etcetera here. As much as he disdains the Mueller thread, he obviously reads it because Durham's name popped up months ago, right after Barr's confirmation. Although, other than Durham's extensive experience in prosecuting public officials for corruption was noted, it was still unclear exactly what Barr was tapping him for at the time.
Now we know he has Durham set up with a taint team to do a parallel construction to avoid a Garrity* problem caused by IG Horowitz's report.
*Garrity is a case that protects federal employee who are compelled to cooperate with IG's or lose their jobs cannot have that evidence used against them in a criminal proceeding.
P.S. You're welcome, etcetera.
No, we didn't know exactly what Durham had been tasked with investigating at the time. We did note that he was apparently looking into some leaks out of the FBI and was looking at James Baker. Baker's attorney instructed him not to answer some questions because he was under investigation specifically and by name, John Durham.backintexas2013 said:
But in this role? I don't think anyone knew this. Even the NYT seemed caught off guard and had to circle the wagons. The Dems didn't even have the talking points ready. They all thought it was Huber doing this and basically doing nothing.
With the ***** slapping of Steele in the memo and then this it's taken a huge turn in the last week. That memo is not a good look for DOJ. (not even going to try and spell that name. )
There were several months between Sessions' resignation and Barr's confirmation. As we know, Barr didn't sit back and wait to be confirmed before he was briefed and brought up to speed, putting things in place. He had Rosenstein contact Mueller about the form of the Report he wanted before he was confirmed, for instance.
benchmark said:Also, Durham's first mention was buried on page 37 of Baker's 150 page transcript from his testimony to the joint committee of congress on October 3rd, 2018 ... so Durham was already heavily involved before Barr arrived. Makes me wonder how much of the NYT article is retreaded news vs new news.aggiehawg said:
In an exceedingly rare type of post, I will actually sort of vindicate etcetera here. As much as he disdains the Mueller thread, he obviously reads it because Durham's name popped up months ago, right after Barr's confirmation. Although, other than Durham's extensive experience in prosecuting public officials for corruption was noted, it was still unclear exactly what Barr was tapping him for at the time.
Now we know he has Durham set up with a taint team to do a parallel construction to avoid a Garrity* problem caused by IG Horowitz's report.
*Garrity is a case that protects federal employee who are compelled to cooperate with IG's or lose their jobs cannot have that evidence used against them in a criminal proceeding.
P.S. You're welcome, etcetera.
Can you explain to us what the "non-roses" parts of him are?Mtn_Guide said:
Some of you need to tap the breaks on the Barr love affair. He isn't all roses.
Meet John Durham
Think these two will walk back their statement soon?Quote:
"John Durham is a fierce, fair prosecutor. As a career prosecutor, John has dedicated his life to public service and the pursuit of justice. He knows how to try tough cases, having taken on organized crime and government corruption. He will be an outstanding U.S. attorney," Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy said in a statement.
here is what is an absolute certainty.
When he's done with his investigation, he will either be a turncoat that ignored the law to benefit Trump OR another member of the deep state hell bent on covering up the malfeasance.
When he's done with his investigation, he will either be a turncoat that ignored the law to benefit Trump OR another member of the deep state hell bent on covering up the malfeasance.
I've noticed CNN isn't showing much interest in covering this story. Weird.
BMX Bandit said:
here is what is an absolute certainty.
When he's done with his investigation, he will either be a turncoat that ignored the law to benefit Trump OR another member of the deep state hell bent on covering up the malfeasance.
Featured Stories
See All
15:56
58m ago
1.0k
12:03
2h ago
2.0k
Longley shares how in-house competition has improved A&M's offense
by Ryan Brauninger
9:33
19h ago
4.9k
Aggies run-rule Purdue as 'Lefty' keeps no-no on scorekeeping oddity
by Kolton Becker