Wasn't CNN required by law to give notice of a RIF?Quote:
It wasn't lay-offs and severance packages. We just paid 100 people not to come to work here anymore
aggiehawg said:Wasn't CNN required by law to give notice of a RIF?Quote:
It wasn't lay-offs and severance packages. We just paid 100 people not to come to work here anymore
Quote:
This is when an employer lays off 500 or more full-time employees in a 30-day period, or when the employer lays off 50 to 499 full-time employees in a 30-day period and those employees make up at least 33% of the employer's workforce.
aggiehawg said:Wasn't CNN required by law to give notice of a RIF?Quote:
It wasn't lay-offs and severance packages. We just paid 100 people not to come to work here anymore
Her dog, Stevie Ray is a rockstar!!!Prognightmare said:
Jessica is PrincessButtercup on TAs. She's a great follow on Twitter too.
Thanks. Had just seen where the New Orleans Times Picayune had given their employees notice after it was acquired by their rival Advocate. But they fired the entire staff, so was confused of when the notification was required. Appreciate your clarification.Zombie Jon Snow said:aggiehawg said:Wasn't CNN required by law to give notice of a RIF?Quote:
It wasn't lay-offs and severance packages. We just paid 100 people not to come to work here anymore
Not likely no. It would have to involve 33% or more of employees.
WARN Act trigger for mass layoffs:Quote:
This is when an employer lays off 500 or more full-time employees in a 30-day period, or when the employer lays off 50 to 499 full-time employees in a 30-day period and those employees make up at least 33% of the employer's workforce.
captkirk said:
Meh...Zombie Jon Snow said:
90s...... but still too soon!!!!!!
jk..... funny....
(November 1991 to be exact)