All men worship and serve Idols!

731 Views | 44 Replies | Last: 20 yr ago by Notafraid
Notafraid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blueagman,

quote:

I find it ironic that from my studies the early church preached universal salvation. They also prayed for the dead, that they would receive salvation.


Would it bother you that 99.9% of all historians and theologians for the past 2000 years would disagree with that view?
blueagman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These are some interesting articles...

http://www.tentmaker.org/books/Prevailing.html

quote:
Proponents of universal salvation included Clement and Origen of Alexandria, Ambrose and
Jerome, among many others. The theologian Augustine (354-430 A.D.) was converted from heathenism to Christianity at
age 32. Consistent with his heathen roots, he believed in the endless punishment of the unsaved. His theology soon
became dominant in the church. Consequently, at the Fifth Ecumenical Council in 553 A.D. the church took an official
stand against the teaching of universal salvation.


http://askelm.com/news/n020812.htm

Of course, I am wrong plenty of times.
Notafraid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see no quotes of these church fathers in the first article, only spin of what this guy tells us that they beleived.

The second pulls a bunch of quotes out of context, or it seem just reads things into them... I am not going to waste my time addressing all of them, but if you could pull the top 3 quotes from the second article, I would be glad to address them and show you that most of them are not teaching a universal salvation. With that said, I'm not going to say that every chruch father mentioned there (and you have to recognize that some of these guys like Jerome were 3 to 400 years after Christ), and were prone to some error in places...


[This message has been edited by Notafraid (edited 2/28/2006 3:26p).]
Sink Maggots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That away to ignore what I said YYZ.

Don't beat around the bush -- if God chooses as YOU say then God would be a respecter of persons. However, if he is not a respecter of persons AS THE BIBLE SAYS then he chooses arbitrarily.

Let us listen to you instead of the word of God.
blueagman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
and you have to recognize that some of these guys like Jerome were 3 to 400 years after Christ), and were prone to some error in places...


And NotAfraid who is 2000+ years after Christ is using the same texts as those like Jerome, but he is smarter...
Notafraid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:

That away to ignore what I said YYZ.

Don't beat around the bush -- if God chooses as YOU say then God would be a respecter of persons. However, if he is not a respecter of persons AS THE BIBLE SAYS then he chooses arbitrarily.



What does it mean to be a respecter of persons? Doesn’t it mean that you look on someone with respect, that they are admirable, and noble, and worthy of something, perhaps they even make good choices that please us? By that definition those He chooses per I Corinthians 1 makes sense:

For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, so that no man may boast before God. But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, so that, just as it is written, "LET HIM WHO BOASTS, BOAST IN THE LORD." – 1Cor 1:26-36

So you see, He is no respecter of persons. He calls real screwed up people like me to be His, and I praise His name for that. It is by His grace (His unmerited favor) that I have been saved, and because of Him I am in Christ Jesus, not because of my good decision making capability! He made the decision that which I desired!

quote:

Let us listen to you instead of the word of God.


Well, I for one prefer the Word of God, which is why I prove my arguments BY the Word of God, and not through philosophical arguments about what I think it takes for man to be accountable!
Notafraid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blue,

quote:

And NotAfraid who is 2000+ years after Christ is using the same texts as those like Jerome, but he is smarter...


You are the one who has aligned yourself against all of Christendom, and 99.9% of all historians and theologians for the past 2000 years to take the side of an internet nut job. Wouldn’t that make you the one who has arrogated himself against even common reason it’s self? It would seem that you who have in the past exalted your own reason above the Word of God have been shown to be foolish, even by your own previous standards.
Sink Maggots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Acts 2:37 -- Brethren, what shall we do?

I will go by the word of God. It tells me what to do to be saved -- I will go by Peter's response, and all the words revealed by the Holy Spirit. It is so simple -- so simple. Anyone -- ANYONE -- can be saved -- those that are on a path leading to hell can change their lives and go to Heaven by the grace of God.

What about your system? If you are going to hell there is nothing you can do to turn from that and follow God. Why even evangelize the lost? What difference would it make if they were chosen for hell from the beginning? God's word would serve absolutely no purpose, and Jesus' death on the cross would serve no purpose because why did he have to die if I was already going to hell before I was born? He didn't have to if your system was the case -- because there is no remission of sins. My destiny is set before I am born.

By the way -- a respecter of persons is one who shows partiality. God who does not show partiality cannot be impartial in your system. God would be a liar, and you would have to just throw your bible in the trash.
blueagman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
You are the one who has aligned yourself against all of Christendom, and 99.9% of all historians and theologians for the past 2000 years to take the side of an internet nut job. Wouldn’t that make you the one who has arrogated himself against even common reason it’s self? It would seem that you who have in the past exalted your own reason above the Word of God have been shown to be foolish, even by your own previous standards.


Just cause I say it here, doesn't mean I believe it. I think it is an interesting take though. Man, you are so black and white, no gray area for NotAfraid. AA calls this type style of thinking being a "dry drunk".

Notafraid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blue,

quote:
Just cause I say it here, doesn't mean I believe it. I think it is an interesting take though.


So when you said this: “I find it ironic that from my studies the early church preached universal salvation. They also prayed for the dead, that they would receive salvation.”

You were just pretending to believe it?
quote:

Man, you are so black and white, no gray area for NotAfraid. AA calls this type style of thinking being a "dry drunk".


“God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.” That is a good prayer!


Notafraid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
77,

quote:

Acts 2:37 -- Brethren, what shall we do?

I will go by the word of God. It tells me what to do to be saved -- I will go by Peter's response, and all the words revealed by the Holy Spirit. It is so simple -- so simple. Anyone -- ANYONE -- can be saved -- those that are on a path leading to hell can change their lives and go to Heaven by the grace of God.



Yes, but you know that I have always agreed with you on this. That anyone can be saved, but my point has always been that people who don’t ever want to be saved can’t be, so it’s not so much choosing Christ, as the *will* to choose Christ.

The scriptures teach that No one chooses for God, unless God has worked in their heart, giving them eyes to see, and ears to hear. That has always been the argument, and you know it…


quote:

What about your system? If you are going to hell there is nothing you can do to turn from that and follow God. Why even evangelize the lost? What difference would it make if they were chosen for hell from the beginning?


Now, how many times have I answered this for you? Nobody knows which people God will open their hearts to receive the gospel, and it’s really not our business to ponder that, but just to preach the Word faithfully. Some plant, others water, but God makes it grow… It is true that the preaching of the gospel with some will never make a difference in them, but that is no reason not to preach it… The bible does not teach that just because God is sovereign that man should be a fatalist…

quote:

God's word would serve absolutely no purpose, and Jesus' death on the cross would serve no purpose because why did he have to die if I was already going to hell before I was born? He didn't have to if your system was the case -- because there is no remission of sins. My destiny is set before I am born.


Jesus death served a purpose. It saved everyone he died for, and He causes everyone He died for to be saved, no one will snatch them from His hand! Your system means He accomplished nothing on the cross, only a potential salvation ultimately left up to their own glorious self determination. The scriptures know nothing of this.

quote:

By the way -- a respecter of persons is one who shows partiality. God who does not show partiality cannot be impartial in your system. God would be a liar, and you would have to just throw your bible in the trash.


No, your view is the one He shows partiality to, because according to your view He chooses those who choose Him… So, since you do such a good job of choosing for Him, and obeying Him, you are rewarded with salvation in the end… My view is exactly what I quoted out of 1Cor 1… Not that there is a level playing field, and that we are all at 0 and God saves us, but even more so, that we are in the negative, even despised, and ignoble, and screwed up is the kind of people that the scriptures say there that God chooses. My view teaches that God saves by grace, unmerited favor, which is by definition saying that I don’t deserve to be saved, but am. My view is that I am not in Christ because of me, and I would leave Him if I were not preserved by His power. I am simply a humble recipient of all these things that I don’t deserve. All I can do is be humbled by it, and glorify Him! It is your view that teaches the opposite, and exalts yourself! You are in Him because of you, what you do, and will, and act on… This is what separates you from those who perish, so by that very definition, you have earned a favored relationship by those actions… In your view, you have made him partial to you, by your own hand. Tell us, what is better about you that you are in Christ, where as your neighbor who has heard of Christ is not in Christ? What is that special and glorious spark that is in you that causes you to make the right moves for salvation, and him not?


[This message has been edited by Notafraid (edited 3/1/2006 12:20a).]
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.