Exactly

Truth be told 77, a lot of your fellow believers have left you high and dry on the 6k-10k theory, so I guess you consider them to be smarter than you too.

i can say that if somebody like getting off w/ a horse, whatever. i think it's gross but what the heck do i care, it doesn't affect me in any way. not like they are going to have hybrid babies. and also which is important is that it doesn't hurt anybody.

there are many strong points to be made against homosexual adoption, marriage, etc. but they beastiality card just makes you look foolish.

and from what I can tell, they don't ask you on an adoption quesionaire if you have ever banged a chicken. Its just a stupid, invalid comparison.


an animal cannot consent to human sex. period. no matter what notafraid says.

(i am not implying notafraid has animal sex, only that he has argued consent is possible on other threads)

I only care about the bible -- I do not care about men. Those people who "left" have no firm foundation on which to stand. The bible is clear on it as I have said. Moses and Jesus both believe it -- I haven't "left" them.

by the way, toolag, i was being sarcastic earlier.

all other things being equal, a home with a mom and dad is the best situation for a child. for the life of me, i can't understand why anyone would deny a child the opportunity to grow up in a family with those that love him/her, regardless of the orientation of the parents.

I am not talking about adoption -- I am talking about supporting sex between man/man or man/animal.

I asked the question. Will you answer it?

quote:

---

i can say that if somebody like getting off w/ a horse, whatever. i think it's gross but what the heck do i care, it doesn't affect me in any way. not like they are going to have hybrid babies. and also which is important is that it doesn't hurt anybody.

---

Would you support their marriage?

I thought I did:

quote:

---

an animal cannot consent to human sex. period.

---

(though i don't really support any sex unless I am involved in it)

they can't be married. by definition, marriage is between a man and a woman.


now why don't you answer this question:

Would you deny a child an opportunity to live with two loving female parents if no one else would take the child?

What?

We must not have a meeting of the minds

I am not arguing adoption. Of course I have a negative opinion about it, but it's better than being in an orphans home etc...

again, what do i care if they make a human/animal marriage? it has nothing to do w/ me. also, animals don't consent to being killed and eatin.

OK -- that's all. So you would allow marriage between man and animal also.

Why are you equating a human being with an animal? If we cannot come to the consensus that man is much more than a chicken, bicycle, or washing machine then there is no point to this discussion.


"There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't."

meeh

Were talking about marriage here. If you say man can marry man -- then why can't man marry animal? I say beastialitists(???) should have there rights as well.

77

With your attempts at making homosexuality rights = to beasteality and your theories on the age of the Earth, you are providing non-christians a reason to not take the Lord or the Bible seriously.

I wonder if your views are shared by most Christians.

Why should homosexuals have more rights than a person who practices beastiality? Because you don't like it? That person has the same rights as a homosexual.

.............. you can't figure out the differences between homosexuality and beasteality.

Sad.

You are being left high and dry again on this board by people who were on your side.

Use an argument that is obviously relational, or spend more time showing the rest of us of the similarities between the two that joins them together so we can debate if you would like to continue.

I know the difference -- man -v- animal. My point is that in God's eyes there is no difference. They are both sinful.

man & man - you say is fine.
man & animal - you say is not fine
You don't believe the word of God so why is there a difference in your eyes?

When I think of homos, I instantly think of someone buggering a dog. I mean c'mon the similarities are obvious!

They are both unnatural -- what's the difference? Please tell me I am dying to know.

Driving a car is "unnatural". Flying in a plane is "unnatural". Flying in a plane while buggering your dog is really "unnatural".

That a way to dismiss it with no thought...

The only solution to this issue is for the government to get out of the marriage business. If two men happen to find a church that will marry them so be it.


"There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't."

quote:

---

That a way to dismiss it with no thought...

---

Just following your lead . . .