Reformation Week

16,970 Views | 381 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Quo Vadis?
Create Account
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

you asked which group has the gospel as taught by the apostles - the apostolic teaching, or the apostolic deposit of faith. the one the bible says was passed down once for all to the saints.

my question to you is, if we were going to look at this with fresh eyes, zero bias, zero presuppositions... how would we figure this out?

what would we look for as evidence?

what tests would we come up with?

how could we do this as a question of actual fact, not opinion?

Read the Bible?
10andBOUNCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quo Vadis? said:

10andBOUNCE said:

Kinda weird the same early Church who endured persecution and saints who sacrificed their lives for the gospel are now the ones okay burning those who are dying as they profess grace alone, faith alone, and Christ alone.


These people were willing to die for their faith, but were going to apostatize over some made up sola's?

I'd rather fall under that category than man made sacraments.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Create Account said:

Zobel said:

you asked which group has the gospel as taught by the apostles - the apostolic teaching, or the apostolic deposit of faith. the one the bible says was passed down once for all to the saints.

my question to you is, if we were going to look at this with fresh eyes, zero bias, zero presuppositions... how would we figure this out?

what would we look for as evidence?

what tests would we come up with?

how could we do this as a question of actual fact, not opinion?

Read the Bible?

Seems logical to me.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dermdoc said:

Zobel said:

this is not true. read the torah again.

I read the Bible. What I said is specifically mentioned in the NT.
Truly curious, do you follow all the I nelieve 713 laws of the Torah? If so, I am impressed.

I have always been taught Christ took away all the laws with the New Covenant. You obviously believe differently.

I know some Orthodox folk and a priest. Have never heard them take this line of reasoning.

Christ says the opposite - that he didn't come to abolish the Torah, and anyone who teaches people to not follow the Torah is least in the kingdom.

I follow all of the Torah that is applicable to me as a gentile Christian. The church continued to keep the Torah.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where'd you get the Bible from and how do you know that it's reliable?
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zobel said:

dermdoc said:

Zobel said:

this is not true. read the torah again.

I read the Bible. What I said is specifically mentioned in the NT.
Truly curious, do you follow all the I nelieve 713 laws of the Torah? If so, I am impressed.

I have always been taught Christ took away all the laws with the New Covenant. You obviously believe differently.

I know some Orthodox folk and a priest. Have never heard them take this line of reasoning.

Christ says the opposite - that he didn't come to abolish the Torah, and anyone who teaches people to not follow the Torah is least in the kingdom.

I follow all of the Torah that is applicable to me as a gentile Christian. The church continued to keep the Torah.

As a Gentile Christian, I follow what the Council of Jerusalem said Gentile Christians should not do. No idolatry, no eating of blood, and no sexual immorality. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Create Account
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

Where'd you get the Bible from and how do you know that it's reliable?

I would get it from the book store. I'm not sure how to answer your second question. I would just know by reading it.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zobel said:

dermdoc said:

Zobel said:

this is not true. read the torah again.

I read the Bible. What I said is specifically mentioned in the NT.
Truly curious, do you follow all the I nelieve 713 laws of the Torah? If so, I am impressed.

I have always been taught Christ took away all the laws with the New Covenant. You obviously believe differently.

I know some Orthodox folk and a priest. Have never heard them take this line of reasoning.

Christ says the opposite - that he didn't come to abolish the Torah, and anyone who teaches people to not follow the Torah is least in the kingdom.

I follow all of the Torah that is applicable to me as a gentile Christian. The church continued to keep the Torah.

Matthew 5 17
Do not think I have come to abolish the Law or Prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfill them.
So Christ is the fulfillment of the Law.

Paul said it like this
Galatians 3 23-25
We were held in custody under the Law, locked up until faith should be revealed. So the Law became our guardian to lead us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. Now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.

Praise the Lord!

No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That is a literal application of the Torah by the apostles. In other words, that means the Torah is still applicable to the church.

And St Paul refers directly to it when he says - expel the wicked from among you.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And wasn't Jesus criticized for not following the Torah as far as healing on the Sabbath? And of being a wine bibber and glutton?
And of course the dealings with the Samaritan woman at the well, the adulteress, consorting with tax collectors, prostitutes, and unclean folks by Torah standards.
From my reading of Scriptures, one of the reasons Jesus was crucified was that He did not follow the Torah as interpreted by the Jewish religious leaders.
I believe Jesus was saying the Torah was a changed heart, that the law was inscribed on our hearts, that we are new creatures, and we are born again.
Not a list of rules but a changed heart.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Create Account said:

Zobel said:

Where'd you get the Bible from and how do you know that it's reliable?

I would get it from the book store. I'm not sure how to answer your second question. I would just know by reading it.


I can't tell if you're being flippant or serious. What do you think people did in, say the 3rd century? Or the 9th? Or 13th?
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Acts 10:38 And he said to them, "You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a Jew to associate with or to visit anyone of another nation, but God has shown me that I should not call any person common or unclean."
Create Account
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

Create Account said:

Zobel said:

Where'd you get the Bible from and how do you know that it's reliable?

I would get it from the book store. I'm not sure how to answer your second question. I would just know by reading it.


I can't tell if you're being flippant or serious. What do you think people did in, say the 3rd century? Or the 9th? Or 13th?

I'm not sure where a person in the 3rd, 9th, or 13th century would get a Bible from. Probably no where since it would be expensive.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zobel said:

That is a literal application of the Torah by the apostles. In other words, that means the Torah is still applicable to the church.

And St Paul refers directly to it when he says - expel the wicked from among you.

No problem with that. Referring them for execution by civil authorities is another story to me.

And do you agree that the Council of Jerusalem stated what Gentile Christians were required under Torah?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Acts 10 9-16
About noon the following day as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray. He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was prepared, he fell into a trance.
He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. It contained all kinds of four footed animals, as well as reptiles and birds. Then a voice told him, "Get up Peter, kill and eat".
"Surely not Lord" Peter replied "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean"
The voice said to him a second time, "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean".

No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ok, one at a time.

first, if you say "i'm going to follow the council of Jerusalem" that's good. my question is why stop at that council, and not follow all the rest?

two, as i mentioned, that council examined the question of what to do about the gentiles, and where did the apostles go to get the answer? Leviticus. they took a close reading of Leviticus, and applied all the holiness code commandments that were given to both the sons of Israel and the foreigners dwelling among them in the land. this affirms that the torah applies to the church.

next, you cut the Lord's quote short. "...For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven." He goes on, but the point i'd like to make is it sure does seem like you are suggesting that St Paul is contradicting Christ, and it sure does seem like you're removing a whole lot (basically all?) of the torah from your life. how is your "fulfilled" different than "abolished"? they look functionally identical from here. St Paul denies teaching people to not follow the Torah.

then... St Paul quotes from the Torah as authoritative. specifically in the matter of church discipline - which you said the Torah doesn't say - he quotes the torah where it is explicitly talking about death, for the crime which he is discussing with the Corinthians! (Lev 20:11)! how can you say the Torah doesn't apply to church discipline??

yes the pharisees criticized Christ for not following the Torah, and they were WRONG. the point that Christ makes is that their understanding and application of the Torah is WRONG. HE was right - HE gave them the Torah. THEY were wrong, they misunderstood it. the Torah was never given to prevent someone from, for example, saving a life on the Sabbath. you either say - Christ broke His own law (??) and they pharisees were right in accusing Him (??!!) - or they were wrong and He did not. since the psalms and prophets say he has no sin, and the Torah reveals sin, i don't think we should say Christ broke violated the Torah. Especially because He specifically says He fulfills it.

A changed heart doesn't mean you don't follow the Torah. A changed heart means if you have love for your neighbor, you won't break the Torah. That is exactly what St Paul teaches (Gal 5:14) which echoes the words of the Lord (Matthew 22:40). you quoted the fruits of the Spirit - that comes in a discourse about the Torah, where St Paul concludes with saying "against such things there is no law," meaning, if you do these things you will fulfill the torah.

and if we're going to say - only council of Jerusalem applies - what about the ten commandments? are you free to murder, commit adultery? of course not. there is nowhere in the scriptures that says what is and isn't applicable, because it is ALL applicable. and in fact the scriptures explicitly say that 1) it is all applicable forever and 2) it was never canceled. otherwise we make St Paul -- and the Lord!! -- a liar.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
and what does this mean? what is this story in the context of? a gentile.

gentiles were unclean, because they were out in the world. but Christ in His death and self-offering made atonement, purification, for all of creation.

the point isn't that the law was broken, or that things were never clean or unclean, it was that through the blood of Christ all mankind could come to the God of Israel, because He had made them clean.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i think this is flippant, then? hard to say.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zobel said:

ok, one at a time.

first, if you say "i'm going to follow the council of Jerusalem" that's good. my question is why stop at that council, and not follow all the rest?

two, as i mentioned, that council examined the question of what to do about the gentiles, and where did the apostles go to get the answer? Leviticus. they took a close reading of Leviticus, and applied all the holiness code commandments that were given to both the sons of Israel and the foreigners dwelling among them in the land. this affirms that the torah applies to the church.

next, you cut the Lord's quote short. "...For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven." He goes on, but the point i'd like to make is it sure does seem like you are suggesting that St Paul is contradicting Christ, and it sure does seem like you're removing a whole lot (basically all?) of the torah from your life. how is your "fulfilled" different than "abolished"? they look functionally identical from here. St Paul denies teaching people to not follow the Torah.

then... St Paul quotes from the Torah as authoritative. specifically in the matter of church discipline - which you said the Torah doesn't say - he quotes the torah where it is explicitly talking about death, for the crime which he is discussing with the Corinthians! (Lev 20:11)! how can you say the Torah doesn't apply to church discipline??

yes the pharisees criticized Christ for not following the Torah, and they were WRONG. the point that Christ makes is that their understanding and application of the Torah is WRONG. HE was right - HE gave them the Torah. THEY were wrong, they misunderstood it. the Torah was never given to prevent someone from, for example, saving a life on the Sabbath. you either say - Christ broke His own law (??) and they pharisees were right in accusing Him (??!!) - or they were wrong and He did not. since the psalms and prophets say he has no sin, and the Torah reveals sin, i don't think we should say Christ broke violated the Torah. Especially because He specifically says He fulfills it.

A changed heart doesn't mean you don't follow the Torah. A changed heart means if you have love for your neighbor, you won't break the Torah. That is exactly what St Paul teaches (Gal 5:14) which echoes the words of the Lord (Matthew 22:40). you quoted the fruits of the Spirit - that comes in a discourse about the Torah, where St Paul concludes with saying "against such things there is no law," meaning, if you do these things you will fulfill the torah.

and if we're going to say - only council of Jerusalem applies - what about the ten commandments? are you free to murder, commit adultery? of course not. there is nowhere in the scriptures that says what is and isn't applicable, because it is ALL applicable. and in fact the scriptures explicitly say that 1) it is all applicable forever and 2) it was never canceled. otherwise we make St Paul -- and the Lord!! -- a liar.

After reading this I think we are saying the same thing in a different way.

The key is Jesus changed how the Torah was supposed to be applied and interpreted. I think when you are born again (or whatever you want to call it) you follow Torah naturally because it is inscribed on your heart.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Create Account
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

i think this is flippant, then? hard to say.

I'm not sure I understand your question or what it's referring to. Or why you're asking me 20 questions. I was essentially asking is there only one denomination with the gospel message? Or is there a gospel that several believe and only differ on minor things.
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

and what does this mean? what is this story in the context of? a gentile.

gentiles were unclean, because they were out in the world. but Christ in His death and self-offering made atonement, purification, for all of creation.

the point isn't that the law was broken, or that things were never clean or unclean, it was that through the blood of Christ all mankind could come to the God of Israel, because He had made them clean.

People couldn't come to the God of Israel before? The man Peter is speaking to was "a devout man who feared God with all his household, gave alms generously to the people, and prayed continually to God." The Ethiopian eunuch two chapters prior "had come to Jerusalem to worship."
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They were unclean, yes. They were not allowed to be in the temple or participate in the sacrifices or Passover. To do that you had to become an Israelite, be circumcised. Then you weren't a gentile any more.

Now you don't. Hence the confusion at the council of Jerusalem.
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

They were unclean, yes. They were not allowed to be in the temple or participate in the sacrifices or Passover. To do that you had to become an Israelite, be circumcised. Then you weren't a gentile any more.

Now you don't. Hence the confusion at the council of Jerusalem.

But that doesn't create one, unified group under Christ, but two: Israelites and clean, converted Gentiles. And they follow two different laws.

From a letter written specifically to Jews: Heb. 7:12 For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

What was the change?
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To the first, there is only one Assembly or Church, the Israel of God. Not two. But there are two groups, yes - the sons of Israel, and the gentiles who are grafted in. The Torah has commandments mostly directed at the sons of Israel, but it also speaks to everyone. The Torah is never abolished, and is applied by the apostles to the gentiles.

Hebrews is a meditation about Christ's greatness with a focus on Psalm 110. This picks up in the middle of that discussion. St Paul continues saying that there is a new covenant, and that covenant is mediated by a new priesthood (other than Levi or Aaron's). Abraham tithes to Melchizedek, which means Melchizedek is greater - and greater than Levi. The messiah is a priest according to that priesthood. But Christ, as St Paul continues, comes from Judah. So if Christ is a priest, he cannot be a priest under the Torah. There must be something new - a new covenant, with a new priesthood, and because Melchizedek is greater than Abraham, the priesthood described in Ps 110 is greater than the Levitical, the new covenant is greater than the old. He is not a priest according to the Torah. This is how the Messiah can be son of David, of Judah, and be a priest - which under the Torah is impossible. This is another way to show that Christ is greater than Moses, which he previously said.

Just like the covenant at Sinai built on the covenant with Abraham - but did not abolish it! - this new and final covenant builds on the old.

The Levitical priests were tied to an altar. They served at one altar, and couldn't go making sacrifices elsewhere. Our priests today are not Levites - they can't be, they're not Jewish. So in what way are our priests, priests? They're priests of the new order according to Melchizedek, with new altars in all nations as the prophets foretold, after the pattern of Christ the great high priest. This explains why St Paul says we eat from an altar that they (the Jews and the Levitical priests) have no right to eat from.

This isn't an argument that the Torah is abolished. Because, again, that would make both Christ and St Paul a liar, and it would make it extremely confusing why the Apostles and St Paul applied it and taught from it authoritatively.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The New Testament doesn't say that though. Unless you're saying the Jews were doing it wrong, which is true. I mean the way they interpreted that you couldn't heal on the sabbath was wrong - not that keeping the sabbath was wrong. It is wrong for sons of Israel to work on the sabbath. The Torah says that. But that doesn't mean that suddenly the whole thing doesn't matter at all. If that were true, murder, adultery, etc would be permissible too.

And we agree, if you follow the Spirit you won't violate the Torah. But that doesn't invalidate the Torah! It means that if you break the Torah, you're not following the spirit. So this affirms the Torah, which is what St. Paul says in Romans 3. The Torah is as applicable today as ever.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You said which denomination had the gospel passed down from the apostles and to find out you said you'd go buy a Bible and read it. But why read the Bible and not maybe the Quran or Book of Mormon? I'm saying, how do you know the Bible is right? How do we know what the apostles taught? I'm asking because I'm trying to actually get to your question. Not asking in bad faith.
Create Account
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

You said which denomination had the gospel passed down from the apostles and to find out you said you'd go buy a Bible and read it. But why read the Bible and not maybe the Quran or Book of Mormon? I'm saying, how do you know the Bible is right? How do we know what the apostles taught? I'm asking because I'm trying to actually get to your question. Not asking in bad faith.
Because the gospel is a Christian message. It comes from the Bible. Not the book of mormon or quran.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Both the Muslims and the Mormons say the Christian faith isn't right, and they have the true message of Jesus.

How do we know what the apostles taught? How do you know that the Bible has the right info in it?
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A very timely discussion as we in the RCC celebrate a landmark document, Nostra Aetate, written 60 years ago that reset previous Catholic - Jewish relationships.

From the prayer service 2 days ago,

"Pope Leo XIV referenced "Nostra Aetate," which set forth the Catholic Church's relation to non-Christian religions, in an Oct. 28 interfaith prayer service closing the "International Meeting for Peace: Religions and Cultures in Dialogue" in Rome.

Stressing the need for dialogue and friendship, Pope Leo noted the gathering took place on the 60th anniversary of "Nostra Aetate," and referenced the text directly, saying, "We cannot truly pray to God as Father of all if we treat any people as other than sisters and brothers, for all are created in God's image."

+++

From the Catholic standpoint, we do not believe in a "replacement theology" when it comes to our Jewish brothers and sisters. We pray alongside them to the same God.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

A very timely discussion as we in the RCC celebrate a landmark document, Nostra Aetate, written 60 years ago that reset previous Catholic - Jewish relationships.

From the prayer service 2 days ago,

"Pope Leo XIV referenced "Nostra Aetate," which set forth the Catholic Church's relation to non-Christian religions, in an Oct. 28 interfaith prayer service closing the "International Meeting for Peace: Religions and Cultures in Dialogue" in Rome.

Stressing the need for dialogue and friendship, Pope Leo noted the gathering took place on the 60th anniversary of "Nostra Aetate," and referenced the text directly, saying, "We cannot truly pray to God as Father of all if we treat any people as other than sisters and brothers, for all are created in God's image."

+++

From the Catholic standpoint, we do not believe in a "replacement theology" when it comes to our Jewish brothers and sisters. We pray alongside them to the same God.



Who is the new Israel, Pablo?
Create Account
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

Both the Muslims and the Mormons say the Christian faith isn't right, and they have the true message of Jesus.

How do we know what the apostles taught? How do you know that the Bible has the right info in it?
I already answered that. I read it and I think it's true. The muslims and mormons basically have the same message that one person went off and had a vision and came back and said "everybody is wrong and this book I was given is true." Obviously hoax if you ask me.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zobel said:

Both the Muslims and the Mormons say the Christian faith isn't right, and they have the true message of Jesus.

How do we know what the apostles taught? How do you know that the Bible has the right info in it?

Faith.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Create Account said:

Zobel said:

Both the Muslims and the Mormons say the Christian faith isn't right, and they have the true message of Jesus.

How do we know what the apostles taught? How do you know that the Bible has the right info in it?

I already answered that. I read it and I think it's true. The muslims and mormons basically have the same message that one person went off and had a vision and came back and said "everybody is wrong and this book I was given is true." Obviously hoax if you ask me.

Agree.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Surely Muslims and Mormons will say they have faith?
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

Both the Muslims and the Mormons say the Christian faith isn't right, and they have the true message of Jesus.

How do we know what the apostles taught? How do you know that the Bible has the right info in it?


The Mormons also claim an ecclesiastical structure similar to that of Rome and the EO with claimed knowledge outside of Scripture..why shouldn't I give them equal or more weight on extra-biblical claims than Rome or EO?

Maybe they have better sources than anybody else for historical truth...



 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.