Let us look at how this plays out in the Apostle Paul's letter to the Roman Christians of both Jew and Gentile lineage.
Romans 1:7 (ESV)
"7 To all those in Rome who are loved by God and called to be saints:"
The letter is addressed to both Jew and Gentile believers in Rome.
St. Paul further clarified here.
Romans 1:16 (ESV)
"16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek."
So let's see the power of God for salvation to both Jew and Gentile/Greek believers to the Romans.
Romans Chapter Nine
Romans 9:1-5 (ESV)
"I am speaking the truth in Christ (I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit) 2 that I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my kinsmen according to the flesh. 4 They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. 5 To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen."
Therefore, this portion of the text is addressed to his friends that he is mourning over who have rejected Christ and are fellow Jews like himself as well as to Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians struggling with other Jewish authorities.
At this time the Edomites were even among the Israelites, since 2nd Century BC.
"The Greek name for Edom in the LXX. After the exile { (586 BC)} the name designated the region in Judea from Beth-zur to south of Beer-sheba, an area occupied in part by Edomites (Idumeans). Herod the Great was an Idumean, and people from Idumea came to hear Jesus (Mark 3:8)."
https://www.compellingtruth.org/Edomites.html
Obadiah, the minor prophet is from the region where Edomites lived at the time.
As per the tradition Obadiah was a convert from the land of Edom (Talmud 39).
"The story of Romulus and Remus:
According to the Jewish historians, Romulus, the founder of Rome was from the lineage of Esau. Read the story of Romulus and Remus.
From Edom came forth Idumaea, and Herodian dynasty. "
Edomites also called Idumaeas also connect to Greek ethnicity.
"The early Christians were from the lineage of Edomite (Esau):
According to Don Isaac Abarbanel (1437-1508) a tradition existed that many of the early Christians were Edomites.
One authority who dealt with this matter Ernest L. Martin, 1932-2002.
Martin claimed ("The People That History Forgot", 1993, USA) that most of the Edomites from Edom (southeast of Judah) and many from Tyre went to the West (Italy, etc) where they became Christian.
Martin admittedly had an agenda. He was making an historical-cultural point rather than a racial one.
His book says that Non-Israelite Samaritans (originally from Cutha in Babylon) along with other Middle Eastern peoples (such as the Edomites) migrated en masse to western regions of the Roman Empire.
They became Christian but retained something of their previous practices and influenced early Christianity with their pagan traditions, and pagan festivals."
https://clseducation.org/2016/12/18/esau-the-father-of-rome-greece-and-christianity/
King Herod, though a terrible one, did build the second temple fulfilling Hebrew prophecy. The man Job is said to have been a descendent of Essau. So was Obadiah the Prophet.
So this definitely has nothing to do with Edomites hardening nor physical-Jews hardening. See all the thousands of conversions to Christ in the book of Acts when the Gospel is preached. Most all other early church leaders were Jewishsee the Apostles ethnicity.
St. Paul is in mourning over individuals that he studied with and most likely some of the ones who persecuted the church with him in verses 1-5. He even goes as far as to say that he wishes he were cut off instead.
6-7
"6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, 7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring,"
Literally in the Greek "Not all of Israel is Israel."
And what makes up Israel? And some not of Abraham's physical seed in verse 7. So what makes up Israel according to the Apostle? Both Jew and Gentile. To do exegesis here. We have to see Pauline thought earlier in his letter to the Galatians to further solidify that St. Paul is not speaking of the hardening of the Jews or Edomites here. For the Gospel is for the elect form every nation, tribe, and tongue.
Galatians 6:15-16
"15 For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. 16 And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the ISRAEL OF GOD."
Meaning once again that Jews and Gentiles make up Israel in Pauline thought. And we will get into Romans 11 later.
Paul is also reaching back to this in chapter 2.
Romans 2:28-29
"28 For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. 29 But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God."
The rest of verse 7-11
"but "Through Isaac shall your offspring be named." 8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. 9 For this is what the promise said: "About this time next year I will return, and Sarah shall have a son." 10 And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or badin order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls"
So, hold onto what Paul has already established. Election is about the Israel of God made up of both Jew and Gentile.
And read renowned Hebrew scholar named John Gill and his commentary on Malachi 1 as well because both the Old and New Testaments reach back and forth as does Paul here.
"11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or badin order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls"
God elects from both Jew and Gentile unconditionally and bases his purpose of election on before the Christian is even born…"and had done nothing either good or bad."
12-14
"12 she was told, "The older will serve the younger." 13 As it is written, "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated."
Did Essau receive the objective blessings of circumcision? Yes. Was he wicked? Yes he was. See below on Micah which stretches back to Genesis, which I will post soon.
But Essau didn't receive the internal blessing of the conenant and didn't bear a sin by the name of Joseph like Jacob did either.
14 What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part? By no means!"
"The number one objection through the years to double predestination is this is not American equal opportunity God here! We just find 30 different theories outside of scripture to argue against this! This makes God into Hitler!" Wrong.
How dare you question the application of the Holiness and Justice of God! For this is his full character.
"Who is thou oh man who is complaining against God?"
Seems to fit every objection here. The opposition reading their unreformed beliefs into the text, doesn't raise such a fuss if the text of Romans 9 were discussing merely physical-Israel or Edom or whatever they make up in adding or taking away from God's holy Word.
And the Apostle Paul states that there is no injustice with God in a manner of speaking and that there is no injustice with God by no means.
Humans either receive mercy or they receive justice. No one receives injustice. And please raise your hand if you want justice from God in your own life?
Verse 15
{15 For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."}
God is free. He has freewill! Whom could mean both singular and plural referring to both Jew and Gentile believers making of Israel in the New Covenant.
Verse 16
"16 So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy."
So it doesn't depend upon freewill. Clearly.
17-18
{17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." 18 So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.}
By nature man hardens his own heart like Pharaoh did.
Paul calls the unregenerate "slaves to sin."
But here the Apostle says that it is God who ultimately hardened Pharaoh. And the New Testament always had supremacy in interpreting the Old Testament for us. I can give you several examples as to why this is mandatory.
19-21
{19 You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" 20 But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" 21 Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?}
You are still likely having the same response to these things and I have experienced this through many years of discussions, which further demonstrates that this exegesis is is absolutely correct. "Why does he still find fault?"
22-24
"22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory 24 even us whom he has called, not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles?
Not from Jews only but also from Gentiles. Once again, Paul is reminding us that this passage is not about the hardening of the Jews or Edomites or whatever.
And in the following, Paul is now dealing with Jewish believers and skeptics who saw Gentiles and were taught that Gentiles were dogs.
Paul had to keep reiterating this to Jewish believers. For Paul had to even deal with the Apostle Peter and his Jew crowd for refusing to eat at the same table as Gentile converts.
For Israel now is both Jew and Gentile and this is the rock of offense.
{25 As indeed he says in Hosea,
"Those who were not my people I will call 'my people,'
and her who was not beloved I will call 'beloved.'"
26 "And in the very place where it was said to them, 'You are not my people,'
there they will be called 'sons of the living God.'"
27 And Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: "Though the number of the sons of Israel[c] be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant of them will be saved, 28 for the Lord will carry out his sentence upon the earth fully and without delay." 29 And as Isaiah predicted,
"If the Lord of hosts had not left us offspring,
we would have been like Sodom
and become like Gomorrah."
Religious leaders of Israel's Unbelief
30 What shall we say, then? That Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness have attained it, that is, a righteousness that is by faith; 31 but that Israel who pursued a law that would lead to righteousness did not succeed in reaching that law. 32 Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the stumbling stone, 33 as it is written,
"Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense;
and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame."}
Gentiles are true Jews by faith now. Gentiles are apart of the New Testament Israel. In fact, you see Gentiles entering the covenant in the Old Testament in several places.
See my thread on what is a Jew? And what is Israel in the New Covenant?
Lastly, Rebekah was an individual. Hahah. Who is she supposed to represent? Pharaoh was an individual. Who is he supposed to represent?
Read the following two posts for more prolegomena on our interpretation of Romans Nine, Malachi 1, and Genesis. For they reach back and forth for proper understanding.
Grace and Peace,
Joshua Wallace
Romans 1:7 (ESV)
"7 To all those in Rome who are loved by God and called to be saints:"
The letter is addressed to both Jew and Gentile believers in Rome.
St. Paul further clarified here.
Romans 1:16 (ESV)
"16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek."
So let's see the power of God for salvation to both Jew and Gentile/Greek believers to the Romans.
Romans Chapter Nine
Romans 9:1-5 (ESV)
"I am speaking the truth in Christ (I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit) 2 that I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my kinsmen according to the flesh. 4 They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. 5 To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen."
Therefore, this portion of the text is addressed to his friends that he is mourning over who have rejected Christ and are fellow Jews like himself as well as to Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians struggling with other Jewish authorities.
At this time the Edomites were even among the Israelites, since 2nd Century BC.
"The Greek name for Edom in the LXX. After the exile { (586 BC)} the name designated the region in Judea from Beth-zur to south of Beer-sheba, an area occupied in part by Edomites (Idumeans). Herod the Great was an Idumean, and people from Idumea came to hear Jesus (Mark 3:8)."
https://www.compellingtruth.org/Edomites.html
Obadiah, the minor prophet is from the region where Edomites lived at the time.
As per the tradition Obadiah was a convert from the land of Edom (Talmud 39).
"The story of Romulus and Remus:
According to the Jewish historians, Romulus, the founder of Rome was from the lineage of Esau. Read the story of Romulus and Remus.
From Edom came forth Idumaea, and Herodian dynasty. "
Edomites also called Idumaeas also connect to Greek ethnicity.
"The early Christians were from the lineage of Edomite (Esau):
According to Don Isaac Abarbanel (1437-1508) a tradition existed that many of the early Christians were Edomites.
One authority who dealt with this matter Ernest L. Martin, 1932-2002.
Martin claimed ("The People That History Forgot", 1993, USA) that most of the Edomites from Edom (southeast of Judah) and many from Tyre went to the West (Italy, etc) where they became Christian.
Martin admittedly had an agenda. He was making an historical-cultural point rather than a racial one.
His book says that Non-Israelite Samaritans (originally from Cutha in Babylon) along with other Middle Eastern peoples (such as the Edomites) migrated en masse to western regions of the Roman Empire.
They became Christian but retained something of their previous practices and influenced early Christianity with their pagan traditions, and pagan festivals."
https://clseducation.org/2016/12/18/esau-the-father-of-rome-greece-and-christianity/
King Herod, though a terrible one, did build the second temple fulfilling Hebrew prophecy. The man Job is said to have been a descendent of Essau. So was Obadiah the Prophet.
So this definitely has nothing to do with Edomites hardening nor physical-Jews hardening. See all the thousands of conversions to Christ in the book of Acts when the Gospel is preached. Most all other early church leaders were Jewishsee the Apostles ethnicity.
St. Paul is in mourning over individuals that he studied with and most likely some of the ones who persecuted the church with him in verses 1-5. He even goes as far as to say that he wishes he were cut off instead.
6-7
"6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, 7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring,"
Literally in the Greek "Not all of Israel is Israel."
And what makes up Israel? And some not of Abraham's physical seed in verse 7. So what makes up Israel according to the Apostle? Both Jew and Gentile. To do exegesis here. We have to see Pauline thought earlier in his letter to the Galatians to further solidify that St. Paul is not speaking of the hardening of the Jews or Edomites here. For the Gospel is for the elect form every nation, tribe, and tongue.
Galatians 6:15-16
"15 For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. 16 And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the ISRAEL OF GOD."
Meaning once again that Jews and Gentiles make up Israel in Pauline thought. And we will get into Romans 11 later.
Paul is also reaching back to this in chapter 2.
Romans 2:28-29
"28 For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. 29 But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God."
The rest of verse 7-11
"but "Through Isaac shall your offspring be named." 8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. 9 For this is what the promise said: "About this time next year I will return, and Sarah shall have a son." 10 And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or badin order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls"
So, hold onto what Paul has already established. Election is about the Israel of God made up of both Jew and Gentile.
And read renowned Hebrew scholar named John Gill and his commentary on Malachi 1 as well because both the Old and New Testaments reach back and forth as does Paul here.
"11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or badin order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls"
God elects from both Jew and Gentile unconditionally and bases his purpose of election on before the Christian is even born…"and had done nothing either good or bad."
12-14
"12 she was told, "The older will serve the younger." 13 As it is written, "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated."
Did Essau receive the objective blessings of circumcision? Yes. Was he wicked? Yes he was. See below on Micah which stretches back to Genesis, which I will post soon.
But Essau didn't receive the internal blessing of the conenant and didn't bear a sin by the name of Joseph like Jacob did either.
14 What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part? By no means!"
"The number one objection through the years to double predestination is this is not American equal opportunity God here! We just find 30 different theories outside of scripture to argue against this! This makes God into Hitler!" Wrong.
How dare you question the application of the Holiness and Justice of God! For this is his full character.
"Who is thou oh man who is complaining against God?"
Seems to fit every objection here. The opposition reading their unreformed beliefs into the text, doesn't raise such a fuss if the text of Romans 9 were discussing merely physical-Israel or Edom or whatever they make up in adding or taking away from God's holy Word.
And the Apostle Paul states that there is no injustice with God in a manner of speaking and that there is no injustice with God by no means.
Humans either receive mercy or they receive justice. No one receives injustice. And please raise your hand if you want justice from God in your own life?
Verse 15
{15 For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."}
God is free. He has freewill! Whom could mean both singular and plural referring to both Jew and Gentile believers making of Israel in the New Covenant.
Verse 16
"16 So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy."
So it doesn't depend upon freewill. Clearly.
17-18
{17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." 18 So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.}
By nature man hardens his own heart like Pharaoh did.
Paul calls the unregenerate "slaves to sin."
But here the Apostle says that it is God who ultimately hardened Pharaoh. And the New Testament always had supremacy in interpreting the Old Testament for us. I can give you several examples as to why this is mandatory.
19-21
{19 You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" 20 But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" 21 Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?}
You are still likely having the same response to these things and I have experienced this through many years of discussions, which further demonstrates that this exegesis is is absolutely correct. "Why does he still find fault?"
22-24
"22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory 24 even us whom he has called, not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles?
Not from Jews only but also from Gentiles. Once again, Paul is reminding us that this passage is not about the hardening of the Jews or Edomites or whatever.
And in the following, Paul is now dealing with Jewish believers and skeptics who saw Gentiles and were taught that Gentiles were dogs.
Paul had to keep reiterating this to Jewish believers. For Paul had to even deal with the Apostle Peter and his Jew crowd for refusing to eat at the same table as Gentile converts.
For Israel now is both Jew and Gentile and this is the rock of offense.
{25 As indeed he says in Hosea,
"Those who were not my people I will call 'my people,'
and her who was not beloved I will call 'beloved.'"
26 "And in the very place where it was said to them, 'You are not my people,'
there they will be called 'sons of the living God.'"
27 And Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: "Though the number of the sons of Israel[c] be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant of them will be saved, 28 for the Lord will carry out his sentence upon the earth fully and without delay." 29 And as Isaiah predicted,
"If the Lord of hosts had not left us offspring,
we would have been like Sodom
and become like Gomorrah."
Religious leaders of Israel's Unbelief
30 What shall we say, then? That Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness have attained it, that is, a righteousness that is by faith; 31 but that Israel who pursued a law that would lead to righteousness did not succeed in reaching that law. 32 Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the stumbling stone, 33 as it is written,
"Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense;
and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame."}
Gentiles are true Jews by faith now. Gentiles are apart of the New Testament Israel. In fact, you see Gentiles entering the covenant in the Old Testament in several places.
See my thread on what is a Jew? And what is Israel in the New Covenant?
Lastly, Rebekah was an individual. Hahah. Who is she supposed to represent? Pharaoh was an individual. Who is he supposed to represent?
Read the following two posts for more prolegomena on our interpretation of Romans Nine, Malachi 1, and Genesis. For they reach back and forth for proper understanding.
Grace and Peace,
Joshua Wallace