It is funny that many neo Darwinians entertain the idea of alien sperm for life on earth.
Klaus Schwab said:
It is funny that many neo Darwinians entertain the idea of alien sperm for life on earth.
Are you into remote viewing or something? Be careful, that's a demonic gateway.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
Yes, I've heard that. But when you come to realize that angels, demons, skygods, Elohim et. al. are simply extraterrestrials...the game changes. Reality changes. At least here. Trust the data. Thoughts on the data presented?Klaus Schwab said:Are you into remote viewing or something? Be careful, that's a demonic gateway.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
Aztec1948 said:Yes, I've heard that. But when you come to realize that angels, demons, skygods, Elohim et. al. are simply extraterrestrials...the game changes. Reality changes. At least here. Trust the data. Thoughts on the data presented?Klaus Schwab said:Are you into remote viewing or something? Be careful, that's a demonic gateway.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
Who told you that? What if they didn't have to exceed the SOL? What if you had the tech to bend spacetime? You could effectly exceed the SOL multiple times over...TheGreatEscape said:Aztec1948 said:Yes, I've heard that. But when you come to realize that angels, demons, skygods, Elohim et. al. are simply extraterrestrials...the game changes. Reality changes. At least here. Trust the data. Thoughts on the data presented?Klaus Schwab said:Are you into remote viewing or something? Be careful, that's a demonic gateway.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
I reject that based upon the numbers. No way are these from other planets traveling beyond the speed of light to get here.
Why would we place any trust into beings that you have no relationship with other than gathering "data" through remote viewing?Aztec1948 said:Yes, I've heard that. But when you come to realize that angels, demons, skygods, Elohim et. al. are simply extraterrestrials...the game changes. Reality changes. At least here. Trust the data. Thoughts on the data presented?Klaus Schwab said:Are you into remote viewing or something? Be careful, that's a demonic gateway.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
Focused on the truth.Klaus Schwab said:
Overall point being that you are an empiricist with a focus on aliens and that's actually worse than the average atheist empiricist. At least the atheist isn't actively searching for contact with something that could destroy them. The machine elves are not your friend.
Neither do we.TheGreatEscape said:
I'm currently reading "Mary" by Catholic answers.
I have no problem with saying that Mary was the Mother of God. But I do not pray to dead people, even Mary that is blessed among women and full of grace.
Listened to it and I gotta tell you it is full of errors just on the recap. If you know anything about the apparition you know that the children actually asked the woman, whom they were pretty sure was Mary, her name. She gave it in detail and this recap missed it. That was just one of several errors.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
Is was not the mother of Jesus. Nor are any of the multitude of events involving her down through the ages all over the planet. Thats the whole point of the project...to find out the true story, not what has been told. RV is not perfect. But the data presented here clearly suggests something else entirely took place. This "Mary" was an extraterrestrial. As was the "angel" Gabriel that had contact with Mohamed in the cave. Yes, I realize just how hard it is to question one's world view. You watched the vid...that's a good 1st step perhaps.PabloSerna said:Listened to it and I gotta tell you it is full of errors just on the recap. If you know anything about the apparition you know that the children actually asked the woman, whom they were pretty sure was Mary, her name. She gave it in detail and this recap missed it. That was just one of several errors.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
Why does accuracy matter? I guess for some it doesn't.
PabloSerna said:Neither do we.TheGreatEscape said:
I'm currently reading "Mary" by Catholic answers.
I have no problem with saying that Mary was the Mother of God. But I do not pray to dead people, even Mary that is blessed among women and full of grace.
Aztec1948 said:Is was not the mother of Jesus. Nor are any of the multitude of events involving her down through the ages all over the planet. Thats the whole point of the project...to find out the true story, not what has been told. RV is not perfect. But the data presented here clearly suggests something else entirely took place. This "Mary" was an extraterrestrial. As was the "angel" Gabriel that had contact with Mohamed in the cave. Yes, I realize just how hard it is to question one's world view. You watched the vid...that's a good 1st step perhaps.PabloSerna said:Listened to it and I gotta tell you it is full of errors just on the recap. If you know anything about the apparition you know that the children actually asked the woman, whom they were pretty sure was Mary, her name. She gave it in detail and this recap missed it. That was just one of several errors.Aztec1948 said:
Not a warning. Just another example of a project with some really interesting data involving remote viewing.
This project was probably more applicable to the topic.
Miracle at Fatima
Why does accuracy matter? I guess for some it doesn't.
Wait until you see this month's project on The Secret Space Program. It's one thing to disclose the et reality. It's quite another to disclose just what all has resulted from the 75+ years of back-engineering recovered et materials..
So asking living humans on earth is okay though? This is different than asking the living Mary to intercede? I'll take the mother of our Saviors prayers for me at least on par with Jim Bob and Sally's in my bible study. I used to be Protestant...in fact most of my life. But after really reading scripture I could not refute any longer why God tells us and what the disciples and their followers practiced.TheGreatEscape said:PabloSerna said:Neither do we.TheGreatEscape said:
I'm currently reading "Mary" by Catholic answers.
I have no problem with saying that Mary was the Mother of God. But I do not pray to dead people, even Mary that is blessed among women and full of grace.
Or living saints in heaven…semantics
Aztec1948 said:
Why did they disable our nuclear tipped ICBM's?
The security guard called and said, "Sir, there's a glowing red object hovering right outside the front gate. I've got all the men out here with their weapons drawn." We lost between 16-18 ICBMs (nuclear tipped Inter Continental Ballistic Missiles) at the same time UFOs were in the area… (A high-ranking Air Force officer) said, "Stop the investigation; do no more on this and do not write a final report. I heard that many of the guards that reported the incident were sent off to Vietnam." Captain Robert Salas, USAF, during a videotaped interview for the Disclosure program.AggieRain said:Aztec1948 said:
Why did they disable our nuclear tipped ICBM's?
Huh?
Maryism has deep roots in the occult. I suspect Theotokos was just a trial run. But no data to support that. Worship of goddesses etc...and probably worse. But its all based on a lie. Several actually. Duped is the term I believe. Damn sad, but it was thought to be in our best interest. And to control us. The mother of Jesus was simply a pawn in a much bigger program.jkag89 said:
You do realize the Theotokos was venerated centuries before the apparitions I guess that does not rule out "aliens" using any of it for their own purposes..
Aztec1948 said:Maryism has deep roots in the occult. I suspect Theotokos was just a trial run. But no data to support that. Worship of goddesses etc...and probably worse. But its all based on a lie. Several actually. Duped is the term I believe. Damn sad, but it was thought to be in our best interest. And to control us. The mother of Jesus was simply a pawn in a much bigger program.jkag89 said:
You do realize the Theotokos was venerated centuries before the apparitions I guess that does not rule out "aliens" using any of it for their own purposes..
The OP did ask....
Does the thought of aliens and the apparent involvement in humanity disturb you though?
I'm not familiar with this person/thing, but I suspect it was to placate/encourage the native peoples into accepting the tenets of this sect perhaps? A PR move if you will. Christmas, Easter etc. also had their roots in pagan religions and were "touched up" and brought into the sects faith for the same reason. But Mary, the mother of Jesus, was just a mom. A very good one at that. But nothing more. Certainly nothing to worship, pray to whatever. The apparitions down thru the ages are false events, people etc. Civilizations that have been in place for millions, perhaps billions of years longer than ours, have the means and tech etc to pull this off. Which is exactly what happened at Fatima and I suspect many other places.05AG said:Aztec1948 said:Maryism has deep roots in the occult. I suspect Theotokos was just a trial run. But no data to support that. Worship of goddesses etc...and probably worse. But its all based on a lie. Several actually. Duped is the term I believe. Damn sad, but it was thought to be in our best interest. And to control us. The mother of Jesus was simply a pawn in a much bigger program.jkag89 said:
You do realize the Theotokos was venerated centuries before the apparitions I guess that does not rule out "aliens" using any of it for their own purposes..
The OP did ask....
Does the thought of aliens and the apparent involvement in humanity disturb you though?
Why did they decide declare Mary the Theotokos at the Council of Ephesus?
Aztec1948 said:I'm not familiar with this person/thing, but I suspect it was to placate/encourage the native peoples into accepting the tenets of this sect perhaps? A PR move if you will. Christmas, Easter etc. also had their roots in pagan religions and were "touched up" and brought into the sects faith for the same reason. But Mary, the mother of Jesus, was just a mom. A very good one at that. But nothing more. Certainly nothing to worship, pray to whatever. The apparitions down thru the ages are false events, people etc. Civilizations that have been in place for millions, perhaps billions of years longer than ours, have the means and tech etc to pull this off. Which is exactly what happened at Fatima and I suspect many other places.05AG said:Aztec1948 said:Maryism has deep roots in the occult. I suspect Theotokos was just a trial run. But no data to support that. Worship of goddesses etc...and probably worse. But its all based on a lie. Several actually. Duped is the term I believe. Damn sad, but it was thought to be in our best interest. And to control us. The mother of Jesus was simply a pawn in a much bigger program.jkag89 said:
You do realize the Theotokos was venerated centuries before the apparitions I guess that does not rule out "aliens" using any of it for their own purposes..
The OP did ask....
Does the thought of aliens and the apparent involvement in humanity disturb you though?
Why did they decide declare Mary the Theotokos at the Council of Ephesus?
I understand many will not buy this, but it's what I think is the truth. Religion is a hard thing to shake, especially one as controlling/binding as this sect.
I think the account of how Jimmy Carter reacted to being told the truth about extraterrestrials involvement in religions, gives a great deal of validity to the notion that not only this sect, but Christianity and Islam both are pretty much inert. Which would mean Mary as well.
I didn't create the memo, just deliver it.
The council of ephesus was in the mid 5th century, in turkey. Just fyi.Aztec1948 said:I'm not familiar with this person/thing, but I suspect it was to placate/encourage the native peoples into accepting the tenets of this sect perhaps? A PR move if you will. Christmas, Easter etc. also had their roots in pagan religions and were "touched up" and brought into the sects faith for the same reason. But Mary, the mother of Jesus, was just a mom. A very good one at that. But nothing more. Certainly nothing to worship, pray to whatever. The apparitions down thru the ages are false events, people etc. Civilizations that have been in place for millions, perhaps billions of years longer than ours, have the means and tech etc to pull this off. Which is exactly what happened at Fatima and I suspect many other places.05AG said:Aztec1948 said:Maryism has deep roots in the occult. I suspect Theotokos was just a trial run. But no data to support that. Worship of goddesses etc...and probably worse. But its all based on a lie. Several actually. Duped is the term I believe. Damn sad, but it was thought to be in our best interest. And to control us. The mother of Jesus was simply a pawn in a much bigger program.jkag89 said:
You do realize the Theotokos was venerated centuries before the apparitions I guess that does not rule out "aliens" using any of it for their own purposes..
The OP did ask....
Does the thought of aliens and the apparent involvement in humanity disturb you though?
Why did they decide declare Mary the Theotokos at the Council of Ephesus?
I understand many will not buy this, but it's what I think is the truth. Religion is a hard thing to shake, especially one as controlling/binding as this sect.
I think the account of how Jimmy Carter reacted to being told the truth about extraterrestrials involvement in religions, gives a great deal of validity to the notion that not only this sect, but Christianity and Islam both are pretty much inert. Which would mean Mary as well.
I didn't create the memo, just deliver it.
Aztec1948 said:I'm not familiar with this person/thing, but I suspect it was to placate/encourage the native peoples into accepting the tenets of this sect perhaps? A PR move if you will. Christmas, Easter etc. also had their roots in pagan religions and were "touched up" and brought into the sects faith for the same reason. But Mary, the mother of Jesus, was just a mom. A very good one at that. But nothing more. Certainly nothing to worship, pray to whatever. The apparitions down thru the ages are false events, people etc. Civilizations that have been in place for millions, perhaps billions of years longer than ours, have the means and tech etc to pull this off. Which is exactly what happened at Fatima and I suspect many other places.05AG said:Aztec1948 said:Maryism has deep roots in the occult. I suspect Theotokos was just a trial run. But no data to support that. Worship of goddesses etc...and probably worse. But its all based on a lie. Several actually. Duped is the term I believe. Damn sad, but it was thought to be in our best interest. And to control us. The mother of Jesus was simply a pawn in a much bigger program.jkag89 said:
You do realize the Theotokos was venerated centuries before the apparitions I guess that does not rule out "aliens" using any of it for their own purposes..
The OP did ask....
Does the thought of aliens and the apparent involvement in humanity disturb you though?
Why did they decide declare Mary the Theotokos at the Council of Ephesus?
I understand many will not buy this, but it's what I think is the truth. Religion is a hard thing to shake, especially one as controlling/binding as this sect.
I think the account of how Jimmy Carter reacted to being told the truth about extraterrestrials involvement in religions, gives a great deal of validity to the notion that not only this sect, but Christianity and Islam both are pretty much inert. Which would mean Mary as well.
I didn't create the memo, just deliver it.