Does anybody really believe that Constantine was a Pope, and not emperor? And that the Pope "passes a law?"
So funny...
So funny...
This is not so. The Catholic Catechism (2174) still quotes "we gather on the day of the SUN." The fact that Yeshua rose at the head of the week (actually that was Saturday night according to scripture and Jewish reckoning), is just a coincidental and convenient excuse.Thaddeus73 said:
The early Church moved the worship day to Sunday, as that was the day Jesus rose from the dead...The Pope never "passed a law" on anything...
This is correct and the basis for the CCC 2175:Thaddeus73 said:
The early Church moved the worship day to Sunday, as that was the day Jesus rose from the dead...The Pope never "passed a law" on anything...
TheBonifaceOption said:
8th day worship is the tradition from resurrection and penecost, to the apostles continuing the worship on the first day of the week (1 cor 16:2, acts 20:7).
Old Covenant : Saturday (6 days of work, 1 day of rest)
New Covenant : Sunday (the work of the old Covenant, incapable of completion by man, is perfectly performed by Christ, thus the church is a new creation and worships in a new era.)
PabloSerna said:
My friend you are WAY off in the woods. I posted a few more sections for the RCC basis on the Lord's Day above for reference. In short, we are not sun worshippers, ok? ok. The key word is FULFILLMENT.
Zobel said:
what elements of pagan sun god worship are present in the church? be specific
Win At Life said:PabloSerna said:
My friend you are WAY off in the woods. I posted a few more sections for the RCC basis on the Lord's Day above for reference. In short, we are not sun worshippers, ok? ok. The key word is FULFILLMENT.
Of course they have assigned new meaning to the pagan sun rituals. The Catholic church has always done this and are still doing this. It's not a hidden secret even among Catholics. As one example, look at how the Catholic church is practiced in Ecuador. One of their pagan mother earth rituals has been assigned new meaning now attached to the virgin Mary. There are other examples in Ecuador, and there are other examples in just about every place the Catholic church has spread, starting with the Roman pagan sun god worship. This is no secret even among the Catholic Church. It has been their MO since the beginning to not abolish local religions where they spread, but to incorporate them by assigning them new meaning as best they can fit in with scripture. It's no secret, but when called out directly as being wrong, virtually all Catholics recognize how offensive that really is and just deny, deny, deny.
So, yes, the first day that was formerly dedicated by pagans to the worship of the Sun was redeemed and reclaimed to celebrate Christ's victory over all of His enemies on the day of the resurrection, the Lord's day. But that has nothing to do with worship of the Sun - it actually negates it. One of the hymns we sing leading up to and at the Feast of the Nativity captures this idea perfectly:Quote:
The great Moses mystically foreshadowed this day, when he said:
This is the blessed Sabbath.
This is the day of rest, on which the only-begotten Son of God rested from all His works.
He kept the Sabbath in the flesh,
through the dispensation of death.
but on this day, He returned again
through the resurrection.
He has granted us eternal life,
for He alone is Good, the Lover of Mankind.
Shades of Romans 1 here..Quote:
Your birth, O Christ our God, dawned the light of knowledge upon the earth.
For by Your birth those who worshipped the stars were taught by a star
To worship You, the Sun of Justice,
and to know You, the Orient from on High.
O Lord, glory to You.
https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/asd/2018/12/05/no-christmas-is-not-pagan-just-stop/Quote:
When someone says that Mithras was also born on December 25th, ask them which scholar they are referring to when they say that. Which historian or theologian can validate that fact? As the historian Tom Holland points out:
"There is no evidence -- absolutely none -- that the birth of Mithras was celebrated on 25 December. The confusion seems to have arisen because Mithras had Sol Invictus, 'Unconquered Sun,' as one of his titles, and -- according to an ambiguous entry in a mid-4th century almanac -- the birthday of a quite different god called Sol Invictus may have been celebrated on the same date."
Saturnalia, likewise, was celebrated sometime between December 17th and 23rd. It's celebration was also utterly different from Christianity. It was one of licentiousness, gambling, and great, gluttonous excess. "Aha!", my dad might reply, "that's exactly what Christmas is!" Yes, it is today. The original spirit of Christmas, though, was about a cold, abandoned Virgin Mary looking for somewhere to stay. It was about modesty, charity, and temperance. The bacchanal extravagances of modern Christmas owe themselves more to capitalism than to Christianity.
Quote:
Is this about December 25?
This is the worst. Did you know that the original Christmas festival was a holiday celebrated together with Christ's baptism on January 6? No Sol Invictus (Roman pagan feast of the Invincible Sun) there, I'm afraid, so that can't be the origin of Christmas. (Armenian Christians still celebrate this single feast on January 6, though because the calendar some of them use is out of sync with the one many of us use, it will fall on our January 19.)
And even when Christmas did get moved to December 25 (getting separated out from the baptism feast), it was not about Sol Invictus, which actually post-dates (you read that right!) the association of Christ's birth with December 25, being introduced by the emperor Aurelian only in AD 274. Meanwhile, St. Hippolytus said in his commentary on Daniel (written ca. AD 202-211) that Jesus' birthdate is December 25. (Maybe the pagans stole it from the Christians!)
Rather, December 25 was arrived at because it was exactly nine months after March 25, when the Annunciation was being celebrated, which is the feast of Christ's conception in the womb of the Virgin Mary.
Christmas on December 25 isn't a claim that Jesus was born on that day or even an attempt to claim a pagan holiday and make it Christian. It's about a feast that was set to be nine months before.
So, yes, you can have Christmas without December 25. And for a long time, most Christians did.
Is this about Saturnalia?
Well, that was originally on December 17 and eventually extended through December 23. Are you saying that that week in December that happens to fall near Christmas on December 25 makes Christmas pagan?
Really? This would be like saying that, if your birthday falls around the first weekend of September, you must belong to the organized labor movement because your birthday is near Labor Day.
The Church already has a feast day to celebrate her birth.Win At Life said:
And a 1000 years from now Catholics celebrating the Virgin Mary on April 22nd in Ecuador will believe that was the birthday of the virgin Mary and not the pagan Mother Earth day.
You're not far off.ramblin_ag02 said:
So a few more thoughts regarding keeping the Sabbath. Now I'm not coming at this from a stance saying the Torah is still in force for Christians. In case you don't already know my position on that. However, the Sabbath predates the Torah. In fact, the Sabbath predates almost everything. God rested on the 7th day of Creation, and that was the first Sabbath. We see the Sabbath observed throughout the Old Testament. We see Jesus called Lord of the Sabbath. We know the earliest Christians observed the Sabbath, and we know that organized, orthodox Christians continued to observe the Sabbath into the 400-500s. We also know from Isaiah 66 that after a new heaven and a new earth has been made, people will still worship God "from one Sabbath to another".
So the Sabbath was observed by God at Creation, was observed by his people in the OT, is part of Jesus' dominion in the NT, was observed by early Christians and will be observed after the resurrection. So to me the question becomes, why not now? What is so special and different about now (500AD onward)? Observance of the Sabbath isn't some time limited commandment. Our current non-observance is the blip.
I think any reading of Scripture shows that God wants His people to observe the Sabbath. I also try to think of our modern lives if we did. We do a good job of giving most people a day off per week, so that wouldn't change much. But there were also Sabbath years, where the land was left untended for one year in seven. Or even the Sabbath year of Sabbath years, the Jubillee. I can't even imagine a mass reset of debts in our society.
Thanks for the article and I agree. Being able to rest in the Lord is not a "day" but a constant thing. I do think setting aside a day and some time every day to rest, pray, and read Scripture is very helpful for spiritual health.Jabin said:
You raise excellent points which caused me to consider, for the first time, whether Christians should keep the Sabbath and whether it should be observed on Saturday.
I sat down this morning to really focus on the issue and the first article I came across is this one:
Should Christians Keep the Sabbath? | Desiring God
The author makes great points in that article, as well. How do you respond to them?
TIA
Or, perhaps he established the rotation period of this one very special planet to correspond to the calendar he instituted?B-1 83 said:
The concept that the Lord God, the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth, of all that is seen and unseen marks time on a calendar based on the rotation of one planet (amongst billions) on its axis and its orbital time around one of billions of stars is laughable.
What did God do on the 8th day other than invent golf?
So a few things in answer to the article. As I said at the beginning, do I think there is an obligation for Christians to Christians to follow the OT law, including the Sabbath, under threat of punishment from God for disobedience? No, there is not. So on that point the author of your article and I agree. So that moves the framing of the question at hand a bit. Instead of talking about what Christians have to do, I am instead talking about what Christians should do. I merely think that Christians should observe the Sabbath.Jabin said:
You raise excellent points which caused me to consider, for the first time, whether Christians should keep the Sabbath and whether it should be observed on Saturday.
I sat down this morning to really focus on the issue and the first article I came across is this one:
Should Christians Keep the Sabbath? | Desiring God
The author makes great points in that article, as well. How do you respond to them?
TIA