Perhaps, but let's keep this subject in mind as things roll out. Hopefully, something more "concrete" will emerge.jkag89 said:
Nearly three minutes of talking nonstop without actually saying anything.
Earth shattering information...perhaps not. None the less it is information, and some may find it interesting. Just trying to keep the topic on the front burner as its important for all of us. Trying to ease the shock I suppose. The shock? It's not that et exists or that they have visited the planet. It's the relationships they have had for many, many years with humanity and the fact that our gov is aware of this and has chosen deception over simply telling the truth.jkag89 said:
You keep saying this but all we get are videos that are the equivalent to a wall of text.
Yes, of course. The above article dealing with the Vatican would be one.jkag89 said:
Is there a single UFO story that you do not take on face value?
I wonder if they will reveal some things with this disclosure process? Interesting times..jkag89 said:
The Boring Truth of the Vatican "Secret" Archives
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mussolini-covered-up-secret-ufo-crash-researcher-claims-in-bombshell-report/ar-AA1doJel?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=e088dc3366b54d91b88335a916ffab09&ei=14jkag89 said:
Like what? Why is it so hard for you to believe that the Vatican Achieves are anything more than what is presented in the linked article? Seriously what is more likely, what was presented in the video you linked or the article?
No, but at the 1:36 mark of the video, the Vatican and disclosure are mentioned. I only added the article link because Italy is nearby and some believe the Vatican is very much aware of the 1933 event. This is probably part of the Vatican disclosure to happen IMO.jkag89 said:
Even if I take the article at face value, it does not even mention the Vatican.
Aztec1948 said:No, but at the 1:36 mark of the video, the Vatican and disclosure are mentioned. I only added the article link because Italy is nearby and some believe the Vatican is very much aware of the 1933 event. This is probably part of the Vatican disclosure to happen IMO.jkag89 said:
Even if I take the article at face value, it does not even mention the Vatican.
You've pushed this angle before in these threads. I find it fascinating how your mind connects the dots to fit the narrative you've created in your mind.Quote:
Preemptive damage control perhaps? The Vatican knows....
Just creating an awareness of the reality here. And yes, these are my opinions as described by others WE all have dots, minds and narratives/opinions. Is this not what forums are for?jkag89 said:Aztec1948 said:No, but at the 1:36 mark of the video, the Vatican and disclosure are mentioned. I only added the article link because Italy is nearby and some believe the Vatican is very much aware of the 1933 event. This is probably part of the Vatican disclosure to happen IMO.jkag89 said:
Even if I take the article at face value, it does not even mention the Vatican.You've pushed this angle before in these threads. I find it fascinating how your mind connects the dots to fit the narrative you've created in your mind.Quote:
Preemptive damage control perhaps? The Vatican knows....
A wall of text from an unsubstantiated source.Quote:
Thoughts on the reality?
said:A wall of text from an unsubstantiated source.Quote:
Thoughts on the reality?
Aztec1948 said:
ontological shock
Jump to navigationJump to search
English[edit]
Noun[edit]
ontological shock (countable and uncountable, plural ontological shocks)
[ol](philosophy) The state of being forced to question one's worldview. [/ol]
It will be when they realize just how off base they were? Religion is a hard thing to shake. But then, that is what et intended. Under their thumb.UTExan said:Aztec1948 said:
ontological shock
Jump to navigationJump to search
English[edit]
Noun[edit]
ontological shock (countable and uncountable, plural ontological shocks)
[ol](philosophy) The state of being forced to question one's worldview. [/ol]
It's not an ontological shock if anybody has listened to the marginalized voices in both evangelical Christianity (Chuck Missler, etc) and traditional Catholicism (Fr Malachi Martin). The creeping revelations of interaction with UFOs and "aliens" is no surprise to anyone who bothers to reach beyond the mainstream media or various church bureaucracies.
Aztec1948 said:It will be when they realize just how off base they were? Religion is a hard thing to shake. But then, that is what et intended. Under their thumb.UTExan said:Aztec1948 said:
ontological shock
Jump to navigationJump to search
English[edit]
Noun[edit]
ontological shock (countable and uncountable, plural ontological shocks)
[ol](philosophy) The state of being forced to question one's worldview. [/ol]
It's not an ontological shock if anybody has listened to the marginalized voices in both evangelical Christianity (Chuck Missler, etc) and traditional Catholicism (Fr Malachi Martin). The creeping revelations of interaction with UFOs and "aliens" is no surprise to anyone who bothers to reach beyond the mainstream media or various church bureaucracies.
I feel the same as Green Dragon.Macarthur said:
Interesting. Can you elaborate on why it would strengthen your faith?
Bird Poo said:I feel the same as Green Dragon.Macarthur said:
Interesting. Can you elaborate on why it would strengthen your faith?
As society continues to devolve into immoral chaos, governments and media have to cook up the next big "thing" to engage the citizenry and distract from their destructive policies.
I've also noticed that unbelievers and leftists tend to race towards this UFO idiocy. I think it will be the next big thing after people finally discover the climate change industry is a scam.
Thus, people tend to pray harder and grow closer to God when the world is falling apart.