NY Times: Catholic-Episcopal Church Switching

2,001 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 21 yr ago by
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's an interesting read from Monday's (Dec. 29) issue of the New York Times. It seems that not only are some conservative Episcopalians abandoning the American church, but also a number of their liberal-thinking Catholic brethren are becoming Episcopalian.

My read on this is a bad one for both churches. Although most church goers would be comfortable worshiping among those who share their viewpoint, the absense of differeing views among parishoners only tends to isolate people from reality. I rather enjoy a good, lively debate in Sunday school.

Your mileage may differ.

quote:
Changes in Episcopal Church Spur Some to Go, Some to Join

December 29, 2003
By LAURIE GOODSTEIN

The decision this year by the Episcopal Church USA to ordain an openly gay bishop has set off a wave of churchswitching, according to dozens of interviews with clergy members and parishioners across the country.

Some lifelong Episcopalians have left their churches,
saying the vote to affirm a gay bishop was the last straw in what they saw as the church's long slide away from orthodoxy. Many of these people have started attending Roman Catholic churches.

"It breaks my heart," said Shari de Silva, a neurologist in Fort Wayne, Ind., who converted from Episcopalian to Catholic this year. "I think the Episcopal Church is headed down the path to secular humanism."

Some Episcopal parishes, meanwhile, are welcoming clusters of new members, many from Roman Catholic churches, who saythey want to belong to a church that regards inclusivity as a Christian virtue. The newcomers include singles and families, gay people and straight people.

"I don't see how and why God would want his church, his worshipers, his sons and daughters to become carbon copies of each other," said Youssef El-Naggar, a former Catholic in Front Royal, Va., who recently joined an Episcopal church there.

While the switching is not always between the Episcopal and Catholic Churches, this appears to be the most common kind. Episcopal and Catholic Church officials say it is too early for them to tally the gains or losses. At the start of the year, the Episcopal Church USA claimed about 2.3 million members, the Catholic Church about 65 million.

It was only in June that the Episcopal Diocese of New
Hampshire elected the Rev. V. Gene Robinson, who has been openly living with a male partner, to be their next bishop. In August, Bishop-elect Robinson was approved by delegates at the church's general convention (who also affirmed that some dioceses are celebrating gay unions). After months of controversy, he was consecrated in November.

The Catholic Church has reiterated its position on homosexuality, one that is a stark contrast to the Episcopal Church's. In July, the Vatican denounced
homosexual acts as "deviant behavior" and said the churchcould not condone gay marriage or adoptions by gay couples. In September, the American Catholic bishops said they would support a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

While it is too soon to assess the fallout, some Episcopal clergy members told of an unusually high rate of arrivals and departures in recent months.

They said the newcomers were far different from casual "church shoppers" checking out a Sunday sermon. Many of the new arrivals say they intend to join, and some have already been confirmed or received into the church by their bishops.

"They're not coming in as they used to even three years agoannouncing, `I'm just church shopping, I'm just lookingaround,' " said the Rev. Elizabeth M. Kaeton, rector of St. Paul's Episcopal Church in Chatham, N.J. "The people I've seen recently have come to me and said, `Sign me up, I'm ready.' "

Ms. Kaeton, who is openly gay, supported the ordination of Bishop Robinson but said she had not dwelled on the issue in her church. She said her parish of about 300 families had recently gained 15 new members, many of them from Catholic churches, and lost one to a Catholic church.

Even for some heterosexuals, the Episcopal Church's stance on homosexuality was the main reason for switching. Mr. El-Naggar, a retired C.I.A. officer and college instructor,said that when he read the news about the church's decision to back Bishop Robinson, he got out the Yellow Pages and phoned the closest Episcopal church.

He said he was pleased to discover that the rector at
Calvary Episcopal Church was a woman, because he had always questioned the Catholic Church's opposition to ordaining women. He now attends Calvary Episcopal and said he had been stunned at the open theological debate there over homosexuality and other issues.

"I am trying to be a good Christian, and I have never felt that spiritual freedom I feel now in the Episcopal Church," Mr. El-Naggar said.

Some new Episcopalians also mentioned that the sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Church had caused them to rethinktheir affiliation. First came revelations that some bishops had covered up abuse, then some Vatican and American officials suggested that gay priests were to blame for the problem.

"We felt increasingly alienated by the Catholic Church," said Robert J. Martin, 56, a lawyer in Philadelphia wholives with his partner, Mark S. Petteruti, 45, ahorticulturist.

Both men were cradle Catholics. Until 1988, Mr. Martin wasa Catholic priest in the Augustinian order.

This year a deacon at St. Paul's Episcopal Church in
Philadelphia invited them to join a small group of gay
church members who meet once a month for dinner. The couple soon began attending Sunday services at St. Paul's, which is directly across the street from the Catholic church where, 30 years ago, Mr. Martin was ordained a priest.

"What was most impressive was the fact that the straight people were welcoming us as a couple, and as potential members of the congregation," Mr. Martin said. "We felt included and affiliated almost immediately."

In Fort Wayne, Dr. de Silva moved in the opposite
direction. She was raised Episcopalian and was bringing uptwo adopted children in that church. But, she said, she could not accept the church's stance on homosexuality because it violates the first commandment, to be faithful to God. She said she objected when her children were taught about gay rights in church Sunday school.

She began attending St. Elizabeth Anne Seton Catholic Church. She has read the catechism cover to cover, she said, and has already been confirmed.

"The advantage of the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churchesis that there is a central authority that tends to hold the church together, and unfortunately the Anglican experiment, which was a wonderful experiment for almost 500 years, lacked that," Dr. de Silva said.

For many the move between the Episcopal and Catholic Churches is a natural transition. The Episcopal Church,which is the American branch of Anglicanism, is considered the bridge between Roman Catholic and Protestant Christianity.

For three decades, these two denominations have seen plenty of back and forth, said Robert Bruce Mullin, professor of history, world mission and modern Anglican studies at the General Theological Seminary of the Episcopal Church in New York. As the Episcopal Church began ordaining women anddropped the ban on communion for divorced people, Professor Mullin said, conservative Episcopalians began to leave,while many socially liberal Catholics began to join.

"It's hard to remember that 30 years ago, the Episcopal Church was one of the more conservative churches on issuesof social morality," he said.

Since the 1970's, when Episcopalians began building anetwork of churches that agreed to be open and accepting toward homosexuality, gay Catholics have been quietly joining Episcopal parishes.

Among clergy members, it is not unusual to find Episcopal priests, especially women, who are converts from Catholicism. Clergy crossovers also go in the other direction. A small number of married Episcopal priests are now allowed to minister in Roman Catholic churches that lack their own clergy members.

But the pace of church swapping among parishioners appears to have picked up this year. In some cases, whole groups have jumped.

About 25 percent of the congregation at St. Francis
Episcopal Church in Dallas recently left after the votes onhomosexuality, said the rector, the Rev. David M. Allen. Those who left included some of the church's bedrock, likeits secretary and the two men who used to volunteer to mowthe lawn every Tuesday, Father Allen said. All but one left for Catholic churches, he said.

The exodus, Father Allen said, was the result of years of dissatisfaction for many parishioners. St. Francis, which had about 300 members, is known as an Anglo-Catholic parish, meaning that in worship style it retained Catholic traditions like a devotion to Mary, the rosary and a solemn high Mass with Gregorian chant. For members long opposed to the ordination of women, a gay bishop was the end of the road.

"I think many people in this parish came to the conclusionthat there was the apparent absence of any kind ofauthority that operates to restrain the Episcopal Church in any way," Father Allen said. "They wanted to be part of a church which they saw as being bigger than American culture, which had an authority which went beyond our cultural conventions."




[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 12/29/2003 1:20a).]
texpat-ute
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DualAG:

I think it comes down to clergy being held accountable by laity. When the United Methodist bishop of the Rocky Mtn. Conference visited my church upon his appointment, he was HAMMERED with questions and remarks as to why he did not stand firm in the faith and demand the same from his subordiantes. Even the clergy, who he appoints, were asking why the local Methodist seminary (Illif in Denver) did not insist on orthodox Christian theology as a belief system for aspirants to the clergy. The result: our conference has taken a decided turn "to the right" with new pastors coming from very conservative Methodist and Wesleyan backgrounds and the theological liberals are receding rapidly as their membership numbers indicate their failure to sustain faith and growth in the Church.

I think the Episcopal Church is in the same boat; if they are excluded from the Anglican Communion and members are fleeing to the Catholic Church, they are fulfilling a prophecy of CS Lewis. But, the battle has to be fought in the individual churches. Retreating to another denomination may be inviting, but I can't see it as something God calls them to do unless the situation is so unsalvageable that they felt led to do it. It is so much more effective to recruit believing clergy and and laity in the battle. It even becomes fun!
AgGermany
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is kinda like going AC/DC for them?

Greetings from Victory Base Baghdad!
Orphan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well now AgGermany....good to see you again. Thank you for your service and sacrifice for the country.

david
Sink Maggots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
maybe it should be:

AgBaghdad

texags77@yahoo.com
Please feel free to respond by email.
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texpat-ute,

You make some very coherent points, but your stance seems to take into account only one-half of the story as depicted in the Times article.

While the Episcopalians becoming Catholic probably are indeed searching for what they consider Christian orthodoxy, the author spends half of the story telling why many life-long Catholics are going in the other direction.

The article has particular significance for me because my father, who will celebrate his 75th birthday in March, recently became a member of an Episcopal denomination after a lifetime in Catholicism. He was unhappy with the conservatism (orthodoxy) of the Roman Catholic Church, and was quite frankly looking for a more liberal faith--one that would change with the times.

For the last twenty years, he would insist that he wasn't a "Roman Catholic," but instead called himself an "American Catholic,' i.e., one who could think for himself. Finally, he came to the conclusion that there was no room for him in his cradle Catholicism and sought a more liberal denomination.

I find all of this church switching to be somewhat disheartening, as it represents a polarization of the faithful. Two personal examples come to mind.

I grew up in the American south in the 1960s, just as Jim Crow was being mortally challenged. We lived and went to school just blocks from an entirely different subculture, the black community with whom we hardly ever interacted. I rode the city bus and walked the streets with black kids, but until I took a job at the newspaper in my junior year in high school, I had never spoken to a Negro, much less exchanged opinions.

In 1964 I had a Barry Goldwater bumper sticker on my bicycle and couldn't imagine how anyone else's parents could vote for Lyndon Johnson. A couple of blocks from me, literally on the other side of the tracks, lived another 11-year old, one with a darker shade of pigmentation, who probably could have explained to me why his parents favored LBJ. But I never thought to ask.

My second example is more modern and perhaps more relevant. I was associated with Mormonism for ten years. The LDS kids at my son's Texas high school would congregate together exclusively, to the point of always sharing the same table in the lunchroom. They didn't want to hear the other kids using profanity or participate in their sexual discussions. (When a Mormon kid actually embraced the more hedonistic popular culture, he was ostracized from the group).

These LDS kids worked very hard to earn entrance into Brigham Young University, where for once in their lives they could be in the majority. BYU is about 97% white, 96% Mormon, and 95% conservative Republican. Those who weren't admitted were crushed, but in my opinion were actually the winners. They were going to be forced into a more pluralistic college environment at a state university. (But maybe not, if they went to Texas A&M :-) )

Granted, people want to worship in an environment in which they feel most comfortable. The Sabbath should be a day of refuge from the world. Yet, I find the NY Times article a bit disturbing. Instead of engaging divergent opinions face to face, we Christians seem to be retreating into ideological faith-camps, from which we continue the battle by firing long-range salvos.

[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 12/31/2003 8:36a).]
Ronnie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
But, the battle has to be fought in the individual churches. Retreating to another denomination may be inviting, but I can't see it as something God calls them to do unless the situation is so unsalvageable that they felt led to do it.


Advice about 500 years too late Seriously though, a move to a more orthodox religion is viewed with skepticism? It's a direct result of the denomination's humanist doctrines which has brought them to this point.

quote:
It is so much more effective to recruit believing clergy and and laity in the battle. It even becomes fun!


Not a good idea IMHO. The gay bishop cannot be "de-consecrated". He won't be the last one either, the fork in the road has passed. The Espiscopal church isn't like the US, you can't just get new leaders and voters and sway the opinion back to the way you like it. The secularists still remain, and now you've intensified the infighting. This all eventually leads to a split and a new denomination, nothing new unfortunately.

AC/DC comment....yeah I guess you could say the Catholic Church does get that Direct Current, while other denominations have the Alternating kind.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DualAG- There are some Catholics that are disappointed that the reforms of Vatican II did not liberalize the Church. Their biggest concerns seem to be the Church's stance against the ordination of women and against any artificial means of birth control. Because of the similar nature each Church's liturgies, it is only natural that some of these might see the Episcopal Church as a new home. Most, however, seem to be sticking with the Catholic Church. From my experience, there are still many liberal Catholics.

"AgBaghdad"- Good to see your post, I'm glad you have some time to spend on TexAgs. Thank you for your service. Keep safe and Happy New Year.





[This message has been edited by jkag89 (edited 12/31/2003 8:55a).]
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
DualAG- There are some Catholics that are disappointed that the reforms of Vatican II did not liberalize the Church. Their biggest concerns seem to be the Church's stance against the ordination of women and against any artificial means of birth control.


And there are those Catholics, like my mother, who think Vatican II "went too far." She blames liberalization, such as the vernacular mass, for making it too easy to be a Catholic, and thus, in her mind, initiating a slippery slope that resulted in the priesthood-pedophilia scandals. She misses the payer bar at the altar and prefers the "mystery" that accompanied consecration of the Eucharist when the priest did it with this back to the congregation. Because she went to a Catholic school (and took her religion classes seriously), she understood the Latin mass, and longs for those days.

However, she won't go so far as to join one of those fundamentalist Catholic congregations. If the Pope supports Vatican II, she will go along with it. People who oppose the Pope go to hell, and of course, the biggest problem nowadays, in her opinon, is that there doesn't seem to be as much of a fear of hell.

I agree, though, there are still are a lot of liberal Catholics, and conservative Catholics, and I happen to have been reared by one of each.


[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 12/31/2003 9:23a).]
b.blauser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We'll see which church survives long term...the one that holds fast to the Bible as it reads, or the one that allows its members to cut out / ignore the portions of the Bible it disagrees with.
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And according to some our evangelical Protestant friends, neither denomination, Catholic nor Episcopal, adheres entirely to the Bible, or at least, to the verses that these critics selectively highlight.

[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 12/31/2003 10:36a).]
texpat-ute
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good points, DualAG. I think polarization is underway as a function of the ongoing culture war. I can't speak for everybody, but I know that my political outlook came as a result of my faith and military service. The Army taught me not to trust large institutions (or myself in many instances) and my faith experience taught me the only trustworthy thing was my Savior. I suspect a lot of people may be in the same boat and it affects their theological orientation. Hence, the schism. The older I get, the less I trust my own understanding.
ro828
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A really strange thought came into my mind while I was reading the various postings on this subject.

I'm a former Episcopalian. Not mad at it, we parted on good terms, but it just didn't do the job and voting with my feet was the best option I had.

Being a conservative fundamentalist, I had the knee-jerk horrified reaction at the appointment of the gay bishop. This is very easy for me because I'm miles and miles away both in geography and affiliation. Heck, I don't even remember the dude's name.

So the position of righteous indignation is both easy and cheap for me.

But what if this guy was somebody I knew personally? Somebody like the several (half-dozen or more) gay friends I had that I really liked and whose conversation I really enjoyed and with whom I shared many values and interests? Then would I have the same feelings toward this issue? I doubt it.
Frankenstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm an Episcopalina, and I'm thinking of leaving the church.

I'm really pretty peeved it has come to this because I have been an Episcopalian all my life, I am proud of the Church's role in this nation's history, and I had told myself along time ago that I would not be one of those causing the "dwindling" of the Church.

BUT,

The secular humanist bent of the ruling liberal "junta" is highly distasteful to me.

I confess, I have not attended regularly in awhile, and this recent consecration has me looking for the exit.

My wife - also a lifelong Episcopalian - does not want to look at Catholicism, while I do.

Discord - directly attributable to the "junta".

Thanks for nothing.
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To provide a diametrically opposite viewpoint:

I am a cradle Catholic who is quite upset with just about every stance the church has taken recently, from its less-than-forthright approach to the pedophilia scandals to its opposition to the war in Iraq. The recent announcement by the bishop of La Cross, Wisconsin, denying the Eucharist within his diocesan boundaries to any politician who advocates abortion or euthanasia, may be the last straw.

There's an Episcopal Church just across my backyard fence. Next Sunday I may visit a service.

Quite frankly, I could use a little more humanism (and respect for the principles of democracy) in my spiritual life.
PurdueAg01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Quite frankly, I could use a little more humanism (and respect for the principles of democracy) in my spiritual life.
Since when does democracy apply to Church teachings? I'm personally very glad that a select few bishops are really getting after local elected leaders regarding abortion. Anybody aiding in the death of 4000 Americans every day needs to rethink what it means to be Catholic.
DualAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Since when does democracy apply to Church teachings?


Who's talking about church teachings?

My post referred to my own personal struggle to reconcile my religious values with my secular ones, and trying to find a church where I can worship God while respecting my ecclesiastical leaders. Currently, I cannot do that in the Catholic Church.

Should I follow my father into the Episcopal Church, I'm sure I won't be delighted with every aspect of its leadership. So the question for me is, do I remain a cafeteria Catholic, picking and choosing among the palatable while rejecting the putrid? Or do I seek out another venue for spiritual sustenance?


[This message has been edited by DualAG (edited 1/12/2004 11:33a).]
NonReg85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
"We felt increasingly alienated by the Catholic Church," said Robert J. Martin, 56, a lawyer in Philadelphia wholives with his partner, Mark S. Petteruti, 45, ahorticulturist.
I AM SHOCKED! People living in sin as defined by the RCC were feeling increasingly alienated by the church. What did these guys expect?
NonReg85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
do I remain a cafeteria Catholic, picking and choosing among the palatable while rejecting the putrid? Or do I seek out another venue for spiritual sustenance?
I guess you do what your heart and conscience tell you to do but I think both options are slippery paths. I sometimes find it hard to agree with the church also so as I examine my conscience I search for ways to reconcile the differences under the assumption that I'm a sinner (which of course I am). This often results in me understanding the church's view in a new light and one with which I can agree. As humans we have an inifinite capacity to rationalize and so I don't necessarily trust myself. I can't always reconcile the differences but I keep trying and ultimately I'm hoping God finds that pleasing.
Ft Worth Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
There's an Episcopal Church just across my backyard fence. Next Sunday I may visit a service.


I for one would like to hear/see how your visit went, even if it went either good or ill.

As for switching churches, do not make a rash decision that you may regret at a later date.


"Expect great things from God; attempt great things for God." - William Carey
LonghornDub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I now consider myself an un-churched Anglican after recently resigning from my positions of Treasurer and Director of Chalicers and Lectors in my local Episcopal church. Although I was a cradle Episcopalian, I have been corrupted by being married to a Baptist preacher's daughter for almost forty years and this evil influence taught me to read the Bible daily and truly trust God to take care of all the things I can't do myself. Until the recent action in Minneapolis, I was worried but optimistic.

When the majority of Bishops denied, by their actions, the tradional acknowledgement of sin, confession, repentance, and redemption and combined it with a denial that the shepherds have a higher duty to live Christian lives than do the sheep, I was gone. I waited to see what the conference in London would do, but when they referred it to a committee, I left. My Priest is also ready to leave, but must wait 18 months for his retirement. He told me it came down to a turf protecting issue for the Bishops.

For 25 years, my wife visited the Episcopal church where I was a member. A year ago she joined. We now visit a medium size Baptist church. It seems different, but my faith is nourished, and I don't have an uncontrollable urge to stand and yell, "That's BS" when some members applaud the heresy of ECUSA. I don't think that would be a Christian way to act, and I like not being tempted.

ECUSA is headed down the path of total humanism. That's fine for those who want to do that. Liberals will join and conservatives leave. There will be no return. I wish they had discovered the Unitarian Church and not destroyed one that produced such works as the King James version of the Bible and the Book of Common Prayer. I will worship with those who disapprove of the actions in Minneapolis, and try not to wish hellfire and damnation on the Bishops who violated their oaths and creeds.

Uva Uvum Vivendo Varia Fit

quote:
"Whomever is unlucky enough to draw OU in the Sugar Bowl, here's some advice. Do not look at Bob Stoops. Do not talk to Bob Stoops. Just let him hang his 50 on you and be thankful that it wasn't 100."
- Jim Rome 11/11/2003




[This message has been edited by LonghornDub (edited 1/20/2004 5:56p).]
LonghornDub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dp

[This message has been edited by LonghornDub (edited 1/20/2004 5:54p).]
AgDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never been out of the Football boards, but its a long slow day at work so here I go. I'm a former Baptist turn Catholic. First let me say the church has its problems, but all do. I like the Catholic Church for one they don't say you are going to heaven or hell; it isn't the point of the church service. The church gives you a guidance as to live your life in service to the Lord. The heaven hell thing is not an issue. Also the Catholic Church has taken the, while very conservative, correct path on birth control, abortion, basically the sexual revolution. The pill is not very good for women's health, if you don't believe me research natural family planning (NFP). Abortion is murder, and was legalized in the most ridiculous way via Roe v. Wade (right to privacy). On a side note if I kill you in the privacy of my home and the police arrest me didn't they violate my rite to privacy? How about if I smoke crack in the privacy of my own home, it is my body I can do with it what I want what I want. Back on track, don't get me wrong the Catholic Church has its problems, but it's the best religion for me. By the way my very good friend and his wife would not have ever know of a hormone imbalance that prevents her from getting pregnant if not for NFP and the Billings Method. Now they are able to use natural hormone replacements to correct their problem and she is pregnant.
LonghornDub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is my opinion that both the RCC and the evangelical churches represent the most conservative branch of Christianity. They interpret the Bible differently, but at least they make the attempt. The leadership of ECUSA let secular matters override spiritual ones.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.