On this day in history 1868 Brigham Young...

5,556 Views | 167 Replies | Last: 15 yr ago by PetroAg87
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jk -I agree and as long as I don't have to do a lot of additional typing I do, and will in the future.

And I just knew you were going to take that postion on A&M baseball and football. Hissss!

(of course I would have also taken the same position!)
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, you quote so often unsubstantiated sources who also have an animus towards the Mormons. I would have a much different attitude towards the ones who have been shown to lie about Joseph, if the character of those so testifying had remained above reproach.

Jon Taylor had no real selfish motivations when he was recovering from being shot to pieces and with the Church in disarray and which was preparing to flee into the wilderness for its very survival. Remember, he was with the Prophet Joseph constantly and was able to observe him under almost every conceivable circumstance. You have claimed Joseph acted in a cowardly manner and was attempting to fire his pistol to save his life and not that of his friends. Both John Taylor and Willard Richards know that was a bunch of bull! I know that Joseph never told Willard and John Taylor the Legion was coming to rescue them for they would have reported it at a later time and would have wondered what happened, and the fact that it never happened, would have made them question Joseph's prophetic calling. Neither John Taylor or Willard Richards had any motivation to stand by Joseph when they would have realized he was a fraud. They would never have suffered what they did for the sake of a lie. John Taylor never had any idea he would become the President of the Church as that position goes to the senior Apostle at the time, and no one knows which one of the Apostles will die or when. There was surely no financial reward for them if anyone of them stayed!

What John Taylor and his wife (who were actually prepared by the Lord) gained by their visions was only a desire to listen to his doctrines carefully. Remember he went over 8 of Elder Pratt's sermons line by line and compared them to the Bible. John Taylor was not an "easy" sell. He had not even met Joseph before he joined. By the way, it took Brigham Young a year of comparing the Book of Mormon to the Bible before he consented to baptism, although his brother had joined a year earlier. They would not have been so earnestly comparing Mormon doctrines to the Bible if they simply wanted to leave Christianity. You really are deluding yourself!

Brigham Young was making the statement concerning "strongest intellect" about John Taylor, not Joseph Smith.

Brother Cardall, who was one of John Taylor's descendants made that statement only a few years ago. This was his opinion and it was correct because John Taylor's opinion was based on his close association with Joseph and witnessed all that resulted from Joseph's efforts and his martyrdom. The same as Peter being a devoted disciple of Jesus. Why? Because he "really" knew him and his actions!

Everything in the Expositor was a lie or half truth. He could have killed as many as needed and fear would have shut the others up. Remember, Joseph already knew the Saints would be leaving for the mountains of the west. But, that is what a fraud and natural man would have done or attempted to do.

As far as your investigation, if things were that easy to dismiss there would not be 14 million of us today and growing so robustly. I wanted you to understand that Elder Oaks was a man of great accomplishment and well versed in the law. The City Council felt that they had the right to destroy the press and was more than willing to defend itself in court. That is why Joseph went willingly back to go to court but with the Governor's promise of absolute protection which the Governor never intended to keep! Joseph knew this. You should read the subsequent history of Governor Ford after his betrayal. The mobs over the years had been frustrated because Joseph kept escaping their clutches. The worst that could have resulted in the trial would have been a fine.

You said that truth always wins out over loyalty. Many of Joseph's followers who rejected him were no different that the ones who rejected Christ and were more than happy to see him murdered.

The Mormons who could possibly have been angry at any of the witnesses who would have denied their testimony, had left for the mountain west and were of no threat to them. Even if someone had snuck back and killed whoever, the damage would have already been done; the cat would have been out of the bag.

Polygamy is ONLY lawful when the Lord commands it. Concubines are secondary wives with not the same status but the same purpose -child bearing!

Henry started your church. He used a selfish pretext to do so and he committed murder to make it work. Neither the spirit of Christ nor his priesthood authority was never enjoyed by Henry's church.

Your "components" make no sense to anyone because instead of them being equal, you have already admitted superior and inferior components that are separated by space.

Their was no choice in leaving in Illinois. It was leave or die. I think it would be of real value for you to examine the witnesses of the Book of Mormons and see what kind of men they really were, which I will do next.
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You should realize Petro, that there is substantial documentation that exists to verify the character and reputation of the Book of Mormon witnesses. The following facts strengthen the position of these individuals as witnesses: (1) they all joined the Church Joseph founded; (2) they devoted substantial time and material resources to building up a new and unpopular religious organization; (3) they became early leaders of the Church; (4) they ALL experienced substantial financial loss that they accumulated from Church participation, frequent moves, and bitter persecution; (5) they were subjected to slanderous criticism and social ostracism; (6) some were subjected to mob violence, including the prophet's brother, Hyrum, who suffered martyrdom with him at Carthage jail; (7) many of the witnesses became personally disaffected from the prophet, including each of the three witnesses, who, for various offenses were excommunicated (two of them, Martin Harris and Oliver Cowdrey returned to the Church, were rebaptized and died in full faith and fellowship. You might also notice they were both Joseph's scribes.); and (8) each of the three witnesses reconfirmed their testimonies just prior to death. Throughout their lives, the witness they bore never faltered, changed, or diminished in any way. Likewise, although several of the eight witnesses left the Church, they never recanted their original testimony. In short Petro, Joseph Smith and the other witnesses of the Book of Mormon were like the Apostles and early Christian martyrs in defense of individual testimony. They were unwilling to yield to any type of pressure, whether physical, emotional, social, financial, or even death. If you are honest Petro, these Book of Mormon witnesses would not only serve as reliable notaries, they could bear up under the most stringent requirements of the law as material witnesses in any civilized court on earth!

Let's look at Martin Harris who was a mature man of 46 years when he met the prophet Joseph. In order to properly assess his character, we must know him as the people of Palymra knew him for 30 tears BEFORE his introduction to the plates. It is well documented that no person in the early Palymra period exceeded him in achievement or reputation for honesty and responsibility. Before his involvement in bringing forth the Book of Mormon, Martin was known as a farmer and citizen of recognized ability. In addition to owning more that 240 acres of productive land, he was also noted for his expertise in raising animals, such as swine and sheep; and for his production of textiles, such as linen, cotton, blankets, and flannel. Martin also served his community a number of times as an elected official. He was chosen seven times in his district to be the "overseer of highways and fence viewer", including 1829, the year the Book of Mormon translation was completed. His repeated selection for this type of service indicated his diplomacy in working with people and the universal trust he had earned among the citizenry. (Palymra Town Record, 1811, 1813, 1814, 1815, 1825, 1827, 1829 in Richard Lloyd Anderson, Investigating the Book of Mormon Witnessess, Deseret Book, 1981, p. 99

In case you think this is not an objective appraisal, one of Martins contemporaries, an OPPONENT OF MORMONISM, wrote of him, "He was considered an honest, industrious citizen by his neighbors". The Palymra Courier echoed this view when they printed a five-installment series dedicated to Martin and his father. While the Church itself was viewed by the townspeople as regrettable, of the younger Harris it was recorded he "was an industrious, hard working farmer, shrewd in his business calculations, frugal in his habits, and was termed a prosperous man in the world." Another respected non-Mormon, Pomeroy Tucker, an eminent politician and editor in western New York for more than 40 years, appraised him as "honest and benevolent" and credited him with being "a prosperous, independent farmer, strictly upright in his business dealings." (Eber D. Howe, Mormonism Unveiled; Pomery Tucker, Origin, Rise, and Progress of Mormonism; and Andersons's book, p.95-96)

But Stephen S. Harding, a non-Mormon who served as territorial governor of Utah during the Civil War and born in Palymra, captures the best essence as to how the people of Palymra felt about Martin Harris. He recalled that the stir caused by the Book of Mormon "excited a good deal of curiosity and comment" chiefly because "such a man as Martin Harris" believed in it and financially supported it. To a prejudiced community, it was "truly phenomenal" that he "should abandon the cultivation of one of the best farms in the neighborhood"!

From all this that is recorded after his involvement with the prophet Joseph Smith, he was still considered an honest, trustworthy, responsible, and reputable man prior to his involvement with the Book of Mormon, but that Joseph had deluded him somehow. It is reported by an impartial observer who wrote that no early citizen of Palymra "received so many unfeeling comments as did Martin Harris. But in spite of such cruelty, he defended his witness and testimony until death. In 1871, shortly before his passing, he made the following statement:

"I have never failed to bear testimony to the divine authenticity of the Book of Mormon. I know of a surety that the work is true. It is not a matter of belief... But knowledge. Just as surely as the sun is shinning on us and gives us light, and the moon and the stars give us light by night, just as surely as the breath of life sustains us, so surely do I know that Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God, chosen by God to open the last dispensation of the fullness of times; so surely do I know that the Book of Mormon was divinely inspired. I saw the plates; I saw the angel; I heard the voice of God ...I might as well as to doubt my own existence as to doubt the divine authenticity of the Book of Mormon or the divine calling of Joseph Smith...My testimony...has not varied...in 41 years". (Stevenson, "Incident in the Life of Martin Harris," 470, in Backman, Eye Witness Accounts of the Book of Mormon, 159.

I will cover the remaining two witnesses of the three after Mother's day. Then the remaining 8 witnesses.

[This message has been edited by diamond4 (edited 5/7/2010 11:20p).]
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
You should realize Petro, that there is substantial documentation that exists to verify the character and reputation of the Book of Mormon witnesses.
Just as there is substantial documentation indicate the lack of character and ethics that existed in Joseph Smith Jr.

You think Diamond that even people of good character can't be mislead and fooled?

quote:
(1) they all joined the Church Joseph founded;
That in NO way is an indication of good behavior but instead simply a sign of either gullibility or much worse!

quote:
(2) they devoted substantial time and material resources to building up a new and unpopular religious organization;
Because of their greed and desire to become Gods in Heaven or because of their desire to gain power here on Earth.

quote:
(3) they became early leaders of the Church;
Exactly. It wasn't good character that drove them but rather this quest for power.

quote:
(4) they ALL experienced substantial financial loss that they accumulated from Church participation, frequent moves, and bitter persecution;
Resulting from the poor leadership and business dealings of their leader. Again Diamond, they may have suffered some short term financial penalties due to Smith's bank fraud, his failed commune, etc. but that doesn't mean that the power itself didn't continue to be a key driver.

quote:
(5) they were subjected to slanderous criticism and social ostracism;
Which is why they eventually moved to Utah so that they could retain their power and avoid that criticism.

quote:
(6) some were subjected to mob violence, including the prophet's brother, Hyrum, who suffered martyrdom with him at Carthage jail;
Yeap. Smith false religion created a firestorm that unfortunately led to violence against some who both opposed Smith and those who supported him.

quote:
(7) many of the witnesses became personally disaffected from the prophet, including each of the three witnesses, who, for various offenses were excommunicated
Indicating that for at least some of them, they eventually became disgusted with Smith and his claims and, even if they felt unsafe to actually denounce him, were certainly not willing to continue to stand by him!

quote:
You might also notice they were both Joseph's scribes
Which sure tells us something about what ACTUALLY went on during these 'translation' sessions versus what is claimed by the Mormons.

quote:
(8) each of the three witnesses reconfirmed their testimonies just prior to death.
Again, when one has mislead others throughout life, either intentionally or unintentionally, it takes true courage to admit such to others. Those three apparently didn't have such courage.

quote:
If you are honest Petro, these Book of Mormon witnesses would not only serve as reliable notaries, they could bear up under the most stringent requirements of the law as material witnesses in any civilized court on earth!
Wrong in all respects Diamond. These were the most biased of all and as a result, their testimony is no more valid than would be the testimony of those who would sing the virtues of David Koresh, Sun Myung Moon, L. Ron Hubbard, etc.

quote:
I will cover the remaining two witnesses of the three after Mother's day. Then the remaining 8 witnesses
And such testimony will be just as insignificant and irrelevant as the claims of Harris. What you absolutely fail to realize or accept Diamond is that you can't prove the validity of a religion by pasting the claims of the fanatics of that religion. But then I suppose that since this is all that you have left, everything else being refuted, you really have no choice do you?
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, I agree that people of good character can be fooled initially, but not over 14 years with all of the experiences that they had. They were not "gullible" when they saw the angel and the plates. Now they too could have been in on the "fraud", if that is what it was. But it would be the only time in history that the three most significant testators were kicked out, as well as any of the other 8, and none of them did not turn on the leader of the fraud. The numbers are too great. The Church was so young and small they would have endured no real threats to their lives. Human nature being what it is, they would never allowed Joseph to get away with this fraud and them not be able to prosper from it themselves!

In 1830 they joined the Church but it was in the April Conference in 1844 that Joseph spoke at the funeral of Elder King Follett who had been accidentally killed a few days previously. George Q. Cannon related that Joseph's address to the some 20,000 people in attendance "uplifted the souls of the congregation to a higher comprehension of the glory that comes after death to the faithful. His address ceased to be a mere eulogy of an individual, and became a "revelation" of eternal truths concerning the glories of immortality. The address occupied three and a half hours in delivery, and the multitude was held spellbound by its power. The Prophet seemed to rise above the world. It was as if the light of heaven encircled his physical being"! This "King Follett Address," after well over 100 years, is still regarded today as a classic in the literature of the Church. This is when the deification of man was introduced so that was obviously not a reason to follow after Joseph. And since Church positions and calling center around service to the members, power was no object, any more than anyone who supposedly chooses to go into the ministry for the right reason Sorry Petro, more empty and erroneous conclusions on your part! If any of the Three Witnesses wanted to recoup their financial losses, as not only did they loose money but any chance of "power" was long gone, all they would have had to do was to offer to come clean for a price and give the "scoop" of a decade, or write a best selling book as to how the fraud was planned executed!

But, it was their good character and competence that qualified them for leadership positions. With no chance of power because of their excommunication, they would have turned on Joseph in a moment when it was obvious they were no longer going to be part of 'deal"!! Their losses stemmed from much more than the failure of the bank at Kirtland. It involved the expense of their missionary work, the cost of the first printing of the 5,000 copies of the Book of Mormon, the cost of frequent moves, the negative results of ongoing persecutions, etc. Sorry Petro, another weak and misguided conclusion on your part that denies how human nature really works!

Only two of the Three Witnesses moved to Utah and that was years later. They were rebaptized but held no Church position of leadership or power, so there was absolutely no temporal advantage to them at all. Another big strike out Petro, but it is so very amusing watching you try to explain away what you don't dare give any credence to.
There was violence against almost all of the Saints. Many suffered death immediately or a short time later from exposure, having to move in the dead of winter by going on foot to Ill. And from Missouri and from Ill. to the Rockies, also in the dead of winter. Of course Christ's "false religion" as viewed by the Pharisees and the Sadduccees plus the Romans, created a firestorm also that led to much violence, including death to Christ's early adherents. The more things change, the more they stay the same..

Those who became disaffected with the prophet over various doctrines, of which plural marriage was just one, had no problem denouncing Joseph. It is interesting that some who knowing signed their names to documents of lies because they felt Joseph was a "fallen" Prophet begged Joseph for forgiveness and came back. The most famous before Joseph was murdered was W.W. Phelps.
Martin and Oliver would never have come back to the Church, repentant and asking to be baptized if they thought for a moment the Book of Mormon was a fraudulent work. And to think that Hyrum and Joseph in Carthage Jail and knowing they were about to be killed and stand before God, Hyrum read passages from the Book of Mormon and Joseph bore a powerful testimony to the guards of the divinity of the Book of Mormon by which he declared that the Gospel had been restored and that the Kingdom of God was again established on the earth!

It takes courage to resist the pressure they had to renounce their testimonies before men and only fools reaffirm a testimony of this kind when they are at death's door. And this applies to all ELEVEN witnesses! Their testimonies are entirely different that the individuals you mentioned and their followers because none of their followers claimed to see an angel, John the Baptist, Peter, James and John, Moses, Elijah, etc. As well as see and handle the gold plates and their is no comparison to the outstanding character of the witnesses.

You my friend are truly self delusional. The last thing you have done is refuted anything thing as it pertains to the character of Joseph Smith or the doctrines that here introduced. If you are willing to study just the three witnesses alone and what their peers thought of them after they let the Church, you will know that the term 'fanatic" could never be applied to them. They are fanatics in your mind because they were first hand witnesses and they were faithful to their testimonies of what they saw and heard. Being a Nicene Christian, you do not know of any other way to dismiss their valid testimonies for which they paid such a high price for over their lives.

Later tonight you will learn much more about Oliver Cowdrey.
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Petro, I agree that people of good character can be fooled initially
And sometimes pride and ego prevent people from admitting that they have been fooled. ESPECIALLY after 14 years of being fooled.

quote:
They were not "gullible" when they saw the angel and the plates. Now they too could have been in on the "fraud", if that is what it was.
Your second sentence obviously is a good explanation for the first. But let's also keep in mind that with the plates for example, Smith only allowed them to look at a small portion, claiming that the rest was 'sealed'. While it is indeed possibile that they were in on the fraud from the start, it also is possible that they simply fell for the counterfeit plates that Smith had created.

And with regard to the alleged 'angel', let's consider that Whitmer's story continued to change. At times, he claimed to have seen the angel "plain as day". But then at other times, such as his interview with John Murphy, as recorded in the "Early Mormon Documents 5:63" he stated that the angel had "no appearance or shape." and that his vision of the angel was just "an impression". Yeah Diamond, Whitmer was about as inconsistent as you and Joseph Smith. That's the problem when you start telling stories that don't have a factual basis.....

quote:
the three most significant testators were kicked out, as well as any of the other 8, and none of them did not turn on the leader of the fraud. The numbers are too great.
Not at all. We already have seen that Smith was killed after destroying the printing presses. The threat of violence that could have occured if those co-conspirators admitted their role in Smith's charade would certainly have been great. Plus there would have also been the threats of economic and/or criminal penalties if they had admitted anything.

quote:
The Church was so young and small they would have endured no real threats to their lives.
Again we have seen that this most certainly wasn't the case. As discussed below, the Danites certainly proved otherwise!

quote:
The address occupied three and a half hours in delivery, and the multitude was held spellbound by its power. The Prophet seemed to rise above the world. It was as if the light of heaven encircled his physical being"!
I bet Moonies say the same thing about some of the speeches that Sun Myung Moon gives as well.

quote:
And since Church positions and calling center around service to the members, power was no object, any more than anyone who supposedly chooses to go into the ministry for the right reason
You can claim that power was not an objective of your early leaders but the evidence quickly proves you wrong. Smith and the others were ALL about the power. That is why he wanted to establish a theocratic government, it is why he felt the right to destroy the presses of those who opposed him, it is why he chose to take on numerous wives, it basically was the driver behind every one of his actions.

quote:
Sorry Petro, more empty and erroneous conclusions on your part!
Nah. Simply more ignoring the facts on your part Diamond.

quote:
all they would have had to do was to offer to come clean for a price and give the "scoop" of a decade, or write a best selling book as to how the fraud was planned executed!
Wrong. There was much more to be lost than to be gained for them to ever admit that they had been active participants in such a con game.

quote:
But, it was their good character and competence that qualified them for leadership positions.
No. It was their loyalty and support of Smith's positions that ensured them ongoing power.

quote:
Their losses stemmed from much more than the failure of the bank at Kirtland.
Of course it did although the Kirtland bank fraud certainly didn't help. But unfortunately Smith's various failures and constant fleeing from the law DID cost others in the short term. But in exchange many of them got the increased power, the multiple wives to sleep with, etc.

quote:
Sorry Petro, another weak and misguided conclusion on your part that denies how human nature really works!
Nope. I understand exactly how it works and that is why it makes sense as to why so many people could be so easily fooled by Smith and his claims.

quote:
Only two of the Three Witnesses moved to Utah and that was years later. They were rebaptized but held no Church position of leadership or power, so there was absolutely no temporal advantage to them at all.
You are wrong yet again Diamond. Let's look at those two Witnesses and the power and reasons that prevented them from recanting:

First David Whitmer: After he rejected the Mormons, they in turn tried to have him expelled from Caldwell County, Missouri where he lived and owned plenty of land. In fact why don't you tell us Diamond about the Danite vigilante group that even issued the Danite Manifesto warning Whitmer that: "depart or a more fatal calamity shall befall you." And shortly afterwards, Whitmer did just that fleeing with his family to Richmond Missouri. Obviously Whitmer took those threats seriously and understood what would have happened if he had admitted his part in Smith's fraud.

Let's also keep in mind that Whitmer continuned throughout various periods in his life to use Smith's claims to further his own. In 1867, he claimed to be the true successor to Joseph Smith as he had proclaimed previously. And then at the very end of his life, he proclaimed that his nephew was the true successor to the Mormon church. So no Diamond, even to the very end, Whitmer had reasons to fear revealing Smith's fraud and he also had motivation in the form of desires for power that prevented him from admitting what had actually occured.

Let's also consider Whitmer's alleged statement referencing the validity of his testimony: "If you believe my testimony to the Book of Mormon," wrote Whitmer, "if you believe that God spake to us three witnesses by his own voice, then I tell you that in June, 1838, God spake to me again by his own voice from the heavens and told me to 'separate myself from among the Latter Day Saints, for as they sought to do unto me, so it should be done unto them." So if you are so willing to believe Whitmer's testimony in the first event and so unwilling to believe in the second...Why? The answer Diamond is that you choose to believe only that which supports your position while ignoring everything else!

Now let’s look at Cowdery, who JUST HAPPENED to be a relative of Joseph Smith (Yet another reason that he wouldn’t have admitted that Smith was a fraud!) Of the three ‘witnesses’ it certainly appears that Cowdery was the most likely of them to have been aware of the fraud from the very beginning. Just consider that Smith’s ‘translating’ didn’t really go very quickly until Cowdery became his scribe. Now as second in command behind Smith, Cowdery certainly had power and a reason not to reveal if Smith was a fraud didn’t he? But eventually, he became disgusted with Smith’s behavior and rejected him. So why didn’t he at that time reveal the truth about Smith? Because, like Whitmer, Cowdery still owned land in the area and was subject to the same threats of violence from the Danites. In fact, consider the sermon given by Mormon leader Sidney Rigdon who proclaimed that the dissenters were “as salt that had lost its savor" and that it was the duty of the faithful to cast the dissenters out "to be trodden beneath the feet of men." No Diamond, there was plenty of reason for Cowdery to remain quiet.

quote:
Those who became disaffected with the prophet over various doctrines, of which plural marriage was just one, had no problem denouncing Joseph.
Yes Diamond we all know that there were plenty of people who eventually recognized Smith for what he was and rejected him.

quote:
It is interesting that some who knowing signed their names to documents of lies because they felt Joseph was a "fallen" Prophet begged Joseph for forgiveness and came back.
Temptations and power are tough to reject. There are plenty of lapsed Christians as well Diamond.

quote:
And to think that Hyrum and Joseph in Carthage Jail and knowing they were about to be killed and stand before God, Hyrum read passages from the Book of Mormon and Joseph bore a powerful testimony to the guards of the divinity of the Book of Mormon by which he declared that the Gospel had been restored and that the Kingdom of God was again established on the earth!
And WHO tells us that this occurred??? What a surprise that such a claim was made by Smith’s followers….
quote:
You my friend are truly self delusional.
No Diamond. I am simply willing to consider the facts and not allow my theology to be driven by personal greed and arrogance.

quote:
last thing you have done is refuted anything thing as it pertains to the character of Joseph Smith or the doctrines that here introduced.
Yeap. I have continually refuted both Smith’s character AND his doctrines first, last, and throughout these discussions.

quote:
If you are willing to study just the three witnesses alone and what their peers thought of them after they let the Church, you will know that the term 'fanatic" could never be applied to them.
Can someone who was in on the con be properly labeled a ‘fanatic’ or simply power hungry?

quote:
Being a Nicene Christian, you do not know of any other way to dismiss their valid testimonies for which they paid such a high price for over their lives.
There is nothing valid in their testimonies to begin with Diamond. You choose to believe such only because it fits your desires to do so.

Now you have used all of your statements in a failed attempt to support the claims by Smith and his alleged ‘witnesses’. However if this represents ‘validation’ to you, then let’s look at a similar but unrelated case of such a vision occurring with James Jesse Strang:
Strang was a Mormon who alleged that an angel had visited him and given him authority over the Mormons after Smith’s death. The angel supposedly granted him the “Urim and Thurmmim” which was used to lead him to another set of plates that he claims he retrieved and translated just as Smith had previously claimed HE had done.

In 1845, he supposedly led FOUR witnesses to a hill at which time: “The witnesses, in signed statements, said that Strang led them to an oak tree about a foot in diameter and that Strang asked them to look for any sign the sod had been disturbed. The witnesses reported none. The four men dug up the tree, while Strang kept his distance. After digging through the topsoil and subsoil, the men worked with a pickax and shovel to dig through the clay. Suddenly the shovel clunked against something—a stone about a foot square and three inches thick. Below the stone was a case of slightly baked clay embedded in the hard clay soil. Inside were three plates of brass, small enough to fit in a hand.

“On one of the six sides of the three plates was a landscape view, apparently of the prairie and the range of hills where the men had dug. On another was a drawing of a man wearing a cap (or a crown?) with a scepter in his hand; he was surrounded by symbols that had direct parallels to the Mormon Church hierarchy. The witnesses add the other four sides are very closely covered with what appears to be alphabetic characters but in a language of which we have no knowledge’”
(“King of Beaver Island: The Life and Assassination of James Jesse Strang, 1998)

Strang then supposedly showed the plates to his followers and ‘translated’ them after stating that the plates had been written in a “lost, Levitical language”. He claimed that they were the “Book of the Law of the Lord”. Now here is the interesting part Diamond… Seven MORE witnesses later attested to the truthfulness of Strangs record and claims. Their statement was that:
“Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues and people, to whom this Book of the Law of the Lord shall come, that James J. Strang has the plates of the ancient Book of the Law of the Lord given to Moses, from which he translated this law, and has shown them to us. We examined them with our eyes, and handled them with our hands. The engravings are beautiful antique workmanship, bearing a striking resemblance to the ancient oriental languages; and those from which the laws in this book were translated are eighteen in number, about seven inches and three-eights wide, by nine inches long, occasionally embellished with beautiful pictures.

“And we testify unto you all that the everlasting kingdom of God is established, in which this law shall be kept, till it brings in rest and everlasting righteousness to all the faithful.”


And guess what Diamond….We have ZERO record that a single one of those witnesses ever recanted their testimony.
SO if you want to suggest that such testimonies in any way validated Smith’s claims, then in order to be consistent, you must ALSO believe that similar testimonies from Strang’s witnesses also validate HIS claims. And yet you won’t because there is nothing about you that is consistent nor logical.
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think you two need to meet at a neutral location and "hug it out." Do you bowl?

I'll give you both an "E" for effort, but this thread needs to die now. It has become nothing but an exercise in futility. Both of you need to put your pride back in your pockets and step away from your keyboards. Now, take a deep breath and exhale.

There...doesn't that feel better?

[This message has been edited by outofstateaggie (edited 5/11/2010 5:40p).]
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, Not when you have a chance to get even and recoup your losses. Sorry, wrong motivation analysis! Smith let them see all of the Plates that he was permitted to translate from. He never had access to the sealed plates!

As usual you are in a state of denial. It is almost incalculable the odds of all 11 remaining quiet to a fraud that they would have been a part to, and from which they were expecting to profit from ,but now would be unable. They would have simply moved to Missouri and revealed the fraud and the Missourians would have been glad to protect them and reward them. They would have gained much for exposing the fraud materially and the appreciation of those who had been deluded. Even if they had been killed afterwoods, the "fraud" would have been exposed. You really have very little understanding of human nature, especially the desire for revenge such as they would have wanted to take on Joseph for expelling them.

So you understand, no one ever joined the Church because they thought that they could become gods before that Sermon, if anyone ever did. This was the first mention of it. So as you are on so many occasions, you are in error, but continue to lie because you are willfully ignore the facts!

It is so funny about you thinking that Joseph and the others were about "power". Power for a small, poor, persecuted group of people who were so unpopular? That kind of power would have been meaningless. And then to e willing to give up your life when that means the end of your "power". Sorry Petro, you need to find some thing else as you have no facts but your idle and erroneous speculations.

There is not one documented murder by a "Danite". And after the Mormons were gone there was no threat. It was John Taylor and Willard Richards, eyewitnesses who observed all of the events in Carthage Jail. Sorry but you have only "attempted" to refute Joseph and his doctrines, and quite unsuccessfully I might add. You see what happened to all those that broke away from the Church and tried to make something to their advantage.
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, I had unexpected company last night and did not have a chance to finish this. I would like for you to consider these men's lives and compare them to what you think a "fanatic' is or is not. As you are aware, Oliver Cowdrey was also a faithful witness of the Book of Mormon until his passing. He had become separated from the Church for a period because of differences with some of its leaders, but was later rebaptized in Kanesville (now Council Bluffs), Iowa in Nov. 1848, when the Church was still in the process of heading west.

If you want to accurately appraise Oliver's character and reputation Petro, you must become acquainted with his activities and pursuits during the period he was estranged from the Church. From 1838 to 1848 he became a highly respected attorney, politician, journalist, and civic servant. Moving to Ohio in 1839, he was elected as one of thirteen delegates to represent Geauga County at the bicounty senatorial convention and in 1840 was initially selected as editor of a Democratic campaign newspaper. But unfortunately, when it was learned he was of the Three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon, he was dropped from consideration. In spite of this rebuff, he remained in Tiffin, Ohio, for seven years, during which period of time he earned an impeccable reputation. One of Oliver's many advocates, William Lang, was a prominent citizen who served as a prosecuting attorney, probate judge, mayor of Tiffin, county treasurer, and a two-term Ohio state senator. In a work entitled History of Seneca Country, authored by Lang in his early life, he expressed sincere praise and admiration for the "noble and true manhood" exhibited by Oliver Cowdrey! (Anderson, Investigating the Book of Mormon Witnesses, 41)

"Mr. Cowdrey was an able lawyer and a great advocate. His manners were easy and gentlemanly; he was polite, dignified, yet courteous. He had an open countenance, high forehead, dark brown eyes, Roman Nose, clenched lips and prominent lower jaw. He shaved smooth and was neat and cleanly in his person. He was of light stature, about 5'5" high, and had a loose, easy walk. with all his kind and friendly disposition, there was a certain degree of sadness that seemed to pervade his whole being. His association with others was marked by the great amount of information his conversation conveyed and the beauty of his musical voice. His addresses to the court and jury were characterized by a high order of oratory, with brilliant and forensic force. He was modest and reserved, never spoke ill of anyone, never complained." (p.365)

Just a typical fanatic Petro. Right? But the real truth is that from this quotation, and numerous others that could be cited, we can easily discern the integrity, and good name earned by Oliver in providing distinguished service to his community.

But, nevertheless, one may also imagine the melanchoy he must have felt from time to time having witnessed such marvelous and miraculous events, only to be separated from that organization he was instrumental in founding and from which he had derived so much joy. Suffering from an incurable lung disease, he died on march 3, 1850, almost 18 months after rejoining the Church of Jesus Christ of latter-day Saints.

It is interesting to note that when the community of Tiffin learned of Oliver's passing, the Seneca Advisor reported:

"His numerous acquaintances at this place will receive the tidings of his decease with much regret. He was a man or more than ordinary ability, and during his residence among us had endeared himself to all who knew him in the private and social walks of life."

Most importantly for the purposes of our discussions, before his death, Oliver repeated to David Whitmer the testimony he had expressed to others on so many occasions:

"I was present at the death bed of Oliver Cowdrey in 1850...Oliver died the happiest man I ever so...His last words were, 'Brother David, be true to your testimony to the Book of Mormon, for we know that it is of God and that it is verily true.' After shaking hands with the family and kissing his wife and daughter, he said, 'Now I lay me down for the last time, I am going to my Savior,' and died immediately, with a smile on his face. Many witnesses yet live in Richmond, who will testify to the truth of these facts, as well as to the good character of Oliver Cowdrey."

Next I will educate you about David Whitmer.
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I think you two need to meet at a neutral location and "hug it out."
Think I'll pass on that outofstate!

quote:
I'll give you both an "E" for effort, but this thread needs to die now. It has become nothing but an exercise in futility.
Correcting Diamond's 'misstatements' and helping him understand the difference between 'fact' and 'opinion' can certainly be a full time job outofstate. Honestly, I am amazed that anyone is actually still reading this thread by now!
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Petro, Not when you have a chance to get even and recoup your losses.
Except by the time they decided to reject Joseph Smith and his theology, they were already so far sunk that there was little chance of "recouping their losses" and much risk in admitting that Smith wasn't what he claimed.

quote:
Smith let them see all of the Plates that he was permitted to translate from. He never had access to the sealed plates!
In other words, he very conveniently had an excuse as to why they could only look at a small portion of the plates. Certainly it would have been much easier to simply counterfeit a few metalic plates instead of the entire thing wouldn't it Diamond?

quote:
It is almost incalculable the odds of all 11 remaining quiet to a fraud that they would have been a part to, and from which they were expecting to profit from ,but now would be unable.
Wrong. But if you insist on believing that assumption than you must also be willing to accept that Strang also found plates from God right? After all, he had 12 witnessess, none of whom ever recanted their testimonies as to what they had seen. If you insist that such is all that is needed to validate Smith's claims, then you have to accept Strang's as well. And yet you don't because your conclusions and assumptions are based on logical analysis but rather on simply what you WANT to believe.

quote:
They would have gained much for exposing the fraud materially and the appreciation of those who had been deluded.
You think that all of those who are deluded WANT to be told such? No Diamond, many people's ego won't allow them to accept such claims of delusion. You are a perfect example. Let's consider this: If you were told that documentation had been found in which one or more of those witnessess HAD claimd that it was all a fraud, would it change your theological beliefs? Probably not. You instead would try and find excuses for ignoring such documentation as you do with other facts that have been presented out here. And the same would have happened back then. No Diamond, as we have already seen, there were good and solid reasons that those witnessess would have been hesitant to reveal their true feelings about Smith and his theology.

quote:
Even if they had been killed afterwoods, the "fraud" would have been exposed.
And your next statement certainly seems to aknowledge that such an admissions COULD have been dangerous to them.

quote:
You really have very little understanding of human nature, especially the desire for revenge such as they would have wanted to take on Joseph for expelling them.
Sure they probably wanted revenge. But they probably also wanted to protect both they and their families health and safety AND they wanted to protect their land, assets and potential future power that was available to them within the Mormon organization. No Diamond, in ignoring those particular drivers, you are showing that you have little appreciation for what actually drives much of human nature.

quote:
So you understand, no one ever joined the Church because they thought that they could become gods before that Sermon, if anyone ever did. This was the first mention of it.
Yet another example of the way Mormons 'evolve' their doctrine continuously to fit the desires of its members.

quote:
It is so funny about you thinking that Joseph and the others were about "power". Power for a small, poor, persecuted group of people who were so unpopular?
Smith controlled the 3,000 strong Nauvoo Legion. He was both Mayor of his city AND the religious leader. He used his theology as an excuse to have multiple wives. There were laws in the city that specifically exempted Smith from arrest. He had the power to order printing presses destroyed when they dared to reveal truths about him that he didn't wish people to know about. No Diamond. For you to now claim that Smith neither had nor desired power is not supported by the facts and is yet another indication of the inconsistencies in your arguments.

quote:
And then to e willing to give up your life when that means the end of your "power".
We know that Smith DID intend to flee until he realized that he was being accused of cowardice by his followers. Smith realized at that point that the only way to retain his hold on his power was to stop the fleeing and take his chances with the courts. Unfortunately, his lawbreaking had so infuriated the local population that he never had the day in court that he deserved.

quote:
Sorry Petro, you need to find some thing else as you have no facts but your idle and erroneous speculations.
It is facts that are the basis for my speculations Diamond.

quote:
There is not one documented murder by a "Danite".
I never said there was did I??? But that certainly doesn't mean that threats weren't made does it? Do you want to deny the threats within the Danite Manifesto or as spoken by Rigdon?

quote:
It was John Taylor and Willard Richards, eyewitnesses who observed all of the events in Carthage Jail.
Two Mormon leaders of course... You certainly aren't trying to suggest that those two men were unbiased in their opinions are you Diamond? It certainly is convenient how quickly you are willing to take their testimony at face value while just as quickly rejecting the statements made by the jailer and what Smith allegedly told him.... Yet another example of your selective picking and choosing based on what you WANT to believe.

quote:
Sorry but you have only "attempted" to refute Joseph and his doctrines, and quite unsuccessfully I might add.
Actually I have continuously succeeded in refuting Smith and his character. And you have either ignored or backpedalled every time it has occured. Remember for example you initially denying that Smith had ever lied about his polygamy? And how much hemhawing around you eventually had to do to try and justify his denial (lying) of such activities?

quote:
You see what happened to all those that broke away from the Church and tried to make something to their advantage.
And yet, in the long term, on a spiritual level, they as compared to the Mormons are the lucky ones because they DID break away!



diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, They would have had an excellent chance of recouping their losses in the future, but being men of such great integrity, as well as God-fearing, they would have not proclaimed on their death beds that their testimonies were true. You don't understand that there were many leaves that the plates were translated from. I know that you want to believe there were paper pages in the hat that Joseph peered into, but you might want to reread what his wife Emma told her son. "I am convinced that no man could have dictated the writing of the manuscripts unless he was inspired; for when acting as scribe, your father would dictate to me hour after hour; and when returning for meals, or after interruptions, he would begin at once where he had left off, without seeing the manuscript or having any portion of it read to him. This was a usual thing for him to do. It would have been improbable that a learned man could do this; and for one so ignorant and unlearned as he was, it was simply impossible"! Petro, he would have had to have a lot of paper pages stuffed into the hat to translate for hour after hour.

When Joseph and the others arose on that particular day that had been designated, after breakfast and the usual morning service -which included reading, singing and prayer -Joseph stood and turning to his friend, said, "Martin Harris, you have got to humble yourself before God this day and obtain, if possible, a forgiveness of your sins. If you will do this, it is God's will and Oliver Cowdrey and David Whitmer should look upon the plates. In David Whitmer's personal account, when the three witnesses and Joseph were together, David recorded that an angel of the Lord stood before them and held in his hands the plates they had been praying to view. "He turned over the leaves one by one," so that the engraving could be distinctly viewed. The angel addressed himself to David Whitmer directly, saying "Blessed is the Lord and he that keeps his commandments." Then they heard a voice from out of the bright light sky say, "These plates have been revealed by the power of God, and they have been translated by the power of God; the translation of them which you have seen is correct, and I command you to bear record of what you now see and hear".

Strang found no plates from God for that claimed incident came to naught, and God's work does not come to naught in the last days. There was no danger to any that would have revealed the fraud, but if there had been, the danger was passed when the Saints fled into the unknown wilderness! Of course you think that all of these men were sniveling cowards with no courage to expose someone they would have now hated.

They abandoned their property when they went west and there was no prospect of power to them at all, nor did they have any, as you imagine power. The Church was so small when they were excommunicated, that they would have found it impossible to believe they would have had more wealth in the future that what they already had, but keep kidding yourself Petro.

Joseph would have easily held onto his "power and influence" as his followers knew that the anti-Mormons had been trying to kill him and them, and he had the perfect excuse; he was going to find a place of refuge for all of the Saints.

I believe that John Taylor and Willard Richards were men of such integrity as that their testimony is above reproach. They had no reason to lie. The Church was in total disarray and its future looked very doubtful. The mobs were convinced that when they killed Joseph, they had killed the Church. They did not realize that this was not the Church of Joseph Smith, or the Church of Brigham Young, etc., but the Church of Jesus Christ, for he was at its head. But the mob forgot to kill the Apostles and Christ's Church this time survived as the Lord promised it to Joseph would when the Lord called him to be the Prophet of the restoration!

Sadly, those who broke away lost both temporally and spiritually!
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know this is hard on you Petro, but David Whitmer, like his associates Martin Harris and Oliver Cowdrey, was esteemed as a man of high character and integrity by all who knew him. According to one historian, David Whitmer was an "individualist' who bordered on the edge of 'stubborn". "Whether in Mormon Society or not," he wrote, 'he stood like a rock for his principles." This outspoken and utterly honest personality would have been the first to detect fraud and expose it. During 8 years in the Church and fifty years of strict separation from it, he maintained without compromise that he had seen the angel and the plates". (Anderson, Investigating the Book of Mormon Witnesses. Not given to frivolous statements, Whitmer had a stern reputation for saying what he meant and meaning what he said.

David's father was characterized by his family as a "hard working, God-fearing man," a strict Presbyterian" who "brought his children up with sectarian discipline." Although somewhat tempered by his experiences with the Book of Mormon and the Restoration, David was often described in a similar manner by those who knew him best. As a young man, he demonstrated uncommon responsibility and natural leadership. Consequently he was elected sergeant of the newly formed Seneca County militia in 1825 at the age of twenty. Two letters written to him by Oliver Cowdrey, expressing a firm conviction of Joseph's prophetic role, initiated his interest in the Book of Mormon. The work of the translation moved to his father's home shortly thereafter and by June 29 1829, he had become a witness to the world of the divine authenticity of the plates, the appearance of the angel, and hearing the voice of God bear record that the translation was correct.

His involvement in the Church was at the highest levels for eight years between 1830 and 1838. According to David, concerns over new revelations and a growing and changing Church polity began to influence his thinking negatively. This condition combined with the growing influence of Sidney Rigdon, a former Campbellite preacher, widened his disaffection from the Prophet. David wrote "Rigdon was a thorough Bible scholar, a man of fine education, and a powerful orator. He soon worked himself deep into Brother Joseph's affections, and had more influence over him that any man living." Although all three Book of Mormon witnesses separated from the Church, only David never returned.

Locating in Richmond, Missouri, Whitmer became involved in many successful business enterprises and served on fair boards, was elected to several terms as a city councilman, and was chosen to fill an unexpired mayoral term in 1867-68. Jacob T. Child, the prominent editor of the Richmond Conservator, was one of many who held David Whitmer in high esteem .The Ray County Atlas of 1877 featured him as one of the regions most influential citizens! Serving at various times as both mayor of Richmond and state assemblyman, he was also elected president of the Missouri Press Association by his peers and was appointed Ambassador to Siam by President Grover Cleveland. Child's respect for Whitmer impelled him to defend this honored citizen when he was criticized because of his connection to the Book of Mormon. One occasion an anti-Mormon lecturer, Clark Braden, visited Richmond and publicly denounced Whitmer as disreputable. The Conservator's rebuttal was published on the front page and, while unsupportive of Mormonism, it was resolute in its opinion that in view of David Whitmer's 46 years of private citizenship ... In Richmond, without stain or blemish," his public credibility was fully warranted! The respected journalist readily acknowledged that theological views were open to debate but insisted that this man's character was not! "If a life of probity," he wrote, "of unobtrusive benevolence and well doing for nigh a half century, marks a man as a good citizen, the David Whitmer should enjoy the confidence and esteem of his fellow men".

David Whitmer's last written testimony was recorded in a pamphlet he published shortly before his death, in part to explain his separation from the Church. In this booklet, he confirmed the witness he had consistently given throughout his life:

"I will say once more to all mankind, that I have never denied my testimony or any part thereof. I also testify to the world, that neither Oliver Cowdrey or Martin Harris ever at any time denied their testimony. They both denied reaffirming the truth of the divine authenticity of the Book of Mormon. I wish now, standing as it were, in the very sunset of life, and in the fear of God once and for all to make this public statement: That I have never at any time denied that testimony or any part thereof, which has so long since been published with that Book, as one of three witnesses. Those who know me best, will know that I have always adhered to that testimony. And that no man may be misled or doubt my present views in regard to the same, I do AGAIN affirm the truth of all my statements, as then made and published. "He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear"; it was no delusion. What is written, and he that readeth let him understand. Beware how you hastily condemn that book which I know to be the word of God; for his own voice and an angel from heaven declared the truth of it unto me, and to the two other witnesses who testified on their deathbed that it was true.

That warning is for you also Petro and others. As I have stated before neither of the three Witnesses nor any of the eight ever recanted their testimonies as published in the Book of Mormon. And contrary to your conclusions, not only did they reaffirm their testimonies throughout their lives, they suffered personally and professionally for remaining true to their witnesses; there was never any personal gain, or any hope for such, either in the beginning or at any time during their mortal existence. Not only has their testimony stood the test of time, the religious organization they helped found has flourished throughout the world, and its people, taken as a whole, are a powerful testament of its truth!!

Sorry Petro, but there is not even a hint of fanaticism, much to your chagrin I am sure.
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I know this is hard on you Petro, but David Whitmer, ... was esteemed as a man of high character and integrity by all who knew him
And of course Diamond once again 'forgets' to mention that the author making that claim about Whitmer is a life long Mormon. But I guess in the absence of non-biased, objective support for your claims, you have no choice do you Diamond?

If Whitmer was of such high character and integrity, then why do you so quickly dismiss his claims that in June of 1838, God spoke to him and told him to leave the LDS organization? And why do you reject his claims that God wanted HIM and later his nephew to actually lead the Mormons?

You try and claim that you believe Whitmer based on his alleged character and integrity but the reality is that you choose to selectively believe Whitmer when he supports your position and then you just as quickly reject his claims when you disagree with his statements.

quote:
This outspoken and utterly honest personality would have been the first to detect fraud and expose it.
First, even people of integrity are often times conned Diamond. Second, we have already seen his continued quest for power for both he and his nephew that would have prevented him from revealing his potential knowledge of the fraud. And third, we have already seen the threats made by the Danites that very well could have made him think twice about fully exposing Smith.

quote:
I will say once more to all mankind, that I have never denied my testimony or any part thereof. I also testify to the world, that neither Oliver Cowdrey or Martin Harris ever at any time denied their testimony.
Made right after his claim that according to God, his nephew was to be the true leader of the Mormons right Diamond? Yes even in death, there was motivation to keep any knowledge of Smith's fraud a secret.

quote:
Beware how you hastily condemn that book which I know to be the word of God...That warning is for you also Petro and others.
Of course that warning has zero relevance to the Book of Mormon since it was created by man and not by God.

quote:
As I have stated before neither of the three Witnesses nor any of the eight ever recanted their testimonies as published in the Book of Mormon.
None of the Strang witnessess ever recanted THEIR testimonies either with regards to Strang's discovery of additional plates. So why do you so selectively choose who to believe and not believe Diamond? The fact that you believe one and not the other shows us that in reality, it has nothing to do with the witnesses and whether they recanted or not.

quote:
Not only has their testimony stood the test of time, the religious organization they helped found has flourished throughout the world
Test of time? The Muslims and Buddhist religions have also stood the test of time and flourished. So if you want to use that as some sort of validity test, than you must be as accepting of those other religions as well. The fact that you are not is indication that such a 'test' is completely invalid and irrelevant!
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, the same spirit that led David out of the Church is and was the source of his on going spiritual problems. But to his credit, he and the others were faithful to their death bed as to what they heard, saw and handled. Those facts are inescapable!
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am so amused listening to you describe how it was the wealth and/or power those that were Church leaders were so desirous of keeping. But then you examine what really transpired. The following example of John Taylor was repeated hundreds of times over by other members of the Church in nauvoo and in Missouri and Kirtland. You would have thought they would have renounced their religion to keep the "bird in the hand vs. the two in the bush".

After John Taylor was seriously wounded he was conveyed to his home in Nauvoo after a few days. It was many weeks before he was able to resume his normal work load. The councils of the Twelve were frequently held at his house while recovering, and when once again on his feet, he continued with his publications, besides his Church activities and a splendid farm which he operated near Nauvoo. When it was decided to flee Nauvoo and preparations begun, John Taylor left on the 16th of February, 1846 for the great migration westward. To get some idea of his sacrifice he made at the time of his leaving, he left behind in Nauvoo a large two-story brick house, well furnished, with a brick store on one side, and a new brick building that he had erected for a printing office on the other, with a large barn in the rear. The lot and buildings were worth over $10,000. In addition to this property, a short distance east of Nauvoo, he had a farm of 106 aces, another farm of 80 acres, forty of which were under cultivation and forty in timber. He also owned a corner lot, 101X85 feet on Main and Weber Streets. All of this property which he had built and developed, Elder Taylor abandoned in Nauvoo as he pursued the very weary journey into the western wilderness. But he was driven by the thought and belief that the Saints could find a place where they could worship God in peace, and dwell in security without being molested by wicked mobs.



[This message has been edited by diamond4 (edited 5/14/2010 3:56p).]
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I forgot to mention Petro (and this is for all of you that have been following this discussion) that this is a very intersting discourse on the King Follett Sermon which was very profound as it covered much new doctrine and doctinal insights over 3.5 hours in its presentation without notes, brought about by revelation.

http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2004_King_Follett_Discourse_in_the_Light_of_Ancient_Beliefs.html

Here are a couple of excerpts:

The Assembly of the Gods

...Joseph Smith maintained that there was a council or assembly of the Gods held prior to the creation of the earth. "The head God called together the Gods and sat in grand council to bring forth the world. The grand counsellors sat at the head in yonder heavens, and contemplated the creation of the worlds which were created at that time... In the beginning, the head of the Gods called a council of the Gods; and they came together and concocted a plan to create the world and people it." (Journal of Discourses 6:5). The idea is also reflected in the creation account recorded in chapters 4 and 5 of the Book of Abraham,3 and in D&C 121:32, the latter speaking of "that which was ordained in the midst of the Council of the Eternal God of all other gods before this world was."

The concept of a divine council can be demonstrated from the Hebrew Bible. For example, the King James version (KJV) of Psalm 82:1 reads, "God [Hebrew µyhla, 'el?h?m] standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods." The Hebrew term rendered "congregation of the mighty" is la td[ (cedat 'el), which really means "the council of God." Another Hebrew term that means "council" is dws (s?d),4 which is often translated "secret" in KJV. Passages in which it should be read as "council" are Job 15:8;5 29:4; Psalm 25:14; and Proverbs 3:32. Indeed, in some passages, KJV translates it "assembly" (Psalm 111:1; Jeremiah 6:11; 15:17; Ezekiel 13:9), while in a few others KJV renders it "counsel" (Psalm 55:14; 83:3; 89:5-7; Proverbs 15:22; Jeremiah 23:18, 22), while in Psalm 64:2, KJV renders it "secret counsel."6...


The Meaning of Creation

...In his King Follett discourse, Joseph Smith said, You ask the learned doctors why they say the world was made out of nothing; and they will answer, "Don't the Bible say he created the world?" And they infer, from the word create, that it must have been made out of nothing. How, the word create came from the word baurau, which does not mean to create out of nothing; it means to organize--the same as a man would organize materials and build a ship. Hence we infer that God had materials to organize the world out of chaos--chaotic matter, which is element, and in which dwells all the glory. Element had an existence from the time He had. The pure principles of element are principles which can never be destroyed: they may be organized and re-organized, but not destroyed. They had no beginning, and can have no end. (Journal of Discourses 6:6)

Other Latter-day Saint scholars have thoroughly discussed Joseph Smith's teachings about the eternity of matter, so I shall not go into that subject here.38 It is the Hebrew term rendered "created" in the KJV and "organized" by Joseph Smith in the King Follett discourse and Abraham 4:1-3. He declared that "Baurau signified to bring forth. If you do not believe it, you do not believe the learned man of God" (Journal of Discourses 6:5).

Joseph Smith's critics claim that the Hebrew verb arb (b?r?')39 is used only of acts of God because only God can really create something out of nothing. This verb is used in reference to God's creative activity in nine Old Testament passages, including five instances in the Genesis account of creation.40 In nine other passages, it refers to other miracles performed by God.41 Contrary to what the critics have said, it is sometimes used in reference to the acts of human beings. See, for example, Joshua 17:15; 17:18 (where the KJV renders it "cut down," in reference to wood, perhaps for building purposes), 1 Samuel 2:29 (KJV "make yourselves fat", Ezekiel 21:19 (twice rendered "choose" in KJV), and Ezekiel 23:47 (KJV "dispatch". The reading of the Hebrew text of 1 Samuel 2:29 has been challenged and other readings proposed, but it is interesting that the verb here appears just before tyvarm (m?-r?'sh?t, "from the beginning of", rendered "with the chiefest" in KJV. This is the same word that appears as tyvarb (ber?'š?t), "in the beginning of" in Genesis 1:1 with the root arb (b?r?').

In a number of passages, the Hebrew verbal root arb, though used in reference to God's work, clearly cannot mean to create out of nothing.42 Psalm 102:18 says that "the people which shall be created shall praise the Lord," but no one understands this to mean that God would "create" these future inhabitants of the earth out of nothing.43 In Isaiah 43:1, 7, 15, we read of God as "the creator of Israel," yet Israel was not "created" out of nothing, but out of a people God chose from among the nations (cf. Ezekiel 21:30). And though several passages indicate that God created mankind,44 we read elsewhere that the first man was shaped from the ground (Genesis 2:7) and his wife from his own body (Genesis 2:21-23), not from nonexistent matter. The Lord says that he "create[d]" Jerusalem (Isaiah 65:18), yet we know that the city was built of rock and mortar. When God will, in future, "create new heavens and a new earth" (Isaiah 65:17), will he use existing matter, or will he need to create more elements?...



[This message has been edited by diamond4 (edited 5/14/2010 4:28p).]
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Petro, the same spirit that led David out of the Church is and was the source of his on going spiritual problems.
And it is that same 'spirit' that led him away from Christianity and towards Joseph Smith in the first place.

Just to be clear Diamond, are you claiming that you believe David Whitmer's claims that God spoke to him in June of 1838?

quote:
But to his credit, he and the others were faithful to their death bed as to what they heard, saw and handled. Those facts are inescapable!
And another fact that is inescapable is that even immediately prior to death, Whitmer never recanted his claims that Smith was preaching non-Godly doctrine and that his nephew was God's true leader of the LDS organization.

quote:
I am so amused listening to you describe how it was the wealth and/or power those that were Church leaders were so desirous of keeping.
The facts speak for themselves. Look at how many power struggles developed in the Mormon church as the various leaders tried to gain control. Whitmer is but just one example of this.

quote:
The following example of John Taylor was repeated hundreds of times over by other members of the Church
Yeap. John Taylor is indeed a perfect example of an early Mormon driven not by spiritually but by other desires.

quote:
To get some idea of his sacrifice he made at the time of his leaving...
Yes he gave up some property. But in exchange, he became so powerful that he became president after Brigham Young. AND he got to move into the Gardo Mansion in Salt Lake City. Of course it wasn't just power for himself but power for his family as well that drove him. One son served as one of the first Presidents of the Seventy and also was powerful enough to serve in the Utah legislature. One of his daughters was leader in the Relief Society general presidency and founded the Daughters of Utah Pioneers. And of course one of Taylor's wives was a member of the inaugural general presidency of what eventually became the Young Woman's Association. No Diamond, it becomes obvious that Taylor's power resulting from his involvement in the Mormon organization extended well beyond just himself.

Of course beyond the drive for power, we also have to look at what other non-spiritual desires drove John Taylor. And carnal pursuits certainly were a key driver for Taylor. He had 7 or more wives and 35 or more children. Yes Taylor certainly knew how to keep himself happy and pleasured during his time as Mormon leader!

While on the subject of John Taylor, let's also take a look at the lack of ethics that he apparently shared with the other early Mormon leaders. The facts show that he outright lied to the potential converts in Liverpool, England when he denied the practice of Polygamy by Mormons even when he already had his seven wives!

quote:
this is a very intersting discourse on the King Follett Sermon which was very profound as it covered much new doctrine and doctinal insights over 3.5 hours in its presentation without notes, brought about by revelation.
In other words, yet another example of how the Mormon organization ignores Scripture and instead makes things up as they go along always using this alleged 'revelation' as an excuse to say whatever they want.

quote:
Hence we infer that God had materials to organize the world out of chaos
So once again, your leaders make an assumption simply because it 'sounds' reasonable even if it isn't supported by Scripture.

quote:
The pure principles of element are principles which can never be destroyed: they may be organized and re-organized, but not destroyed. They had no beginning, and can have no end.
And as before, you are attempting to force God to live by the physical rules of a physical universe. He exists beyond this universe Diamond and is not bound by it's laws which HE created. You yet again attempt to limit God's powers in order to force fit him to more closely match yourself!
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, it was the Spirit of God that led David to the Church and made him a part of the great work that was about to come forth among the children of men. I do not believe that David ever made that claim, and if he believed that he was spoken to, it was not by God. Most of those who left the Church believed that although Joseph was a Prophet of God, he had become a "fallen" prophet because they would not or could not accept the new doctrines that the Lord revealed. Same as in the time of Christ and those who deserted him.

As far as Stang's work, we will ignore the fact that it came about 17 years after the Book of Mormon. The statement of Strang's witnesses speaks of seeing the plates, but mentions nothing of any miraculous character, nor did Strang supply any second set of corroborating testimony comparable to that of the Three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon. One of the witnesses to the "Plates of Laban," Samuel P. Bacon, eventually denied the inspiration of Strang's movement and denounced it as mere "human invention." Another, Samuel Graham, later claimed that he had assisted Strang in the fabrication of the "Plates of Laban."

So Strang's witnesses:
- had no supernatural component to their witness
- had one who later denounced his project as mere "human invention"
- had one who later confessed to helping fabricate the plates

The collective testimony of the Book of Mormon Witnesses is, in terms of its evidentiary value and strength, far more challenging to critics than is the testimony of James J. Strang's witnesses.

You have to understand that when one is converted to the restored Gospel of Jesus Christ, they do not immediately leave all of their baggage behind. It takes time to overcome all of their weaknesses. Some never do. You might notice that after it was revealed that Brigham Young was to succeed Joseph, there was never another "power" struggle again. Ever!

It was John Taylor's great spirituality that did lead him to abandon all of his wealth that he had personally accumulated. You can read about what kind of husband he was to his wives and what kind of a father he was to his children. 180 degree away from what you would like to believe! The posterity that he raised was outstanding and many qualified themselves for positions of leadership. You have no clue as to what these kind of positions entail. Nobody ever wants the kind of sacrifice of time away from family and personal pursuits, not to mention expense that these positions require. My wife has been Young Women's President, Relief Society President, etc. And I know first hand the sacrifice that she has made to magnify her calling. Those she served with and who she presided over loved her because of the sacrifice she made on their behalf. I to have had positions of leadership and know firsthand what is involved in Church callings. I have never met an individual who looked forward to the kind of sacrifice these positions entail! But you accept these callings when they come, for you know they come from the Lord. Large or small, the most important calling in the Church is "your' calling for this what you will be judged on. No one elses!

Revelations are also that which teaches the fullness of the Gospel that had been lost to the world after the Great Apostasy. They tie the scriptures together and make plain what the scriptures originally taught, the many plain and precious truths that had been lost through either the cunning of men or their carelessness!

You will learn that God is also bound by laws. And you should remember that when we receive any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated!
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Petro, it was the Spirit of God that led David to the Church and made him a part of the great work that was about to come forth among the children of men.
And followers of Sun Myung Moon would just as quickly claim that it was the Spirit of God that led them to become Moonies. Muslims would just as quickly claim that it was the Spirit of God that led them to Islam. But you, like those Moonies and Muslims, are wrong in your assumption as to who was leading you to your theology and away from Christianity!

quote:
I do not believe that David ever made that claim, and if he believed that he was spoken to, it was not by God.
So the same man who you just claimed was so full of character and integrity and couldn't be fooled....now you are suddenly saying that his later claims were invalid? You are not being consistent Diamond. Again, you are picking and choosing what you believe based solely on what you WANT to believe.

quote:
Most of those who left the Church believed that although Joseph was a Prophet of God, he had become a "fallen" prophet
In other words, even though they wanted to believe what Smith was claiming, his lack of character and integrity drove a wedge amongst many of his followers.

quote:
because they would not or could not accept the new doctrines that the Lord revealed.
Or because they realized that the new doctrines that Smith was claiming weren't really coming from God.

quote:
As far as Stang's work, we will ignore the fact that it came about 17 years after the Book of Mormon.
The fact that you mention it means that you have chosen NOT to ignore the timing. So what? Are you suddenly changing your tune and suggesting that you don't believe that revelation was occuring 17 years after Smith's alleged visions? Yet more inconsistency from Diamond.

quote:
The statement of Strang's witnesses speaks of seeing the plates, but mentions nothing of any miraculous character, nor did Strang supply any second set of corroborating testimony comparable to that of the Three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon.
So are you now suggesting that it is OK to discount the claims of Strang EVEN THOUGH he had so many witnesses testifying to the reality of those plates? So obviously testimony from supposed witnesses suddenly doesn't carry the validity that you earlier attempted to suggest...

quote:
One of the witnesses to the "Plates of Laban," Samuel P. Bacon, eventually denied the inspiration of Strang's movement and denounced it as mere "human invention." Another, Samuel Graham, later claimed that he had assisted Strang in the fabrication of the "Plates of Laban."
You make this claim and yet don't provide a single source to back it up do you? And you can't because you don't have a clue as to what this alleged source is. And the reason you don't know? Because as is typice for you Diamond, you simply plagiarized your entire argument from fairmormon.org, cut and pasting the entire thing word for word. Typical!

Let's look at something else mentioned in the fairmormon article that you 'conveniently' forgot to mention: One source reports that most of the four witnesses to the Rajah Manchou plates ultimately repudiated their testimonies. (However, the credibility of this source is suspect, since it also asserts that the Book of Mormon witnesses repudiated their testimonies, which is demonstrably false).

See what fairmormon does? The implication is certainly that they would have had zero problem with the credibility of that source if it had ONLY repudiated the the witnesses to Strang's plates. But instead since it also repudiated the witnesses to Smith's plates, fairmormon has to change its tune and question the credibility. Fairmormon, like you Diamond, bases their assumption of credibility, not as much on actual credibility but simply on what fits their agenda.

quote:
The collective testimony of the Book of Mormon Witnesses is, in terms of its evidentiary value and strength, far more challenging to critics than is the testimony of James J. Strang's witnesses.
Not at all. In reality, the fact that the claims of Strang's witnesses didn't have a supernatural basis, that they didn't involve as far as we know witnesses who were strong believers in folk magic as were Smith's, and the fact that the testimony of Strang's witnesses didn't change as did those of Smith's.... all of those things tend to actually make Strang's claims much MORE credible than Smith's. Of course that doesn't mean a lot since NEITHER of those claims were true. Instead, it simply demonstrates that none of those sort of claims can claim any factual validity based simply on the testimony of alleged witnesses.

quote:
You have to understand that when one is converted to the restored Gospel of Jesus Christ, they do not immediately leave all of their baggage behind. It takes time to overcome all of their weaknesses.
Or alternately, the reason that some people such as the early Mormon leaders were so easily led astray and away from God and Christianity was BECAUSE of their already existing weaknesses.

quote:
You might notice that after it was revealed that Brigham Young was to succeed Joseph, there was never another "power" struggle again. Ever!
Within the main branch of the Mormon organization perhaps. And that is because all of those who would have contested for power had already been run of or excommunicated. The fact that no one contests Kim Jong-Il for power in North Korea isn't because he is such a good and valid leader. It is because he has already 'removed' any potentiall opposition. Similar to what the Mormons did.

quote:
It was John Taylor's great spirituality that did lead him to abandon all of his wealth that he had personally accumulated.
No. It was his desire for power and his desire for carnal opportunities with multiple women.

quote:
You can read about what kind of husband he was to his wives and what kind of a father he was to his children. 180 degree away from what you would like to believe!
He could have been the greatest guy in the world to his wiveS and his 37 children. That in no way refutes his drive for power. And it certainly seems to support his desire for sleeping with numerous women doesn't it?

quote:
You have no clue as to what these kind of positions entail. Nobody ever wants the kind of sacrifice of time away from family and personal pursuits, not to mention expense that these positions require.
Sure.... No one wants to be a theocratic leader. No one wants to have power concentrated in their hands. You are truly delusional Diamond if you honestly expect anyone to believe that. I don't even thing that YOU believe that.

quote:
Revelations are also that which teaches the fullness of the Gospel that had been lost to the world after the Great Apostasy.
Unfortunately, such claims are nothing but FALSE revelations.

quote:
They tie the scriptures together and make plain what the scriptures originally taught
In other words, because Smith didn't like or understand what Scripture was saying, he tried to change it so that it would make more sense to him.... Perhaps the resulting modifications he made DO make more sense to him but that unfortunately does not make them valid.

quote:
You will learn that God is also bound by laws.
He absolutely is not! God is omnipotent Diamond and has no such limits.





diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry Petro, but they never had a witness like that which David Whitmer had and that was confirmed by Joseph Smith and ten other witnesses who NEVER denied their testimony and suffered much because of their refusal to do so! Show me where David made this claim. When the Holy Ghost departs, as it did in David's case, and all others who have denied the truth, they are fair game for the Father of all lies who waits patiently to deceive.

They left because they could not endure sound doctrine that did not fit their preconceived ideas. Same as in the time of Christ when those who followed him fell away for the same reason.

Strang's claims are worthless because his witnesses had no supernatural component to their witness; there was one (Samuel P. Bacon) who later denounced his project as mere "human invention"; and there was one (Samuel Graham) who later confessed to helping fabricate the plates. You can not even compare the two although I know you will desperately try. But the real proof of the pudding is the fate of this movement -oblivion. Here is a larger piece on Strang's fraud. The link (and there is more information in the link)http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Witnesses/Strangite_parallels

Differences from the Three and Eight Witnesses to the Book of Mormon

Unfortunately for the critics' theory, no one doubts that Strang had a set of a few very small metallic plates in his possession, or that they were removed from the earth in the manner reported above. In that sense, there would be nothing for his witnesses to deny.
Wrote Daniel C. Peterson in an unpublished manuscript posted to the FAIR message boards:
Forgery is the virtually certain explanation for the two sets of inscribed metal plates that James Jesse Strang said he had found in Wisconsin and Michigan (between 1845 and 1849) and translated. Strang, who claimed to have a letter of appointment from Joseph Smith, announced himself as Joseph Smith's successor and was clearly seeking to imitate the Prophet. That his plates really existed is beyond serious dispute. The first set, the three "Voree" or "Rajah Manchou" plates, were dug up by four "witnesses" whom Strang had brought to the appropriate site.

Inscribed on both sides with illustrations and "writing," the Rajah Manchou plates were roughly 1.5 by 2.75 inches in size—small enough to fit in the palm of a hand or to carry in a pocket. Among the many who saw them was Stephen Post, who reported that they were brass and, indeed, that they resembled the French brass used in familiar kitchen kettles. "With all the faith & confidence that I could exercise," he wrote, "all that I could realize was that Strang made the plates himself, or at least that it was possible that he made them."

One source reports that most of the four witnesses to the Rajah Manchou plates ultimately repudiated their testimonies. (However, the credibility of this source is suspect, since it also asserts that the Book of Mormon witnesses repudiated their testimonies, which is demonstrably false). The eighteen "Plates of Laban," likewise of brass and each about 7 3/8 by 9 inches, were first mentioned in 1849 and, in 1851, were seen by seven witnesses. Their testimony appeared at the front of The Book of the Law of the Lord, which Strang said he translated from the "Plates of Laban." (Work on the translation seems to have begun at least as early as April 1849. An 84-page version appeared in 1851; by 1856, it had reached 350 pages.)

The statement of Strang's witnesses speaks of seeing the plates, but mentions nothing of any miraculous character, nor did Strang supply any second set of corroborating testimony comparable to that of the Three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon. One of the witnesses to the "Plates of Laban," Samuel P. Bacon, eventually denied the inspiration of Strang's movement and denounced it as mere "human invention." Another, Samuel Graham, later claimed that he had assisted Strang in the fabrication of the "Plates of Laban."
The well-read Strang had been an editor and lawyer before his brief affiliation with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and his subsequent career as a schismatic leader.[2]

Thus, Strang's plates were much less numerous than those associated with Joseph Smith, his witnesses saw nothing supernatural, his translation required the better part of a decade rather than a little more than two months, and, unlike the Witnesses to the Book of Mormon, Strang's witnesses did not remain faithful to their testimonies. Milo Quaife, in his early, standard biography of Strang, reflected that "It is quite conceivable that Strang's angelic visitations may have had only a subjective existence in the brain of the man who reported them. But the metallic plates possessed a very material objective reality." If we are unwilling to accept The Book of the Law of the Lord as authentically divine, he says, "we can hardly escape the conclusion . . . that Strang knowingly fabricated and 'planted' them for the purpose of duping his credulous followers" and, accordingly, that "Strang's prophetic career was a false and impudent imposture." [3]
Roger Van Noord, Strang's most recent biographer, concludes that, "Based on the evidence, it is probable that Strang—or someone under his direction—manufactured the letter of appointment and the brass plates to support his claim to be a prophet and to sell land at Voree. If this scenario is correct, Strang's advocacy of himself as a prophet was more than suspect, but no psychological delusion."

As I said, there is only one Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and there has never been a power struggle after Brigham Young. Nobody gets "run off" but you can get excommunicated. By the way, who did Brigham Young ever "remove".

You confuse John Taylor's motives with yours and what they would have been if you were there. I find it so amusing that you dare to ascribe those kind of motives to John Taylor when you have a moral center of Jell-O and are so ignorant of the scriptures that you think that someone who is involved in sexual perversion can be saved or is fit to be a minister of Christ. Christ came to save us from our sins; not is our sins. And until we repent and turn away from sexual perversion (homosexuality as an example) we are not saved nor are we fit to proclaim his gospel!

I also find it so funny that you are so ignorant as to the "power" you think our leaders have. They can be taken out of their positions every year simply by a non-sustaining vote of the membership. Their power involves no wealth from the Church. They have no power to compel anyone to do anything. I strongly suggest that you read the followings scriptures closely&C 121: 34-42 Behold, there are many called, but few are chosen. And why are they not chosen? Because their hearts are set so much upon the things of this world, and aspire to the honors of men, that they do not learn this one lesson— That the rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven, and that the powers of heaven cannot be controlled nor handled only upon the principles of righteousness. That they may be conferred upon us, it is true; but when we undertake to cover our sins, or to gratify our pride, our vain ambition, or to exercise control or dominion or compulsion upon the souls of the children of men, in any degree of unrighteousness, behold, the heavens withdraw themselves; the Spirit of the Lord is grieved; and when it is withdrawn, Amen to the priesthood or the authority of that man. Behold, ere he is aware, he is left unto himself, to kick against the p r i c k s, to persecute the saints, and to fight against God. We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion. Hence many are called, but few are chosen. No power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood, only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned; By kindness, and pure knowledge, which shall greatly enlarge the soul without hypocrisy, and without guile— This is unlike anything you have ever been associated with.

You can only take the position on being a theocratic leader because you have only your man made experiences to compare. It is totally foreign to the Latter-day Saints today. In the early days of the Church there were some who brought your concept with them but they either gave it up or left the Church. I do know what theological responsibilities are, and nobody seeks after them in our Church. Well, maybe if they were being paid.

There were many things in the scriptures that were confusing to Joseph and Oliver Cowdrey. One of the major items was baptism and that is why they then retired to pray about it, and as a consequence John the Baptist appeared to them and conferred the Aaronic Priesthood upon them. A little later the Melchizedeck Priesthood was conferred by Peter, James and John.

When Joseph was correcting the errors in the Bible by the gift of Revelation (and as we are studying the OT this year) I am going to give you several corrections that Joseph made which make so much more sense. Yet, they do not do anything as far as establishing a new doctrine.

In Gen. 6:6 the Prophet Joseph said that the phrase "it repented the Lord' is not correct. He said it ought to read, "it repented Noah that God made man." In Gen. 6:18, the JST explains that this covenant was first made with Enoch. In Gen. 8:21, the JST inform us that it was Noah was the one who smelled the sweet savour, and it also reveals that Noah prayed that the Lord would "not smite any more every living thing".

In Exodus 10:27 the JST changes this verse to read "But Pharaoh hardened his heart". God did not harden Pharaoh's heart and then use the excuse of the heardened heart to bring so much misery and destruction upon the Egyptians! In Exodus 32:14 it states that "the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do to this people. The JST translation changes this verse to say "If they will repent of the evil which they have done, I will spare them, and turn away my fierce wrath," but if they will not repent, "thou shalt execute judgment upon all that will not repent." The Lord NEVER has to repent!! The same principle applies to 1 Sam. 15:11 as the JST makes it clear that the Lord is not repenting but "Saul repenteth not."! These are but a few of the Biblical errors that Joseph corrected in the OT alone.

God is definitely bound by laws. As an example, he can not lie! If he did, he would cease to be God!
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Sorry Petro, but they never had a witness like that which David Whitmer had
You have yet to offer anything but biased opinion as to what made Smith's witnesses so great or made Stang's witnesses so weak.

quote:
Show me where David made this claim.
You are denying that Whitmer stated that God appeared to him in '38 and told him to leave the LDS organization??? If you want to take that position, I'll be happy to provide a link to the original source.

quote:
When the Holy Ghost departs, as it did in David's case, and all others who have denied the truth, they are fair game for the Father of all lies who waits patiently to deceive.
Which is exactly what happened when they chose to reject Scripture and Christianity and follow Joseph Smith instead.

quote:
They left because they could not endure sound doctrine that did not fit their preconceived ideas.
They left because they eventually realized that the Doctrine that Smith was teaching was divinely inspired but instead were just creations of Smith's.

Again, you try and make a point of what a strong witness Whitmer was and then just as quickly, desire to discount his later claims simply because you don't agree with them. Continuing inconsistency on your part Diamond.

quote:
Strang's claims are worthless because his witnesses had no supernatural component to their witness;
That in no way makes their testimony worthless.

quote:
there was one (Samuel P. Bacon) who later denounced his project as mere "human invention"; and there was one (Samuel Graham) who later confessed to helping fabricate the plates.
You still haven't provided any link or reference for those two allegations. And the reason you haven't is because you don't have a clue since you simply plagiarized that claim from fairmormon.org who also didn't choose to provide any support for such allegations.

quote:
You can not even compare the two although I know you will desperately try.
Of course we can compare the two. You attempt to validate Smith's claims simply because he had some alleged eyewitnesses. I mention Strang because he ALSO had eyewitnesses but you choose to discount their testimonies simply because you don't like what they claimed to have seen. The key point is that you are being a hypocrite in trying to use eyewitness testimony to validate one event while refusing to do so with the other.

quote:
But the real proof of the pudding is the fate of this movement -oblivion.
That is no proof at all. Muslims and Hindus have been around for much longer than Mormons haven't they? So longetivity obviously in no way validates a theology.

quote:
Here is a larger piece on Strang's fraud. The link (and there is more information in the link)http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Witnesses/Strangite_parallels
Hillarious that you would attempt to claim fraud with Stang based on the similarities between his and Smith's experience while at the same time, you try and ignore the fact that Smith in turn, stole his 'vision' story from two different previous similar accounts by Norris Stearn and Charles Finney.

quote:
As I said, there is only one Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and there has never been a power struggle after Brigham Young.
Again, you simply choose to ignore all the other Mormon denominations. the reality is that the early times of the Mormons had multiple power struggles with many of the supposed leaders all attempting to make their own claims to power for themselves or for relatives!

quote:
Nobody gets "run off" but you can get excommunicated.
First they were excommunicated and then the Danites ran them off. They certainly didn't want any dissenters creating doubts amongst the followers did they?

quote:
You confuse John Taylor's motives with yours and what they would have been if you were there.
Not really for I wouldn't sleep with seven or more different women at once as John Taylor desired and did.

quote:
I find it so amusing that you dare to ascribe those kind of motives to John Taylor
The facts certainly back up my opinion. Those 37 children certainly weren't immaculate conceptions were they?

quote:
when you have a moral center of Jell-O
Not at all. But the difference is that when it comes to others, I, unlike you, choose not to usurp God's powers by judging and denying anyone the opportunity to worship God.

quote:
are so ignorant of the scriptures that you think that someone who is involved in sexual perversion can be saved or is fit to be a minister of Christ.
There is nothing about scripture which tells us that a sinner isn't still capable of preaching the word of God to others.

quote:
And until we repent and turn away from sexual perversion (homosexuality as an example) we are not saved nor are we fit to proclaim his gospel!
And adultery is another. And yet the Mormons are willing to turn a blind eye to that particular sin aren't they Diamond. You must have decided that you can pick and choose which positions you take a moral stand on based on which is most convenient or not to you and your religion right Diamond?

quote:
I also find it so funny that you are so ignorant as to the "power" you think our leaders have.
I think it is so funny that you so desperately attempt to ignore the great power that Smith and other early Mormon leaders had. When you claim to be a 'prophet' from God, you can make all kinds of proclamations as they certainly did.

quote:
You can only take the position on being a theocratic leader because you have only your man made experiences to compare.
Look at the early history of the Mormons and you WILL see their attempts to create Theocracies. Consider Joseph Smith. He wasn't just the leader of his religion. He was also mayor of his town and even created a law stating that he couldn't be arrested within his town's city limits.

quote:
It is totally foreign to the Latter-day Saints today.
I agree. But it certainly wasn't a foreign concept back in the earlier days of the Mormon organization.

quote:
When Joseph was correcting the errors in the Bible by the gift of Revelation
Unfortunately for you, there was NO revelation involved in the changes and rejections that Smith made of Scripture.

quote:
I am going to give you several corrections that Joseph made which make so much more sense.
That is the problem that you share with other Mormons Diamond and which Smith capitalized on. Just because something may 'make more sense' doesn't mean that it is therefore correct. And that certainly is the case with Scripture. You reject what Scripture is actually telling us because you want to replace it with something that you are more able to follow and understand. You are attempting to force God's message to fit YOUR comprehension levels instead of realizing that God is beyond ANY of our levels and therefore some things, we may not fully understand...

quote:
In Gen. 6:6 the Prophet Joseph said that the phrase "it repented the Lord' is not correct. He said it ought to read, "it repented Noah that God made man."
Perfect example of Smith changing Scripture simply because he thought that he could make it read 'better' and not because there is any historical or gramatical support for such a change.

quote:
These are but a few of the Biblical errors that Joseph corrected in the OT alone.
They weren't errors. Smith just didn't like what they were saying and therefore took it upon himself to make changes according to his own personal whims.

quote:
God is definitely bound by laws. As an example, he can not lie! If he did, he would cease to be God!
You are absolutely and completely wrong on all three points Diamond. God is omnipotent and therefore, by definition, he is bound by NO laws. And while I don't think God would ever choose to lie, he certainly could do so if he chose and it wouldn't in the least bit effect his powers as God.




[This message has been edited by PetroAg87 (edited 5/19/2010 10:32a).]
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, I can sure show you the results of their efforts and what came about. The testimonies of the Three Witnesses go way beyond "biased opinion" and you know it. You could make the same accusation against the Twelve Apostles at Christ's time. They declared as to what they HEARD, what they SAW and what they HANDLED. They were men of impeccable credentials and honored so by their peers where ever they lived.

Give me the link Petro concerning David's alleged statement. They all had the Spirit of Christ and the Gift of the Holy Ghost until they turned against the Lord's Prophet. It has always been so. I think it is funny that God did not welcome them back and help them reject their original testimony as untrue. Tsk. Tsk.

You could make the same statements concerning those who rejected Christ's teachings. And as I stated earlier, not to mention that the Apostles were truly biased in their testimonies! Sorry Petro, but that excuse does not fly. Remember two of the witnesses came back, requested rebaptism and had no position of authority given to them ever again! The witness's testimonies were not "alleged". I do not know how you can even use the term. They were real and you know it. You tried to dismiss them as fanatics but that was driven back down your throat, so you had to come up with some thing else. No Petro, just as Paul taught that "in the mouth of two or more witnesses shall every word be established." (2 Cor. 13;1) This same law of witnesses was also included in the Mosaic covenant (Deut. 17:6;19:15) The Lord instructed Joseph that He would reveal to him special witnesses who would have the privilege of seeing the angel Moroni, hearing the voice of God, and handling for themselves the golden plates from which the Book of Mormon was translated. These witness are the most credible when they possess a character and reputation that is above reproach, when there is no personal bias, when no conspiring connection exists between them, and there is no potential for personal gain, enrichment, or power. In standing the test of time, these witnesses are doubly trustworthy if the story remains the same, in spite of disaffection or even a complete severance in association. One of the ultimate tests is whether the story itself can endure the passage of time, the discovery of new technology, and advances in science and learning! It has and you know it!!

Longevity can not prove the validity of a theology but lack of it will prove it is not God's work and Strang and his followers have none! The same with those who broke away from the LDS Church. Almost all are gone and the other will be in the next 10-20 years.

You can talk about the Danites all you want but you have no evidence to support your accusations. If it was a "man made" organization, I would have had the dissenters killed to make sure they created no doubts. They would simply have disappeared.

When did John Taylor acquire his plural wives, (which he did)? 37 children is an example of what the purpose was of plural marriage. I don't think you have any idea as to what it took in time and labor to provide for the men's plural wives and their posterity. And you can study what kind of children they were to become.

There is a difference between attempting to "worship God" and being an active "member" in good standing and/or trying to preach the Gospel when you are a practicing sexual pervert or adulterer. You have read how the Primitive Church handled the situation. They were excommunicated, as they should be in your church. As I said, you have the moral center of Jell-O and are spiritually dead. Mormons have never turned a blind eye to adultery. They are excommunicated no matter who they are or what position they might hold.

Proclamations are not "power" when the people are free to reject them, as well as those individuals making them, which Mormons may do. Mormonism is a theocracy but with a blend of democracy.

The JST was produced by revelation and not translation, and is a great and wonderful correction of the errors that even Ehrman knows existed. They not only make more sense but they do not distort Deity. He expects us to fully understand who He is, his actions and his doctrines. Are you stupid enough to think that a perfect God has ever a need to repent? Are you foolish enough to worship a God that you think hardened Pharaoh's heart and then used that hardness of heart to kill so many Egyptians, when the children of Israel were not turned loose. Think about it! God would have then been responsible for it. Only stupid fools can believe in a perfect and righteous God that needs to repent and is personally responsible for the murder of so many thousands that He was personally the cause of!!

Because you neither know or understand who our Heavenly Father is, I know it is difficult to understand that there are laws in heaven that even He is bound by, and the violation of which would make him no longer God. Try to get over it.

[This message has been edited by diamond4 (edited 5/21/2010 2:03a).]
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Petro, I can sure show you the results of their efforts and what came about.
Then why don't you?

quote:
The testimonies of the Three Witnesses go way beyond "biased opinion" and you know it.
No they don't. I have already shown to you what motivated them to make their claims along with reasons that they would have been hesitant to admit the fraud later in their lives.

quote:
You could make the same accusation against the Twelve Apostles at Christ's time.
Sure. And I imagine that non-Christians will do just that. And THAT Diamond is why my belief in Christianity is based on FAITH and why your Mormon's beliefs also must be based on faith. But apparently that is not enough for you as you continually try to 'prove' your faith and fail horribly every time.

quote:
They were men of impeccable credentials and honored so by their peers where ever they lived.
You say that and yet you are oh so quickly willing to discount Whitmer's later claims and statements against the Mormons. Did his 'impeccable credentials and honor' suddenly go away? Or did you suddenly reject his claims simply because he stopped saying what you wanted to hear?

quote:

Give me the link Petro concerning David's alleged statement.
You can find it in Whitmer's "An address to all Believer's in Christ". It really isn't that hard to find Diamond which makes me think that you probably are already aware of it and just trying to ignore it. Heck, even fairmormon has an article on it. And I fully expect your next post to contain a parroted response from that site!

quote:
They all had the Spirit of Christ and the Gift of the Holy Ghost until they turned against the Lord's Prophet.
No Diamond. BECAUSE they had the guidance of the Holy Spirit, they were able to eventually realize that Smith was a false prophet and that is why they eventually rejected him.

quote:
The witness's testimonies were not "alleged". I do not know how you can even use the term.
The 'allegations' aren't referring to their statements but rather to the fact that what they say occurred is nothing more than allegation.

quote:
The Lord instructed Joseph that He would reveal to him special witnesses who would have the privilege of seeing the angel Moroni, hearing the voice of God, and handling for themselves the golden plates from which the Book of Mormon was translated.
No. Smith 'claimed' that all of the above happened. But we have ZERO evidence or support that such actually occurred.

quote:
These witness are the most credible when they possess a character and reputation that is above reproach
And yet you choose to discount Whitmer's later claims. Again, you pick and choose what to believe not based on credibility, but rather on simply what you want to hear.

quote:
when there is no personal bias, when no conspiring connection exists between them, and there is no potential for personal gain, enrichment, or power.
Except that all of the above WAS in place with regards to these witnesses.

quote:
In standing the test of time, these witnesses are doubly trustworthy if the story remains the same, in spite of disaffection or even a complete severance in association.
Except that the stories DIDN'T stay exactly the same. AND you have already been shown that up until the very end, there were reasons for these men to continue to not want to admit that what they had previously claimed was untrue.

quote:
One of the ultimate tests is whether the story itself can endure the passage of time, the discovery of new technology, and advances in science and learning! It has and you know it!!
So you are now claiming that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have more validity than Mormonism since they have withstood a longer test of time???

quote:
Longevity can not prove the validity of a theology but lack of it will prove it is not God's work and Strang and his followers have none!
So now you are claiming that the only reason that you don't believe Strang's claims is because his followers didn't last? That if a religious following HAD developed and was still in place, you would therefore believe what he claimed??? Come on Diamond... I don't believe that would be the case and neither do you. The reality is that you don't buy Strang's claims simply because you didn't like the content of those claims.

quote:
You can talk about the Danites all you want but you have no evidence to support your accusations.
I already have. Do you deny the content of the Danite Manifesto and the PUBLIC statements that I previously quoted??? No Diamond, the evidence has been provided and you have, once again, chosen to ignore it.

quote:
If it was a "man made" organization, I would have had the dissenters killed to make sure they created no doubts. They would simply have disappeared.
Thinking like a true Mormon there Diamond! I am sure that thought crossed the minds of all involved and probably why they were forced to abandon their lands and flee the Danite Mormons.

quote:
When did John Taylor acquire his plural wives?
Do you want specific dates or years? Are you denying that Taylor had the 37 wives at the time that he told the potential converts in Liverpool that Polygamy WASN'T being practiced?

quote:
37 children is an example of what the purpose was of plural marriage.
Yes. Carnal knowledge with multiple women!

How much time did you spend Diamond trying to deny that Smith was intimate with his wives or had any children by them. And now, you instead saying that having children WAS the purpose of having these multiple wives. And of course for Taylor and the others, it just happens to be a convenient reason to have sex with all of those women isn't it?

quote:
There is a difference between attempting to "worship God" and being an active "member" in good standing and/or trying to preach the Gospel when you are a practicing sexual pervert or adulterer.
So are you telling me that there aren't active members of the Mormon church who are adulterers as defined by the Bible? Of course you have already admitted that there are. Once again, you are guilty of selective enforcement of the rules based only on the Mormon's comfort level rather than scriptural doctrine.

quote:
As I said, you have the moral center of Jell-O and are spiritually dead.
Of course you are wrong on both counts and simply don't have a clue what you are talking about. I suppose it is easier to resort to the personal attacks rather than actually address the theological arguments that you keep losing.

quote:
Mormons have never turned a blind eye to adultery. They are excommunicated no matter who they are or what position they might hold.
You have already aknowledged that such is not the case.

quote:
Mormonism is a theocracy but with a blend of democracy.
Nice to FINALLY get you to admit that!

quote:
The JST was produced by revelation and not translation
It was produced using neither but instead simply relied upon Smith's imagination. But by claiming revelation, Smith conveniently created a way to avoid having to actually provide any support or evidence for his claims.

quote:
and is a great and wonderful correction of the errors that even Ehrman knows existed.
Of course what you continue to refuse to admit is that what Ehrman thought were mistakes in scripture do not in any way match up with what Smith thought were mistakes!

quote:
He expects us to fully understand who He is, his actions and his doctrines
God never said that was his intent. Yet again, you are simply making assumptions based on your OWN desires. God through scripture gave us the information that we need to worship him and obtain potential salvation. In order for that to happen, we do NOT need to know EVERYTHING about him and his actions.

quote:
Are you stupid enough to think that a perfect God has ever a need to repent?
Are you stupid enough to think that I ever made such a claim??? Remember, it is you rather than I that continues to insist that God is weak and without omnipotent power.

quote:
Only stupid fools can believe in a perfect and righteous God that needs to repent and is personally responsible for the murder of so many thousands that He was personally the cause of!!
Once again with the personal attacks Diamond.... The reality is that only someone such as yourself that desires to be a God himself...is forced to believe that God is NOT perfect, righteous, and omnipotent. As far as murder, God is responsible for millions of deaths over the ages. For you to deny that is truly delusional!

quote:
Because you neither know or understand who our Heavenly Father is, I know it is difficult to understand that there are laws in heaven that even He is bound by.
Because I DO understand God, I therefore realize that God IS omnipotent and therefore NOT limited in power as you so desperately desire to believe.

quote:
there are laws in heaven that even He is bound by, and the violation of which would make him no longer God.
So you believe that being omnipotent means that he would no longer be a God??? Yet another example of just how illogical your arguments are Diamond!

quote:
Try to get over it.
'Get over' my Christian beliefs??? Not a chance Diamond.

[This message has been edited by PetroAg87 (edited 5/22/2010 11:03a).]
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, I want you to do some of your own work. But in case you miss the obvious, look where the Church is today and it has only just begun. You have shown absolutely nothing of any real substance concerning their witness and you lie through your teeth when you claim it. You just can not handle what these men of impeccable character testified to! They were strong personalties and the Church was long gone and was no threat to them, even in their imagination. Of course because you reason so stupidly, when they were on their death bed and reiterated their testimony, they were in fear of there lives. Right? (sigh) Want to explain why two of them came back into the Church knowing they would hold no position of "power" or riches that you so believe motivates us.

I don't fail at all in explaining any questions or misrepresentations of LDS doctrines. But conversion is a result of the witness of the Holy Ghost. And of course you have that most annoying evidence of all - the fact that the proof of the pudding is in eating. Nicene Christianity does not begin to compare with New Testament Christianity whci we represent!

I am aware of the link but was curious to see if you would provide it and how you would do so. Of course you provided only a part and you ignore the conclusion it gave, which I shall post:

Whitmer was not instructed to leave the Church or "repudiate Mormonism," he was instructed to leave Far West after he was already excommunicated. This was arguably a very prudent course, both for Whitmer's safety and the integrity of the Restoration witnesses.
Believing Latter-day Saints have no trouble seeing both of Whitmer's revelatory experiences as inspired of God. While God would not force Whitmer to remain in the Church, He might well take steps to ensure that the Three Witnesses remained alive. In fact, Whitmer's fidelity to his testimony despite great disagreements with Joseph and the Church strengthen its force.

Critics are dishonest if they imply Whitmer did not leave the Church until God "told him to."


If they had regained the spirit that you think David and the others lost when they joined the Church, why did they not repudiate their testimonies, ever?

You do not know the difference between an allegation versus a witness. Allegations can be made with or without personal observance. That was not the case with the Three Witnesses. I can talk all I want about my personal witness of the Holy Ghost, but no one can confirm it. That would be much different that if I claimed to hear the voice of God, see an Angel and handle the gold plates and have 2 other individuals give witness to the same thing. And then have 8 other witness who saw and handled the gold plates. And none of us 11 witnesses to ever deny our testimony, even though 6 of us become estranged from our leader and left the organization that he founded. Yet all of our associates afterwards would say nothing but praise as to our honesty, character, integrity and competence. Sorry Petro, you are just a desperate individual trying to explain away that which you do want to even seriously examine up close and personal. And by the way, the Book of Mormon is the material proof of the claim that has been so unsuccessfully attacked.

At the early time of the restoration of the Church, explain how there was any potential for personal gain, enrichment, or power. The early Church was poorer than a church mouse and there was nothing promising about its prospects for survival considering how unpopular it was and the persecution that was going on. There were NO reasons, if you have any understanding of what motivates people when they are angry, to maintain a lie when they can not profit in the "money" or "power" that they might have been derived! The Church had gone away into oblivion for all they knew when it crossed the Mississippi River into the hostile wilderness.

Judaism and Christianity are not passing the longer test of time. Islam would not either, except by enforcement of terror of losing limbs and one's life. Better check out these countries as to how their religion is maintained. To show you the hyprocisy of the leaders like those of Saudi Arabia, they immediately put on Western garb and party as Nicene Christians do with drink and immodest clothing as soon as the jet gets to 30,000 feet.

The real reason that one would never believe Strang is that he and any other apostate would never have the influence and witness of the Spirit and that they were God's real prophet. They all come to naught.

"They would simply have disappeared' is thinking like a "natural" man or a Nicene Christian. Not one proven crime against the so called "danites".

John Taylor, my careless one, had 37 children, not 37 wives. The purpose of plural marriage was to raise a righteous posterity as it always was whenever the Lord commanded plural marriage. But when did he acquire his wives; what month and year? So give me the evidence that President Taylor denied that plural marriage was being practiced. I believe that there was no posterity for Joseph from his plural wives was because he would not be permitted to tarry on this earth. Not to mention that intimacy was very infrequent with those that he was intimate with.

There are no adulterers that are practicing Latter-day Saints and that has been explained to you. If they commit adultery while married, they are excommunicated. You have a moral center of Jell-O when you support sexual perversion as a legitimate expression of love or worthiness to preach the Gospel. I lose no theological arguments.

God has said and the scriptures declare it; "For this is life eternal to know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent". You definitely do not "know" him. Because "you" do not know him nor his doctrines, this fortunately does not apply to us. If you knew what he intended us to know, you would not be so incapable of describing him and his actions.

I repeat, you are a stupid fool if you believe that God ever needs to repent which is what it says in the KJV in the OT. The Prophet Joseph corrected this error, among many others in the Bible. You simply do not know how to read. God is neither weak, nor unrighteous which is why the verses in the Bible are in error. I am sure, based on your stated reasoning, that you think that Catholics murdering Protestants and Protestant murdering Catholics is God's fault. The only people that the Lord ever had dispatched were those that were wicked and would not REPENT. God would cease to be God if he lied or committed any unrighteous act. Godhood is not just a personage but also an office or position. Someday you will learn that!
RAB91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
There are no adulterers that are practicing Latter-day Saints

Bob - The amazing thing is that you really believe that. And you wonder why people say that mormons check their brain at the door. Luckily for them, you're not representative of the mormon faith.
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Petro, I want you to do some of your own work.
I consistently do Diamond. YOU on the other hand, are the one who has repeatedly been caught making statements that turn out to be nothing but plagiarism of other's works. And even worse, even when called out by us (or the moderators) you still don't have the integrity to admit the plagiarism. No Diamond...it isn't I who is guilty of not doing my own work!

Typical Diamond in that you have made a claim and when asked for any supporting evidence or information, you turn out to have absolutely nothing...

quote:
But in case you miss the obvious, look where the Church is today and it has only just begun.
In the Mormons, we have a religious organization that is materially wealthy due to their focus on cash flow above all else. We also have an organization that thinks that shopping malls and golf resorts are more important than humanitarian aid as indicated by the fact that the Mormons have spent three times as much on that real estate in the last few years as they have on humanitarian aid in the last TWENTY-FIVE years! I see an organization who was founded on a false prophet and has therefore relied on false doctrine from the very start. I see an organization whose founder claims that his sleeping with multiple women was commanded by God. But at the same time, he chooses to lie to others about just such activity.... I see an organization that practiced racism up until 1978 and only stopped because the rest of society forced them to. And of course even today, there are members such as Diamond who continue to support the racism of the Mormon's past.

quote:
You have shown absolutely nothing of any real substance concerning their witness and you lie through your teeth when you claim it.
Wrong. You simply choose to ignore or discount anything presented that doesn't agree with your agenda and beliefs.

quote:
You just can not handle what these men of impeccable character testified to!
Again, you refer to their impeccable character and yet choose to completely reject their claims in later life that countered Mormon position. You choose to belief or not belief, not based on their character (or lack thereof), but instead simply on whether their comments at that particular time agree with what you want to hear or not!

quote:
They were strong personalties and the Church was long gone and was no threat to them, even in their imagination.
The Danites certainly indicate otherwise.

quote:
Of course because you reason so stupidly, when they were on their death bed and reiterated their testimony, they were in fear of there lives. Right?
Probably not. But you have already been shown the evidence that at that time, Whitmer was pushing for his nephew as the true leader of the Mormons. As such, even on his deathbed, Whitmer had incentive and reasons not to reveal Smith's fraud.

quote:
Want to explain why two of them came back into the Church knowing they would hold no position of "power" or riches that you so believe motivates us.
Already have...repeatedly. See above for example.

quote:
I don't fail at all in explaining any questions or misrepresentations of LDS doctrines
I never said you did. But what you DO fail at is showing any support for your answers and for LDS doctrine. As I said before, even if your beliefs are in error, I have no problem with you proclaiming FAITH in your beliefs just as I have FAITH in Christianity. But when you attempt to 'prove' your religion, you continue to fail miserably. It truly makes me wonder how weak must your convictions in your faith be when you aren't willing to rely on faith but feel the need to find some absolute proof instead???

quote:
But conversion is a result of the witness of the Holy Ghost
True SOMETIMES. But not all religious conversions are guided by the Holy Ghost. And those who would reject Christianity and embrace Joseph Smith certainly aren't being guided by the Holy Ghost!

quote:
Nicene Christianity does not begin to compare with New Testament Christianity whci we represent!
When your religious founder chooses to modify scripture to fit his particular beliefs, you in no way are representing Christianity!

quote:
I am aware of the link but was curious to see if you would provide it and how you would do so.
Sure you were Diamond.... If you were aware of it, you would have already plagiarized all of the comments in order to attempt to address my statements. Instead, you simply assumed that because YOU often make claims without any actual support, others must do the same as well. Once again however, your assumption fails in that I show that I do NOT make up claims as you do, but instead make my claims based on evidence and research.

quote:
Of course you provided only a part and you ignore the conclusion it gave, which I shall post:
A conclusion of course that is based on the opinion of fairmormon.org! No Diamond, you asked for evidence of my claims which you didn't think I could provide. But I did so without difficulty. And NOW that you have the link, you try to use THEIR opinions to back up your claims.

But since YOU don't have anything to argue my position, I'll argue the fairmormon points instead:

quote:
Whitmer was not instructed to leave the Church or "repudiate Mormonism," he was instructed to leave Far West after he was already excommunicated.
So what Diamond? Whether his supposed vision occurred before or after he was excommunicated doesn't change the fact that he claims to have had a vision telling him to leave the LDS religion. So based on your claims of his good character, why do you NOT believe him when he states that he had such a vision. Answer: Because his claim doesn't match up with your personal beliefs and you therefore reject Whitmer and his alleged good character whenever it suits you.

quote:
This was arguably a very prudent course, both for Whitmer's safety
Even fairmormon aknowledges that making the claims that he did about the Mormons created a threat to his safety. How much MORE of a threat would have been created if he admitted that Smith was a fraud???

quote:
In fact, Whitmer's fidelity to his testimony despite great disagreements with Joseph and the Church strengthen its force.
Not at all because, as already shown, even as he approached death, Whitmer had motivation in the form of his nephew for not revealing his part in the Mormon fraud.

quote:
Judaism and Christianity are not passing the longer test of time. Islam would not either, except by enforcement of terror of losing limbs and one's life
You are truly delusional Diamond if you believe that about any one of those religions!

quote:
To show you the hyprocisy of the leaders like those of Saudi Arabia, they immediately put on Western garb and party as Nicene Christians do with drink and immodest clothing as soon as the jet gets to 30,000 feet.
Typical Diamond in that you only choose to focus on those who are the least faithful to their particular religion while completely ignoring the large majority who DO faithfully live their life as their religion decrees.

quote:
The real reason that one would never believe Strang is that he and any other apostate would never have the influence and witness of the Spirit and that they were God's real prophet.
No. The real reason that you don't believe is because what he claimed doesn't fit with your agenda. The fact that he had the same type of witnesses as did Smith shows that it isn't the witnesses that make you believe or not believe but instead, it is purely a matter of which set of claims matches your personal desires.

quote:
Not one proven crime against the so called "danites".
Because those who were threatened were fearful enough that they chose to flee the Danites. Are you really trying to claim Diamond that threats and intimidation are perfectly OK as long as no actual violence occurs??? The holes that you are forced to dig for yourself in order to support your weak arguments are absolutely embarrassing for you Diamond!

quote:
John Taylor, my careless one, had 37 children, not 37 wives.
Yeap. As I had previously stated. And those 37 children came from 7+ wives didn't they. And what is worse, is that Taylor lied to the people of Liverpool, England when he claimed that polygamy wasn't being practiced by the Mormons even when he was already married to those women. What kind of theology Diamond requires its leaders to hide the truth from potential converts??? The answer is that a fraudulent religion is the type that requires that!

quote:
But when did he acquire his wives; what month and year?
Do you deny that he had multiple wives when he spoke to the people in Liverpool Diamond? I'm getting ready to board a plane to Azerbaijan and therefore can't pull up the specific dates right now. But tell me that you deny that he had those wives at the time and I will be happy to provide the links within the next day or so.

quote:
So give me the evidence that President Taylor denied that plural marriage was being practiced.
I already have. But if you want to deny that he did so, then I will be happy to provide the evidence again.

quote:
I believe that there was no posterity for Joseph from his plural wives was because he would not be permitted to tarry on this earth. Not to mention that intimacy was very infrequent with those that he was intimate with.
I am sure that when you have multiple wives to sleep with, the sexual frequency with any one of them probably DOES go down!

quote:
There are no adulterers that are practicing Latter-day Saints and that has been explained to you.
There indeed are as you already admitted. Perhaps now you are backpedaling and choosing to make up your own definition of 'adultery' instead of using the Biblical definition? Yet another example of your attempts to pick and choose with regards to which parts of Scripture you choose to follow or reject!

quote:
You have a moral center of Jell-O when you support sexual perversion as a legitimate expression of love or worthiness to preach the Gospel.
Nope. I simply recognize that even sinners still have the ability to preach the message of God and perhaps bring others to God!

quote:
I lose no theological arguments.
That is ALL you do Diamond.

quote:
You definitely do not "know" him. If you knew what he intended us to know, you would not be so incapable of describing him and his actions.
Of course I know God Diamond. The difference between us is that I, unlike you, don't demand to know EVERYTHING about God but instead trust him to tell us what we need to know. You on the other hand, in your desire to become a God yourself, demand total knowledge from God and when he doesn't provide it, you are forced to resort to false answers generated by man.

quote:
I repeat, you are a stupid fool if you believe that God ever needs to repent which is what it says in the KJV in the OT.
And I repeat once again that I have never made such a claim.

quote:
The Prophet Joseph corrected this error, among many others in the Bible.
Wrong. Once again, because of Smith's lack of theological education, he made an assumption about something that was said in Scripture and based on this incorrect assumption, decided to change Scripture to something that he thought sounded better regardless of the fact that he had ZERO support or evidence to justify such a change.

You need to go back and study the original verses Diamond and you will discover that the translation word 'repent' is not being used in the way that you assume that it is. God wasn't regretting that he took the action that he did because he was wrong to do so. Instead he regretted that the sinful actions of man had led God to take such action. There is a HUGE difference in those two concepts Diamond which you obviously choose to ignore.

quote:
God is neither weak
You state this and yet show that you don't really believe it when you continue to make statements that God has limitations and is not omnipotent!

quote:
I am sure, based on your stated reasoning, that you think that Catholics murdering Protestants and Protestant murdering Catholics is God's fault.
And I am sure that once again, you don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. In fact, I have stated specifically on more than one occasion that the fighting between various Christian denominations is due to the fault and sins of man rather than any such weakness in God. Guess you 'forgot' those statements didn't you Diamond?

quote:
God would cease to be God if he lied or committed any unrighteous act.
Wrong. While I don't believe for a moment that God has done either, even if he did, it wouldn't in the least bit affect his nature as God.

quote:
Godhood is not just a personage but also an office or position. Someday you will learn that!

Yet another made up fact from Diamond completely unsupported by scripture.

[This message has been edited by PetroAg87 (edited 5/23/2010 5:27p).]
diamond4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petro, I can not help that you hold so many defective views concerning the Church. I will simply tell you that the Lord has blessed his Church and its members immeasurably and will continue to do as long as we are faithful and obedient. You and yours will simply continue to limp along, weaker and weaker.

The Three Witnesses rejected nothing concerning their testimony. They disagreed with some of the new doctrines that the Lord revealed through Joseph, but it was the same as it was with Christ and his followers that kept falling away. But these witnesses never denied what they heard, saw and handled and there is NO way you can get around that fact!!

The Danites were long gone and there never was a single bit of evidence that they did any violent acts. When you talk about a desire that David Whitmer had in trying to influence others so that a relative could lead the Church, you must remember that David was not a member of the Church and thus had no influence. After Brigham Young became the President of the Church, no one could have changed anything. At this time David was still a relatively young man. When he made his final statement concerning what he heard and saw and handled, he knew that he would be facing God very shortly and as religious as he was, he would not go to his death promulgating a terrible falsehood. Only a fool could entertain that as a real possibility, especially when you see how honest he was and what an impeccable reputation he had throughout his community. But keep trying Petro, but you can never get there from here. You still can not explain why Oliver Cowdrey and Martin Harris, not only never denied their testimony as they were about to die, but would make the arduous journey to rejoin the Saints, ask for baptism again, knowing that they would have no position of power or authority.

If you were willing to learn, you would find that people who join the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints do not reject Christianity, but instead receive a witness by the Holy Ghost that Joseph was a Prophet and that the Church is true. The Church they have established is spreading throughout the world and is a growing influence for good. I would admonish you that there is no other conversion to any other religion that is by the Holy Ghost. I invite you to accept the challenge and learn and experience this for yourself that it is by the power of the Holy Ghost that people are converted. It just takes courage Petro and I know that it is hard. But, I have been where you are now trapped!

The correction of scripture that Joseph made was simply to teach the world the real truth as to what the scriptures originally said. It was not like he had nothing else to do in his free time while establishing the Church. But, you are free to reject the glad message that is provided, but you will never know the happiness the Latter-day Saints enjoy!

David's vision was to leave Far West. He had already been excommunicated and could not have been instructed at that time to then leave the Church; he was alredy gone. I don't reject David or his good character. But I do accept and respect the fact that he never rejected his testimony, regardless of much pressure and circumstance. I also recognize he could have enriched himself greatly by detailing a so called fraud, which is what you think was one of the real motivations of these men. There would have been no threat to him because David was long gone from among the Saints and would have been fiercely protected by the Missourians. When the Church crossed the Mississippi, most nonmembers thought it was going to its destruction. A turn around by David Whitmer could have destroyed the Church but the way it worked out, it made his witness even stronger! Things always work out for the LDS Church in the long run, much to the dismay of our enemies.

David had not a prayer of success if that was his desire for his nephew. Church government would not have permitted it. No person is "selected" to become the Prophet and President of the Church. The order of succession was set when Brigham Young replaced the Prophet Joseph. Upon the death of the president of the Church, the senior member of the Quorum of the Twelve succeeds him. The Lord's Church is a house of order! You really should spend some time educating yourself about Church Government. It is unlike anything you have ever been exposed to! You might also want to consider why would a man, considered to honest in every regard, proclaim a fraudulent work just to acquire eventual condemnation for himself and a relative in the next world? Especially on his death bed getting ready to face his maker. Makes no sense Petro and you know it, but those are the kind of positions you are forced to take.

I am not delusional. Judaism is falling apart in Israel with its youth and even in America. You see how the Islamic fanatics enforce their religious beliefs on their own people. When exposed to Western civilization, as it eventually will be, it will fall apart. It already has with most of its leaders when exposed to Western civilization and the same will happen with the great unwashed.

Gee, all those gutless Mormon's who were so ready to flee the Danites at a "threat" but all the other Mormons who stood up against years of murder, rape and plunder by their Nicene Christian neighbors led by their neighborhood ministers. I guess you could say that was one way to separate the sheep from the goats. But, then again, you might want to check who was in Nauvoo at the time the Expositor was destroyed.

Of course John Taylor had 7 wives and 37 children but I do not believe you can show me a link where he lied to the people in Liverpool. But what were the years that he took his wives?

Everyone is a sinner and your defective views on sexual perversion shows how out of step you are with both the OT and NT and have no real clue as to what is still an abomination in the eyes of the Lord. This is why that disqualifies them from having active membership in "His" church or to preach his gospel. Thhe Atonement saves us from our sins, NOT in our sins. But if I was a cynic, I could take the position that the positive thing for mankind is that people like yourself are helping to weaken and eventually destroy Henry's church. Not to mention that since none of your churches are the Lord's church, you can contaminate them to your hearts content. I loose no theological arguments; not one!

You know you kid yourself when you claim you know God when you can describe no attributes that he has. God is much more than "love" or mercy, etc. He is our Father in Heaven in whose physical image and likeness we are created in. As I have read what you have written about your "knowledge" of God I could not keep from getting the biggest grin on my face as it is so absurd. Latter-day Saints "demand" nothing from God but we are grateful that he has willingly revealed himself to us.

I am glad that you have accepted the fact that this is an error concerning the nature of God i.e. that he would ever need to repent. The Prophet Joseph Smith is the only person I know that has corrected that error as well as so many others. I am glad that you are so willing to admit that Joseph had a lack of theological education, and thus would have never picked up on the subtleties such as God hardening Pharaoh's heart, or God needing to repent, etc. He did not need any physical evidence as to a text because he enjoyed the real advantage of revelation, which none of your theologians have ever had! Having limitations has nothing to do with being "weak".

I think that you can thus easily conclude that none of these Catholics and Protestants enjoyed the Spirit of Christ nor did the church whose leaders sent them out. They were led by Satan! Again, just more overwhelming evidence Petro, that Christ's Church was no longer on the earth!! Nothing but a dead form with no real difference between them and the pagans.

This is a most interesting new story about a newly called General Authority and his conversion and I suggest that you might want to read it and see how it goes along with what I have so strongly urged you to do. I have taken the liberty to highlight some things that I feel are especially important.

Elder Larry R. Lawrence: True conversion propelled new Seventy

By Marianne Holman
Published: Saturday, May 22, 2010

As a young man growing up in Tucson, Ariz., Larry R. Lawrence was the oldest of three brothers in a family that were not members of the Church. He had many friends who would invite him to participate in Church activities, but he always had to decline because of his parents' wishes. Still, he noticed something was different about Latter-day Saints.

"I remember thinking to myself that someday I would look into it more seriously when I had more agency of my own."

For Elder Lawrence, who was sustained as a member of the Seventy during the April 2010 general conference, that day came years later when he was in medical school at the University of Arizona. He got a job working at a lab where one of his co-workers was a Latter-day Saint and another co-worker had a sister who had recently been baptized. As they worked, conversations about the Church frequently came up.

"I remembered the good examples set by my LDS friends," Elder Lawrence said. "I decided that now was the time to learn more."
Determined to make the decision for himself, Elder Lawrence didn't tell anybody he was investigating the Church and started studying on his own.

"I didn't want to let myself be influenced by others, so I decided not to tell anybody. I was going to get all of my material from the public library," he said.

During the time he was studying about the Church, Elder Lawrence received a phone call from a high school friend who was attending college at BYU. Her name was Laurel Stott, and it had been a while since he had seen or heard from her.

"We hadn't talked to each other for a long time," Elder Lawrence said. "Out of nowhere, she called and invited me to come up to Provo. Her timing was perfect; I had plenty of questions and no one to ask."

During his visit, he and Laurel went to Temple Square. There, he was able to learn more about the Church and have many of his questions answered before returning home to Arizona.

"We said goodbye, and I got in the car to drive back to Tucson, but what I had learned while at Temple Square was on my mind," Elder Lawrence said. "As I thought and pondered about things during my drive, I realized one thing was missing from my entire investigation. I was lacking faith.

"So, somewhere around Flagstaff on my way back to Tucson, I made a commitment to be baptized. As soon as I did, I felt the Holy Ghost confirm my decision."

Three weeks later, he was baptized, and a year later, he and Laurel were married in the Mesa Arizona Temple. As a convert of only five years, Elder Lawrence was called to serve as a bishop. He and his wife were living in Fresno, Calif., and he was completing his medical residency in ophthalmology. They had three young children at the time and were starting to look for a place to set up a practice after he finished his training. They had scheduled time off for a trip to the Northwest to visit possible opportunities.

One week prior to their departure, the stake presidency visited the Lawrences' home and extended a call for Elder Lawrence to be bishop of their ward. "I think the Lord's telling you where He wants you to live," the stake president counseled. They accepted the call and stayed in Fresno to raise their family. Their lives were greatly blessed as a result.

Whether called to serve as a bishop, stake president or Area Seventy, Elder Lawrence understood his priesthood duties and always happily accepted. When he was called to preside over one of the largest geographical missions in the world, the Russia Novosibirsk Mission, from 2001-2004, he was completely taken by surprise.

"I didn't serve a mission as a young man and had no foreign language skills," he said. "But the Lord blessed us, and it was a wonderful time in our lives."

Just as important as his callings in the Church, Elder Lawrence recognized the importance of his priesthood leadership within his own family. "My father-in-law was a great mentor of how to be a good priesthood leader in the home," he said. "Family prayer, family scripture study, family home evening and having family dinner together, those are the keys to building strong, faithful families. Parents can use family dinner as an opportunity to teach their children."

Elder and Sister Lawrence have been assigned to return to Russia where he will serve as the first counselor in the Europe East Area presidency. They are excited to serve together as they approach this new calling to the Seventy. For them, the decision to serve from the beginning of their marriage set the stage for the rest of their lives.

Sister Lawrence explained: "We started out with faith and no money, but we made a decision early on that we would trust in the Lord and start our family anyway. It taught us from the beginning of our marriage that even doing things that are hard — accepting hard responsibilities — the Lord will open the way and not to worry, it will all work out. That was one of the best things we ever did, that foundation of having enough faith to move forward."


Biographical information
FAMILY: Born Aug. 25, 1947, in Cheverly, Md., to Argil and Mary Jenkins Lawrence; married Laurel Stott on Nov. 5, 1971, in the Mesa Arizona Temple. Parents of six children: Case (Kerri), Skyler (Kyla), Logan (Jamie), Brooke (Carter) Swift, McLane (Kimberly), Mackenzie (Jeremy) Ware; 22 grandchildren.
CAREER: Ophthalmologist.
EDUCATION: Bachelor of science degree in agricultural biochemistry from the University of Arizona in 1969; doctorate of medicine from the University of Arizona in 1973.
CHURCH SERVICE: Area Seventy, President of the Russia Novosibirsk Mission from 2001-2004, stake president, counselor in stake presidency, high councilor, stake mission president, bishop, elders quorum president.

Here is the link: http://www.ldschurchnews.com/articles/59363/Elder-Larry-R-Lawrence-True-conversion-propelled-new-Seventy.html
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Petro, I can not help that you hold so many defective views concerning the Church.
And I cannot help that your religion holds so many defective views regarding God.

quote:
You and yours will simply continue to limp along, weaker and weaker.
Wishful thinking on your part Diamond. No matter how much you desire it, Christianity is not going to go away.

quote:
The Three Witnesses rejected nothing concerning their testimony.
And we have already discussed the various reasons that they would not have been inclined to admit their role in Smith's fraud.

quote:
They disagreed with some of the new doctrines that the Lord revealed through Joseph
No. They disagreed with Smith's claims that such doctrines had actually originated from God. They realized that Smith was building his theology around his personal desires that had nothing to do with God.

quote:
But these witnesses never denied what they heard, saw and handled and there is NO way you can get around that fact!!
And yet again, we have already discussed both the threats and the personal motivations that kept them quiet.

quote:
The Danites were long gone and there never was a single bit of evidence that they did any violent acts.
But there IS evidence that they made threats and that the opposition took those threats seriously!

quote:
When you talk about a desire that David Whitmer had in trying to influence others so that a relative could lead the Church, you must remember that David was not a member of the Church and thus had no influence.
But it didn't stop him from still trying to promote his nephew did it? And if he had admitted that Smith was a fraud, his nephew would have had even less of a chance!

quote:
After Brigham Young became the President of the Church, no one could have changed anything.
Yes Brigham Young sucessfully consolidated his power and silenced his opposition.

quote:
When he made his final statement concerning what he heard and saw and handled, he knew that he would be facing God very shortly and as religious as he was, he would not go to his death promulgating a terrible falsehood.
So you therefore accept as truth his claim regarding God speaking to him in 1838? Or do you want to pick and choose which of his falsehoods you want to believe?

quote:
If you were willing to learn, you would find that people who join the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints do not reject Christianity,
Of course they do as evidenced by your animosity towards Christian doctrine.
Only a fool could entertain that as a real possibility, especially when you see how honest he was and what an impeccable reputation he had throughout his community. But keep trying Petro, but you can never get there from here. You still can not explain why Oliver Cowdrey and Martin Harris, not only never denied their testimony as they were about to die, but would make the arduous journey to rejoin the Saints, ask for baptism again, knowing that they would have no position of power or authority.

quote:
The Church they have established is spreading throughout the world
So is Islam Seven Day adventists, Jehova's Witnessesan etc. That doesn't mean that any of those religions or mormonism are therefore valid.

quote:
I would admonish you that there is no other conversion to any other religion that is by the Holy Ghost.
It isn't the Holy Ghost that is responsible for conversion to Mormonism or any other non-Christian religion.

quote:
It just takes courage Petro and I know that it is hard.
No diamond. Converting to Mormonism doesn't take courage but rather gullibility.

quote:
But, I have been where you are now trapped!
Fortunately, Christianity isn't a "trap" as you try to portray it!

quote:
The correction of scripture that Joseph made was simply to teach the world the real truth as to what the scriptures originally said.
And of course no one believes that except the Mormons. The key point is that there is absolutely zero evidence or support that there was anything divine in Smith's rejection and rewrite of scripture. Believe as you like Diamond but understand that your belief is based on faith and not on evidence!

quote:
But, you are free to reject the glad message that is provided,
I DO reject it due to it running counter to Scripture and Christianity.

quote:
David's vision was to leave Far West.
It was much more than that. Did you ever read his statement that I referenced earlier or are you comfortable simply parroting the fairmormon site rather thab doing any research on your own?

quote:
But I do accept and respect the fact that he never rejected his testimony, regardless of much pressure and circumstance.
He never rejected his claim regarding his 1838 vision did he?

quote:
I also recognize he could have enriched himself greatly by detailing a so called fraud
Possibly. Buth the evidence shows that the reality is that the risk of making such an admission far outweighed any possible enrichment opportunities.

quote:
There would have been no threat to him because David was long gone from among the Saints and would have been fiercely protected by the Missourians.
But as previously discussed it wasn't JUST the threats that kept Whitmer quiet but also the desire to place his nephew in a position of power.

quote:
When the Church crossed the Mississippi, most nonmembers thought it was going to its destruction.
Bull. They hoped to get away from society so that they could exert greater control over all aspects of their society. They thought they were going to be able to create a theocracy and for a while, they were right.

quote:
David had not a prayer of success if that was his desire for his nephew. Church government would not have permitted it.
And yet he still hoped and tried didn't he?

quote:
The Lord's Church is a house of order!
quote:
And the Mormon religion is a house of politics and accountants.

quote:
You really should spend some time educating yourself about Church Government.
'Goverment' is a good way to describe it!

quote:
You might also want to consider why would a man, considered to honest in every regard
EVERY regard Diamond? Including his 1838 vision?

quote:
proclaim a fraudulent work just to acquire eventual condemnation for himself and a relative in the next world?
For the same reason that many men throughout history have risked salvation in pursuit of Earthly power.

quote:
I am not delusional.
Of course you are. But no one expects you to recognize it or admit it. But all of us out here see it Diamond.

quote:
You see how the Islamic fanatics enforce their religious beliefs on their own people.
The 'fanatics' do indeed. So the big question is did the Mormon Danites pick up this technique from the Muslims or was it the other way around?

quote:
Gee, all those gutless Mormon's who were so ready to flee the Danites at a "threat"
So because they fled out of fear as a result of Mormon threats, they were therefore 'gutless'???

quote:
But, then again, you might want to check who was in Nauvoo at the time the Expositor was destroyed.
It doesn't really matter does it. The Mormons once again showed that they had no problem going outside the law to silence those who dared speak out against them,

[Quite]Of course John Taylor had 7 wives and 37 children but I do not believe you can show me a link where he lied to the people in Liverpool. But what were the years that he took his wives?
So what part of my claim do you dispute Diamond? Thjat Taylor denied in Liverpool that polygamy was being practiced by Mormons or that he already had multiple wives at the time? Which is it Diamond or do you even know why you reject my statement?

quote:
Everyone is a sinner and your defective views on sexual perversion shows how out of step you are with both the OT and NT
And I could say the same about your acceptance of adultery. You are picking and choosing Diamond.

quote:
This is why that disqualifies them from having active membership in "His" church or to preach his gospel.
Wrong. Even sinners can still lead others to God.

quote:
But if I was a cynic, I could take the position that the positive thing for mankind is that people like yourself are helping to weaken and eventually destroy Henry's church.
your hatred of and desire to see Christianity destroyed is quite amazing (and rather sad). But I suppose ypur desperate hope is that if Christianity was to go away, Mormonism would't appear as flawed and people would therefore be more easily converted.

quote:
Not to mention that since none of your churches are the Lord's church
Most, if not all, Christian churches, regardless of denomination, are part of the Lord's Church.

[Quotea I loose no theological arguments; not one!
The only thing consistent about you Diamond is your continued failures with regards to your theological arguments!

quote:
You know you kid yourself when you claim you know God when you can describe no attributes that he has.
Not at all. Your problem Diamond is that you are only willing to consider 'physical' descriptions for a spiritual God.

quote:
He is our Father in Heaven in whose physical image and likeness we are created in.
Nope. Your addition of the 'physical' qualifier isn't supported by scripture.

quote:
Latter-day Saints "demand" nothing from God
Of course you do. And in areas that God didn't provuide answers, the Mormons simply create their own best guess explanation and offer it as doctrine.

quote:
I am glad that you have accepted the fact that this is an error concerning the nature of God i.e. that he would ever need to repent.
An error in your translation and comprehension Diamond.

quote:
The Prophet Joseph Smith is the only person I know that has corrected that error as well as so many others.
Again, your lack of comprehension doesn't equate to a scriptural error.

quote:
I am glad that you are so willing to admit that Joseph had a lack of theological education, and thus would have never picked up on the subtleties such as God hardening Pharaoh's heart, or God needing to repent, etc.
Wrong. Someone without a strong theological education would have been exactly the type to misunderstand those Scriptures and therefore assume that they needed to be changed.

quote:
He did not need any physical evidence as to a text because he enjoyed the real advantage of revelation
Or in reality, he claimed revelation because he has zero physical evidence to support his claims.

quote:
Having limitations has nothing to do with being "weak".
Of course it does. Someone subject to limitations IS weaker than someone without such limitations.

quote:
I think that you can thus easily conclude that none of these Catholics and Protestants enjoyed the Spirit of Christ nor did the church whose leaders sent them out. They were led by Satan!
Catholics and Protestants are led by Satan? Good luck with that one!

quote:
Again, just more overwhelming evidence Petro, that Christ's Church was no longer on the earth!!
Nope. Christ's church has never left us. You once try and reject Christianity by focusing only on those weakest in their faith while ignoring those who are strongest.


quote:
During his visit, he and Laurel went to Temple Square.
Three weeks later, he was baptized, and a year later, he and Laurel were married in the Mesa Arizona Temple.
As with most of your conversion stories Diamond, we have a guy who is led to convert by a Mormon girlfriend. Certainly a good indication of just how strong the emotion of love is and how willing people are to suspend logic and objectivety as a result of such emotion. Of course you already knew that based on your own wife's willingness to convert in order to preserve your marriage right?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.