quote:
Petro, I want you to do some of your own work.
I consistently do Diamond. YOU on the other hand, are the one who has repeatedly been caught making statements that turn out to be nothing but plagiarism of other's works. And even worse, even when called out by us (or the moderators) you still don't have the integrity to admit the plagiarism. No Diamond...it isn't I who is guilty of not doing my own work!
Typical Diamond in that you have made a claim and when asked for any supporting evidence or information, you turn out to have absolutely nothing...
quote:
But in case you miss the obvious, look where the Church is today and it has only just begun.
In the Mormons, we have a religious organization that is materially wealthy due to their focus on cash flow above all else. We also have an organization that thinks that shopping malls and golf resorts are more important than humanitarian aid as indicated by the fact that the Mormons have spent three times as much on that real estate in the last few years as they have on humanitarian aid in the last TWENTY-FIVE years! I see an organization who was founded on a false prophet and has therefore relied on false doctrine from the very start. I see an organization whose founder claims that his sleeping with multiple women was commanded by God. But at the same time, he chooses to lie to others about just such activity.... I see an organization that practiced racism up until 1978 and only stopped because the rest of society forced them to. And of course even today, there are members such as Diamond who continue to support the racism of the Mormon's past.
quote:
You have shown absolutely nothing of any real substance concerning their witness and you lie through your teeth when you claim it.
Wrong. You simply choose to ignore or discount anything presented that doesn't agree with your agenda and beliefs.
quote:
You just can not handle what these men of impeccable character testified to!
Again, you refer to their impeccable character and yet choose to completely reject their claims in later life that countered Mormon position. You choose to belief or not belief, not based on their character (or lack thereof), but instead simply on whether their comments at that particular time agree with what you want to hear or not!
quote:
They were strong personalties and the Church was long gone and was no threat to them, even in their imagination.
The Danites certainly indicate otherwise.
quote:
Of course because you reason so stupidly, when they were on their death bed and reiterated their testimony, they were in fear of there lives. Right?
Probably not. But you have already been shown the evidence that at that time, Whitmer was pushing for his nephew as the true leader of the Mormons. As such, even on his deathbed, Whitmer had incentive and reasons not to reveal Smith's fraud.
quote:
Want to explain why two of them came back into the Church knowing they would hold no position of "power" or riches that you so believe motivates us.
Already have...repeatedly. See above for example.
quote:
I don't fail at all in explaining any questions or misrepresentations of LDS doctrines
I never said you did. But what you DO fail at is showing any support for your answers and for LDS doctrine. As I said before, even if your beliefs are in error, I have no problem with you proclaiming FAITH in your beliefs just as I have FAITH in Christianity. But when you attempt to 'prove' your religion, you continue to fail miserably. It truly makes me wonder how weak must your convictions in your faith be when you aren't willing to rely on faith but feel the need to find some absolute proof instead???
quote:
But conversion is a result of the witness of the Holy Ghost
True SOMETIMES. But not all religious conversions are guided by the Holy Ghost. And those who would reject Christianity and embrace Joseph Smith certainly aren't being guided by the Holy Ghost!
quote:
Nicene Christianity does not begin to compare with New Testament Christianity whci we represent!
When your religious founder chooses to modify scripture to fit his particular beliefs, you in no way are representing Christianity!
quote:
I am aware of the link but was curious to see if you would provide it and how you would do so.
Sure you were Diamond.... If you were aware of it, you would have already plagiarized all of the comments in order to attempt to address my statements. Instead, you simply assumed that because YOU often make claims without any actual support, others must do the same as well. Once again however, your assumption fails in that I show that I do NOT make up claims as you do, but instead make my claims based on evidence and research.
quote:
Of course you provided only a part and you ignore the conclusion it gave, which I shall post:
A conclusion of course that is based on the opinion of fairmormon.org! No Diamond, you asked for evidence of my claims which you didn't think I could provide. But I did so without difficulty. And NOW that you have the link, you try to use THEIR opinions to back up your claims.
But since YOU don't have anything to argue my position, I'll argue the fairmormon points instead:
quote:
Whitmer was not instructed to leave the Church or "repudiate Mormonism," he was instructed to leave Far West after he was already excommunicated.
So what Diamond? Whether his supposed vision occurred before or after he was excommunicated doesn't change the fact that he claims to have had a vision telling him to leave the LDS religion. So based on your claims of his good character, why do you NOT believe him when he states that he had such a vision. Answer: Because his claim doesn't match up with your personal beliefs and you therefore reject Whitmer and his alleged good character whenever it suits you.
quote:
This was arguably a very prudent course, both for Whitmer's safety
Even fairmormon aknowledges that making the claims that he did about the Mormons created a threat to his safety. How much MORE of a threat would have been created if he admitted that Smith was a fraud???
quote:
In fact, Whitmer's fidelity to his testimony despite great disagreements with Joseph and the Church strengthen its force.
Not at all because, as already shown, even as he approached death, Whitmer had motivation in the form of his nephew for not revealing his part in the Mormon fraud.
quote:
Judaism and Christianity are not passing the longer test of time. Islam would not either, except by enforcement of terror of losing limbs and one's life
You are truly delusional Diamond if you believe that about any one of those religions!
quote:
To show you the hyprocisy of the leaders like those of Saudi Arabia, they immediately put on Western garb and party as Nicene Christians do with drink and immodest clothing as soon as the jet gets to 30,000 feet.
Typical Diamond in that you only choose to focus on those who are the least faithful to their particular religion while completely ignoring the large majority who DO faithfully live their life as their religion decrees.
quote:
The real reason that one would never believe Strang is that he and any other apostate would never have the influence and witness of the Spirit and that they were God's real prophet.
No. The real reason that you don't believe is because what he claimed doesn't fit with your agenda. The fact that he had the same type of witnesses as did Smith shows that it isn't the witnesses that make you believe or not believe but instead, it is purely a matter of which set of claims matches your personal desires.
quote:
Not one proven crime against the so called "danites".
Because those who were threatened were fearful enough that they chose to flee the Danites. Are you really trying to claim Diamond that threats and intimidation are perfectly OK as long as no actual violence occurs??? The holes that you are forced to dig for yourself in order to support your weak arguments are absolutely embarrassing for you Diamond!
quote:
John Taylor, my careless one, had 37 children, not 37 wives.
Yeap. As I had previously stated. And those 37 children came from 7+ wives didn't they. And what is worse, is that Taylor lied to the people of Liverpool, England when he claimed that polygamy wasn't being practiced by the Mormons even when he was already married to those women. What kind of theology Diamond requires its leaders to hide the truth from potential converts??? The answer is that a fraudulent religion is the type that requires that!
quote:
But when did he acquire his wives; what month and year?
Do you deny that he had multiple wives when he spoke to the people in Liverpool Diamond? I'm getting ready to board a plane to Azerbaijan and therefore can't pull up the specific dates right now. But tell me that you deny that he had those wives at the time and I will be happy to provide the links within the next day or so.
quote:
So give me the evidence that President Taylor denied that plural marriage was being practiced.
I already have. But if you want to deny that he did so, then I will be happy to provide the evidence again.
quote:
I believe that there was no posterity for Joseph from his plural wives was because he would not be permitted to tarry on this earth. Not to mention that intimacy was very infrequent with those that he was intimate with.
I am sure that when you have multiple wives to sleep with, the sexual frequency with any one of them probably DOES go down!
quote:
There are no adulterers that are practicing Latter-day Saints and that has been explained to you.
There indeed are as you already admitted. Perhaps now you are backpedaling and choosing to make up your own definition of 'adultery' instead of using the Biblical definition? Yet another example of your attempts to pick and choose with regards to which parts of Scripture you choose to follow or reject!
quote:
You have a moral center of Jell-O when you support sexual perversion as a legitimate expression of love or worthiness to preach the Gospel.
Nope. I simply recognize that even sinners still have the ability to preach the message of God and perhaps bring others to God!
quote:
I lose no theological arguments.
That is ALL you do Diamond.
quote:
You definitely do not "know" him. If you knew what he intended us to know, you would not be so incapable of describing him and his actions.
Of course I know God Diamond. The difference between us is that I, unlike you, don't demand to know EVERYTHING about God but instead trust him to tell us what we need to know. You on the other hand, in your desire to become a God yourself, demand total knowledge from God and when he doesn't provide it, you are forced to resort to false answers generated by man.
quote:
I repeat, you are a stupid fool if you believe that God ever needs to repent which is what it says in the KJV in the OT.
And I repeat once again that I have never made such a claim.
quote:
The Prophet Joseph corrected this error, among many others in the Bible.
Wrong. Once again, because of Smith's lack of theological education, he made an assumption about something that was said in Scripture and based on this incorrect assumption, decided to change Scripture to something that he thought sounded better regardless of the fact that he had ZERO support or evidence to justify such a change.
You need to go back and study the original verses Diamond and you will discover that the translation word 'repent' is not being used in the way that you assume that it is. God wasn't regretting that he took the action that he did because he was wrong to do so. Instead he regretted that the sinful actions of man had led God to take such action. There is a HUGE difference in those two concepts Diamond which you obviously choose to ignore.
quote:
God is neither weak
You state this and yet show that you don't really believe it when you continue to make statements that God has limitations and is not omnipotent!
quote:
I am sure, based on your stated reasoning, that you think that Catholics murdering Protestants and Protestant murdering Catholics is God's fault.
And I am sure that once again, you don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. In fact, I have stated specifically on more than one occasion that the fighting between various Christian denominations is due to the fault and sins of man rather than any such weakness in God. Guess you 'forgot' those statements didn't you Diamond?
quote:
God would cease to be God if he lied or committed any unrighteous act.
Wrong. While I don't believe for a moment that God has done either, even if he did, it wouldn't in the least bit affect his nature as God.
quote:
Godhood is not just a personage but also an office or position. Someday you will learn that!
Yet another made up fact from Diamond completely unsupported by scripture.
[This message has been edited by PetroAg87 (edited 5/23/2010 5:27p).]