Entertainment
Sponsored by

War of the Worlds - the BAD version

578 Views | 6 Replies | Last: 20 yr ago by DB Coach
Jay Omega
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I picked up the Pendragon version for $8.96 at Sam's yesterday. I'd heard a little about it; it was supposed to be very faithful to the original story.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0425638/

Well, if you collect crappy movies here's a good one for your collection. A few of my thoughts:

1. It's three hours long. THREE HOURS. 180 MINUTES.

2. The film to DVD transfer is jerky, so every once in a while they skip a little.

3. Worst use of a green screen I've ever seen.

4. Special effects were better than a typical Dr. Who episode. But not much better. The Martians looked like squids/ticks with a bunch of tentacles. Their machines were pretty unbelievable as well. It looked like they used miniatures for the machines, and not very well either.

5. Sometimes film-makers use colored filters to imply nighttime or what-not. This film uses sepia tone as the default and randomly uses red, orange, yellow, green and blue filters to imply... I don't know. Maybe confusion or embarrassment?

6. Acting. Good lord. I feel sorry for them guys. They must be so embarrassed.

7. They totally screwed up the Thunderchild sequence. What should have been the coolest scene in the past five years was confusing and uncomprehensible. (In the book, the ironclad Thunderchild takes on three war machines to give a ferry boat time to escape).

8. Walking. Walking. And more walking.

9. Bad sound effects. A falling war machine sounded like they dumped out the silverware drawer; a crying baby sounded like they downloaded an audio clip off the internet with 4k sampling. Guh.

There were a few things I did like:

1. Ogilvy the Astronomer shakes his finger at the local boys playing around where the first cylinder landed and says "You boys get away from there!" Funnier if you see it.

2. A woman gets stomped by a war machine. Kinda like stepping on a grape.

3. The Writer punches out a panicky preacher, then the Martians grabbed him and pulled him through a small basement window. He deserved it.


I guess that's about it. There were a lot of other stupid things, like people's skeletons writhing around on the ground after their flesh had been burned off, but whatever. I mainly thought I'd warn ya'll against picking this up (unless you like doing the MST3K thing like me and the kids).

Pick up the George Pal 1953 version if you can find it. It had better special effects than this piece of junk.
Professor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, but is the hero a follower of scientology?
Jay Omega
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, but he had the worst fake moustache of all time.

He also played The Writer's brother. Exactly the same character, but no moustache. Kinda cornfusin.
GigemAgs31
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anybody remember the tv series in the late 80's?

http://imdb.com/title/tt0094578/

I thought I liked it as a kid, but that could be due to not knowing better.
Jay Omega
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember it. I could never get past the premise that everyone on Earth forgot the Martians invaded in the 1950s.
bogustrumper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
...speaking of bad, as in bad in the head...anybody else catch this? Is this guy serious? I don't think the author had this in mind when he wrote this 107 years ago.

Movie More Than Meets the Eye?

Actor Tom Cruise might not have known it, but in his new movie "War of the Worlds" he's playing someone that the film's screenwriter thinks represents the Iraqi insurgents. Screenwriter David Koepp, quoted by the Canadian magazine Rue Morgue, said, "…the Martians [in the movie] ... represent American military forces invading the Iraqis, and the futility of the occupation of a faraway land is again the subtext." And, in an interview with USA Weekend, Koepp said, "You can read our movie several ways. It could be 9/11 paranoia. Or it could be about how U.S. military interventionism abroad is doomed by insurgency, just the way an alien invasion might be."



Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's a damn shame. The thought of an alien invasion in the Victorian era is very intriguing. I think it has a lot of potential for a great movie with the right production.
DB Coach
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Koepp said, "You can read our movie several ways. It could be 9/11 paranoia. Or it could be about how U.S. military interventionism abroad is doomed by insurgency, just the way an alien invasion might be."


What does this @$$hat Koepp think doomed the aliens in the first place? It certainly wasn't human resistance...they were getting hammered, aside from one lucky grenade placement. I know this guy worked with the movie and all, but come on, he doesn't need to bring his veiled political opinions to the table.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.