*** ALIEN ROMULUS *** (Spoilers)

6,400 Views | 84 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by Cinco Ranch Aggie
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was there an actual, bone-thin dude in that suit? Was that an animatronic? I still don't know what I'm looking at...

Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Clearly there was. Edit to add, I'm actually surprised at this. I've seen the movie twice, and not once did it occur to me that was an actor in a suit. I really thought that was all CGI.

The original Alien was a 7+ foot African who was rail thin,
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AJ02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:




His neck is wider than his head. Which you can see with some roided up people. But for a scrawny dude to have a neck wider than his head? Weird.
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That was fun. My wife didn't know the originals too well, but she still enjoyed.

First half was definitely better though. Something about the production really had the original set/technology and video quality down. That was super cool.

But it felt like a different movie at the end. Slightly less interesting than Prometheus for me. But same grouping behind the first two movies imo.

Lastly, this is why we go to the movies. The first half was badass with the ships taking off … really intense in the Dolby theaters.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saw in theatre. Good not great.

Set design, look and feel of it was great.

Sound was great w/ 2001 vibes.

Biggest complaint was that the main characters fell completely flat. Noting interesting about any of them. Casting was bad in that regard.

Main characters were forgettable with the exception of the two synthetics, one of which was AI.

Plot point that the guy had a grudge against synthetics because on locked their dad in a mine was meh.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This was essentially a re-make of Alien.

I see why they cast a bunch of young looking kids.

They wanted to appeal to a new generation not even familiar with Alien and also a younger demo.

This was to appeal to a larger worldwide market.

This also the reason that movies have declined over the years.

Too many cooks in the kitchen.
astros4545
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Was there an actual, bone-thin dude in that suit? Was that an animatronic? I still don't know what I'm looking at...




&ct=g
joerobert_pete06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just saw this movie and thought it was good. I liked the start of the movie, gave me a Total Recall feel to it with they depicted the mining colony.

I liked how they brought Arthur back. Didn't they give his 'module' to the other robot? Then how is he still controlling the output and all that?

The whole last scene with the half human alien was weird, I was totally hoping it was going to be one of the buff engineers but we got that instead.

Either way I enjoyed it and give it a 7.0
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I liked how they brought Arthur back. Didn't they give his 'module' to the other robot? Then how is he still controlling the output and all that?
Ash. But technically, not Ash, just another model of the Ash model, this one was named Rook.

And nice catch on the chip. I've watched this three times but never caught that.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

Quote:

I liked how they brought Arthur back. Didn't they give his 'module' to the other robot? Then how is he still controlling the output and all that?
Ash. But technically, not Ash, just another model of the Ash model, this one was named Rook.

And nice catch on the chip. I've watched this three times but never caught that.


One could argue hardwiring him into the ship substituted his loss of his chip. Wired vs wireless, if you will.

I thought this was movie was good but not great.

I have zero issues with the broken information flow among WY employees and other people in this series.

Reasoning:

1. Logical or not you have future tech with an almost analog stamp on it. Fairly common theme in sci-fi where capabilities we think should be standard are sometimes not. They may not have had seamless information flow due to tech in this universe. In addition, it's a big damn universe and getting information across it would be challenging without super advanced technology that could clearly be lacking here.

2. WY is the classic, uber powerful corporation in the future that is swimming in unethical and illegal waters. R&D, especially highly deadly and unethical R&D, gets compartmentalized in large organizations. Compartmentalization is a classic strategy of terrorist and rebel organizations as well. Nothing unusual here at all to me if certain parts of WY don't know what other parts are doing.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I'd considered the compartmentalization angle, and that makes the most sense. The suits in the boardroom in Aliens said they had no evidence of a creature Ripley described, but that doesn't mean they would have even been aware of WY's efforts to secure the critter a few years before Ripley was found lost in space.

The tech in the Alien universe is a weird mish-mash of old school with new-fangled stuff, but that's not so much the case in AR. It's more evident in Prometheus/Alien Covenant, set years before Alien, with more modern-looking interfaces than what the future Nostromo carried. Perhaps because those were top-of-the-line starships in the WY fleet, as opposed to the tug boat the the Nostromo essentially was.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
By the way, I wasn't really directing that response at you. Was commenting in General to others who think the information flow is a plot hole and I don't think it is for reasons given.

Also, that basketball player is weirder looking than the alien. lol. Did they see him first and base the alien around him or the other way around?
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Finally got around to seeing this and thought it was disappointingly average.

Which makes all the praise odd for me.

I've come to believe the older generation is more about nostalgia.

While the younger generation that has grown up watching remakes upon remakes upon remakes and reboots and reimaginings, frenetic films hyper-focused on visual stimulation, and story telling influenced by the current sociopolitical paradigm that has narrowed creativity,

- a generation that doesn't even read books -

doesn't know what a good story/film looks like.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think any Alien movie is going to suffer from something that it can do nothing about: it's supposed to scare the crap out of you, but since everyone knows what the monster looks like, it just cannot be frightening like it was for audiences in 1979. That fright element is just not reproducible given all that movie-goers know about the creature from its various sequels and spin-offs.

Having said that, what I liked most about AR was the early part of the movie with a look at life on a fully colonized planet, which is what they were doing with LV-426 in Aliens. And I loved the attention to detail to make interfaces and wall placards look a lot like what was seen aboard the Nostromo. Since this movie was only a few years after Alien, that made sense to make things like that be similar.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.