Yeah, I get the sense that as a closeted gay dude in both Hollywood and the theatre scenes he definitely used his status as people often do, to make advances on younger targets (by younger Im meaning much younger than him but still over 18). The fact that the grosser allegations came up from decades before and that he was acquitted of them after his main alleged victim wanted $40 m, it does seem possible that they were former casual partners who decided he'd be someone to easily get a settlement from. Also, the fact that numerous other actors who know him well, like Liam Neeson, spoke out in his defense -- hopefully means he isn't the monster he was painted as. Not that this is a good thing or excuses it, but the stuff he definitely DID do, seems frankly pretty common in that industry (Leo, J Franco), the only difference being that he was concealing his actions more because he hadn't come out while he was at the height of his career. At any moment 3 or 4 women could all in unison say without any evidence that 20 years ago Leo made unwanted advances on them or assaulted them when they were 18-20, and it would be somewhat believable because he has that reputation for going after younger women, but at the same time if there isn't solid evidence that it was done without consent or that they were underage at the time, I wonder if people would cancel him as quickly.
Or, maybe he's 100% guilty of it all, which sucks not only because he's victimized people but also because it tarnished a lot of movies that I enjoy. Similar to how I feel when a Michael Jackon song comes on.