TXAG 05 said:
Macarthur said:
wangus12 said:
I won't say they're overrated. It's clear how much influence they've had on music. I will say that it just wasn't good to me.
I'm pretty much here. However, I do like much of their music, acknowledge their influence and greatness.
However, I do think they are a bit overrated and one big element for me is being a live touring band, which there really weren't. They were a studio group that made great music that laid the blueprint.
I will also say that I tend to gravitate to more blues based so the answer to the Beatles/Stones question, for me, will always be The Stones.
Having said all that, Led Zeppelin was the greatest rock band of all time.
They toured relentlessly till 66.
Ok, I get your point, but let's dive into this a bit deeper.
If you look at them playing all over England and those clubs, yes, they played a ton.
But let's really look at their 5 years of 'touring'.
Let me first say, I think most folks would agree (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) that they really started to do their best work and experimenting on Rubber Soul which was released in Dec of 65 - six months before they essentially stopped touring. So they really didn't tour with what most of us would consider their most influential and experimental work....correct?
Back to the original point
Outside of the many UK dates, here are their tours outside of the UK:
Feb 64 - They did 5 US shows and 3 of those were TV so those were not concerts.
June 64 - 4 European dates, 1 Hong Kong, 16 Australian & New Zealand dates
Aug 64 - 26 N. American dates - this clearly was their biggest tour
June 65 - 7 European dates
Aug 65 - 10 N. American Shows
June 66 - 3 Germany, 1 Japan & 1 Philipines
Aug 66 - 14 N. American shows.
That's it....I guess this is subjective, but I don't think that's an extensive touring schedule, esp when you factor in that, with Rubber Soul being released in Dec of 65, they really didn't play any of that material and what came after it live.