*** THE INVISIBLE MAN ***

8,081 Views | 87 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by k20dub
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So this is getting rave reviews. Currently at 86% on Rotten Tomatoes and opens this weekend. I wasn't planning on seeing it at all, but reactions dropped late last night and are way too strong to ignore. To the point where I just bought tickets with a couple of friends for Friday night at the Dome at the ArcLight in Hollywood. The last horror/thriller I saw in that theater was Get Out, and it was an incredible experience/audience to see it with. Hoping for more of the same this weekend. Anxious to hear what everyone else thinks as well...



PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think she's a great actress. The writer/director apparently wrote Saw and Insidious from what I can tell, and he wrote and directed Upgrade which I found surprisingly entertaining. Granted, I had no real expectations when I saw it, so maybe that helped. At the very least, it had some innovative special effects going on.

On a side note, why do the publishing companies still put cheesy tag lines on posters?

He's also set to direct Escape from New York remake, that should be illegal
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
GiveEmHellBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think mixing "Sleeping with the Enemy" with "Hollow Man" makes for an intriguing idea.

However...there is just something about Elizabeth Moss that completely turns me off. I just do...not...like...her.

I may still see this just because it looks cool and I need something to do.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GiveEmHellBill said:

I think mixing "Sleeping with the Enemy" with "Hollow Man" makes for an intriguing idea.

However...there is just something about Elizabeth Moss that completely turns me off. I just do...not...like...her.

I may still see this just because it looks cool and I need something to do.
you don't like Peggy?!
Saxsoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Leigh Whanell is a legend in my eyes when it comes to horror. His work on Saw, Insidious, and Upgrade are major achievements. Turning this into an abuse story was a stroke of genius.
Fighting Texas Aggie Class of 2012
Saxsoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

So this is getting rave reviews. Currently at 86% on Rotten Tomatoes and opens this weekend. I wasn't planning on seeing it at all, but reactions dropped late last night and are way too strong to ignore. To the point where I just bought tickets with a couple of friends for Friday night at the Dome at the ArcLight in Hollywood. The last horror/thriller I saw in that theater was Get Out, and it was an incredible experience/audience to see it with. Hoping for more of the same this weekend. Anxious to hear what everyone else thinks as well...




Seeing get out on opening night with nearly half of the audience being black was such an awesome experience. The final scene with the cop car went exactly how you would expect with that audience.
Fighting Texas Aggie Class of 2012
Aggie_Journalist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For some reason none of your text was loading at first (but everyone else's was, and I could drag my mouse to select your text so I knew it was there) and I thought you'd found a way to write an invisible review for the invisible man.

Then the text loaded and appeared. Ah well.
Thanks and gig'em
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sex Panther
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can't believe how surprisingly good this looks. I'm really looking forward to it.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Blumhouse, so I'm in
pimplepopper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess my barometer is broken. From the previews and the constant ads popping up on youtube, I had this pegged as a < 20% flop.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you're invisible, you can't see yourself, right?

But then, you can't wear deodorant since you'll be able to see it. How much dirt has to build up on your skin for it to make you visible?
GiveEmHellBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just realized that, in order to be invisible, he cannot be wearing any clothing.

So that scene where Moss says "there's someone sitting in that chair"........he was sitting in that chair naked.

Gross.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

I guess my barometer is broken. From the previews and the constant ads popping up on youtube, I had this pegged as a < 20% flop.
It looks bad to me from the trailer, but I have liked the movies the director as made so we will see.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thought the trailer had enough to show it could be interesting if done right. Glad to see the good reviews. This genre is usually a redbox/stream or never watch it for me.

I'm the same way in that the last movie in this type of genre I saw in theaters was Get Out. Might be worth a Sunday early showing or a 4:30 work getaway next week.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone seeing/seen this tonight?
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
GiveEmHellBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
11:45 am tomorrow for me.
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That was great. Truly very frightening movie.
ChipFTAC01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im with you. I hated Zoey Bartlett and that's ruined everything else she's been in for me. Was out on Mad Men after about a season and a half (although that could have been due to a writers strike or something). No interest in Handmaids Tale.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ummmmm....wouldn't a handful of flour take care of all of that?
GiveEmHellBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For now, until I can get some time to get more detailed let me just say this:

this is an incredible movie. Go see it.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great to hear. Seeing it in a few hours.
FriendlyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

Saw an early preview.

I found it too transparent.


You must have saw right through it
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Amazing movie just walked out of it. I was hooked from the first few minutes until the very end literally sitting on the edge of the seat at times.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be accepted at face value.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. What a blast. I too was on the edge of my seat the entire time. In fact, I can't remember the last time I squirmed in my seat as much as I did in this. From the opening scene, it's just an unrelenting thrill ride. That, and the build up/incremental "reveal" of the invisible man is masterful. The we never truly see him in-full before the "transformation" is a stroke of genius and gives the whole thing such an effective, the-shark-in-Jaws vibe. Really, the way the camera strategically hints at even the faintest idea of him at first, which leads to the paranoia, which leads to the first tiny little reveal of him, which leads to the scary-as-sh*t-bedroom sequence, which then leads to more and more f*cked up "hauntings," which give way to his blatant "appearances" all the way through to the end is just so brilliant and pitch perfect.

There's one scene, in particular, that truly shocked/freaked me the hell out, as it did everyone else in the theater, like I haven't been socked/freaked out in I don't know how long, which is out of no where and straight up terrifying, in the best possible way. Before you can even register what you're seeing, you go from "Wait, what?" to "HOLY SH*T!" in no time flat and it's just jaw-dropping.

That said, I do have a couple very minor quibbles...

- Elizabeth Moss is really good at playing really scared, she sells the losing-her-mind thing incredibly well, and she was certainly better than I expected (and this is coming from someone who loved her in Mad Men). But frankly, I simply didn't buy her as the wife of a hunky/psycho tech genius millionaire, especially a hunky/psycho tech genius millionaire who would go to such lengths to control, torture, and pine after her. Maybe decades of more blatantly attractive women in this type of role have unfairly set my expectations, but Moss just feels "off" not because of her performance, but because of her look/vibe, as superficial as that sounds. Maybe if *he* was a little more of a nerd as well I would have bought it, but as-is it's admittedly somewhat distracting.

- Speaking of, on one hand, I totally get why this has the cast it does. It was somehow made for only $7M and does have a bit of a B-movie vibe. But on the other hand, it's so well done that I'm surprised they either weren't able to garner a bigger-name cast or didn't want to spend the money on one. I have no problem with any of the performances whatsoever, but as you're watching it, it really does have such a surprisingly "event" feel, to the point where you're wondering how the hell this hasn't been done since Hollow Man twenty years ago. It's just so cool and feels so "classic" in a way that you can't help but wonder what this would have been like with even just slightly bigger, more mainstream names in a couple of the roles.

- Finally, the plot is admittedly a little contrived at times, and there are a couple of awkward beats/lines as well. As masterful as the slow, incremental build up of the invisible man is, again, the movie never quite sheds itself of its slight, B-movie vibe. While writer/director Leigh Whannell knocks it out of the park for the most part, I wish that another writer could have done just one more quick pass on the script. Don't get me wrong - it's tight, it's incredibly solid, super effective, and even brilliant at times, but if two or three minor things could have been addressed just a bit better, it would have been damn near perfect.

All that said, SEE THIS MOVIE. This weekend if you can. With this biggest audience you can. Because it's so, so worth it.
Saxsoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Yep. What a blast. I too was on the edge of my seat the entire time. In fact, I can't remember the last time I squirmed in my seat as much as I did in this. From the opening scene, it's just an unrelenting thrill ride. That, and the build up/incremental "reveal" of the invisible man is masterful. The we never truly see him in-full before the "transformation" is a stroke of genius and gives the whole thing such an effective, the-shark-in-Jaws vibe. Really, the way the camera strategically hints at even the faintest idea of him at first, which leads to the paranoia, which leads to the first tiny little reveal of him, which leads to the scary-as-sh*t-bedroom sequence, which then leads to more and more f*cked up "hauntings," which give way to his blatant "appearances" all the way through to the end is just so brilliant and pitch perfect.

There's one scene, in particular, that truly shocked/freaked me the hell out, as it did everyone else in the theater, like I haven't been socked/freaked out in I don't know how long, which is out of no where and straight up terrifying, in the best possible way. Before you can even register what you're seeing, you go from "Wait, what?" to "HOLY SH*T!" in no time flat and it's just jaw-dropping.

That said, I do have a couple very minor quibbles...

- Elizabeth Moss is really good at playing really scared, she sells the losing-her-mind thing incredibly well, and she was certainly better than I expected (and this is coming from someone who loved her in Mad Men). But frankly, I simply didn't buy her as the wife of a hunky/psycho tech genius millionaire, especially a hunky/psycho tech genius millionaire who would go to such lengths to control, torture, and pine after her. Maybe decades of more blatantly attractive women in this type of role have unfairly set my expectations, but Moss just feels "off" not because of her performance, but because of her look/vibe, as superficial as that sounds. Maybe if *he* was a little more of a nerd as well I would have bought it, but as-is it's admittedly somewhat distracting.

- Speaking of, on one hand, I totally get why this has the cast it does. It was somehow made for only $7M and does have a bit of a B-movie vibe. But on the other hand, it's so well done that I'm surprised they either weren't able to garner a bigger-name cast or didn't want to spend the money on one. I have no problem with any of the performances whatsoever, but as you're watching it, it really does have such a surprisingly "event" feel, to the point where you're wondering how the hell this hasn't been done since Hollow Man twenty years ago. It's just so cool and feels so "classic" in a way that you can't help but wonder what this would have been like with even just slightly bigger, more mainstream names in a couple of the roles.

- Finally, the plot is admittedly a little contrived at times, and there are a couple of awkward beats/lines as well. As masterful as the slow, incremental build up of the invisible man is, again, the movie never quite sheds itself of its slight, B-movie vibe. While writer/director Leigh Whannell knocks it out of the park for the most part, I wish that another writer could have done just one more quick pass on the script. Don't get me wrong - it's tight, it's incredibly solid, super effective, and even brilliant at times, but if two or three minor things could have been addressed just a bit better, it would have been damn near perfect.

All that said, SEE THIS MOVIE. This weekend if you can. With this biggest audience you can. Because it's so, so worth it.
Awesome, I am a fan of horror in general and will see whatever schlock comes out but I always get excited when a film like this or Get Out come around that can please even non-horror audiences. Going to see in a few hours.
Fighting Texas Aggie Class of 2012
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought the same about Moss when I saw the home of the man she was living in at the beginning, no way she would be in his league with his looks and money. That all changed when he finally made his "appearance". He was kind of dorky and awkward like he was a genius with a personality disorder that would prevent him from connecting with most women.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be accepted at face value.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I get that and I guess you're right. Still, I would have much rather seen someone like Emily Blunt in the role. Not just looks-wise, but like I said, as good as the movie is, I just wanted it to feel more like the "event" it deserved to be.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That trailer seemed to basically spoil the entire movie. Is there any reason to see it now?
Saxsoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I loved the opening with the crashing waves showing the logos.

That entire opening sequence with the escape as intense. And I agree tc that the escalation was so well done. I think I know which scene you are thinking of because the scene was what I call a "safe space" in these horror films where exposition happens and nothing wrong could happen. I put this up there with a particular scene in Insidious as coming out of left field.

Acting was wonderful and the film just exuded dread at every turn. Leigh Whannel is incredibly talented between this and upgrade
Fighting Texas Aggie Class of 2012
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.