The girl in The Bridge to Terabithia. The trailer made that movie look like a Narnia type fantasy, but instead you get kicked in the stomach with that death.
Drawkcab said:E.KingTrill said:
Samuel L Jackson in Deep Blue Sea
Damn you! I opened this thread to post a gif of this.
Oh well, least now I don't have to find one.
Really? I was more surprised by the FBI accountant getting shot.Aggie94 said:
Sean Connery's character in The Untouchables - was not expecting it.
Re-watch the movie. The story did a good job of making you change your mind before Fredo was killed.Presley OBannons Sword said:
I don't really get why so many of you are saying Fredo. By the end of GF2, Michael was completely cold-blooded, and he had already shown in part 1 that he had no qualms about killing family members. If any death ordered by Michael was surprising, it was Carlo's in part 1. In fact, Fredo's death was nearly an exact duplicate of Carlo's, in the way Michael pretty much made him confess his betrayal, then led him to believe he would be let go with a harsh punishment, but not death, right before he was executed. I don't really remember the first time I watched GF2, but I certainly don't remember being surprised. It was perfectly within character for Michael.
AgGrad99 said:Re-watch the movie. The story did a good job of making you change your mind before Fredo was killed.Presley OBannons Sword said:
I don't really get why so many of you are saying Fredo. By the end of GF2, Michael was completely cold-blooded, and he had already shown in part 1 that he had no qualms about killing family members. If any death ordered by Michael was surprising, it was Carlo's in part 1. In fact, Fredo's death was nearly an exact duplicate of Carlo's, in the way Michael pretty much made him confess his betrayal, then led him to believe he would be let go with a harsh punishment, but not death, right before he was executed. I don't really remember the first time I watched GF2, but I certainly don't remember being surprised. It was perfectly within character for Michael.
You're right, Michael had become ruthless, but things were also in chaos with the family (business and personal). Hyman Roth situation, his wife and kids, internally finding the rat, he had issues with Frank Pentangeli, the Cuban investment loss, the Nevada license situation, the hearings in DC...he couldn't plug the holes quick enough.
But everything started to reverse course, and Michael started to close loose ends one by one.
You knew he was going to kill Fredo from the moment he kissed him in Cuba. Michael had been losing all the family he had. His father was dead, his mom passed, Connie had been gone, he literally closed the door on Kate...But then his mother's funeral came. Connie returns to the family, pledges to take care of Michael (which he hadnt had that in a long time), and she pleads with Michael to save Fredo. You then have the scene with them embracing, with Michael seemingly forgiving him. They did a good job making you think, like everything else, things with Michael and Fredo were reversing course...
Until boom.
AgGrad99 said:Re-watch the movie. The story did a good job of making you change your mind before Fredo was killed.Presley OBannons Sword said:
I don't really get why so many of you are saying Fredo. By the end of GF2, Michael was completely cold-blooded, and he had already shown in part 1 that he had no qualms about killing family members. If any death ordered by Michael was surprising, it was Carlo's in part 1. In fact, Fredo's death was nearly an exact duplicate of Carlo's, in the way Michael pretty much made him confess his betrayal, then led him to believe he would be let go with a harsh punishment, but not death, right before he was executed. I don't really remember the first time I watched GF2, but I certainly don't remember being surprised. It was perfectly within character for Michael.
You're right, Michael had become ruthless, but things were also in chaos with the family (business and personal). Hyman Roth situation, his wife and kids, internally finding the rat, he had issues with Frank Pentangeli, the Cuban investment loss, the Nevada license situation, the hearings in DC...he couldn't plug the holes quick enough.
But everything started to reverse course, and Michael started to close loose ends one by one.
You knew he was going to kill Fredo from the moment he kissed him in Cuba. Michael had been losing all the family he had. His father was dead, his mom passed, Connie had been gone, he literally closed the door on Kate...But then his mother's funeral came. Connie returns to the family, pledges to take care of Michael (which he hadnt had that in a long time), and she pleads with Michael to save Fredo. You then have the scene with them embracing, with Michael seemingly forgiving him. They did a good job making you think, like everything else, things with Michael and Fredo were reversing course...
Until boom.
Dawale said:
The girl in The Bridge to Terabithia. The trailer made that movie look like a Narnia type fantasy, but instead you get kicked in the stomach with that death.
Bitter Old Man said:
About 5-10 minutes before the end of Rogue 1 when I realized that they were all going to die. I spent the rest of the movie thinking through the ramifications of that for Disney.
jabberwalkie09 said:Bitter Old Man said:
About 5-10 minutes before the end of Rogue 1 when I realized that they were all going to die. I spent the rest of the movie thinking through the ramifications of that for Disney.
Yeah, I had the "holy ****, Lucasfilm is going to kill off every last one of them" reaction as well. Had a bit of a alright this is more than I expected and I don't want them all to die mixed emotions going on.
Also, Carlo is not comparable. He wasn't blood family, he had one brother killed and he regularly beat the sister. His death was expected, not shocking.AgGrad99 said:Re-watch the movie. The story did a good job of making you change your mind before Fredo was killed.Presley OBannons Sword said:
I don't really get why so many of you are saying Fredo. By the end of GF2, Michael was completely cold-blooded, and he had already shown in part 1 that he had no qualms about killing family members. If any death ordered by Michael was surprising, it was Carlo's in part 1. In fact, Fredo's death was nearly an exact duplicate of Carlo's, in the way Michael pretty much made him confess his betrayal, then led him to believe he would be let go with a harsh punishment, but not death, right before he was executed. I don't really remember the first time I watched GF2, but I certainly don't remember being surprised. It was perfectly within character for Michael.
You're right, Michael had become ruthless, but things were also in chaos with the family (business and personal). Hyman Roth situation, his wife and kids, internally finding the rat, he had issues with Frank Pentangeli, the Cuban investment loss, the Nevada license situation, the hearings in DC...he couldn't plug the holes quick enough.
But everything started to reverse course, and Michael started to close loose ends one by one.
You knew he was going to kill Fredo from the moment he kissed him in Cuba. Michael had been losing all the family he had. His father was dead, his mom passed, Connie had been gone, he literally closed the door on Kate...But then his mother's funeral came. Connie returns to the family, pledges to take care of Michael (which he hadnt had that in a long time), and she pleads with Michael to save Fredo. You then have the scene with them embracing, with Michael seemingly forgiving him. They did a good job making you think, like everything else, things with Michael and Fredo were reversing course...
Until boom.
dude....SPOILERS!!!!!!!Bruce Almighty said:
Agree. It was obvious that Jack was going to die, otherwise the movie would have a happy ending. You can't make a movie about the Titanic sinking and have a happy ending.
I didn't think Carlo's death was shocking. I said that if either of them were surprising it would be Carlo's over Fredo's, but I didn't think either of them were particularly surprising. You are also viewing GF1 Michael through 2017 lenses. Upon the first viewing of GF1, it wasn't so obvious that he was going to be so utterly and completely cold blooded.HtownAg92 said:Also, Carlo is not comparable. He wasn't blood family, he had one brother killed and he regularly beat the sister. His death was expected, not shocking.AgGrad99 said:Re-watch the movie. The story did a good job of making you change your mind before Fredo was killed.Presley OBannons Sword said:
I don't really get why so many of you are saying Fredo. By the end of GF2, Michael was completely cold-blooded, and he had already shown in part 1 that he had no qualms about killing family members. If any death ordered by Michael was surprising, it was Carlo's in part 1. In fact, Fredo's death was nearly an exact duplicate of Carlo's, in the way Michael pretty much made him confess his betrayal, then led him to believe he would be let go with a harsh punishment, but not death, right before he was executed. I don't really remember the first time I watched GF2, but I certainly don't remember being surprised. It was perfectly within character for Michael.
You're right, Michael had become ruthless, but things were also in chaos with the family (business and personal). Hyman Roth situation, his wife and kids, internally finding the rat, he had issues with Frank Pentangeli, the Cuban investment loss, the Nevada license situation, the hearings in DC...he couldn't plug the holes quick enough.
But everything started to reverse course, and Michael started to close loose ends one by one.
You knew he was going to kill Fredo from the moment he kissed him in Cuba. Michael had been losing all the family he had. His father was dead, his mom passed, Connie had been gone, he literally closed the door on Kate...But then his mother's funeral came. Connie returns to the family, pledges to take care of Michael (which he hadnt had that in a long time), and she pleads with Michael to save Fredo. You then have the scene with them embracing, with Michael seemingly forgiving him. They did a good job making you think, like everything else, things with Michael and Fredo were reversing course...
Until boom.
agreed. it was pretty much obvious from the very beginning with the old lady and the entire tone of the filmGuitarsoup said:
I don't see how any thought that Jack in Titanic was a shocking death.l
Presley OBannons Sword said:agreed. it was pretty much obvious from the very beginning with the old lady and the entire tone of the filmGuitarsoup said:
I don't see how any thought that Jack in Titanic was a shocking death.l