Looks promising. Lot of Iron Man

We need a third Spiderman reboot about as much as we needed a third Hulk...

Well at least this isn't an origin story and its being made by Marvel who are about 1 million times more competent than Sony

Spiderman is the most popular Marvel superhero. Now that Marvel has finally gotten back to the rights to him, Marvel is not going to pass up the guaranteed money he will bring. Just be glad that since Marvel is in charge of it, it will likely be the best Spiderman movie that has been made.

CorpsAg11 said:

---

We need a third Spiderman reboot about as much as we needed a third Hulk...

---

I agree. It's about time BOTH were done right.

Looks promising. Hopefully Marvel will do this right. I have faith.

Champ Bailey said:

---

Just be glad that since Marvel is in charge of it, it will likely be the best Spiderman movie that has been made.

---

Tall order... Isn't Spider-Man 2 considered by many to be one of the best super hero movies still?

Really? I just never liked Kirsten Dunst, so it always bugged me.

No, he's right. Spidey 2 is considered a fantastic movie.

I just never bought Tobet Macguire as Spiderman.

I mean don't get me wrong, I thought it was good, but I would rank probably 5 or 6 Marvel movies above it.

Are "the Avengers" at the beginning using Chitauri technology from the attack on New York?

That little subplot of weapons floating around in the wrong hands was brought up in one of the Marvel One-Shots but hasn't been mentioned again. Would be interesting if they were.

Good trailer. I hope they use a lot of "teen music" ala a John Hughes film.

Champ Bailey said:

---

I mean don't get me wrong, I thought it was good, but I would rank probably 5 or 6 Marvel movies above it.

---

Absolutely!

Looks awesome.

Will definitely be seeing this.

pwalnuts said:

---

---

You're evil.

I'm not much of a Spiderman fan, but that looks good.
It definitely looks Marvel, and lately, that has meant good things.
I'll be seeing it. Of course, i have a ten year old son, so, we'll be seeing it.

The first two Tobey spider-mans were fantastic. The second one imo, is up there with the best of the MCU.

I have a feeling this will be better than any of the Tobey Spiders or Garfield's

GiveEmHellBill said:

---

Are "the Avengers" at the beginning using Chitauri technology from the attack on New York?

That little subplot of weapons floating around in the wrong hands was brought up in one of the Marvel One-Shots but hasn't been mentioned again. Would be interesting if they were.

Good trailer. I hope they use a lot of "teen music" ala a John Hughes film.

---

I am almost positive that The Vulture's armor/equipment is modified Chitauri tech

GiveEmHellBill said:

---

That little subplot of weapons floating around in the wrong hands was brought up in one of the Marvel One-Shots but hasn't been mentioned again. Would be interesting if they were.

---

Wasn't that a big plot point in Luke Cage?

IIRC the bullets that whats his name used on Cage were made from the alloy that the Chitauri used, not the actual technology itself like in the One Shot that had Lizzy Caplan in it. Though I could be totally off base.

so what did marvel give sony to get the rights back?

Sequel already announced, based on the success of the TRAILER, which hasn't even been online for 24 hours. Don't think I've ever seen that before...

http://deadline.com/2016/12/spider-man-homecoming-2-bad-boys-4-1201867983/

jabberwalkie09 said:

---

IIRC the bullets that whats his name used on Cage were made from the alloy that the Chitauri used, not the actual technology itself like in the One Shot that had Lizzy Caplan in it. Though I could be totally off base.

---

Yeah, the bullets were made of metal salvaged from the Chitauri attack...not specifically from their technology.

Tony Stark cameos, Happy Hogan cameos, all the money Sony will make, all the critical acclaim that the movie will receive.

I think I'm not alone in saying that Spider-Man is my favorite super hero in a nostalgic way just like Star Wars is for me with space movies. Any spider man movie is going to bring in a large viewing if it is at least passable. I personally have enjoyed every Spider-Man movie except for sm3 more than many of the marvel products.

I think Garfield and Emma stone had a way better chemistry than Toby and Kirsten but they were both a good spider-man. Amazing Spider-Man 2 went off the rails with the villain development as did Spider-Man 3 in almost every aspect but I still think both actors represented Peter Parker well.

I think it's no surprise that Sony destroyed the Spider-Man franchise TWICE.

Sam Raimi was adamant against putting Venom in his third film. He had no desire in the character, yet Sony demanded him to be put in. You can sense his lack on enthusiasm whenever Venom is on screen. Even the "emo Parker" scenes seem like Raimi just not taking that entire subplot seriously. Even if the franchise had continued, I doubt Raimi would have been a part of it. I think the studio interference soured him.

Then, after a successful reboot, Sony once again shoots the franchise in the back of the head. Instead of just letting them do the death of Gwen Stacey plotline (which was handled extremely well, IMO), the studio insisted that the filmmakers create a "shared universe" and cram everything setting it up into that one film. It was terrible. Thank God none of that ever came to pass.

They wanted to do an Aunt May origin film. Seriously.

GiveEmHellBill said:

---

Then, after an unsuccessful reboot...

---

FIFY