Entertainment
Sponsored by

Saw "Blood Work," "Signs," "Minority Report," "Road To Perdition" & "Reign Of Fire."

585 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 23 yr ago by
FAST FRED
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Clint Eastwood flic, "Blood Work," was, I thought, quite enjoyable.

I'd rate it somewhat above "Insomnia" for entertainment value.

Eastwood portrays the same general character as usual, but the story was interesting and Clint's usual character usually works for me.

Jeff Daniels has sort of a "Life's Been Good To Me So Far" role in it and he'd be my choice if there were ever a casting call to play guitarist Joe Walsh or even Jimmy Buffett.



It grieves me to report that I found "Signs" to be a BIG disappointment.

As a thriller, I'd characterize it as a meeting in a cornfield between "The Creature From The Black Lagoon" and "The Blair Witch Project."

And writer/director M. Night Shyamalan had best keep his day job, because as an actor he's no match for Alfred Hitchcock.

For me, the most remarkable thing about this movie was the pre-release campaign that buzzed up a big opening box office cash intake.

It's impressive that Shyamalan comes up with entire movies by himself, but this time I thought he ran smack dab into the Peter Principle.

So, that old sixties song "Signs" by The Five Man Electrical Band (more recently covered by Tesla) even yet remains as the best artistic effort bearing that particular title.

I was really sorry to find the movie wasn't what I'd expected, because I had looked forward to seeing it.

But, IMHO, this crop circle cropper was no more than a marketing hoax itself.

It was like "The Exorcist" set in a panic room, but with less action and a less formidible group of antagonists.



I thought "Minority Report" slowly went down the tubes much the same as "A. I." did.

It had lots of good stuff like those cool spider thingies, but it was way too long with way too much mediocre melodrama.

As a thespian, Tom Cruise is no favorite of mine, but I'll admit to being impressed when he let that single air bubble out of a single nostril as he hid underwater in a bathtub.

I read that he insisted on actually performing that singular piece of business himself and, pro that he is, nailed it in, yes, a SINGLE take.

His boyish smile is usually his best facial feature, but for this bubbly action sequence his always imposing nose filled the screen, this time to good purpose.

Steven Speilberg is a proven cinematic genius, but maybe I'd like his inspirations better on a shorter or, I'll specify, a more restraining leash.

It's like everything he comes up with (or at least most of it) makes the final cut.

Almost all of this stuff has merit, but it's so uneven and it goes on and on and on.

Sometimes Speilberg's karma is as instant as Beatle John's and other times he's as long and winding as Beatle Paul, but his recent offerings make me think how either Lennon or McCartney might have fared alone if each one had never found the other against whom to hone collaborative ideas.



I really liked "Road To Perdition."

For my money, it had good acting, a good story and some good cinematography.

Sam Mendes creates a much lesser Godfather saga with a little nod to "The Sting."



I also saw "Reign Of Fire" and enjoyed the action and the special effects.

Think of "Mad Max" meets an airborne "Godzilla" with the most amazing movie magic being how Matthew McConaughey was pumped up to mimic Arnold Swartzenegger or Jesse Ventura a la "Predator."


So, to sum up my feelings about these five flics, "Blood Work" and "Road To Perdition" each feature good acting by some of the best around with bunches of bullets flying about in the face of all morality;

"Minority Report" showcases hunk Tom Cruise in a lengthy fantasy flight taken with the unbridled imagination of noted moralist Steven Spielberg working overtime;

"Reign Of Fire" has a beefed-up bongo boy and little else on a Quixotic pilgrimage seeking to tilt with a flying dragon;

and "Signs" was either a promising film-maker's type-casting of Gibson into yet another movie where Mel struggles with faith, mortality AND morality, this time in a movie misleadingly masqueraded in its advertising campaign as a sci-fi thriller......or it flew right over my head.



I felt the Eastwood/Daniels flic and the Tom Hanks/Paul Newman/Jude Law flic were the cream of this crop.

But at matinee or rental prices, you won't go far wrong if you feel a need to check any of them out.


Gig 'em, FAST FRED '65.

Before the world wide web, village idiots usually stayed in their own village.

[This message has been edited by FAST FRED (edited 9/15/2004 1:48p).]
DamnGood'88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fast Fred remains my favorite synopsizer. That would be a good line in a fast food restaurant - I'd like a number 1 with a diet coke, please. Would you like to Synop-Size it?

I've only seen Road to Perdition of the bunch you've covered. And though I definitely enjoyed it, I never got so attached enough to be seriously affected (ala Sonny at the tollbooth, or Michael and Solozzo). No jaw dropping shots. I thought Hanks and Newman were very, very good (Okay, I never really saw a ruthless killer in Hanks - He's Tom Hanks, dammit). The movie looked very good. It and Bourne Identity, which I also liked a lot, make me think that more movies should be shot in winter. It looked very much like the Coen brother's Miller's Crossing: dark mahogany and overcast. And in that comparison it comes up short too, because I still have crystal clear images from Crossing in my head: Albert Finney's Leo, chomping a cigar, pouring fire from his Thompson as he walks down the rainy street in his silk robe and slippers, John Torturro begging for his life or the crooked police destroying Leo's nightclup. Perdition never showed me those kinds of images. In it's favor, you didn't need a flow chart to follow the plot, as you did in Miller's Crossing.

I'd put Perdition safely below the pantheon of gangster movies occupied by Godfather's and Goodfellas. But it would be pretty well established in the flawed but excellent movies like Miller's Crossing, Long Good Friday, Scarface, etc.
FAST FRED
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree with your pantheon, DamnGood'88!

With "The Godfather" trilogy ranked as Zeus supreme, "Good Fellas" as Poseidon, "Road To Perdition" and "Miller's Crossing" as Apollo and Ares and "Scarface" as perhaps Dionysus, using Greek mythology.

Cool.



Gig 'em, FAST FRED '65.

Before the world wide web, village idiots usually stayed in their own village.

[This message has been edited by FAST FRED (edited 8/12/2002 1:19a).]
Sazerac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree exactly w/ DG88's review.
Philo B 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I too am in the Fast Fred Movie Review Fan Club, but I'm disappointed to have to disagree with him on the Signs review. I didn't go to that movie looking for a sci-fi thriller. I went with absolutely no expectations. If anything, I figured it would be some variation of an old genre made for intellectuals (i.e. Sixth Sense - pretty much a ghost story with a kick, and Unbreakable - a super hero story). And, it turns out, it was - an alien invasion movie. They've been done hundreds of times, but never like this. Great great movie.

Minority Report - a little long, I could take it or leave it.

Reign of Fire - I saw it on a rainy Saturday afternoon while my wife was shopping. For that occasion, it was probably the perfect movie. Not too long, not too serious, a lot of fun.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I couldn't disagree more with your take on "Signs" also, Fred. I thought this was an outstanding film. Without giving too much away, you are correct in stating that the crop circles and aliens are secondary to the point of the movie. However, that is what truly makes it a superb film IMO. It's also a typical Shyalaman story -- he drops little clues and hints that seemingly mean nothing at the time, but become critical to the story at the very end. Plus, his acting wasn't THAT bad. Consider the awkwardness inherent in the relationship between his character and Gibson's. There's really only one way to play that in the limited screen time he has, and it came across just fine. I loved his parting line re: the contents of his pantry, too. Almost as classic as "I see dead people."

~~~~~~~~~~
"We are in a conflict between good and evil, and America will call evil by its name. By confronting evil and lawless regimes, we do not create a problem, we reveal a problem. And we will lead the world in opposing it."
- George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States of America

Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people. www.despair.com

[This message has been edited by G Martin 87 (edited 8/12/2002 12:41p).]
FAST FRED
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Myself, I was taken in by the hype campaign for M. Night Shyalaman's "thriller."

We all saw that ominous preview with the clicking circles finally revolving around to spell out "Signs," followed by a foreboding promise that this flic was "coming soon to a theater near you."

But instead of those taut graphics, when the actual movie began, there was swelling orchestral music and the title "Signs" appears on the screen in BIG, FLOWING CURSIVE letters.

Like "Gone With The Wind" or something.

I smelled a rat, but UFOs, crop circles, abominable snowmen, bigfoots (bigfeet?) and Nessie will get me everytime.

However, it did make me briefly consider whether I had wandered perhaps into the wrong auditorium.

This movie had some intense moments where something suddenly pops into view and everybody jumps, but it was mostly about Mel Gibson's stuggle with the loss of his faith or whatever.

Actually, the overall cinematic theme reminded me of Richard Todd and Jean Peters in that fifties faith flic, "A Man Called Peter," as much as anything.

Of course, a farmhouse sitting next to a big cornfield made me flash immediately over to "Field Of Dreams."

Now, admittedly, this time after "it" was built something different came, but really this movie wasn't all that much spookier than Kevin Costner's, IMHO.

Misleading advertising sure can be misleading.

I found things to enjoy about "Signs," but, before I saw it, all signs pointed to it being about something I would have enjoyed more.



Gig 'em, FAST FRED '65.

Before the world wide web, village idiots usually stayed in their own village.

[This message has been edited by FAST FRED (edited 9/2/2002 7:31p).]
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Misleading advertising sure can be misleading.
True, but I think you're putting too much blame on the ad campaign for your disappointment with the movie. Personally, I prefer for the previews and ads NOT to give away the whole story before I see it.
FAST FRED
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only ads or previews I saw didn't give away anything much about the movie at all.

I didn't call Shyamalan's acting bad, but I liked Hitchcock's little appearances in his films better.

I'm glad others were pleased with "Signs" and that doesn't surprise me, as I said, I was disappointed.

Gig 'em, FAST FRED '65.

Before the world wide web, village idiots usually stayed in their own village.

[This message has been edited by FAST FRED (edited 8/12/2002 1:20p).]
Whoop04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I saw Blood Work the other day and did not like it at all. I thought the script was very unimaginative and there were a number of noticeable holes in the movie. They should have followed the book more closely.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have a student reading Blood Work.

They have to read 600 pages of any kind of fiction every grading period.

He didn't like the movie much, but liked the plot concept. So he thought the book would be better. He seems to like it.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I finally saw "Signs"

I was disappointed.

I wanted Sci-Fi and got a touchy feel good movie about a man's Faith.

I was really disappointed.
TheFro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Expectation Verses Reality.

The cause of about 90% of all problems.

Fro

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
It's nice to be nice to the nice.
AGnBCS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saw "Signs" this weekend and I have to I feel like I was cheated after all the hype etc..

I kept waiting for the payoff at the end and it never came.Where was the suprise ending? It was like I was really paying close attention to not miss anything but then realized hey there is nothing to miss.All in all I liked the way the aliens looked but that was about it.
woop01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fast Fred,

Have you ever thought of starting an e-mail list to send out your reviews? If not, would you consider it?
FAST FRED
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sharing thoughts about movies, music and football on these BBs with other posters is enough fun for me.

After working with my hands all day, a little psuedo-intellectual activity is welcome.

BTHOO Virginia Tech!!!!!!!

[This message has been edited by FAST FRED (edited 9/18/2002 5:26p).]
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.