ErnestEndeavor said:

In this context there's no way for yellow to know whether blue is turning into the business or making a u-turn.
First of all, the left turn in should be further ahead than the right turn out, like this example near my home (not in TX)

This would prevent blue from uturning directly into yellow. If a collision happened, it would be yellow fault, because blue would have already nearly completed the uturn by the time yellow decided to go out. If blue has not yet begun the u turn, then yellow can go safely since they are further ahead already.
The other option, especially if it's a high mph road, is to have an accel lane there for the right turner, that would solve the problem even if the uturn and right turns were lined up. You can't expect a person to turn directly into a lane with cars moving at a high rate of speed.
In the instance of an accel lane, if there was a collision in the accel lane, it's blues fault. If collision is in main lane, it's yellows fault.
So it sounds like TXDOT needs to just get their **** together and make these a bit more bullet proof, because your example is certainly ambiguous. I would side with yellow having ROW, since they are not expected to know what blue is doing, while blue absolutely knows what yellow is doing and so has opportunity to prevent the crash.