Ragnar Danneskjoldd said:

---

We were wrong to create the internet. We need to mutually agree to destroy it. Absolute cancer.

---

But then you couldn't tell people mean things on message boards and say they have low IQs….

Aggie Therapist said:

---

Ragnar Danneskjoldd said:

---

We were wrong to create the internet. We need to mutually agree to destroy it. Absolute cancer.

---

But then you couldn't tell people mean things on message boards and say they have low IQs….

---

Those hurt feelings keep you in business.

Oh yeahhhhhh.

And your tax dollars.

If I'm autistic, you're straight up ******ed.

What have they done to protect our border from drug traffickers? Has anyone fixed our crippling grid that wiped out the entire state 2 years ago? What's the plan for all these dams and bridges that have seen zero maintenance over the last 50 years?

You must be the liberalist of dbags if you need a bunch of white-haired men all up in your daily business. Big government is a problem and this is a prime example.

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

Of course by your logic we should legislate that as well. These idiots aren't doing jack **** and people like you just slurp them up.

AggieArchitect04 said:

---

If I'm autistic, you're straight up ******ed.

What have they done to protect our border from drug traffickers? Has anyone fixed our crippling grid that wiped out the entire state 2 years ago? What's the plan for all these dams and bridges that have seen zero maintenance over the last 50 years?

You must be the liberalist of dbags if you need a bunch of white-haired men all up in your daily business. Big government is a problem and this is a prime example.

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

Of course by your logic we should legislate that as well. These idiots aren't doing jack **** and people like you just slurp them up.

---

Just to recap:

1. Legislating porn (if they're even doing that, which I doubt) does not preclude them from also promulgating legislation for other things at the same time. I see you have no response to that.

2. Nowhere did I say or even imply that I want or need white haired men "all up in my daily business." Nor did I say anything that could be construed as even remotely liberal.

3. I expressed no interest at all in your sex life, or lack thereof.

4. Nothing I said could possibly lead to the logical conclusion that I think women having sex with other men (or whatever you were getting at; I couldn't really tell) should be legislated. I didn't even say that porn should be legislated. I said don't worry, they're not legislating it.

So, instead of responding to anything I said, you just concocted a bunch of make believe dog **** and responded to that instead. Better luck next time.

the most cool guy said:

---

AggieArchitect04 said:

---

If I'm autistic, you're straight up ******ed.

What have they done to protect our border from drug traffickers? Has anyone fixed our crippling grid that wiped out the entire state 2 years ago? What's the plan for all these dams and bridges that have seen zero maintenance over the last 50 years?

You must be the liberalist of dbags if you need a bunch of white-haired men all up in your daily business. Big government is a problem and this is a prime example.

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

Of course by your logic we should legislate that as well. These idiots aren't doing jack **** and people like you just slurp them up.

---

Just to recap:

1. Legislating porn (if they're even doing that, which I doubt) does not preclude them from also promulgating legislation for other things at the same time. I see you have no response to that.

2. Nowhere did I say or even imply that I want or need white haired men "all up in my daily business." Nor did I say anything that could be construed as even remotely liberal.

3. I expressed no interest at all in your sex life, or lack thereof.

4. Nothing I said could possibly lead to the logical conclusion that I think women having sex with other men (or whatever you were getting at; I couldn't really tell) should be legislated. I didn't even say that porn should be legislated. I said don't worry, they're not legislating it.

So, instead of responding to anything I said, you just concocted a bunch of make believe dog **** and responded to that instead. Better luck next time.

---

On June 2, 2023, Texas lawmakers passed House Bill 1181.

So yes, dumbass, they are legislating it. Sounds like you just don't know what the hell you're talking about. Your defense of this shows that you want (or sadly need) to freely give up your rights to big government. I don't.

For me, this has little to do with porn and more to do with the government's interference in and monitoring of the life of its citizens. Collecting data digitally under the pretense that your keeping that 16 year old off Pornhub is dumb hot take that I'm sure you just shrug your shoulders and go along with. Some of us don't like that.

Time to eat your **** sandwich, my cool guy. I'll go ahead and claim victory on this debate.

maroon barchetta said:

---

Crippling grid?

Tell us you don't understand what happened without actually telling us.

---

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/02/15/texas-power-grid-winter-storm-2021/

Quote:

---

The inability of power plants to perform in the extreme cold was the No. 1 cause of the outages

---

Where's the lie?

stop getting off-topic

focus on the OP.

Aggie Therapist said:

---

stop getting off-topic

focus on the OP.

---

I don't remember what we were talking about

maroon barchetta said:

---

It wasn't "the grid".

It was plants down for winter maintenance they schedule this time of year every year.

They could not perform because they were already offline as scheduled. Not "crippled".

---

True Grid

Don't you remember those hard drives overseas that kept Soldiers occupied and passed around the platoon?....

They weren't filled with praise and worship songs. I don't think it was a disgrace to their family. Better that then banging out some downrange sloot.

Aggie Therapist said:

---

Better that then banging out some downrange sloot.

---

This is very similar to the "porn isnt as bad as getting shot" argument. Well no ***** Its still disgraceful.

Quote:

---

HB 1181 said you have to verify age before giving access to porn on the internet. Porn websites said they'd rather just pull out of texas entirely if they couldnt give porn to kids. Texas law does not prevent you from disgracing yourself and your family.

---

It's all pointless platitudes. One click of a VPN and the titties roll in.

Aggie Therapist said:

---

Don't you remember those hard drives overseas that kept Soldiers occupied and passed around the platoon?....

They weren't filled with praise and worship songs. I don't think it was a disgrace to their family. Better that then banging out some downrange sloot.

---

In 2020 I had spent some decent time compiling a decent spanking collection on a hard drive only to find out that all the good sites still streamed fine with an Iraqi cell phone plan.

Teslag said:

---

Quote:

---

HB 1181 said you have to verify age before giving access to porn on the internet. Porn websites said they'd rather just pull out of texas entirely if they couldnt give porn to kids. Texas law does not prevent you from disgracing yourself and your family.

---

It's all pointless platitudes. One click of a VPN and the titties roll in.

---

Could be said of any law.

Many laws are actually effective.

Saying a law could be evaded is not evidence that it isn't. Indisputably, companies that purposefully market porn to children are hindered, some have even been prosecuted.

Which porn sites in Texas have been prosecuted under this law? Many huge sites, like xvideos, are ignoring it altogether.

Ragnar Danneskjoldd said:

---

Aggie Therapist said:

---

Better that then banging out some downrange sloot.

---

This is very similar to the "porn isnt as bad as getting shot" argument. Well no ***** Its still disgraceful.

---

Agree to disagree good sir. I respect your opinion on it being disgraceful.

somehow this sloots actions will be blamed on men and the patriarchy western women are a lost cause, get your passports ready gents

Quote:

---

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

---

this is something a beta would say

This thread has not only jumped the shark, but I also think the shark got pregnant in the process!

HoustonAg9999 said:

---

somehow this sloots actions will be blamed on men and the patriarchy western women are a lost cause, get your passports ready gents

Quote:

---

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

---

this is something a beta would say

---

Might want to head to the Middle East. The women are conservative and covered from head to toe!

HoustonAg9999 said:

---

somehow this sloots actions will be blamed on men and the patriarchy western women are a lost cause, get your passports ready gents

Quote:

---

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

---

this is something a beta would say

---

Takes one to know one!

Aggie Therapist said:

---

Don't you remember those hard drives overseas that kept Soldiers occupied and passed around the platoon?....

They weren't filled with praise and worship songs. I don't think it was a disgrace to their family. Better that then banging out some downrange sloot.

---

Wait, yall saw women overseas?!

I don't think we can call the grid crippled anymore

Better kink: leg or teeth braces?

AggieArchitect04 said:

---

HoustonAg9999 said:

---

somehow this sloots actions will be blamed on men and the patriarchy western women are a lost cause, get your passports ready gents

Quote:

---

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

---

this is something a beta would say

---

Takes one to know one!

---

ibtIknowyouarebutwhatamI?

AggieArchitect04 said:

---

the most cool guy said:

---

AggieArchitect04 said:

---

If I'm autistic, you're straight up ******ed.

What have they done to protect our border from drug traffickers? Has anyone fixed our crippling grid that wiped out the entire state 2 years ago? What's the plan for all these dams and bridges that have seen zero maintenance over the last 50 years?

You must be the liberalist of dbags if you need a bunch of white-haired men all up in your daily business. Big government is a problem and this is a prime example.

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

Of course by your logic we should legislate that as well. These idiots aren't doing jack **** and people like you just slurp them up.

---

Just to recap:

1. Legislating porn (if they're even doing that, which I doubt) does not preclude them from also promulgating legislation for other things at the same time. I see you have no response to that.

2. Nowhere did I say or even imply that I want or need white haired men "all up in my daily business." Nor did I say anything that could be construed as even remotely liberal.

3. I expressed no interest at all in your sex life, or lack thereof.

4. Nothing I said could possibly lead to the logical conclusion that I think women having sex with other men (or whatever you were getting at; I couldn't really tell) should be legislated. I didn't even say that porn should be legislated. I said don't worry, they're not legislating it.

So, instead of responding to anything I said, you just concocted a bunch of make believe dog **** and responded to that instead. Better luck next time.

---

On June 2, 2023, Texas lawmakers passed House Bill 1181.

So yes, dumbass, they are legislating it. Sounds like you just don't know what the hell you're talking about. Your defense of this shows that you want (or sadly need) to freely give up your rights to big government. I don't.

For me, this has little to do with porn and more to do with the government's interference in and monitoring of the life of its citizens. Collecting data digitally under the pretense that your keeping that 16 year old off Pornhub is dumb hot take that I'm sure you just shrug your shoulders and go along with. Some of us don't like that.

Time to eat your **** sandwich, my cool guy. I'll go ahead and claim victory on this debate.

---

Now you're moving the goalposts. You originally said that you were angered that the legislature might be addressing porn because it should be focusing on other things, like the border or the power grid. I just pointed out that the legislature could deal with porn and also focus on other things at the same time, which is objectively true. You had no response to my point, so you just called me a ******, a liberal, and bizarrely claimed I was interested in your sex life.

You also expressed anger that Ken Paxton or any other politician might try to keep you or other adults from watching porn and jerking off. I said I doubted that was being legislated, and I don't think it is.

But now you point to House Bill 1181, which was to try and restrict minors from having unfettered access to porn. That's a completely different issue. If you're really so outraged that minors won't be able to watch porn and jerk off at will, and that's the hill you're willing to die on, then you're most likely a pedophile, and you should seek help. Restricting minors' access to porn is a good thing. Here is what the American College of Pediatricians says about the impact of porn on minors. None of it is good, and it includes a very specific statement that "sexual predators purposefully expose young children to pornography for the purpose of grooming the children for sexual exploitation."

https://acpeds.org/position-statements/the-impact-of-pornography-on-children

So again, if you're that up in arms about it, you're probably a pedophile. I am not, so we likely don't have much else to talk about, but I do hope you get the help you need.

the most cool guy said:

---

AggieArchitect04 said:

---

the most cool guy said:

---

AggieArchitect04 said:

---

If I'm autistic, you're straight up ******ed.

What have they done to protect our border from drug traffickers? Has anyone fixed our crippling grid that wiped out the entire state 2 years ago? What's the plan for all these dams and bridges that have seen zero maintenance over the last 50 years?

You must be the liberalist of dbags if you need a bunch of white-haired men all up in your daily business. Big government is a problem and this is a prime example.

Appreciate your interest in my sex life. Don't worry about me getting laid. I promise you any woman would drop their panties for me long before being caught dead with a simp like you.

Of course by your logic we should legislate that as well. These idiots aren't doing jack **** and people like you just slurp them up.

---

Just to recap:

1. Legislating porn (if they're even doing that, which I doubt) does not preclude them from also promulgating legislation for other things at the same time. I see you have no response to that.

2. Nowhere did I say or even imply that I want or need white haired men "all up in my daily business." Nor did I say anything that could be construed as even remotely liberal.

3. I expressed no interest at all in your sex life, or lack thereof.

4. Nothing I said could possibly lead to the logical conclusion that I think women having sex with other men (or whatever you were getting at; I couldn't really tell) should be legislated. I didn't even say that porn should be legislated. I said don't worry, they're not legislating it.

So, instead of responding to anything I said, you just concocted a bunch of make believe dog **** and responded to that instead. Better luck next time.

---

On June 2, 2023, Texas lawmakers passed House Bill 1181.

So yes, dumbass, they are legislating it. Sounds like you just don't know what the hell you're talking about. Your defense of this shows that you want (or sadly need) to freely give up your rights to big government. I don't.

For me, this has little to do with porn and more to do with the government's interference in and monitoring of the life of its citizens. Collecting data digitally under the pretense that your keeping that 16 year old off Pornhub is dumb hot take that I'm sure you just shrug your shoulders and go along with. Some of us don't like that.

Time to eat your **** sandwich, my cool guy. I'll go ahead and claim victory on this debate.

---

Now you're moving the goalposts. You originally said that you were angered that the legislature might be addressing porn because it should be focusing on other things, like the border or the power grid. I just pointed out that the legislature could deal with porn and also focus on other things at the same time, which is objectively true. You had no response to my point, so you just called me a ******, a liberal, and bizarrely claimed I was interested in your sex life.

You also expressed anger that Ken Paxton or any other politician might try to keep you or other adults from watching porn and jerking off. I said I doubted that was being legislated, and I don't think it is.

But now you point to House Bill 1181, which was to try and restrict minors from having unfettered access to porn. That's a completely different issue. If you're really so outraged that minors won't be able to watch porn and jerk off at will, and that's the hill you're willing to die on, then you're most likely a pedophile, and you should seek help. Restricting minors' access to porn is a good thing. Here is what the American College of Pediatricians says about the impact of porn on minors. None of it is good, and it includes a very specific statement that "sexual predators purposefully expose young children to pornography for the purpose of grooming the children for sexual exploitation."

https://acpeds.org/position-statements/the-impact-of-pornography-on-children

So again, if you're that up in arms about it, you're probably a pedophile. I am not, so we likely don't have much else to talk about, but I do hope you get the help you need.

---

1. While it's true the could focus on other things at the same time it doesn't mean they are addressing other issues

2.HB 1181 attempts to keep porn from minors but does so by unconstitutionally limiting the free speech of adults and limiting the ability for adults to access constitutionally protected material. SCOTUS ruled on that when they struck down the 2004 Child Online Protection Act because it violated the 1st Amendment

3. HB 1181 places a significant financial burden on business who now must verify and retain personal information of it's users.

4. HB 1181 does little to deter minors from accessing pornography. Rather it redirects them to non compliant sites or those based in a foreign country who are unlikely to have antitrafficking or CP prevention policies.

5. Finally, I don't really trust the American College of Pediatricians on anything. They want you to think they are the better known and legitimate American Academy of Pediatrics. In reality they are a very small group mainly against gay marriage, gay adoption, gay parenting, the HPV vaccine, and in general any rights for LGTBQ individuals. They also are big proponents of Abstinence Only sex education and conversion therapy for children.